CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT

 

                   SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2170

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                        53rd Legislature

                      1994 Regular Session

Passed by the House February 10, 1994

  Yeas 93   Nays 0

 

 

 

 

Speaker of the

      House of Representatives

 

Passed by the Senate March 2, 1994

  Yeas 47   Nays 1

             CERTIFICATE

 

I, Marilyn Showalter, Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2170 as passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate on the dates hereon set forth.

 

 

 

 

President of the Senate

 

                          Chief Clerk

 

 

Approved Place Style On Codes above, and Style Off Codes below.

                                FILED

          

 

 

Governor of the State of Washington

                   Secretary of State

                  State of Washington


          _______________________________________________

 

                    SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2170

          _______________________________________________

 

             Passed Legislature - 1994 Regular Session

 

 

State of Washington      53rd Legislature     1994 Regular Session

 

By House Committee on Education (originally sponsored by Representatives Sommers, Silver, Ogden, Fuhrman, Dunshee, Dorn, Brough, B. Thomas, L. Johnson and J. Kohl; by request of Legislative Budget Committee)

 

Read first time 02/02/94. 

 

Extending the duration of special services demonstration projects.



    AN ACT Relating to special services demonstration projects; amending RCW 28A.630.845, 28A.630.850, 28A.630.825, 28A.630.830, and 28A.630.840; repealing RCW 28A.630.851; and declaring an emergency.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

 

    Sec. 1.  RCW 28A.630.845 and 1992 c 180 s 3 are each amended to read as follows:

    (1) The legislature finds that the state system of funding handicapped education has fiscal incentives to label children as handicapped and that unnecessary labeling can be detrimental to children.  The legislature encourages demonstration projects that provide needed services without unnecessary labeling.  To test this approach, the legislature intends to maintain the funding level for innovative special services programs that reduce the incidence of unnecessary labeling.

    (2) School districts may propose demonstration projects under this ((section)) subsection to provide needed services and achieve major reductions in the percentage of district students labeled as handicapped in one or more specified categories.  State handicapped funding for districts with such projects shall be based for the duration of the project ((and for two years after the end of the project)) on the average percentage of the kindergarten through twelfth grade enrollment in the specified categories ((during the 1991-92 school year or, for projects approved after April 1, 1992,)) during the school year before the start of the project.

    (3) School districts with specific learning disabled enrollment at or above four percent of the district's kindergarten through twelfth grade enrollment may propose demonstration projects under this subsection to provide needed services and reduce unnecessary labeling to below the four percent level.  When the specific learning disabled enrollment is below the four percent level, funding for the district shall be based on four percent of the kindergarten through twelfth grade enrollment considered as specific learning disabled, without regard to the actual number of students so identified.

    (4) Funding under subsections (2) and (3) of this section is contingent on the following:  (a) The funding is spent on children needing special services; and (b) the overall percentage of first through twelfth grade students in the district labeled as handicapped declines each year of the project ((after the 1991-92 school year)), excluding handicapped students who transfer into the district.

    (((4) School districts with approved demonstration projects that wish to convert to a project under this section shall by May 1, 1992, notify the selection advisory committee and the superintendent of public instruction and propose appropriate modifications to the project.

    (5) This section expires September 1, 1997.))

 

    Sec. 2.  RCW 28A.630.850 and 1991 c 265 s 7 are each amended to read as follows:

    ((Sections 1 through 5 of this act)) RCW 28A.630.820 through 28A.630.845 shall expire ((January 1, 1996)) September 1, 2001.

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 3.  RCW 28A.630.851 and 1992 c 180 s 4 are each repealed.

 

    Sec. 4.  RCW 28A.630.825 and 1991 c 265 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:

    The superintendent of public instruction shall:

    (1) ((Make ten)) Approve fifteen to twenty-five ((awards for)) demonstration projects in individual school districts and cooperatives, including at least seven projects approved after the effective date of this section;

    (2) Make awards for in-service training of teachers and other staff;

    (3) Provide technical assistance;

    (4) Grant waivers from state rules needed to implement the projects, or request such waivers to be granted by the appropriate agency;

    (5) ((Contract with school districts for demonstration projects and make contract payments in accordance with RCW 28A.630.820 through 28A.630.840;

    (6))) Perform or contract for an evaluation of the projects;

    (((7))) (6) Confer on the evaluation design with the selection advisory committee; and

    (((8))) (7) Submit to the legislature an interim report on the evaluation by December 31, 1993, and a final report by December 31, 1995.

