CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT

 

              ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1677

 

 

                               

 

 

 

                        52nd Legislature

                      1991 Regular Session

 

 


Passed by the House March 15, 1991

  Yeas 83   Nays 15

 

 

                                   

Speaker of the

       House of Representatives

 

Passed by the Senate April 17, 1991

  Yeas 46   Nays 1

 

 

                                   

President of the Senate

 

 

Approved

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                   

Governor of the State of Washington


       CERTIFICATE

 

I, Alan Thompson, Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1677 as passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate on the dates hereon set forth.

 

 

 

                                      Chief Clerk

 

 

                                     FILED         

 

 

 

                                         

 

 

 

                        Secretary of State   

                       State of Washington  



 


                  _______________________________________________

 

                       ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1677

                  _______________________________________________

 

                             AS AMENDED BY THE SENATE

 

                     Passed Legislature - 1991 Regular Session

 

 

State of Washington              52nd Legislature             1991 Regular Session

 

By House Committee on Transportation (originally sponsored by Representatives Cooper, R. Fisher, Peery, Ogden, H. Myers, Morris, Jacobsen and Winsley).

 

Read first time March 5, 1991.Updating population criteria for high capacity transportation programs.


     AN ACT Relating to high capacity transportation funding and planning; amending RCW 35.58.273, 81.104.030, 81.104.110, 81.104.140, and 82.44.150; and creating a new section.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

 

     Sec. 1.  RCW 35.58.273 and 1990 c 42 s 316 are each amended to read as follows:

     (1) Through June 30, 1992, any municipality ((within a class AA county, or within a class A county contiguous to a class AA county, or within a second class county contiguous to a class A county that is contiguous to a class AA county)), as defined in this subsection, is authorized to levy and collect a special excise tax not exceeding .7824 percent and beginning July 1, 1992, .725 percent on the fair market value of every motor vehicle owned by a resident of such municipality for the privilege of using such motor vehicle provided that in no event shall the tax be less than one dollar and, subject to RCW 82.44.150 (((5) and (6))) (3) and (4), the amount of such tax shall be credited against the amount of the excise tax levied by the state under RCW 82.44.020.  As used in this subsection, the term "municipality" means a municipality that is located within (a) each county with a population of two hundred ten thousand or more and (b) each county with a population of from one hundred twenty-five thousand to less than two hundred ten thousand except for those counties that do not border a county with a population as described under subsection (a) of this subsection.

     (2) Through June 30, 1992, any other municipality is authorized to levy and collect a special excise tax not exceeding .815 percent, and beginning July 1, 1992, .725 percent on the fair market value of every motor vehicle owned by a resident of such municipality for the privilege of using such motor vehicle provided that in no event shall the tax be less than one dollar and, subject to RCW 82.44.150 (3) and (4), the amount of such tax shall be credited against the amount of the excise tax levied by the state under RCW 82.44.020.  Before utilization of any excise tax moneys collected under authorization of this section for acquisition of right of way or construction of a mass transit facility on a separate right of way the municipality shall adopt rules affording the public an opportunity for "corridor public hearings" and "design public hearings" as herein defined, which rule shall provide in detail the procedures necessary for public participation in the following instances:  (a) prior to adoption of location and design plans having a substantial social, economic or environmental effect upon the locality upon which they are to be constructed or (b) on such mass rapid transit systems operating on a separate right of way whenever a substantial change is proposed relating to location or design in the adopted plan.  In adopting rules the municipality shall adhere to the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act.

     (3) A "corridor public hearing" is a public hearing that:  (a) is held before the municipality is committed to a specific mass transit route proposal, and before a route location is established; (b) is held to afford an opportunity for participation by those interested in the determination of the need for, and the location of, the mass rapid transit system; (c) provides a public forum that affords a full opportunity for presenting views on the mass rapid transit system route location, and the social, economic and environmental effects on that location and alternate locations:  PROVIDED, That such hearing shall not be deemed to be necessary before adoption of an overall mass rapid transit system plan by a vote of the electorate of the municipality.

     (4) A "design public hearing" is a public hearing that:  (a) is held after the location is established but before the design is adopted; and (b) is held to afford an opportunity for participation by those interested in the determination of major design features of the mass rapid transit system; and (c) provides a public forum to afford a full opportunity for presenting views on the mass rapid transit system design, and the social, economic, environmental effects of that design and alternate designs.

