(1) In designating and protecting critical areas under this chapter, counties and cities shall ((include)) consider the best available science in developing policies and development regulations to protect the functions and values of critical areas. In addition, counties and cities shall give special consideration to conservation or protection measures necessary to preserve or enhance anadromous fisheries.

   (2) If it determines that advice from scientific or other experts is necessary or will be of substantial assistance in reaching its decision, a growth management hearings board may retain scientific or other expert advice to assist in reviewing a petition under RCW 36.70A.290 that involves critical areas.

   (3) Where a proposed critical area ordinance is based upon science that has yet to be replicated in a physical context similar to the one at issue, but is theoretically sound and otherwise meets the test for best available science, that science constitutes the best available science.

   (4) The requirement to consider the best available science under subsection (1) of this section does not obligate a county or city to use science from a different physical context if the county or city determines that the science is not applicable to a specific local situation or physical context, even if it is the only available science.

   (5) The requirement to consider the best available science is a procedural, not substantive, requirement.

   (6) In the development of critical areas policies and development regulations, counties and cities may consider a wide range of information, including scientific, legal, social, cultural, economic, political, and other information pertinent to the creation of policies and regulations that address local environmental concerns and serve local needs."

Correct the title.

EFFECT:

•   Deletes all provisions of the substitute bill;

•   Requires that counties and cities "consider" the best available science in developing policies and regulations to protect the functions and values of a critical area;

•   Creates guidelines for use by local governments in determining the scientific basis that must be considered in the development of ordinances for the protection of critical areas;

•   Declares that the requirement that best available science be considered in the development of a critical area ordinance is a procedural rather than a substantive requirement; and

•   Allows a local government to consider any information pertinent to the development of critical areas policies and development regulations that address local environmental concerns and serve local needs.