HOUSE BILL REPORT

SHB 2939

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

As Passed House:

February 12, 2010

Title: An act relating to notations on driver abstracts that a person was not at fault in a motor vehicle accident.

Brief Description: Concerning notations on driver abstracts that a person was not at fault in a motor vehicle accident.

Sponsors: House Committee on Transportation (originally sponsored by Representatives Dammeier, Orwall, Parker, Probst, Morrell, Kessler, Smith and Kenney).

Brief History:

Committee Activity:

Transportation: 2/1/10, 2/8/10 [DPS].

Floor Activity:

Passed House: 2/12/10, 95-0.

Brief Summary of Substitute Bill

  • Requires the Department of Licensing to indicate in a driving abstract obtained for employment or certain volunteer organization purposes that an individual was not at fault in an accident if an individual provides appropriate documentation to that effect.

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION

Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 27 members: Representatives Clibborn, Chair; Liias, Vice Chair; Roach, Ranking Minority Member; Rodne, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Armstrong, Campbell, Dickerson, Driscoll, Eddy, Ericksen, Finn, Flannigan, Johnson, Klippert, Kristiansen, Moeller, Morris, Nealey, Rolfes, Sells, Shea, Simpson, Springer, Takko, Upthegrove, Williams and Wood.

Staff: David Munnecke (786-7315).

Background:

The Director of the Department of Licensing (DOL) maintains a case record on every person licensed to operate a motor vehicle in Washington. These case records, or abstracts, contain information relating to a person's driving record, including:

Washington law restricts the distribution and use of abstracts. Certified abstracts may only be released to specified persons, including:

A full abstract may be released to the individual named in the abstract, an employer or prospective employer, or a city or county prosecuting attorney. Certain requesters are allowed to receive partial abstracts, meaning driving records that date back a limited number of years.

State-approved alcohol/drug assessment or treatment agencies receive an abstract covering a period of not more than five years, plus any records of alcohol-related driving offenses for a period of not more than 10 years.

Information may only be used for specific purposes depending on who requests the abstract. An abstract provided to an alcohol/drug assessment or treatment agency may only be used to assist its employees in determining the appropriate level of treatment.

Persons requesting the abstract, other than the individual named in the abstract, may not give any information contained in the abstract to a third party unless authorized. Prosecutors are authorized to provide the abstract to state-approved alcohol/drug assessment or treatment agencies.

The DOL may destroy certain records, such as applications for drivers' licenses, if they have been microfilmed or are older than five years. However, the DOL must keep convictions for vehicular homicide and vehicular assault permanently on file. Convictions for driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs must be kept for 15 years from the date of the conviction.

Summary of Substitute Bill:

The DOL is required to indicate in a driving abstract obtained for employment or certain volunteer organization purposes that an individual was not at fault in a particular accident if the individual named in the abstract provides the DOL with court records or other documents showing that the individual was not at fault.

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Available.

Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of the session in which the bill is passed. However, the bill is null and void unless funded in the budget.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony:

(In support) This bill was brought forward because of a question of fairness. Driving abstracts can significantly effect employment opportunities, and people have been turned down for jobs because of an accident on their abstract. People should be allowed to reduce this potential barrier to employment by annotating an abstract if they're not at fault in an accident. The decision on whether to report an accident that will go in an abstract is made on a police department-by-police department basis. The language was intended to assist professional drivers, and if the intent can be preserved while modifying the language to reduce the fiscal impact then that should occur.

(Opposed) None.

Persons Testifying: Representative Dammeier, prime sponsor; and Michael Akers.

Persons Signed In To Testify But Not Testifying: None.