CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5412



60th Legislature
2007 Regular Session

Passed by the Senate April 18, 2007
  YEAS 45   NAYS 0


________________________________________    
President of the Senate
Passed by the House April 17, 2007
  YEAS 97   NAYS 1


________________________________________    
Speaker of the House of Representatives


CERTIFICATE

I, Thomas Hoemann, Secretary of the Senate of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5412 as passed by the Senate and the House of Representatives on the dates hereon set forth.


________________________________________    
Secretary
Approved 









________________________________________    
Governor of the State of Washington
FILED







Secretary of State
State of Washington


_____________________________________________ 

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5412
_____________________________________________

AS AMENDED BY THE HOUSE

Passed Legislature - 2007 Regular Session
State of Washington60th Legislature2007 Regular Session

By Senate Committee on Transportation (originally sponsored by Senators Murray, Swecker, Marr, Clements and Haugen)

READ FIRST TIME 03/05/07.   



     AN ACT Relating to clarifying goals, objectives, and responsibilities of certain transportation agencies; amending RCW 47.01.011, 47.01.012, 47.01.071, 47.01.075, 47.05.030, 47.05.035, 47.06.020, 47.06.050, 47.06.140, and 35.95A.120; adding a new section to chapter 47.04 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 47.01 RCW; creating a new section; recodifying RCW 47.01.012; and repealing RCW 47.01.370, 47.05.051, and 47.06.030.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1   The legislature finds and declares that the citizens of the state expect clear and concise goals, objectives, and responsibilities regarding the operation of the statewide transportation system. Furthermore, the state's citizens expect that the state periodically receive clear and streamlined information that measures whether the goals and objectives are being satisfied. Therefore, it is the intent of the legislature that this act serve to clarify existing goals, objectives, and responsibilities related to the operation of an efficient statewide transportation system.

Sec. 2   RCW 47.01.011 and 1977 ex.s. c 151 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:
     The legislature hereby recognizes the following imperative needs within the state: To create a statewide transportation development plan which identifies present status and sets goals for the future; to coordinate transportation modes; to promote and protect land use programs required in local, state, and federal law; to coordinate transportation with the economic development of the state; to supply a broad framework in which regional, metropolitan, and local transportation needs can be related; to facilitate the supply of federal and state aid to those areas which will most benefit the state as a whole; to provide for public involvement in the transportation planning and development process; to administer programs within the jurisdiction of this title relating to the safety of the state's transportation systems; and to coordinate and implement national transportation policy with the state transportation planning program.
     The legislature finds and declares that placing all elements of transportation in a single department is fully consistent with and shall in no way impair the use of moneys in the motor vehicle fund exclusively for highway purposes.
     Through this chapter, a unified department of transportation is created. To the jurisdiction of this department will be transferred the present powers, duties, and functions of the department of highways, the highway commission, the toll bridge authority, the aeronautics commission, and the canal commission, and the transportation related powers, duties, and functions of the planning and community affairs agency. The powers, duties, and functions of the department of transportation must be performed in a manner consistent with the policy goals set forth in RCW 47.01.012 (as recodified by this act).