 

     Sec. 2.  RCW 81.104.030 and 1990 c 43 s 24 are each amended to read as follows:

     (1) In any ((class A)) county with a population of from two hundred ten thousand to less than one million that is not bordered by a ((class AA)) county with a population of one million or more, and in ((counties of the first class and smaller)) each county with a population of less than two hundred ten thousand, city-owned transit systems, county transportation authorities, metropolitan municipal corporations, and public transportation benefit areas may elect to establish high capacity transportation service.  Such agencies shall form a regional policy committee with proportional representation based upon population distribution within the designated service area and a representative of the department of transportation, or such agencies may use the designated metropolitan planning organization as the regional policy committee.

     (a) City-owned transit systems, county transportation authorities, metropolitan municipal corporations, and public transportation benefit areas participating in joint regional policy committees shall seek voter approval within their own service boundaries of a high capacity transportation system plan and an implementation program including a financing program.

     (b) An interim regional authority may be formed pursuant to RCW 81.104.040(2) and shall seek voter approval of a high capacity transportation plan and financing program within its proposed service boundaries.

     (2) City-owned transit systems, county transportation authorities, metropolitan municipal corporations, and public transportation benefit areas in counties adjoining state or international boundaries are authorized to participate in the regional high capacity transportation programs of an adjoining state or nation.

 

     Sec. 3.  RCW 81.104.110 and 1990 c 43 s 32 are each amended to read as follows:

     The legislature recognizes that the planning process described in RCW 81.104.100 provides a recognized framework for guiding high capacity transportation studies.  However, the process cannot guarantee appropriate transit decisions unless key study assumptions are reasonable.

     To assure appropriate project assumptions and to provide for review of project results, the department of transportation shall develop independent oversight procedures which are appropriate to the scope of any project for which high capacity transportation account funds are requested.

     An expert review panel shall be appointed to provide independent technical review for any project which is to be funded in whole or in part by the imposition of any voter-approved local option funding sources enumerated in RCW 81.104.140.

     (1) The expert review panel shall consist of five to ten members who are recognized experts in relevant fields, such as transit operations, planning, emerging transportation technologies, engineering, finance, law, the environment, geography, economics, and political science.

     (2) The expert review panel shall be selected cooperatively by the chair of the legislative transportation committee, the secretary of the department of transportation, and the governor to assure a balance of disciplines.  In the case of counties adjoining another state or Canadian province the expert review panel membership shall be selected cooperatively with representatives of the adjoining state or Canadian province.

     (3) The chair of the expert review panel shall be designated by the appointing body.

     (4) The expert review panel shall serve without compensation but shall be reimbursed for expenses according to chapter 43.03 RCW.

     (5) Funds appropriated for expenses of the expert panel shall be administered by the department of transportation.

     (6) The expert panel shall review all reports required in RCW 81.104.100(2)(b)(vi) but shall concentrate on service modes and concepts, costs, patronage, financing, and project evaluation.

     (7) The expert panel shall provide timely reviews and comments on individual project reports and study conclusions to the governor, the legislative transportation committee, the department of transportation, and the submitting lead transit agency.  In the case of counties adjoining another state or Canadian province, the expert review panel shall provide its reviews, comments, and conclusions to the representatives of the adjoining state or Canadian province.

     (8) The legislative transportation committee shall contract for consulting services for expert review panels.  The amount of consultant support shall be negotiated with each expert review panel by the legislative transportation committee and shall be paid from the high capacity transportation account.

 

     Sec. 4.  RCW 81.104.140 and 1990 c 43 s 35 are each amended to read as follows:

     (1) Agencies authorized to provide high capacity transportation service, including city-owned transit systems, county transportation authorities, metropolitan municipal corporations and public transportation benefit areas, are hereby granted dedicated funding sources for such  systems.  These dedicated funding sources, as set forth in RCW 81.104.150, 81.104.160, and 81.104.170, are authorized only for agencies located in ((class AA counties, class A counties, counties of the first class which border another state, and counties which, on March 14, 1990, are of the second class and which adjoin class A counties)) (a) each county with a population of two hundred ten thousand or more and (b) each county with a population of from one hundred twenty-five thousand to less than two hundred ten thousand except for those counties that do not border a county with a population as described under subsection (a) of this subsection.

