SENATE BILL REPORT

                   HB 2350

              As Reported By Senate Committee On:

               Law & Justice, February 22, 1996

 

Title:  An act relating to records of pistol purchases or transfers.

 

Brief Description:  Eliminating the authority of the department of licensing to keep records of pistol purchases or transfers.

 

Sponsors:  Representatives Radcliff, McMorris, Campbell, Koster, Thompson, D. Schmidt, Blanton, Schoesler, Honeyford, Johnson, D. Sommers, Hargrove, Sheldon, Smith, Pennington, Mulliken and McMahan.

 

Brief History:

Committee Activity:  Law & Justice:  2/22/96 [DP].

 

SENATE COMMITTEE ON LAW & JUSTICE

 

Majority Report:  Do pass.

  Signed by Senators Smith, Chair; Fairley, Vice Chair; Goings, Hargrove, Haugen, Johnson, Long, McCaslin, Quigley and Roach.

 

Staff:  Cynthia Runger (786-7717)

 

Background:  Under the state's firearms law, records of certain transactions involving firearms are maintained by the Department of Licensing (DOL).

 

Among the records that DOL maintains are applications for concealed pistol licenses, applications for alien firearm licenses, applications to purchase pistols, and records of pistol transfers.  Generally, these records are exempt from the public records law and may be released only to law enforcement agencies or the Department of Corrections.

 

Issuers of pistol or alien firearm licenses and dealers who sell or transfer pistols are required to send copies of the records of these transactions to DOL.  Dealers are also required to send copies of records of pistol sales to the local law enforcement agency in the jurisdiction in which the purchaser lives.

 

Summary of Bill:  The authority of DOL to maintain records of applications to purchase pistols and of pistol sales and transfers is removed.  Dealers are no longer required to send copies of the records of such transactions to DOL.  Copies must still be sent to local law enforcement agencies.

 

Appropriation:  None.

 

Fiscal Note:  Not requested.

 

Effective Date:  Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.

 

Testimony For:  This is necessary because the Department of Licensing can't keep up with the paperwork.

 

Testimony Against:  None.

 

Testified:  Rep. Radcliff, prime sponsor.