Sec. 3   RCW 47.01.012 and 2002 c 5 s 101 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) It is the intent of the legislature to establish policy goals for the planning, operation, performance of, and investment in, the state's transportation system. The policy goals ((shall consist of, but not be limited to, the following)) established under this section are deemed consistent with the benchmark categories((,)) adopted by the state's blue ribbon commission on transportation on November 30, 2000. ((In addition to improving safety,)) Public investments in transportation ((shall)) should support achievement of these ((and other priority)) policy goals:
     ((No interstate highways, state routes, and local arterials shall be in poor condition; no bridges shall be structurally deficient, and safety retrofits shall be performed on those state bridges at the highest seismic risk levels; traffic congestion on urban state highways shall be significantly reduced and be no worse than the national mean; delay per driver shall be significantly reduced and no worse than the national mean; per capita vehicle miles traveled shall be maintained at 2000 levels; the nonauto share of commuter trips shall be increased in urban areas; administrative costs as a percentage of transportation spending shall achieve the most efficient quartile nationally; and the state's public transit agencies shall achieve the median cost per vehicle revenue hour of peer transit agencies, adjusting for the regional cost-of-living.))
     (a) Preservation: To maintain, preserve, and extend the life and utility of prior investments in transportation systems and services;
     (b) Safety: To provide for and improve the safety and security of transportation customers and the transportation system;
     (c) Mobility: To improve the predictable movement of goods and people throughout Washington state;
     (d) Environment: To enhance Washington's quality of life through transportation investments that promote energy conservation, enhance healthy communities, and protect the environment; and
     (e) Stewardship: To continuously improve the quality, effectiveness, and efficiency of the transportation system.
     (2) The powers, duties, and functions of state transportation agencies must be performed in a manner consistent with the policy goals set forth in subsection (1) of this section.
     (3)
These policy goals ((shall)) are intended to be the basis for ((establishment of)) establishing detailed and measurable objectives and related performance ((benchmarks)) measures.
     (4) It is the intent of the legislature that the ((transportation commission)) office of financial management establish objectives and performance measures for the department of transportation and other state agencies with transportation-related responsibilities to ensure transportation system performance at local, regional, and state government levels((, and the transportation commission should work with appropriate government entities to accomplish this)) progresses toward the attainment of the policy goals set forth in subsection (1) of this section. The office of financial management shall submit initial objectives and performance measures to the legislature for its review and shall provide copies of the same to the commission during the 2008 legislative session. The office of financial management shall submit objectives and performance measures to the legislature for its review and shall provide copies of the same to the commission during each regular session of the legislature during an even-numbered year thereafter.
     (5) This section does not create a private right of action.

Sec. 4   RCW 47.01.071 and 2006 c 334 s 3 are each amended to read as follows:
     The transportation commission shall have the following functions, powers, and duties:
     (1) To propose policies to be adopted by the governor and the legislature designed to assure the development and maintenance of a comprehensive and balanced statewide transportation system which will meet the needs of the people of this state for safe and efficient transportation services. Wherever appropriate, the policies shall provide for the use of integrated, intermodal transportation systems ((to implement the social, economic, and environmental policies, goals, and objectives of the people of the state, and especially to conserve nonrenewable natural resources including land and energy)). The policies must be aligned with the goals established in RCW 47.01.012 (as recodified by this act). To this end the commission shall:
     (a) Develop transportation policies which are based on the policies, goals, and objectives expressed and inherent in existing state laws;
     (b) Inventory the adopted policies, goals, and objectives of the local and area-wide governmental bodies of the state and define the role of the state, regional, and local governments in determining transportation policies, in transportation planning, and in implementing the state transportation plan;
     (c) ((Propose a transportation policy for the state;
     (d)
)) Establish a procedure for review and revision of the state transportation policy and for submission of proposed changes to the governor and the legislature; and
     (((e) To)) (d) Integrate the statewide transportation plan with the needs of the elderly and ((handicapped)) persons with disabilities, and ((to)) coordinate federal and state programs directed at assisting local governments to answer such needs;
     (2) To provide for the effective coordination of state transportation planning with national transportation policy, state and local land use policies, and local and regional transportation plans and programs;
     (3) In conjunction with the provisions under RCW 47.01.075, to provide for public involvement in transportation designed to elicit the public's views both with respect to adequate transportation services and appropriate means of minimizing adverse social, economic, environmental, and energy impact of transportation programs;
     (4) By December 2010, to prepare a comprehensive and balanced statewide transportation plan ((which shall be)) consistent with the state's growth management goals and based on the transportation policy ((adopted by the governor and the legislature,)) goals provided under RCW 47.01.012 (as recodified by this act) and applicable state and federal laws. The plan must reflect the priorities of government developed by the office of financial management and address regional needs, including multimodal transportation planning. The plan must, at a minimum: (a) Establish a vision for the development of the statewide transportation system; (b) identify significant statewide transportation policy issues; and (c) recommend statewide transportation policies and strategies to the legislature to fulfill the requirements of subsection (1) of this section. The plan must be the product of an ongoing process that involves representatives of significant transportation interests and the general public from across the state. Every four years, the plan shall be reviewed and revised, and submitted to the governor and the house of representatives and senate standing committees on transportation((, prior to each regular session of the legislature during an even-numbered year thereafter. The plan shall be subject to the approval of the legislature in the biennial transportation budget act)).
     The plan shall take into account federal law and regulations relating to the planning, construction, and operation of transportation facilities;
     (5) By December 2007, the office of financial management shall submit a baseline report on the progress toward attaining the policy goals under RCW 47.01.012 (as recodified by this act) in the 2005-2007 fiscal biennium. By October 1, 2008, beginning with the development of the 2009-2011 biennial transportation budget, and by October 1st biennially thereafter, the office of financial management shall submit to the legislature and the governor a report on the progress toward the attainment by state transportation agencies of the state transportation policy goals and objectives prescribed by statute, appropriation, and governor directive. The report must, at a minimum, include the degree to which state transportation programs have progressed toward the attainment of the policy goals established under RCW 47.01.012 (as recodified by this act), as measured by the objectives and performance measures established by the office of financial management under RCW 47.01.012 (as recodified by this act);
     (6)
To propose to the governor and the legislature prior to the convening of each regular session held in an odd-numbered year a recommended budget for the operations of the commission as required by RCW 47.01.061;
     (((6))) (7) To adopt such rules as may be necessary to carry out reasonably and properly those functions expressly vested in the commission by statute;
     (((7))) (8) To contract with the office of financial management or other appropriate state agencies for administrative support, accounting services, computer services, and other support services necessary to carry out its other statutory duties;
     (((8))) (9) To conduct transportation-related studies and policy analysis to the extent directed by the legislature or governor in the biennial transportation budget act, or as otherwise provided in law, and subject to the availability of amounts appropriated for this specific purpose; and
     (((9))) (10) To exercise such other specific powers and duties as may be vested in the transportation commission by this or any other provision of law.

