H-3567.1  _______________________________________________

 

                          HOUSE BILL 2908

          _______________________________________________

 

State of Washington      53rd Legislature     1994 Regular Session

 

By Representatives L. Thomas and McMorris

 

Read first time 02/04/94.  Referred to Committee on Transportation.

 

Denying drivers license renewals because of dishonored checks.



    AN ACT Relating to bad checks; adding a new section to chapter 46.20 RCW; and creating a new section.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1.  The legislature finds that the problem of dishonored checks and check fraud is rising significantly.  This primarily is due to an antiquated national system for check payment and processing and to the policy of financial institutions and retailers of offering customers quick, hassle-free service.  While bad checks and check fraud cause higher expenses for retailers and financial institutions, the citizens of this state ultimately pay for this problem in higher prices and service fees.  The legislature intends to reduce the problem of bad checks by conditioning the privilege of renewing a driver's license on the licensee honoring checks written by the licensee.

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 2.  A new section is added to chapter 46.20 RCW to read as follows:

    (1) The department shall not approve an application to renew a driver's license under RCW 46.20.181 if the department receives information that the applicant has an outstanding dishonored check at the time of application as provided in subsection (2) of this section.

    (2) The department shall establish a process for receiving information from payees or holders of dishonored checks.  The information shall include, but is not limited to, the name of the payee or holder, the name and driver's license number of the payor, and the check number of the dishonored check.  The process required under this subsection shall also provide for receiving information from the payee or holder that a check reported to the department as dishonored later has been paid.  The department may consider information provided by the applicant in determining whether the applicant has an outstanding dishonored check at the time of application.

    (3) The department is not liable for incorrect information provided to it under subsection (2) of this section.

    (4) This section does not limit any liability for actions by payees or holders who provide inaccurate information or who fail to inform the department that a dishonored check subsequently has been paid.

    (5) For purposes of this section, "dishonored check" means nonpayment or nonacceptance of a check as provided under the uniform commercial code, Title 62A RCW, if the statutory notice of dishonor has been provided, fifteen days have elapsed, and the check remains unpaid.  A check is not considered dishonored if payment was not made based on a stop payment order.

 


                            --- END ---