Z-1527.1  _______________________________________________

 

                         SENATE BILL 6249

          _______________________________________________

 

State of Washington      53rd Legislature     1994 Regular Session

 

By Senator Vognild; by request of Utilities & Transportation Commission

 

Read first time 01/18/94.  Referred to Committee on Transportation.

 

Concerning railroad crossing protective devices and their cost of maintenance.



    AN ACT Relating to the appointment and recovery of maintenance costs of railroad crossing protective devices; and amending RCW 81.53.271 and 81.53.281.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

 

    Sec. 1.  RCW 81.53.271 and 1982 c 94 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:

    The petition shall set forth by description the location of the crossing or crossings, the type of signal or other warning device to be installed, the necessity from the standpoint of public safety for such installation, the approximate cost of installation and related work, and the approximate annual cost of maintenance.  If the commission directs the installation of a grade crossing protective device, and a federal-aid funding program is available to participate in the costs of such installation, both installation and maintenance costs of the device shall be apportioned in accordance with the provisions of RCW 81.53.295.  Otherwise if installation is directed by the commission, it shall apportion the cost of installation ((and maintenance)) as provided in this section:

    Installation:  (1) Sixty percent to the grade crossing protective fund, created by RCW 81.53.281;

    (2) Thirty percent to the city, town, county, or state; and

    (3) Ten percent to the railroad:

    PROVIDED, That, if the proposed installation is located at a new crossing requested by a city, town, county, or state, forty percent of the cost shall be apportioned to the city, town, county, or state, and none to the railroad.  If the proposed installation is located at a new crossing requested by a railroad, then the entire cost shall be apportioned to the railroad.  In the event the city, town, county, or state should concurrently petition the commission and secure an order authorizing the closure of an existing crossing or crossings in proximity to the crossing for which installation of signals or other warning devices shall have been directed, the apportionment to the petitioning city, town, county, or state shall be reduced by ten percent of the total cost for each crossing ordered closed and the apportionment from the grade crossing protective fund increased accordingly.  This exception shall not be construed to permit a charge to the grade crossing protective fund in an amount greater than the total cost otherwise apportionable to the city, town, county, or state.  No reduction shall be applied where one crossing is closed and another opened in lieu thereof, nor to crossings of a private nature.

    Maintenance:  (((1) Twenty-five percent to the grade crossing protective fund, created by RCW 81.53.281; and

    (2) Seventy-five percent to the railroad:

    PROVIDED, That if the proposed installation is located at a new crossing requested by a railroad, then the entire cost shall be apportioned to the railroad)) The entire cost of maintenance shall be borne by the railroad.

 

    Sec. 2.  RCW 81.53.281 and 1987 c 257 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:

    There is hereby created in the state treasury a "grade crossing protective fund," to which shall be transferred all moneys appropriated for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of RCW 81.53.261, 81.53.271, 81.53.281, 81.53.291, and 81.53.295.  At the time the commission makes each allocation of cost to said grade crossing protective fund, it shall certify that such cost shall be payable out of said fund.  When federal-aid highway funds are not involved, the railroad shall, upon completion of the installation of any such signal or other protective device and related work, present its claim for reimbursement for the cost of installation and related work from said fund of the amount allocated thereto by the commission.  ((The annual cost of maintenance shall be presented and paid in a like manner.))  When federal-aid highway funds are involved, the department of transportation shall, upon entry of an order by the commission requiring the installation or upgrading of a grade crossing protective device, submit to the commission an estimate for the cost of the proposed installation and related work.  Upon receipt of the estimate the commission shall pay to the department of transportation the percentage of the estimate specified in RCW 81.53.295, as now or hereafter amended, to be used as the grade crossing protective fund portion of the cost of the installation and related work.  The commission is hereby authorized to recover administrative costs from said fund in an amount not to exceed three percent of the direct appropriation provided for any biennium, and in the event administrative costs exceed three percent of the appropriation, the excess shall be chargeable to regulatory fees paid by railroads pursuant to RCW 81.24.010.

    Within ninety days of the end of each fiscal year, the commission shall report to the legislative transportation committee, and the senate and house committees on transportation, the status of the grade crossing protective fund, including revenue sources, fund balances, and expenditures.

    ((The office of financial management shall direct the state treasurer to transfer to the motor vehicle fund an amount not to exceed $1,331,000 from the grade crossing protective fund for the 1987-89 fiscal biennium.))

 


                            --- END ---