Sec. 5   RCW 47.01.075 and 2006 c 334 s 4 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) The transportation commission shall provide a public forum for the development of transportation policy in Washington state to include coordination with regional transportation planning organizations, transportation stakeholders, counties, cities, and citizens. ((It may recommend to the secretary of transportation, the governor, and the legislature means for obtaining appropriate citizen and professional involvement in all transportation policy formulation and other matters related to the powers and duties of the department. It may further hold hearings and explore ways to improve the mobility of the citizenry.)) At least every five years, the commission shall convene regional forums to gather citizen input on transportation issues. The commission shall consider the input gathered at the forums as it establishes the statewide transportation plan under RCW 47.01.071(4).
     (2) ((Every two years, in coordination with the development of the state biennial budget, the commission shall prepare the statewide multimodal transportation progress report and propose to the office of financial management transportation priorities for the ensuing biennium. The report must:
     (a) Consider the citizen input gathered at the forums;
     (b) Be developed with the assistance of state transportation-related agencies and organizations;
     (c) Be developed with the input from state, local, and regional jurisdictions, transportation service providers, key transportation stakeholders, and the office of financial management;
     (d) Be considered by the secretary of transportation and other state transportation-related agencies in preparing proposed agency budgets and executive request legislation;
     (e) Be submitted by the commission to the governor and the legislature by October 1st of each even-numbered year for consideration by the governor.
     (3)
)) In fulfilling its responsibilities under this section, the commission may create ad hoc committees or other such committees of limited duration as necessary.
     (((4))) (3) In order to promote a better transportation system, the commission ((shall)) may offer policy guidance and make recommendations to the governor and the legislature in key issue areas, including but not limited to:
     (a) Transportation finance;
     (b) Preserving, maintaining, and operating the statewide transportation system;
     (c) Transportation infrastructure needs;
     (d) Promoting best practices for adoption and use by transportation-related agencies and programs;
     (e) Transportation efficiencies that will improve service delivery and/or coordination;
     (f) Improved planning and coordination among transportation agencies and providers; and
     (g) Use of intelligent transportation systems and other technology-based solutions((; and
     (h) Reporting of performance against goals, targets, and benchmarks
)).

