HOUSE BILL REPORT

SSB 5004

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

Brief Summary of Substitute Bill

(As Amended by Committee)

Authorizes any city or town, rather than only cities with a population of over 400,000, to maintain warrant officers within local police departments.
Provides that the authority of warrant officers is established by local ordinance, and may include the authority to serve civil and criminal process and make arrests authorized by warrants.

Majority Report: Do pass as amended. Signed by 10 members: Representatives Jinkins, Chair; Kilduff, Vice Chair; Rodne, Ranking Minority Member; Goodman, Haler, Hansen, Kirby, Muri, Orwall and Walkinshaw.

Background:

Cities with a population of over 400,000 are authorized to maintain warrant officers within the city police department. Warrant officers are limited-commission officers vested only with authority to make arrests authorized by warrants and other arrests as authorized by ordinance. The number and qualifications of warrant officers are fixed by ordinance and compensation is provided by the city. Warrant officers are not entitled to benefits through the Washington Law Enforcement Officers' and Firefighters' Retirement System on the basis of service as a warrant officer.

All criminal and civil process issuing from a municipal court of a city with a population greater than 400,000 must be directed to the chief of police of the city served by the court, the sheriff of the county in which the court is held, or the warrant officers.

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Summary of Amended Bill:

Any city, code city, or town may create warrant officer positions within their city or town police departments pursuant to the same provisions as currently apply to warrant officer positions in cities of over 400,000 people. Warrant officers are vested with the special authority identified in ordinance, which may include the authority to make arrests authorized by warrants and other authority related to service of civil and criminal process. The chief of police of the city or town must establish training requirements consistent with the warrant officer job description as established in that jurisdiction.

Process issuing from any court that is directed to a police department in which a warrant officer position is maintained may be served or enforced by the warrant officer if such service is within the warrant officer's authority as identified in ordinance.

Amended Bill Compared to Substitute Bill:

Language is added to clarify that the authority of a warrant officer to serve process that is directed to the police department in which the warrant officer is housed is contingent upon such service being within the warrant officer's authority as identified in local ordinance.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony:

(In support) This bill will help cities and will keep more policemen on the street. It has bipartisan support. A warrant officer is vested only with the authority as identified in ordinance and can make arrests accordingly. This authorizes any city, code city, and town to maintain warrant officers. It also contains a training requirement for warrant officers.

Existing law only allows the City of Seattle to employ warrant officers, but they were being utilized in other jurisdictions until those jurisdictions discovered they were out of compliance with the law. There is a lot of uncompleted work now. Warrant units have been effective and cost-saving, and do a lot of work that would otherwise pull first responders off the street. An example is jail transport, which can take an hour.

(Opposed) None.