HOUSE BILL REPORT

                  HB 2934

 

             As Reported By House Committee On:

                      Local Government

 

Title:  An act relating to accessory buildings and structures within the flood plain.

 

Brief Description:  Authorizing repair of accessory buildings and structures within the flood plain.

             Revised for 1st Substitute: Making changes to flood plain construction limitations.

 

Sponsors:  Representative Koster.

 

Brief History:

  Committee Activity:

Local Government:  2/2/00 [DPS].

 

           Brief Summary of Substitute Bill

 

$Amends exemption for projects to correct local health, sanitary, or safety code violations from the 50 percent determination related to floodway construction restrictions to apply only to projects which are the minimum necessary to ensure safe living conditions and to require identification of violations by the local enforcement official.

 

CExempts from the floodway prohibition: (1) historic structures; and (2) substantially damaged residential structures other than farmhouses meeting certain requirements.

 

$Applies the Department of Ecology's authority to recommend waivers of the floodway prohibition to residential structures damaged by causes other than flooding and requires the local governments' concurrence with the recommendation to effect a waiver.

 

 

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT

Majority Report:  The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass.  Signed by 7 members:  Representatives Mulliken, Republican Co-Chair; Scott, Democratic Co-Chair; Doumit, Democratic Vice Chair; Mielke, Republican Vice Chair; Edwards; Ericksen and Fortunato.

 

Staff:  Caroleen Dineen (786-7156).

 

Background: 

 

The Department of Ecology (DOE) coordinates the flood plain management regulation elements of the national flood insurance program (NFIP) in Washington.  Local flood plain management regulations applicable to construction activities which might affect the security of life, health and property against flood damage must comply with the NFIP and state requirements for flood plain management.

 

State and local flood plain management regulations are based on designated special flood hazard areas on Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) maps. The DOE  establishes  minimum state requirements and has authority to approve or reject designs and plans for structures or works constructed across the floodway of any stream or water body in the state.

 

The DOE also may disapprove if the local flood plain management ordinance or amendment does not restrict land uses within designated floodways, including prohibiting of construction or reconstruction of residential structures except:

 

Crepairs, reconstruction or improvements not increasing ground floor area; and

Crepairs, reconstruction or improvements, the cost of which does not exceed 50

  percent of the structure's market value either before the repair started or before the damage occurred.

 

Work done to comply with local health, sanitary, or safety code is exempt from the 50 percent determination regarding market value for purposes of the floodway prohibition.  Historic structures are also exempt from the 50 percent determination.

 

Legislation enacted in 1999 (1999 Laws of Washington, chapter 9) exempted existing farmhouses in designated floodways from the general floodway prohibition against substantial repair or reconstruction provided certain conditions are satisfied.  The 1999 legislation also allowed the DOE to consider recommending repair or replacement of residential structures other than farmhouses and required the DOE to adopt rules related to the new authority.

 

 

Summary of Substitute Bill: 

 

The exemption from the 50 percent determination related to floodway construction for work done to comply with health, sanitary or safety codes is amended.  Projects to correct local health, sanitary, or safety code violations identified by a local code or building enforcement official are exempt from the 50 percent determination if they are the minimum necessary to ensure safe living conditions.

 

The exemption from the 50 percent determination related to floodway construction for structures identified as historic places is replaced with an exemption from the floodway prohibition for historic structures. 

 

Substantially damaged residential structures other than farmhouses located in designated floodways may also be exempt from the floodway prohibition under certain circumstances.  Upon request of a local government, the DOE may recommend repair, replacement or relocation of structures substantially damaged by causes other than flooding or flood-related erosion.  The DOE must assess the risk of harm to life and property posed by floodway conditions and base its recommendation on scientific analysis of depth, velocity and flood-related erosion.  The DOE's recommendation, with the local government's concurrence, to allow repair or replacement of a substantially flood-damaged residential structure is a waiver of the floodway prohibition.

 

The deadline for the DOE to develop rules related to the assessment procedures and criteria for repair, replacement or relocation of residential structures other than farmhouses is extended to December 31, 2000.

 

Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:  The original bill authorized the DOE to make recommendations regarding construction, reconstruction, repair, replacement, or relocation of farm accessory buildings and structures on land designated as agricultural land of long-term commercial significance.

 

 

Appropriation:  None.

 

Fiscal Note:  Requested on February 2, 2000.

 

Effective Date of Substitute Bill:  Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.

 

Testimony For:  (Original bill) Counties have authority over replacement of existing accessory buildings under certain circumstances, and provisions regarding new buildings may conflict with federal law. 

 

(Amendment) The amendment strengthens local control by granting local governments a voice in the permitting process.  The provisions in the amendment are necessary for the DOE to implement the flood plain bill the Legislature passed last year. 

 

Testimony Against:  None.

 

Testified:   Representative John Koster, prime sponsor.