SENATE BILL REPORT

SB 5448

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

Background: The Public Works Assistance Account, commonly known as the Public Works Trust Fund, was created by the Legislature in 1985 to provide a source of funding to assist local governments with infrastructure projects. The Public Works Board, within the Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development (CTED), is authorized to make low-interest or interest-free loans from the account to finance the repair, replacement, or improvement of the following public works systems: bridges, roads, water and sewage systems, and solid waste and recycling facilities. All local governments except port districts and school districts are eligible to receive loans.

Cities or towns may authorize counties to aid in road construction and maintenance, but only if the city or town makes full payment for the project to the county road fund.

Summary of Bill: Counties may establish local public works assistance funds (the fund) to fund public works projects located wholly or partially within the county. The fund may be used to make loans to the county and local governments and to administer the funds, but in any year at least 25 percent must be made available to cities and towns, no more than 50 percent may be loaned to the county, and no more than one percent may be used for administrative costs.

Counties may require reasonable and necessary repayment, but such monies must be placed in the fund. Local governments applying for loans must demonstrate utilization of all local revenue, compliance with the Growth Management Act, and consistency with capital facilities plans. Counties must develop a prioritization plan in collaboration with public works directors of local governments, document their findings, and periodically revise the plan. In particular, counties should prioritize needs of local governments suffering the fiscal consequences of natural disaster or emergency public works needs, and should examine the cost of the project, the size of the local government, the funds available, the number of communities served, and whether the project is necessary to meet health and safety standards.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony: PRO: This bill would lead to better coordination between counties and cities under the Growth Management Act. A new section should be added to prioritize increasing existing housing capacity, and the number of new housing units built should be used as a performance measure.