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 6   A new section is added to chapter 47.01 RCW to read as follows:
     To support achievement of the policy goals described in RCW 47.01.012, the department shall:
     (1) Maintain an inventory of the condition of structures and corridors in most urgent need of retrofit or rehabilitation;
     (2) Develop long-term financing tools that reliably provide ongoing maintenance and preservation of the transportation infrastructure;
     (3) Balance system safety and convenience through all phases of a project to accommodate all users of the transportation system to safely, reliably, and efficiently provide mobility to people and goods;
     (4) Develop strategies to gradually reduce the per capita vehicle miles traveled based on consideration of a range of reduction methods;
     (5) Consider efficiency tools, including high-occupancy vehicle and high-occupancy toll lanes, corridor-specific and systemwide pricing strategies, active traffic management, commute trip reduction, and other demand management tools;
     (6) Promote integrated multimodal planning; and
     (7) Consider engineers and architects to design environmentally sustainable, context-sensitive transportation systems.

Sec. 7   RCW 47.05.030 and 2006 c 334 s 45 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) The ((transportation commission)) office of financial management shall ((develop)) propose a comprehensive ten-year investment program ((specifying program objectives and performance measures)) for the preservation and improvement programs defined in this section, consistent with the policy goals described under RCW 47.01.012 (as recodified by this act). The ((adopted)) proposed ten-year investment program must be forwarded as a recommendation ((to)) by the ((governor and)) office of financial management to the legislature, and ((is subject to the approval of the legislature in the biennial transportation budget act. In the specification of investment program objectives and performance measures, the transportation commission, in consultation with the Washington state department of transportation, shall define and adopt standards for effective programming and prioritization practices including a needs analysis process. The analysis process must ensure the identification of problems and deficiencies, the evaluation of alternative solutions and trade-offs, and estimations of the costs and benefits of prospective projects. The investment program)) must be based upon the needs identified in the ((state-owned highway component of the)) statewide ((comprehensive)) transportation plan established under RCW 47.01.071(4).
     (((1))) (2) The preservation program consists of those investments necessary to preserve the existing state highway system and to restore existing safety features, giving consideration to lowest life cycle costing. ((The preservation program must require use of the most cost-effective pavement surfaces, considering:
     (a) Life-cycle cost analysis;
     (b) Traffic volume;
     (c) Subgrade soil conditions;
     (d) Environmental and weather conditions;
     (e) Materials available; and
     (f) Construction factors.
     The comprehensive ten-year investment program for preservation must identify projects for two years and an investment plan for the remaining eight years.
     (2)
)) (3) The improvement program consists of investments needed to address identified deficiencies on the state highway system to ((increase mobility, address congestion, and improve safety, support for the economy, and protection of the environment. The ten-year investment program for improvements must identify projects for two years and major deficiencies proposed to be addressed in the ten-year period giving consideration to relative benefits and life cycle costing. The transportation commission shall give higher priority for correcting identified deficiencies on those facilities classified as facilities of statewide significance as defined in RCW 47.06.140. Project prioritization must be based primarily upon cost-benefit analysis, where appropriate)) meet the goals established in RCW 47.01.012 (as recodified by this act).

