SENATE BILL REPORT

SB 5255

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

As of February 25, 2009

Title: An act relating to aquatic lands lease rates for marinas.

Brief Description: Regarding aquatic lands lease rates for marinas.

Sponsors: Senators Jacobsen, Swecker, Regala, Morton, Kilmer, Pridemore and Shin.

Brief History:

Committee Activity: Natural Resources, Ocean & Recreation: 1/28/09, 2/19/09 [DPS-WM].

Ways & Means: 2/26/09.

SENATE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES, OCEAN & RECREATION

Majority Report: That Substitute Senate Bill No. 5255 be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass and be referred to Committee on Ways & Means.

Signed by Senators Jacobsen, Chair; Ranker, Vice Chair; Morton, Ranking Minority Member; Fraser, Hargrove, Hatfield, Stevens and Swecker.

Staff: Curt Gavigan (786-7437)

SENATE COMMITTEE ON WAYS & MEANS

Staff: Maria Hovde (786-7710)

Background: General Aquatic Lands Management Authority. The Legislature has designated the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) as manager of the state's aquatic lands. DNR manages over two million acres of tidelands, shorelands, and bedlands. This includes the beds of navigable rivers and lakes, along with the beds below Puget Sound.

By statute, the management of aquatic lands must support a balance of goals. DNR must encourage public use and access, water-dependent uses, utilization of renewable resources, environmental protection, and revenue generation. Revenues generated from the state's aquatic lands are used for land management and public benefits, such as shoreline access, environmental protection, and recreational opportunities.Water-Dependent Lease Rates. DNR has general leasing authority for aquatic lands. The Legislature has directed DNR, however, to favor water-dependent uses. A water dependent use is a use that cannot logically exist in any location but on water.

State-owned aquatic land lease rents for water-dependent uses are determined using a statutory method, with a key variable being the upland value of the tax parcel associated with the lease. Specifically, the upland value is the per area assessed value of the associated upland parcel. The formula generally sets the aquatic land value by multiplying the associated upland parcel value by the area of the lease, and multiplying the result by 30 percent. The rent is then determined by multiplying the aquatic land value by a real capitalization rate.

Once an initial lease rate is determined, rents are adjusted annually for inflation. DNR re-calculates lease rates every four years.

Summary of Bill (Recommended Substitute): Marina Lease Rent Calculation. The method for determining aquatic land lease rates for marinas is changed. Instead of establishing marina lease rates individually based on the associated upland parcel value of each individual marina, DNR must follow an upland value averaging process for marinas within a specified geographic averaging zone before applying the current rent calculation formula.

DNR must determine the per area assessed value of the upland parcels associated with all marinas within a geographic averaging zone. DNR must then calculate the average upland value for marinas in this zone. The resulting average is considered the upland value which DNR must use in the rent calculation formula for all marinas in the zone. There are two distinct geographic averaging zones within each county. One zone contains all marinas within cities and the Urban Growth Area. A separate zone contains all other marinas.

If the initial marina rent established under the new formula would result in a lease rate more than 20 percent above or below the prior rent, DNR must gradually implement the new rate. In such cases, the rent may not increase or decrease more than 25 percent of the difference between the new and prior rent in any year.

The term "marina" is defined to include any entity providing vessel moorage on state-owned aquatic lands, examples of which are private and public marinas, yacht clubs, and homeowner associations.

Vessel Sewage Pumpout Station Plan. In cooperation with specified entities, DNR must develop a plan to enhance the number of operating vessel sewage pumpout stations available for use on state-owned aquatic lands. The plan must include a prioritized list of areas in need of pumpout station installation or improved pumpout operation and maintenance, as well as recommendations on plan implementation and funding. DNR must provide the plan to the Legislature by November 1, 2009.

Youth Recreation Aquatic Lands Lease Rate. Organizations qualifying for a youth recreation aquatic lands lease rate are eligible for a 50 percent reduction in the lease rent otherwise due under the water-dependent lease rate formula. An organization is eligible for the reduced rate if it is a nonprofit organization exempt from federal income tax and certifies that the primary use of the aquatic lands is boating and maritime recreation and instruction for youth.

EFFECT OF CHANGES MADE BY NATURAL RESOURCES, OCEAN & RECREATION COMMITTEE (Recommended Substitute): The recommended substitute:

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Available.

Committee/Commission/Task Force Created: No.

Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony (Natural Resources, Ocean & Recreation): PRO: The system is broken because marinas within the same marketplace pay rent based on upland values, which does not necessarily correspond to the amount marinas charge for moorage. This bill is designed to create an even playing field. Marina owners have invested in upland improvements, but have been penalized for these investments by an increase in their aquatic lands lease rents. Often, these rent increases exceed increases in what they can charge for moorage.

CON: DNR has conducted reviews of its leasing system, as have other entities. Despite the imperfection of the current process, DNR and stakeholders have not been able to agree on an alternative. DNR thinks the current system is equitable, though work can be done to incorporate geographic lease rate averaging into the process. DNR requests that it be given time to develop a model to incorporate some form of geographic averaging for marinas.

OTHER: Other groups question whether they want to have their rents calculated under this new process, and want to keep discussing the issue.

Persons Testifying (Natural Resources, Ocean & Recreation): PRO: Ted Johnson, Simon Johnson, LLC; John Woodring, Marina Operator; Joe Dusenbury, City of Des Moines.

CON: Rich Doenges, DNR.

OTHER: Jim King, Recreational Boating Association of Washington; Cliff Webster, Northwest Marine Trade Association.