     (2) Agencies providing high capacity transportation service should also seek other funds, including federal, state, local, and private sector assistance.

     (3) Funding sources should satisfy each of the following criteria to the greatest extent possible:

     (a) Acceptability;

     (b) Ease of administration;

     (c) Equity;

     (d) Implementation feasibility;

     (e) Revenue reliability; and

     (f) Revenue yield.

     (4) Agencies participating in regional high capacity transportation system development through interlocal agreements or a conference-approved interim regional rail authority or subregional process as defined in RCW 81.104.040 are authorized to levy and collect the following voter-approved local option funding sources:

     (a) Employer tax as provided in RCW 81.104.150;

     (b) Special motor vehicle excise tax as provided in RCW 81.104.160; and

     (c) Sales and use tax as provided in RCW 81.104.170.

     Revenues from these taxes may be used only to support those purposes prescribed in subsection (8) of this section.  Before an agency may impose any of the taxes enumerated in this section and authorized in RCW 81.104.150, 81.104.160, and 81.104.170, it must comply with the process prescribed in RCW 81.104.100 and 81.104.110.

     (5) Authorization in subsection (4) of this section shall not adversely affect the funding authority of existing transit agencies.  Local option funds may be used to support implementation of interlocal agreements with respect to the establishment of regional high capacity transportation service.  Local jurisdictions shall retain control over moneys generated within their boundaries, although funds may be commingled for planning, construction, and operation of high capacity transportation systems as set forth in the agreements.

     (6) Agencies providing high capacity transportation service may contract with the state for collection and transference of local option revenue.

     (7) Dedicated high capacity transportation funding shall be subject to voter approval by a simple majority.

     (8) Agencies providing high capacity transportation service shall retain responsibility for revenue encumbrance, disbursement, and bonding.  Funds may be used for any purpose relating to planning, construction, and operation of high capacity transportation, commuter rail, and feeder transportation systems.

 

     Sec. 5.  RCW 82.44.150 and 1990 c 42 s 308 are each amended to read as follows:

     (1) The director of licensing shall, on the twenty-fifth day of February, May, August, and November of each year, advise the state treasurer of the total amount of motor vehicle excise taxes remitted to the department during the preceding calendar quarter ending on the last day of March, June, September, and December, respectively, except for those payable under RCW 82.44.030, from motor vehicle owners residing within each municipality which has levied a tax under RCW 35.58.273, which amount of excise taxes shall be determined by the director as follows:

     The total amount of motor vehicle excise taxes remitted to the department, except those payable under RCW 82.44.030, from each county shall be multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the population of the municipality residing in such county, and the denominator of which is the total population of the county in which such municipality or portion thereof is located.  The product of this computation shall be the amount of excise taxes from motor vehicle owners residing within such municipality or portion thereof.  Where the municipality levying a tax under RCW 35.58.273 is located in more than one county, the above computation shall be made by county, and the combined products shall provide the total amount of motor vehicle excise taxes from motor vehicle owners residing in the municipality as a whole.  Population figures required for these computations shall be supplied to the director by the office of financial management, who shall adjust the fraction annually.

     (2) On the first day of the months of January, April, July, and October of each year, the state treasurer based upon information provided by the department shall, from motor vehicle excise taxes deposited in the general fund, under RCW 82.44.110(7), make the following deposits:

     (a) To the high capacity transportation account created in RCW 47.78.010, a sum equal to four and five-tenths  percent of the special excise tax levied under RCW 35.58.273 by those municipalities authorized to levy a special excise tax within ((a class AA county, or within a class A county contiguous to a class AA county, or within a second class county contiguous to a class A county that is contiguous to a class AA county)) (i) each county with a population of two hundred ten thousand or more and (ii) each county with a population of from one hundred twenty-five thousand to less than two hundred ten thousand except for those counties that do not border a county with a population as described in subsection (i) of this subsection;

     (b) To the central Puget Sound public transportation account created in RCW 82.44.180, for revenues distributed after December 31, 1992, within a ((class AA county or within a class A county contiguous to a class AA)) county with a population of one million or more and a county with a population of from two hundred thousand to less than one million bordering a county with a population of one million or more, a sum equal to the difference between (i) the special excise tax levied and collected under RCW 35.58.273 by those municipalities authorized to levy and collect a special excise tax subject to the requirements of subsections (3) and (4) of this section and (ii) the special excise tax that the municipality would otherwise have been eligible to levy and collect at a tax rate of .815 percent and been able to match with locally generated tax revenues, other than the excise tax imposed under RCW 35.58.273, budgeted for any public transportation purpose.  Before this deposit, the sum shall be reduced by an amount equal to the amount distributed under (a) of this subsection for each of the municipalities within the counties to which this subsection (2)(b) applies; however, any transfer under this subsection (2)(b) must be greater than zero;

