BILL REQ. #:  H-3512.1 



_____________________________________________ 

HOUSE BILL 2575
_____________________________________________
State of Washington62nd Legislature2012 Regular Session

By Representatives Armstrong, Johnson, Rivers, Asay, Kristiansen, Overstreet, Zeiger, Hargrove, Angel, Klippert, Shea, Haler, McCune, and Parker

Read first time 01/17/12.   Referred to Committee on Transportation.



     AN ACT Relating to the use of certain transportation revenue; amending RCW 46.68.070, 47.56.030, 47.56.820, 47.56.830, and 47.56.790; reenacting and amending RCW 47.56.810; adding a new section to chapter 47.56 RCW; and creating new sections.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1   The legislature finds that last year nearly nine hundred thousand voters approved Initiative Measure No. 1125. Postelection polling showed that an overwhelming majority of voters supported many of its major policies. In focusing on those provisions the voters strongly support, this act would:
     (1) Prohibit state government from diverting gas taxes and toll revenues in the motor vehicle fund and other funds to any other funds to be used for nontransportation purposes; and
     (2) Require tolls to be dedicated to the project in which the tolls are paid, end such tolls when the project is completed, and only allow such tolls to be used for purposes consistent with Article II, section 40 of the state Constitution.

Sec. 2   RCW 46.68.070 and 1972 ex.s. c 103 s 6 are each amended to read as follows:
     There is created in the state treasury a permanent fund to be known as the motor vehicle fund to the credit of which shall be deposited all moneys directed by law to be deposited therein. This fund shall be for the use of the state, and through state agencies, for the use of counties, cities, and towns for proper road, street, and highway purposes, including the purposes of RCW 47.30.030. The department of transportation and any other state agency may not transfer any revenues in the motor vehicle fund to any other fund to be used for nontransportation purposes.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 3   A new section is added to chapter 47.56 RCW to read as follows:
     The department or any other state agency may not transfer any revenues from any account created under this chapter to any other account or fund to be used for nontransportation purposes.

Sec. 4   RCW 47.56.030 and 2008 c 122 s 8 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) Except as permitted under chapter 47.29 or 47.46 RCW:
     (a) Unless otherwise delegated, and subject to RCW 47.56.820, the department of transportation shall have full charge of the planning, analysis, and construction of all toll bridges and other toll facilities including the Washington state ferries, and the operation and maintenance thereof.
     (b) The transportation commission shall determine and establish the tolls and charges thereon. Except for Washington state ferries toll facilities, revenue from tolls or charges on a highway, freeway, road, bridge, or street may be used only for the cost of construction and capital improvements to that particular highway, freeway, road, bridge, or street and for purposes consistent with Article II, section 40 of the state Constitution.
     (c) Unless otherwise delegated, and subject to RCW 47.56.820, the department shall have full charge of planning, analysis, and design of all toll facilities. The department may conduct the planning, analysis, and design of toll facilities as necessary to support the legislature's consideration of toll authorization.
     (d) The department shall utilize and administer toll collection systems that are simple, unified, and interoperable. To the extent practicable, the department shall avoid the use of toll booths. The department shall set the statewide standards and protocols for all toll facilities within the state, including those authorized by local authorities.
     (e) Except as provided in this section, the department shall proceed with the construction of such toll bridges and other facilities and the approaches thereto by contract in the manner of state highway construction immediately upon there being made available funds for such work and shall prosecute such work to completion as rapidly as practicable. The department is authorized to negotiate contracts for any amount without bid under (e)(i) and (ii) of this subsection:
     (i) Emergency contracts, in order to make repairs to ferries or ferry terminal facilities or removal of such facilities whenever continued use of ferries or ferry terminal facilities constitutes a real or immediate danger to the traveling public or precludes prudent use of such ferries or facilities; and
     (ii) Single source contracts for vessel dry dockings, when there is clearly and legitimately only one available bidder to conduct dry dock-related work for a specific class or classes of vessels. The contracts may be entered into for a single vessel dry docking or for multiple vessel dry dockings for a period not to exceed two years.
     (2) The department shall proceed with the procurement of materials, supplies, services, and equipment needed for the support, maintenance, and use of a ferry, ferry terminal, or other facility operated by Washington state ferries, in accordance with chapter 43.19 RCW except as follows:
     (a) When the secretary of the department of transportation determines in writing that the use of invitation for bid is either not practicable or not advantageous to the state and it may be necessary to make competitive evaluations, including technical or performance evaluations among acceptable proposals to complete the contract award, a contract may be entered into by use of a competitive sealed proposals method, and a formal request for proposals solicitation. Such formal request for proposals solicitation shall include a functional description of the needs and requirements of the state and the significant factors.
     (b) When purchases are made through a formal request for proposals solicitation the contract shall be awarded to the responsible proposer whose competitive sealed proposal is determined in writing to be the most advantageous to the state taking into consideration price and other evaluation factors set forth in the request for proposals. No significant factors may be used in evaluating a proposal that are not specified in the request for proposals. Factors that may be considered in evaluating proposals include but are not limited to: Price; maintainability; reliability; commonality; performance levels; life cycle cost if applicable under this section; cost of transportation or delivery; delivery schedule offered; installation cost; cost of spare parts; availability of parts and service offered; and the following:
     (i) The ability, capacity, and skill of the proposer to perform the contract or provide the service required;
     (ii) The character, integrity, reputation, judgment, experience, and efficiency of the proposer;
     (iii) Whether the proposer can perform the contract within the time specified;
     (iv) The quality of performance of previous contracts or services;
     (v) The previous and existing compliance by the proposer with laws relating to the contract or services;
     (vi) Objective, measurable criteria defined in the request for proposal. These criteria may include but are not limited to items such as discounts, delivery costs, maintenance services costs, installation costs, and transportation costs; and
     (vii) Such other information as may be secured having a bearing on the decision to award the contract.
     (c) When purchases are made through a request for proposal process, proposals received shall be evaluated based on the evaluation factors set forth in the request for proposal. When issuing a request for proposal for the procurement of propulsion equipment or systems that include an engine, the request for proposal must specify the use of a life cycle cost analysis that includes an evaluation of fuel efficiency. When a life cycle cost analysis is used, the life cycle cost of a proposal shall be given at least the same relative importance as the initial price element specified in the request of proposal documents. The department may reject any and all proposals received. If the proposals are not rejected, the award shall be made to the proposer whose proposal is most advantageous to the department, considering price and the other evaluation factors set forth in the request for proposal.