Sec. 8   RCW 47.05.035 and 2006 c 334 s 46 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) The department shall use the transportation demand modeling tools developed under subsection (2) of this section to evaluate investments based on the best mode or improvement, or mix of modes and improvements, to meet current and future long-term demand within a corridor or system for the lowest cost. The end result of these demand modeling tools is to provide a cost-benefit analysis by which the department can determine the relative mobility improvement and congestion relief each mode or improvement under consideration will provide and the relative investment each mode or improvement under consideration will need to achieve that relief.
     (2) The department will participate in the refinement, enhancement, and application of existing transportation demand modeling tools to be used to evaluate investments. This participation and use of transportation demand modeling tools will be phased in.
     (((3) In developing program objectives and performance measures, the department shall evaluate investment trade-offs between the preservation and improvement programs. In making these investment trade-offs, the department shall evaluate, using cost-benefit techniques, roadway and bridge maintenance activities as compared to roadway and bridge preservation program activities and adjust those programs accordingly.
     (4) The department shall allocate the estimated revenue between preservation and improvement programs giving primary consideration to the following factors:
     (a) The relative needs in each of the programs and the system performance levels that can be achieved by meeting these needs;
     (b) The need to provide adequate funding for preservation to protect the state's investment in its existing highway system;
     (c) The continuity of future transportation development with those improvements previously programmed; and
     (d) The availability of dedicated funds for a specific type of work.
     (5) The department shall consider the findings in this section in the development of the ten-year investment program.
))

Sec. 9   RCW 47.06.020 and 1993 c 446 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:
     The specific role of the department in transportation planning ((shall)) must be, consistent with the policy goals described under RCW 47.01.012 (as recodified by this act): (1) Ongoing coordination and development of statewide transportation policies that guide all Washington transportation providers; (2) ongoing development of a statewide multimodal transportation plan that includes both state-owned and state-interest facilities and services; (3) coordinating the state high-capacity transportation planning and regional transportation planning programs; ((and)) (4) conducting special transportation planning studies that impact state transportation facilities or relate to transportation facilities and services of statewide significance; and (5) assisting the transportation commission in the development of the statewide transportation plan required under RCW 47.01.071(4). Specific requirements for each of these state transportation planning components are described in this chapter.

Sec. 10   RCW 47.06.050 and 2002 c 5 s 413 are each amended to read as follows:
     The state-owned facilities component of the statewide multimodal transportation plan shall consist of:
     (1) The state highway system plan, which identifies program and financing needs and recommends specific and financially realistic improvements to preserve the structural integrity of the state highway system, ensure acceptable operating conditions, and provide for enhanced access to scenic, recreational, and cultural resources. The state highway system plan shall contain the following elements:
     (a) A system preservation element, which shall establish structural preservation objectives for the state highway system including bridges, identify current and future structural deficiencies based upon analysis of current conditions and projected future deterioration, and recommend program funding levels and specific actions necessary to preserve the structural integrity of the state highway system consistent with adopted objectives. Lowest life cycle cost methodologies must be used in developing a pavement management system. This element shall serve as the basis for the preservation component of the six-year highway program and the two-year biennial budget request to the legislature;
     (b) A highway maintenance element, establishing service levels for highway maintenance on state-owned highways ((that meet benchmarks established by the transportation commission)). The highway maintenance element must include an estimate of costs for achieving those service levels over twenty years. This element will serve as the basis for the maintenance component of the six-year highway program and the two-year biennial budget request to the legislature;
     (c) A capacity and operational improvement element, which shall establish operational objectives, including safety considerations, for moving people and goods on the state highway system, identify current and future capacity, operational, and safety deficiencies, and recommend program funding levels and specific improvements and strategies necessary to achieve the operational objectives. In developing capacity and operational improvement plans the department shall first assess strategies to enhance the operational efficiency of the existing system before recommending system expansion. Strategies to enhance the operational efficiencies include but are not limited to access management, transportation system management, demand management, and high-occupancy vehicle facilities. The capacity and operational improvement element must conform to the state implementation plan for air quality and be consistent with regional transportation plans adopted under chapter 47.80 RCW, and shall serve as the basis for the capacity and operational improvement portions of the six-year highway program and the two-year biennial budget request to the legislature;
     (d) A scenic and recreational highways element, which shall identify and recommend designation of scenic and recreational highways, provide for enhanced access to scenic, recreational, and cultural resources associated with designated routes, and recommend a variety of management strategies to protect, preserve, and enhance these resources. The department, affected counties, cities, and towns, regional transportation planning organizations, and other state or federal agencies shall jointly develop this element;
     (e) A paths and trails element, which shall identify the needs of nonmotorized transportation modes on the state transportation systems and provide the basis for the investment of state transportation funds in paths and trails, including funding provided under chapter 47.30 RCW.
     (2) The state ferry system plan, which shall guide capital and operating investments in the state ferry system. The plan shall establish service objectives for state ferry routes, forecast travel demand for the various markets served in the system, develop strategies for ferry system investment that consider regional and statewide vehicle and passenger needs, support local land use plans, and assure that ferry services are fully integrated with other transportation services. The plan must provide for maintenance of capital assets. The plan must also provide for preservation of capital assets based on lowest life cycle cost methodologies. The plan shall assess the role of private ferries operating under the authority of the utilities and transportation commission and shall coordinate ferry system capital and operational plans with these private operations. The ferry system plan must be consistent with the regional transportation plans for areas served by the state ferry system, and shall be developed in conjunction with the ferry advisory committees.

