HOUSE BILL REPORT

SSB 6544

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

As Reported by House Committee On:

Local Government & Housing

Title: An act relating to time limitation for approval of plats.

Brief Description: Extending the time limitations for approval of plats.

Sponsors: Senate Committee on Financial Institutions, Housing & Insurance (originally sponsored by Senators Berkey, Marr, Hobbs, Kilmer and Tom).

Brief History:

Committee Activity:

Local Government & Housing: 2/18/10, 2/22/10 [DP].

Brief Summary of Substitute Bill

  • Extends time limitations associated with final plat submissions and the requirements governing applicable subdivisions from five to seven years.

  • Expires the extension provisions on December 31, 2014.

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT & HOUSING

Majority Report: Do pass. Signed by 11 members: Representatives Simpson, Chair; Nelson, Vice Chair; Angel, Ranking Minority Member; DeBolt, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Fagan, Miloscia, Short, Springer, Upthegrove, White and Williams.

Staff: Ethan Moreno (786-7386).

Background:

The process by which land divisions may occur is governed by state and local requirements. Local governments, the entities charged with receiving and determining land division proposals, must adopt associated ordinances and procedures in conformity with state requirements.

Numerous statutorily defined terms are applicable in land use division actions. Examples include the following:

Preliminary plats of any proposed subdivision and dedication must generally be approved, disapproved, or returned to the applicant for modification within 90 days from the date of filing. For final plats and short plats, the approval, disapproval, or returning action must be completed by the local government within 30 days. Unless the local government adopts extension ordinances, an applicant has five years to submit a final plat meeting specified statutory requirements to the legislative body of the applicable local government.

If the applicable local government finds that the subdivision proposed for final plat approval conforms to all terms of the preliminary plat approval and other requirements in effect at the time of preliminary plat approval, the final plat must be approved and filed with the county auditor. Any lots in a final plat filed for record must be a valid land use, notwithstanding changes in zoning laws, for five years from the date of filing. Unless the local government finds that a change in conditions creates a serious threat to public health or safety in the subdivision, a subdivision must be governed by the terms of approval of the final plat, and the requirements in effect at the time of approval, for five years.

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Summary of Bill:

Five-year time limitations pertaining to final plat submissions and requirements governing applicable subdivisions are temporarily extended to seven years. Unless the local government adopts extension ordinances, an applicant has seven years to submit a final plat to the applicable local government legislative body. Similarly, any lots in a filed final plat must be a valid land use, notwithstanding changes in zoning laws, for seven years from the date of filing. Absent a local government finding that a change in conditions creates a serious threat to public health or safety in the subdivision, a subdivision is governed by the terms of approval of the final plat, and the requirements in effect at the time of approval, for seven years. The two-year extension provisions expire December 31, 2014.

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Not requested.

Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of the session in which the bill is passed.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony:

(In support) Builders have acquired land for development purposes, but the economic downturn has prevented builders from completing the development activities. The Senate amended the bill by deleting intent language and adding an expiration date. This is a straight-forward bill that will ease financial burdens on builders.

(Opposed) None.

Persons Testifying: Scott Hildebrand, Master Builders of King and Snohomish County; and Julie Nichols, Building Industry Association of Washington.

Persons Signed In To Testify But Not Testifying: None.