Sec. 5   RCW 47.56.810 and 2011 c 377 s 7 and 2011 c 369 s 2 are each reenacted and amended to read as follows:
     The definitions in this section apply throughout this subchapter unless the context clearly requires otherwise:
     (1) "Eligible toll facility" or "eligible toll facilities" means portions of the state highway system specifically identified by the legislature including, but not limited to, transportation corridors, bridges, crossings, interchanges, on-ramps, off-ramps, approaches, bistate facilities, and interconnections between highways.
     (2) "Express toll lanes" means one or more high occupancy vehicle lanes of a highway in which the department charges tolls primarily as a means of regulating access to or use of the lanes to maintain travel speed and reliability.
     (3) "Toll revenue" or "revenue from an eligible toll facility" means toll receipts, all interest income derived from the investment of toll receipts, and any gifts, grants, or other funds received for the benefit of transportation facilities in the state, including eligible toll facilities, which may be used only for purposes consistent with Article II, section 40 of the state Constitution.
     (4) "Tolling authority" means the governing body that is legally empowered to review and adjust toll rates. Unless otherwise delegated, the transportation commission is the tolling authority for all state highways.

Sec. 6   RCW 47.56.820 and 2008 c 122 s 4 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) Unless otherwise delegated, only the legislature may authorize the imposition of tolls on eligible toll facilities.
     (2) All revenue from an eligible toll facility must be used only ((to construct, improve, preserve, maintain, manage, or operate)) for the cost of construction and capital improvements to the eligible toll facility on or in which the revenue is collected subject to the limitations under RCW 47.56.830. Expenditures of toll revenues are subject to appropriation and must be made only for the following purposes as long as the expenditure is consistent with Article II, section 40 of the state Constitution:
     (a) To cover the operating costs of the eligible toll facility, including necessary maintenance, preservation, administration, and toll enforcement by public law enforcement within the boundaries of the facility;
     (b) To meet obligations for the repayment of debt and interest on the eligible toll facilities, and any other associated financing costs including, but not limited to, required reserves and insurance;
     (c) To meet any other obligations to provide funding contributions for any projects or operations on the eligible toll facilities;
     (d) To provide for the operations of conveyances of people or goods; or
     (e) For any other improvements to the eligible toll facilities.

Sec. 7   RCW 47.56.830 and 2008 c 122 s 5 are each amended to read as follows:
     Any proposal for the establishment of eligible toll facilities shall consider the following policy guidelines:
     (1) Overall direction. Washington should use tolling to encourage effective use of the transportation system and provide a source of transportation funding.
     (2) When to use tolling. Tolling should be used when it can be demonstrated to contribute a significant portion of the cost of a project that cannot be funded solely with existing sources or optimize the performance of the transportation system. Such tolling should, in all cases, be fairly and equitably applied in the context of the statewide transportation system and not have significant adverse impacts through the diversion of traffic to other routes that cannot otherwise be reasonably mitigated. Such tolling should also consider relevant social equity, environmental, and economic issues, and should be directed at making progress toward the state's greenhouse gas reduction goals.
     (3) Use of toll revenue. All revenue from an eligible toll facility must be used only to improve((, preserve, manage,)) or operate the eligible toll facility on or in which the revenue is collected and for purposes consistent with Article II, section 40 of the state Constitution. Additionally, toll revenue should provide for and encourage the inclusion of recycled and reclaimed construction materials.
     (4) Setting toll rates. Toll rates must be uniform and consistent, ((which)) may not include variable pricing, and must be set to meet anticipated funding obligations. To the extent possible, the toll rates should be set to optimize system performance, recognizing necessary trade-offs to generate revenue.
     (5) Dedication of tolls. As described in RCW 47.56.030, tolls collected on a project must be spent only on that project, and all revenue from such tolls may be used only for purposes consistent with Article II, section 40 of the state Constitution.
     (6)
Duration of toll collection. ((Because transportation infrastructure projects have costs and benefits that extend well beyond those paid for by initial construction funding,)) Tolls on future toll facilities ((may remain in place to fund additional capacity, capital rehabilitation, maintenance, management, and operations, and to optimize performance of the system)) must end after the cost of the toll facility project is paid.

Sec. 8   RCW 47.56.790 and 2008 c 270 s 5 are each amended to read as follows:
     The department shall work with the federal highways administration to determine the necessary actions for receiving federal authorization to toll the Interstate 90 floating bridge. The department must periodically report the status of those discussions to the governor and the joint transportation committee. Tolls imposed and toll revenue collected on Interstate 90 must be used exclusively for toll facilities on and capital improvements to the Interstate 90 floating bridge and may be used only for purposes consistent with Article II, section 40 of the state Constitution.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 9   This act is to be liberally construed to effectuate the intent, policies, and purposes of this act.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 10   If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected.

--- END ---