     (c) To the public transportation systems account created in RCW 82.44.180, for revenues distributed after December 31, 1992, within counties not described in (b) of this subsection, a sum equal to the difference between (i) the special excise tax levied and collected under RCW 35.58.273 by those municipalities authorized to levy and collect a special excise tax subject to the requirements of subsections (3) and (4) of this section and (ii) the special excise tax that the municipality would otherwise have been eligible to levy and collect at a tax rate of .815 percent and been able to match with locally generated tax revenues, other than the excise tax imposed under RCW 35.58.273, budgeted for any public transportation purpose.  Before this deposit, the sum shall be reduced by an amount equal to the amount distributed under (a) of this subsection for each of the municipalities within the counties to which this subsection (2)(c) applies; however, any transfer under this subsection (2)(c) must be greater than zero; and

     (d) To the transportation fund created in RCW 82.44.180, for revenues distributed after June 30, 1991, a sum equal to the difference between (i) the special excise tax levied and collected under RCW 35.58.273 by those municipalities authorized to levy and collect a special excise tax subject to the requirements of subsections (3) and (4) of this section and (ii) the special excise tax that the municipality would otherwise have been eligible to levy and collect at a tax rate of .815 percent notwithstanding the requirements set forth in subsections (3) through (6) of this section, reduced by an amount equal to distributions made under (a), (b), and (c) of this subsection.

     (3) On the first day of the months of January, April, July, and October of each year, the state treasurer, based upon information provided by the department, shall remit motor vehicle excise tax revenues imposed and collected under RCW 35.58.273 as follows:

     (a) The amount required to be remitted by the state treasurer to the treasurer of any municipality levying the tax shall not exceed in any calendar year the amount of locally-generated tax revenues, excluding the excise tax imposed under RCW 35.58.273 for the purposes of this section, which shall have been budgeted by the municipality to be collected in such calendar year for any public transportation purposes including but not limited to operating costs, capital costs, and debt service on general obligation or revenue bonds issued for these purposes; and

     (b) In no event may the amount remitted in a single calendar quarter exceed the amount collected on behalf of the municipality under RCW 35.58.273 during the calendar quarter next preceding the immediately preceding quarter.

      (4) At the close of each calendar year accounting period, but not later than April 1, each municipality that has received motor vehicle excise taxes under subsection (3) of this section shall transmit to the director of licensing and the state auditor a written report showing by source the previous year's budgeted tax revenues for public transportation purposes as compared to actual collections.  Any municipality that has not submitted the report by April 1 shall cease to be eligible to receive motor vehicle excise taxes under subsection (3) of this section until the report is received by the director of licensing.  If a municipality has received more or less money under subsection (3) of this section for the period covered by the report than it is entitled to receive by reason of its locally-generated collected tax revenues, the director of licensing shall, during the next ensuing quarter that the municipality is eligible to receive motor vehicle excise tax funds, increase or decrease the amount to be remitted in an amount equal to the difference between the locally-generated budgeted tax revenues and the locally-generated collected tax revenues.  In no event may the amount remitted for a calendar year exceed the amount collected on behalf of the municipality under RCW 35.58.273 during that same calendar year.  At the time of the next fiscal audit of each municipality, the state auditor shall verify the accuracy of the report submitted and notify the director of licensing of any discrepancies.

      (5) The motor vehicle excise taxes imposed under RCW 35.58.273 and required to be remitted under this section shall be remitted without legislative appropriation.

      (6) Any municipality levying and collecting a tax under RCW 35.58.273 which does not have an operating, public transit system or a contract for public transportation services in effect within one year from the initial effective date of the tax shall return to the state treasurer all motor vehicle excise taxes received under subsection (3) of this section.

 

     NEW SECTION.  Sec. 6.      The 1991 amendments to RCW 35.58.273, 81.104.030, 81.104.140, and 82.44.150 in chapter ---, Laws of 1991 (SHB 1201) are each repealed.