HOUSE BILL REPORT

HB 2119

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

As Reported by House Committee On:

Education

Ways & Means

Title: An act relating to expanding dual credit opportunities.

Brief Description: Expanding dual credit opportunities.

Sponsors: Representatives Wallace, Carlyle, Sullivan, Morrell, Quall, Santos and Ormsby.

Brief History:

Committee Activity:

Education: 2/17/09, 2/20/09 [DPS];

Ways & Means: 3/6/09, 3/9/09 [DP2S(w/o sub ED)].

Brief Summary of Second Substitute Bill

  • Recognizes the importance of dual credit programs.

  • Imposes dual credit program reporting requirements, including disaggregation of data.

  • Codifies College in the High School and requires the development of rules.

  • Outlines College in the High School requirements.

  • Requires the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction to work with the Higher Education Coordinating Board to develop guidelines for students and parents regarding the possible impact of dual credit upon financial aid eligibility.

  • Allows community and technical colleges to charge Running Start students certain fees and provides for low-income fee waivers.

  • Provides that Running Start students shall be counted for purposes of meeting enrollment targets but shall not be counted for purposes of higher education funding and shall not displace students.

  • Tasks the State Board for Community and Technical Colleges to develop long-term funding proposals for Running Start and report recommendations to the Legislature.

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION

Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 13 members: Representatives Quall, Chair; Probst, Vice Chair; Priest, Ranking Minority Member; Hope, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Cox, Dammeier, Hunt, Johnson, Liias, Maxwell, Orwall, Santos and Sullivan.

Staff: Cece Clynch (786-7195)

Background:

A variety of education programs allow high school students to earn post-secondary course credit while also earning credit toward high school graduation. Students who participate in these dual credit programs have the opportunity to graduate from high school with all or a portion of college course work already completed as well as enhance their chances of entry into a chosen trade or profession. Running Start students have the opportunity to study on a college campus while acquiring credits that count toward both high school and college graduation. If the student passes the college course, he or she receives the same amount of credit as any other college student taking the course. The students do not pay tuition for Running Start classes. Rather, for a full-time Running Start student, a school district retains 7 percent of the basic education allocation and provides the remainder to the higher education institution. A Running Start student cannot be charged fees except for consumable supplies, textbooks, and other materials to be retained by the student.

College in the High School permits students to complete college level work while staying on their high school campuses. High school teachers typically form a relationship with a college or university and receive adjunct, extension, or lecturer status. They work with a professor to align a particular high school course with a college level course published in the college catalog. The college course is then taught to high school students by the high school teacher during the regular school day. Students usually pay a fee for this program that varies based on the area of study. Other funding, fees, and eligibility requirements are negotiated by participating schools through a local contract. Tech Prep is a cooperative effort between K-12 schools, community and technical colleges, and the business community to develop applied integrated, academic and technical programs. These professional technical courses are taught on high school campuses by high school instructors. The instructors work with local colleges to assure the courses are taught at the college-level and articulate to the college program. Each of the state's 22 Tech Prep consortia have developed competency-based articulation agreements between high schools and colleges that help students transition from high school into post-secondary professional technical programs. Through Tech Prep articulation agreements, colleges award credit to students who successfully complete college-equivalent courses and programs with a "B" or better while still in high school.

Advanced Placement and International Baccalaureate allow students to take college-level courses while staying on their high school campuses. For both of these programs, students complete courses taught by high school teachers but then must pass a standardized examination at the end of the course. Whether college credit is awarded depends upon a student's score on the exam. For Advanced Placement, students score from zero to five points. Minimum scores to qualify for college credit vary by college and by subject area. Students pay the exam fees.

Running Start for the Trades began in 2006 with the purpose of expanding apprenticeship opportunities for high-school students. High schools work closely with local apprenticeship programs to prepare students to enter apprenticeships immediately after graduation. Depending upon the program, students may earn direct entry into an apprenticeship program or enhance their chances of entry into a program.

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Summary of Substitute Bill:

The Legislature recognizes the need for a well-prepared workforce and the value of the various dual credit programs to the state, its workforce, and the individual students and their families. It is important to increase the number of students in dual credit programs as well as the availability of the various programs.

Dual Credit Reporting Requirements.

By September 1, 2010, and annually thereafter, the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI), in collaboration with the State Board for Community and Technical Colleges (SBCTC), the Workforce Training and Education Coordinating Board, the Apprenticeship Council, the Higher Education Coordinating Board (HECB), and the public baccalaureate institutions must report to the higher education committees in the Legislature regarding participation in dual credit programs. The report must include the following data, disaggregated by race, ethnicity, gender, and receipt of free or reduced-price lunch:

College in the High School Rules Development and Governance.

