HOUSE BILL REPORT

HB 1918

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

As Reported by House Committee On:

Housing, Community Development & Veterans

Title: An act relating to community preservation and development authorities.

Brief Description: Concerning community preservation and development authorities.

Sponsors: Representative Santos.

Brief History:

Committee Activity:

Housing, Community Development & Veterans: 2/19/19, 2/20/19 [DP].

Brief Summary of Bill

  • Establishes the purposes for which a Community Preservation and Development Authority (CPDA) must be formed.

  • Modifies the process by which a CPDA and its initial board of directors is established.

  • Authorizes the Central District CPDA within the city of Seattle.

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON HOUSING, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & VETERANS

Majority Report: Do pass. Signed by 7 members: Representatives Ryu, Chair; Morgan, Vice Chair; Jenkin, Ranking Minority Member; Barkis, Frame, Leavitt and Reeves.

Minority Report: Without recommendation. Signed by 1 member: Representative Gildon, Assistant Ranking Minority Member.

Staff: Cassie Jones (786-7303).

Background:

Community Preservation and Development Authorities.

Residents, property owners, employees, or business owners of an impacted community may propose formation of a Community Preservation and Development Authority (CPDA). The proposal must be presented in writing to the appropriate committees of the Legislature and must contain proposed general geographic boundaries of the CPDA. Proposals submitted after January 1, 2008, must identify one or more stable revenue sources that:

A CPDA must be authorized by statute. The Legislature must make the following findings before authorizing a CPDA in statute:

The affairs of a CPDA are managed by a board of directors with members consisting of representatives from specified groups. A list of candidates for the initial board of directors is created by the state legislative delegation and those proposing the authority. The community then elects board members from that list. The board of directors creates a list of candidates for subsequent boards and the community elects members from that list.

Powers and Duties of a Community Preservation and Development Authority.

A CPDA has the power to:

A CPDA has the duty to:

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Summary of Bill:

A CPDA must have one or more of the following purposes:

The following definitions apply to establishment of CPDAs:

Proposals for the creation of a CPDA presented after January 1, 2020, rather than 2008, must identify one or more stable revenue sources that have a nexus with multiple publicly funded facilities or other land use decisions that adversely impacted the community and can be used to support future operating or capital projects.

The initial board of directors of a CPDA is selected by a committee comprised of the state legislative delegation and those proposing formation of the authority rather than by election.

The Central District CPDA is established. Its boundaries are those contained in the Central District in Seattle.

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Not requested.

Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of the session in which the bill is passed.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony:

(In support) The thirty-seventh district is one of the most diverse districts in the entire nation. The diversity of this district came about as a result of redlining and segregation. The district developed rich, culturally diverse communities that are now threatened by gentrification. Long-time residents are being priced out of the area by rising property values. Homeownership rates among African Americans in the Central District have greatly decreased. Local cultural institutions in the Central District are threatened and those who have been displaced by gentrification must travel many miles to visit these cultural institutions. The bill recognizes that there is a statewide benefit to preserving and restoring these communities.

The CPDA created in this bill would be the second of its kind. It would manage a state-owned asset, the Seattle Vocation Institute (SVI). The SVI would be transferred from the community college responsible for it to the Central District CPDA. The building is deteriorating and the community college is not able to pay the costs associated with building maintenance. A number of programs and groups want to be housed in the SVI; these leases will generate revenue for the Central District CPDA. Areas around the SVI may be developed for affordable housing and the SVI could become a location for programs for future residents.

There are small changes that could be made to improve the bill, including increasing the tenure of board members, allowing staff to be eligible for the public employee benefit board, and allowing greater flexibility around the groups that board members represent. These changes will improve board leadership and stability.

(Opposed) None.

Persons Testifying: Representative Santos, prime sponsor; Eddie Rye Jr., Lynn French, Samuel Berry, McKinney Coalition; Steve Leahy, Seattle Colleges; Kathleen Johnson, Historic South Downtown; Wren Wheeler, Pioneer Square-International District Cultural Preservation Development Authority; and Lawrence Willis.

Persons Signed In To Testify But Not Testifying: None.