Sec. 11   RCW 47.06.140 and 1998 c 171 s 7 are each amended to read as follows:
     The legislature declares the following transportation facilities and services to be of statewide significance: Highways of statewide significance as designated by the legislature under chapter 47.05 RCW, the interstate highway system, interregional state principal arterials including ferry connections that serve statewide travel, intercity passenger rail services, intercity high-speed ground transportation, major passenger intermodal terminals excluding all airport facilities and services, the freight railroad system, the Columbia/Snake navigable river system, marine port facilities and services that are related solely to marine activities affecting international and interstate trade, and high-capacity transportation systems serving regions as defined in RCW 81.104.015. The department, in cooperation with regional transportation planning organizations, counties, cities, transit agencies, public ports, private railroad operators, and private transportation providers, as appropriate, shall plan for improvements to transportation facilities and services of statewide significance in the statewide multimodal transportation plan. Improvements to facilities and services of statewide significance identified in the statewide multimodal transportation plan, or to highways of statewide significance designated by the legislature under chapter 47.05 RCW, are essential state public facilities under RCW 36.70A.200.
     The department of transportation, in consultation with local governments, shall set level of service standards for state highways and state ferry routes of statewide significance. Although the department shall consult with local governments when setting level of service standards, the department retains authority to make final decisions regarding level of service standards for state highways and state ferry routes of statewide significance. In establishing level of service standards for state highways and state ferry routes of statewide significance, the department shall consider the necessary balance between providing for the free interjurisdictional movement of people and goods and the needs of local communities using these facilities.

