SENATE BILL REPORT

SB 6163

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

As of January 22, 2020

Title: An act relating to unlawful possession of firearms for persons free on bond or personal recognizance pending trial, appeal, or sentencing for felony charges under RCW 46.61.502(6) and 46.61.504(6).

Brief Description: Concerning unlawful possession of firearms for persons free on bond or personal recognizance pending trial, appeal, or sentencing for felony charges under RCW 46.61.502(6) and 46.61.504(6).

Sponsors: Senators Dhingra, Kuderer, Wellman, Pedersen, Darneille, Frockt, Rolfes, Stanford and Wilson, C.

Brief History:

Committee Activity: Law & Justice: 1/21/20.

Brief Summary of Bill

  • Prohibits a person from possessing a firearm if the person has been charged with driving or physical control of a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, and the person has a history of three or more prior offenses within ten years, vehicular homicide, or vehicular assault.

SENATE COMMITTEE ON LAW & JUSTICE

Staff: Shani Bauer (786-7468)

Background: Unless the person's rights have been restored, a person may not possess a firearm:

A serious offense is defined as:

The crime of driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor, marijuana, or drug is elevated to a class B felony, and the crime of physical control of a vehicle under the influence of intoxicating liquor, marijuana, or drug is elevated to a class C felony if:

Summary of Bill: A person may not possess a firearm if they have been charged with driving or physical control of a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, and have a history of three or more prior offenses within ten years, vehicular homicide, or vehicular assault.

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Not requested.

Creates Committee/Commission/Task Force that includes Legislative members: No.

Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony: PRO: Studies show that a prior DUI conviction is related to an increased risk for suicide, domestic violence, or other crimes. This bill addresses felony DUI, vehicular homicide, or vehicular assault. In order to get a felony DUI, a person must have had three DUI convictions within the past ten years. This bill gives the prosecutor the ability to request a person not be given access to a firearm. Discretion would be with the judge whether to limit the person's access to firearms as a condition of release.

This bill only addresses a person's access to firearms while pending trial or sentencing. If the person is convicted, the person would be prohibited as a result of their felony conviction. If not convicted, the prohibition goes away. There is a strong nexus between DUI offenses and firearm violence. Anecdotally, in the past year, two persons in my caseload awaiting trial for felony DUI shot themselves. A study of the data shows that nearly 30 percent of those convicted of alcohol related offense are also arrested for a firearm related offense. Twenty-three percent of firearm offenses had a prior DUI. The Legislature can constitutionally add any crimes that it wants under the firearm prohibitions.

This bill is a strong response to suicide prevention. Suicide risk is increased during periods of personal crisis. Firearm owners report problems with alcohol abuse at a greater rate than other individuals. People awaiting trial are in a vulnerable position. Washington has taken smart steps to keep guns out of the hands of those who are at risk of gun violence. This bill would continue that progress.

CON: There are due process concerns with this law. We certainly support felons losing their firearm rights when they are convicted of a felony. However, it is a due process concern to take a person's firearm rights before they are convicted and when there is no direct link between the crime and a firearm. There is a much more direct link between a car and vehicular homicide, yet no one is suggesting that the person's car should be taken away.

Persons Testifying: PRO: Senator Manka Dhingra, Prime Sponsor; Karyn Brownson, King County Public Health; Cheryl Berenson, citizen; Amy Freedheim, King County Prosecuting Attorney's Office. CON: Tom Kwieciak, National Rifle Association.

Persons Signed In To Testify But Not Testifying: No one.