HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 1887
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent. |
As Reported by House Committee On:
Local Government & Housing
Title: An act relating to diking districts.
Brief Description: Concerning diking districts.
Sponsors: Representative Takko.
Brief History:
Committee Activity:
Local Government & Housing: 2/12/09, 2/16/09 [DPS].
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT & HOUSING |
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 7 members: Representatives Simpson, Chair; Nelson, Vice Chair; Miloscia, Springer, Upthegrove, White and Williams.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 3 members: Representatives Angel, Ranking Minority Member; Cox, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Short.
Staff: Sara del Moral (786-7291) and Thamas Osborn (786-7129)
Background:
Diking Districts.
A diking district (district) is charged with constructing and maintaining a system of dikes. Among other things, it has the authority to straighten, widen, and deepen waterways considered a flood threat. It may construct dikes, drains, ditches, and other infrastructure to reduce flood risk.
Annexation Procedures.
A district may annex contiguous territory employing the following methods:
petition and election;
resolution and election; and
direct petition.
To use the petition and election method, a petition signed by at least 10 property owners in the proposed annexation area must be filed with the diking district governing body. To use the resolution and election method, the district governing body must adopt requesting a resolution in favor of annexation.
In both of these cases, a referendum must be held to put the question to voters. For annexation to occur, a majority of voters must approve.
Under the direct petition method, annexation occurs if the owners of the majority of territory in the proposed annexation area sign a petition requesting annexation and the district governing body approves.
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Summary of Substitute Bill:
A new annexation procedure is provided. Under this procedure, a district must meet a number of specific requirements to annex contiguous territory. It must:
adopt a resolution;
publish notice in a newspaper;
hold a public hearing; and
recommend the annexation to the county legislative authority.
The county legislative authority must then hold a public hearing on the proposal. After the hearing, the county legislative authority may either:
reject the proposal; or
approve or modify the proposal and adopt it by ordinance.
Territory bounded by the same river, lake, or other body of water that bounds the district territory may be considered contiguous to the district territory.
Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:
The amendment removes specifications regarding public bidding processes.
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Effective Date of Substitute Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of the session in which the bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) Some districts have had trouble getting bidders. Changes in the bill would make this process easier.
Currently, some districts serve areas outside district boundaries. Property owners in these areas do not pay assessments, and they have no incentive to vote or petition to be annexed and start paying. The bill changes annexation procedures so that territory may be annexed without a referendum or a petition from property owners. Districts need to be able to annex the areas they serve.
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: Representative Takko, prime sponsor; and Kenneth Stone, Cowlitz County.
Persons Signed In To Testify But Not Testifying: None.