 

    Sec. 5.  RCW 28A.630.830 and 1991 c 265 s 3 are each amended to read as follows:

    (1) The selection advisory committee is created.  The committee shall be composed of up to three members from the house of representatives, up to three members from the senate, up to two members from the office of the superintendent of public instruction, and one member from each of the following:  The office of financial management, Washington state special education coalition, transitional bilingual instruction educators, and Washington education association.

    (2) The legislative budget committee and the superintendent of public instruction shall provide staff for the selection advisory committee.

    (3) The selection advisory committee shall:

    (a) Develop appropriate criteria for selecting demonstration projects;

    (b) Issue requests for proposals in accordance with RCW 28A.630.820 through ((28A.630.840)) 28A.630.845 for demonstration projects ((to commence during the 1991‑92 and 1992‑93 school years));

    (c) Review proposals and recommend demonstration projects for approval by the superintendent of public instruction; and

    (d) Advise the superintendent of public instruction on the evaluation design((; and

    (e) Report each year by December 1st on the status of the demonstration projects to the legislative budget committee and the appropriate policy and fiscal committees of the house of representatives and the senate)).

 

    Sec. 6.  RCW 28A.630.840 and 1992 c 180 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:

    (1) ((Project)) Funding used in demonstration projects may include state, federal, and local funds, as ((specified)) determined by the district ((in its approved project proposal)).

    (2) ((As a general guideline, subject to refinements in the district proposal and approval by the superintendent of public instruction, the portion of state handicapped funding included as project funding shall be determined as follows:

    (a) If the district serves specific learning disabled students in the project, the portion of the handicapped allocation attributed to specific learning disabled students shall be included, with proportional adjustments if the project serves only part of the district's specific learning disabled population;

    (b) If other handicapped students are served in the project, the portions of the handicapped allocation attributed to those students shall be included, with proportional adjustments if the project serves only part of the district's population in those categories of handicapped students.

    (3))) State handicapped allocations shall be calculated for ((project)) districts with demonstration projects according to the handicapped funding formula in use for other districts, except for the provisions of RCW 28A.630.845 and with the following changes:

    (a) ((Project)) Funding for school districts that had pilot projects approved under section 13, chapter 233, Laws of 1989, and that were participating in projects under this section on January 31, 1992, shall be based for the duration of a project ((under RCW 28A.630.820 through 28A.630.840)) on four percent of the kindergarten through twelfth grade enrollment considered as specific learning disabled, without regard to the actual number of students so identified.  The legislature recognizes the importance of continuing and developing the pilot projects.

    (b) ((School districts with approved projects as of January 31, 1992, may receive funding in each school year for handicapped students served in the project based on the average percentage of the kindergarten through twelfth grade enrollment in the particular handicapped category during the prior three years.  School districts that wish to exercise this option shall notify the selection advisory committee and the superintendent of public instruction by May 1, 1992.

    (c))) The funding percentages for districts with demonstration projects specified in (a) of this subsection and in RCW 28A.630.845 shall be used to adjust basic education allocations under RCW 28A.150.260 and learning assistance program allocations under RCW 28A.165.070.

    (((d))) (c) State handicapped allocations ((under subsection (2) of this section)) up to the level required by federal maintenance of effort rules shall be expended for services to handicapped students ((in the project)).  Allocations greater than the amount needed to comply with federal maintenance of effort rules may at the option of the district be designated as noncategorical project funds and may be expended on services to any student served in the project.

    (((4) Federal handicapped allocations may be designated in whole or in part for project use.

    (5))) (3) Learning assistance program allocations ((may be designated in whole or in part for project use.  These allocations)) shall be calculated for ((project)) districts with demonstration projects according to the funding formula in use for other districts, except that any increases in the district allocation above the fiscal year 1991 amount shall be designated as noncategorical project funds and may be expended on services to any student served in the project.

    (((6))) (4) Transitional bilingual program allocations ((may be designated in whole or in part for project use.  These allocations)) shall be calculated for ((project)) districts with demonstration projects according to the funding formula in use for other districts, except that any increases in the district allocation above the fiscal year 1991 amount shall be designated as noncategorical project funds and may be expended on services to any student served in the project.

    (((7) Funding under the federal remediation program allocations may be designated in whole or in part for project use.

    (8) Funding from local sources may be designated for project use.

    (9))) (5) Expenditures of noncategorical project funds under subsections (((3)(d), (5), and (6))) (2)(c), (3), and (4) of this section shall be accounted for in new and discrete program or subprogram codes designated by the superintendent of public instruction.  The codes shall take effect by September 1, 1991.

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 7.  This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and shall take effect immediately.

 


                            --- END ---