HOUSE BILL REPORT

HB 2490

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

As Reported by House Committee On:

State Government & Tribal Affairs

Title: An act relating to persons with intellectual disabilities.

Brief Description: Concerning persons with intellectual disabilities.

Sponsors: Representative Angel; by request of Statute Law Committee.

Brief History:

Committee Activity:

State Government & Tribal Affairs: 1/15/10 [DP].

Brief Summary of Bill

  • Updates statutes to replace the term "mental retardation" with the term "intellectual disabilities."

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON STATE GOVERNMENT & TRIBAL AFFAIRS

Majority Report: Do pass. Signed by 6 members: Representatives Hunt, Chair; Appleton, Vice Chair; Armstrong, Ranking Minority Member; Alexander, Hurst and Taylor.

Staff: Tracey O'Brien (786-7196).

Background:

The Revised Code of Washington (RCW) and the Washington Administrative Code both contain extensive references to various individuals with disabilities. With the exception of language used as a specific term of art for purposes of the criminal code and criminal sentencing, these references are generally not essential to describing the circumstances of the particular individual. 

Recent legislation has adopted terms that emphasize the individuality of people, no matter what their physical characteristics. Older legislative language utilized terms appropriate to the moment, some of which are neither appropriate nor specifically necessary for the law. 

In 2004 legislation was enacted that required the Code Reviser to avoid references to certain words frequently used to describe individuals with disabilities. The specific terms are disabled, developmentally disabled, mentally disabled, mentally ill, mentally retarded, handicapped, cripple, and crippled. 

These terms are to be avoided in future laws as well as to be replaced in existing statutes as those statutes are amended by law. The replacement terms are "individuals with disabilities," "individuals with developmental disabilities," "individuals with mental disabilities," "individuals with mental illness," and "individuals with mental retardation."

Last session, the Legislature changed the preferred term to be used in statutes, memorials, and resolutions from "individuals with mental retardation" to "individuals with intellectual disabilities." The Code Reviser was directed to replace the term "mental retardation" with the term "intellectual disability." The Code Reviser was also required to submit a bill with recommendations to the Legislature by December 1, 2009, concerning the replacement of the phrase "mental retardation" with the phrase "intellectual disability" as well as any other perfecting changes to the RCW.

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Summary of Bill:

The Revised Code of Washington (RCW) is updated to remove the demeaning term "individuals with mental retardation" and replace it with "individuals with intellectual disabilities." It is not the intent of the Legislature to expand or contract the scope of the RCW. Nothing in this act may be construed to change the application of any provision of the RCW to any person.

"Intellectual disabilities" replaces the term "mental retardation" in statutes pertaining to:

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Not requested.

Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of the session in which the bill is passed.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony:

(In support) The Code Reviser was instructed to clean up the language in statute.  There were a few instances that needed more than word changes.  The draft was circulated among stakeholder groups.  It is clearly stated that it is not the intent to change the application of any provision in the code.  A great effort was made to avoid conflict in federal law.

The "R" word hurts and a change in language would provide more respect.  This is the last step in the process to respect those persons with disabilities.  Washington is on the cutting edge of respectful language.  The federal government is changing its terminology.

(Opposed) None.

Persons Testifying: Kyle Thiessen, State Law Committee; Robert Wardell, Emily Rogers, Michael Rogers, and Evangeline Abodinas, Self Advocates in Leadership; and George Adams, Self Advocates of Washington.

Persons Signed In To Testify But Not Testifying: None.