The OSPI, the SBCTC, the HECB, and the public baccalaureate institutions must jointly develop, and each adopt, rules governing College in the High School. In developing these rules, the Association of Washington School Principals must be consulted. These rules must be written to encourage the maximum use of the program and may not narrow or limit enrollment options. College in the High School programs are to be governed by a local contract between a school district and an institution of higher education. The following requirements apply:

Dual Credit Advising Guidelines.

The OSPI and the HECB must develop advising guidelines to assure that students and parents understand that college credits earned in high school dual credit programs may impact eligibility for financial aid.

Running Start.

The Running Start statutes are amended to reflect that such programs are not found just at the community and technical colleges but also may be offered by a public tribal college located in Washington that meets accreditation requirements and some of the four year public institutions.

Running Start students may be charged mandatory fees as established by each institution of higher education, with such fees to be prorated based upon credit load. Institutions of higher education must make available fee waivers for low-income students. A Running Start student must be considered low-income, and eligible for a fee waiver, upon proof that the student is currently qualified to receive free or reduced-price lunch.

Students enrolled in Running Start shall be counted for the purpose of meeting enrollment targets imposed by the state on the institution of higher education but shall not be counted for purposes of higher education funding. Running Start students shall not displace any students currently enrolled.

The SBCTC is charged with developing long-term funding proposals for Running Start and reporting recommendations to the Legislature by December 1, 2010.

Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:

Several changes and additions are made:

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Available. New fiscal note requested on February 20, 2009.

Effective Date of Substitute Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of the session in which the bill is passed.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony:

(In support) There are currently about 80,000 students in dual credit programs. A dual credit work group met over the last interim and many of the ideas for this bill came from that work group. The community and technical colleges need additional support. Currently, they receive 93 percent of the basic education allocation (BEA). If the dollar amount of the BEA increases, the community and technical colleges will receive more dollars. It is important that students not be displaced. Principals should be included in the group which will be writing the rules for College in the High School. Traditional students do not understand why Running Start students do not have to pay parking and lab fees. Even if Running Start students are charged these fees, they will still receive great savings by virtue of the fact that they do not pay tuition. Coordinating dual credit programs has something in it for all high schools, large or small. The issue of counting Running Start students is very important. Green River Community College has over 1,000 Running Start students. It is appropriate to charge fees to Running Start students. Running Start is an important and efficient program and there is a tremendous demand but it does have long-term funding implications that need to be addressed. The community and technical colleges do not want to take more money from the K-12 system but there does need to be more funding provided for Running Start. By counting Running Start students toward enrollment targets it will be seen where there is over-enrollment. Counting will not result in more money to the colleges.

(Opposed) None.

Persons Testifying: Representative Wallace, prime sponsor; Jerry Bender, Association of Washington School Principals; Tana Hasart and Nathaniel Anderson, Pierce College; John Aultman, Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction; Rich Rutkowski, Green River Community College; and Chris Reykdal, State Board for Community and Technical Colleges.

Persons Signed In To Testify But Not Testifying: None.

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON WAYS & MEANS

Majority Report: The second substitute bill be substituted therefor and the second substitute bill do pass and do not pass the substitute bill by Committee on Education. Signed by 19 members: Representatives Linville, Chair; Ericks, Vice Chair; Bailey, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Dammeier, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Cody, Conway, Darneille, Haigh, Hunt, Hunter, Kagi, Kenney, Kessler, Pettigrew, Priest, Ross, Schmick, Seaquist and Sullivan.

Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 2 members: Representatives Alexander, Ranking Minority Member; Chandler.

Staff: Debbie Driver (786-7143)

Summary of Recommendation of Committee On Ways & Means Compared to Recommendation of Committee On Education:

The second substitute bill removes authorization for the research universities, the regional universities, and the Evergreen State College to charge fees to Running Start students.

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Available.

Effective Date of Second Substitute Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of the session in which the bill is passed.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony:

(In support) Running Start started off as a small experiment 15 years ago and is now a large, beneficial program to the state. The Running Start program results in cost savings to both the state and the taxpayer. Yet, the Running Start funding model does not provide the resources needed to support the program. Many colleges subsidize Running Start students with other funds. This bill provides a funding resource to the program without cost to the state or the K-12 system. Furthermore, the bill allows colleges to count Running Start Full Time Equivalent (FTE) students towards their state-supported enrollment targets. This will assist colleges that have difficulty meeting their targets yet serve many Running Start students. The Running Start program is an important program that is vital to businesses as well as students, families and the state. Businesses support this bill and want the Running Start program to continue to be successful.

(Opposed) None.

Persons Testifying: Tom Pierson, South Sound Chamber of Commerce; and Chris Reykdal, State Board for Community and Technical Colleges.

Persons Signed In To Testify But Not Testifying: None.