Sec. 12   RCW 35.95A.120 and 2003 c 147 s 14 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) Except as provided in subsection (2) of this section, the city transportation authority may be dissolved by a vote of the people residing within the boundaries of the authority if the authority is faced with significant financial problems. However, the authority may covenant with holders of its bonds that it may not be dissolved and shall continue to exist solely for the purpose of continuing to levy and collect any taxes or assessments levied by it and pledged to the repayment of debt and to take other actions, including the appointment of a trustee, as necessary to allow it to repay any remaining debt. No such debt may be incurred by the authority on a project until thirty days after a final environmental impact statement on that project has been issued as required by chapter 43.21C RCW. The amount of the authority's initial bond issue is limited to the amount of the project costs in the subsequent two years as documented by a certified engineer or by submitted bids, plus any reimbursable capital expenses already incurred at the time of the bond issue. The authority may size the first bond issue consistent with the internal revenue service five-year spend down schedule if an independent financial advisor recommends such an approach is financially advisable. Any referendum petition to dissolve the city transportation authority must be filed with the city council and contain provisions for dissolution of the authority. Within seven days, the city prosecutor must review the validity of the petition and submit its report to the petitioner and city council. If the petitioner's claims are deemed valid by the city prosecutor, within ten days of the petitioner's filing, the city council will confer with the petitioner concerning the form and style of the petition, issue an identification number for the petition, and write a ballot title for the measure. The ballot title must be posed as a question and an affirmative vote on the measure results in authority retention and a negative vote on the measure results in the authority's dissolution. The petitioner will be notified of the identification number and ballot title within this ten-day period.
     After this notification, the petitioner has ninety days in which to secure on petition forms, the signatures of not less than fifteen percent of the registered voters in the authority area and to file the signed petitions with the filing officer. Each petition form must contain the ballot title and the full text of the measure to be referred. The filing officer will verify the sufficiency of the signatures on the petitions. If sufficient valid signatures are properly submitted, the filing officer shall submit the initiative to the authority area voters at a general or special election held on one of the dates provided in RCW ((29.13.010)) 29A.04.321 as determined by the city council, which election will not take place later than one hundred twenty days after the signed petition has been filed with the filing officer.
     (2) A city transportation authority is dissolved and terminated if all of the following events occur before or after the effective date of this section:
     (a) A majority of the qualified electors voting at a regular or special election determine that new public monorail transportation facilities must not be built;
     (b) The governing body of the authority adopts a resolution and publishes a notice of the proposed dissolution at least once every week for three consecutive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation published in the authority area. The resolution and notice must:
     (i) Describe information that must be included in a notice of claim against the authority including, but not limited to, any claims for refunds of special motor vehicle excise tax levied under RCW 35.95A.080 and collected by or on behalf of the authority;
     (ii) Provide a mailing address where a notice of claim may be sent;
     (iii) State the deadline, which must be at least ninety days from the date of the third publication, by which the authority must receive a notice of claim; and
     (iv) State that a claim will be barred if a notice of claim is not received by the deadline;
     (c) The authority resolves all claims timely made under (b) of this subsection; and
     (d) The governing body adopts a resolution (i) finding that the conditions of (a) through (c) of this subsection have been met and (ii) dissolving and terminating the authority.
     (3) A claim against a city transportation authority is barred if (a) a claimant does not deliver a notice of claim to the authority by the deadline stated in subsection (2)(b)(iii) of this section or (b) a claimant whose claim was rejected by the authority does not commence a proceeding to enforce the claim within sixty days from receipt of the rejection notice. For purposes of this subsection, "claim" includes, but is not limited to, any right to payment, whether liquidated, unliquidated, fixed, contingent, matured, unmatured, disputed, undisputed, legal, equitable, secured, or unsecured, or the right to an equitable remedy for breach of performance if the breach gives rise to a right to payment, whether or not the right to an equitable remedy is fixed, contingent, matured, unmatured, disputed, undisputed, secured, or unsecured, including, but not limited to, any claim for a refund of special motor vehicle excise tax levied under RCW 35.95A.080 and collected by or on behalf of the authority.
     (4) The governing body of the authority may transfer any net assets to one or more other political subdivisions with instructions as to their use or disposition. The governing body shall authorize this transfer in the resolution that dissolves and terminates the authority under subsection (2)(d) of this section.
     (5) Upon the dissolution and termination of the authority, the former officers, directors, employees, and agents of the authority shall be immune from personal liability in connection with any claims brought against them arising from or relating to their service to the authority, and any claim brought against any of them is barred.
     (6) Upon satisfaction of the conditions set forth in subsection (2)(a) and (b) of this section, the terms of all members of the governing body of the city transportation authority, whether elected or appointed, who are serving as of the date of the adoption of the resolution described in subsection (2)(b) of this section, shall be extended, and incumbent governing body members shall remain in office until dissolution of the authority, notwithstanding any provision of any law to the contrary.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 13   The following acts or parts of acts are each repealed:
     (1) RCW 47.01.370 (Review of performance and outcome measures of transportation-related agencies -- Definition) and 2006 c 334 s 44;
     (2) RCW 47.05.051 (Ten-year comprehensive investment program--Priority selection criteria -- Improvement program criteria) and 2006 c 334 s 47, 2005 c 319 s 11, 2002 c 189 s 3, 2002 c 5 s 406, 1998 c 175 s 12, 1993 c 490 s 5, 1987 c 179 s 5, 1979 ex.s. c 122 s 5, & 1975 1st ex.s. c 143 s 4; and
     (3) RCW 47.06.030 (Transportation policy plan) and 1997 c 369 s 8 and 1993 c 446 s 3.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 14   RCW 47.01.012 is recodified as a section in chapter 47.04 RCW.

--- END ---