SENATE BILL REPORT
SHB 2879


This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

As Reported By Senate Committee On:
Consumer Protection & Housing, February 28, 2008

Title: An act relating to spyware.

Brief Description: Modifying provisions regulating spyware.

Sponsors: House Committee on Technology, Energy & Communications (originally sponsored by Representatives Morris, Ericksen, Hasegawa, Morrell and Kelley; by request of Attorney General).

Brief History: Passed House: 2/19/08, 95-0.

Committee Activity: Consumer Protection & Housing: 2/28/08 [DP].


SENATE COMMITTEE ON CONSUMER PROTECTION & HOUSING

Majority Report: Do pass.Signed by Senators Weinstein, Chair; Kauffman, Vice Chair; Honeyford, Ranking Minority Member; Delvin, Haugen, Jacobsen, Kilmer, McCaslin and Tom.

Staff: Alison Mendiola (786-7483)

Background: The term "spyware" generally describes any software that is placed on a user's computer to monitor, collect, and transmit personally identifiable information without the user's knowledge or consent. Spyware programs can be difficult to identify and remove, and can cause problems ranging from advertisements to computer viruses to identity theft. Frequently, spyware is hidden within a larger software package that the consumer purposely installs, but spyware can also be installed by visiting a website.

In 2005 the Legislature enacted a spyware law, Chapter 19.270 of the RCW. The law generally prohibits the unauthorized installation of computer spyware if installed through intentionally deceptive means.

Several types of computer spyware activities are prohibited, including collecting web browsing histories, taking control of a user's computer to send e-mails or viruses, creating bogus financial charges, opening multiple pop-up advertisements, and modifying security settings.

The Attorney General, a provider of computer software, or an owner of a website or trademark may bring a civil action to enjoin further violations and recover either actual damages, or $100,000 per violation, whichever is greater. The maximum allowable damage award is $2 million. In addition, a court may increase the damage award up to three times if the defendant has engaged in a pattern and practice of engaging in the prohibited activities. The court may also award costs and reasonable attorneys' fees to the prevailing party.

Summary of Bill: Additions to the Computer Spyware Law. Several computer-related actions, collectively known as spyware, are added to the computer spyware law. The following spyware activities are prohibited:

These prohibitions also apply to those persons who know or consciously avoid knowing that their services are being used to procure or transmit spyware.

Exceptions. These prohibitions do not apply to any monitoring of a subscriber's Internet service by a telecommunications carrier, cable operator, computer hardware or software provider, or provider of information service for network or computer security purposes.

Changes to the Computer Spyware Law. The following computer spyware provisions are modified to prohibit "deceptive" actions rather than "intentionally deceptive" actions:

"Deceptive" is defined as: (1) a materially false or fraudulent statement; or (2) a statement or description that omits or misrepresents material information in order to deceive an owner or operator.

Some provisions of the existing computer spyware law relating to: (1) keystroke logging; and (2) preventing an owner from disabling or blocking the installation of software, are removed.

These exemptions must not be construed as: (1) a defense to liability under the common law or any other state or federal law; or (2) an affirmative grant of authority to engage in certain computer monitoring or remote disablement activities.

Standing to Sue. A provider of computer software or owner of a website or trademark only may bring a civil action if the action arises directly out of the person's status as a provider or owner.

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Not requested.

Committee/Commission/Task Force Created: No.

Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony on Substitute Bill: PRO: This bill is the same as the Senate companion (6499). This bill is a clean-up of the spyware statute and provides for better enforcement. The Attorney General has recovered over $1 million in enforcing this statute, and this money goes into the general revenue for the state.

Persons Testifying: PRO: Paula Sellis, Office of the Attorney General.