The Washington Military Department, under the direction of the Adjutant General, administers the state's comprehensive program of emergency management. The Adjutant General is responsible for developing a comprehensive, all-hazard emergency plan for the state, known as the Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan, that includes an analysis of natural, technological, or human-caused hazards, and procedures to coordinate local and state resources in responding to such hazards.
During state emergencies, the Emergency Management Division of the Military Department manages the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) and coordinates the response to ensure help is provided to those who need it quickly and effectively. The EOC is designated as the central location for information gathering, disaster analysis, and response coordination. Other state agencies with emergency roles may come to the EOC to help coordinate the state response. Federal government agencies, along with state and local volunteer organizations, also may provide representatives. At the EOC, information gathered is used to make decisions concerning emergency actions and to identify and prioritize the use of state resources needed to respond to the emergency. The EOC may issue emergency warnings or disseminate critical information and instructions to government personnel and the public who may need to take emergency protective actions.
A task force to conduct a comprehensive after-action review (AAR) of the statewide pandemic response and recovery is established.
The task force is composed of the following members:
The Adjutant General and the Secretary of the Department of Health must cochair the task force and convene its initial meeting. The task force is required to conduct a comprehensive AAR of the COVID-19 pandemic response in accordance with established national standards for emergency or disaster AAR.
In order to improve the response to and recovery from future pandemics, the task force must develop lessons learned and make recommendations that include, but are not limited to, the following:
It is suggested that the task force consider issues relating to equity, disparities, and discrimination in each topic it studies and for which it makes recommendations. Staff support for the task force must be provided jointly by the Military Department and the Department of Health. The staffing agencies may employ staff and contracted support.
The task force must report its initial findings and recommendations to the Governor and the appropriate committees of the Legislature by July 1, 2022, and its final findings and recommendations by July 1, 2023. The task force expires August 1, 2023. If specific funding for the task force is not provided by June 30, 2021, the act is null and void.
The substitute bill makes the following changes to the original bill:
(In support) Planning is everything; if you have not been planning, you cannot start to work intelligently. The impact of planning was seen during March 2014 when the Oso landslide occurred. More than 130 agencies responded to assist with rescue and recovery. They were trained and well prepared. As an after-action report is prepared for the COVID-19 response, it will tell us what went right, what went wrong, and what we must do better to plan for the next disaster.
There are so many weaknesses that stemmed from lack of planning that could be seen during the last year, including lack of personal protective equipment for nurses and front-line workers. Basic planning could have saved many lives. Lack of vaccine planning is also a problem. This bill could help plan for these problems. We need to look at what we can do better in the future. No government could have stopped the pandemic, but we must learn from this disaster. The task force could address these concerns. Washington should lead the whole country and create a model for how other states can prepare.
Based on the experience of the hospitality industry, there are some items to consider. The current version does not include essential industries in the task force. The pandemic response would benefit from additional partnership with local businesses. The task force may want to consider a centralized food distribution network, better communication on regulations, and a system to regularly review economic restrictions. A state association representing licensed home care providers should be added to the task force membership. The home care industry was greatly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic; its needs should be factored into a response plan.
(Opposed) None.
(Other) The task force will be assessing all levels of government in Washington. The after-action process is critically important to ensure we do not make the same mistakes. The bill essentially directs an after-action review (AAR) for the COVID-19 pandemic. The work done by the task force could also inform preparedness for other types of hazards we face. The pandemic is the most costly disaster in our state's history in terms of lives and cost to businesses and government. This AAR will require significant resources. The Military Department does not have the resources for an undertaking of this magnitude and would like to contract with an entity capable of managing it. The anticipated cost of the contract would be significant. The pandemic is ongoing and an AAR that occurs too early may not identify crucial lessons learned. The report date in the bill is too early. The Department of Health will complete an internal AAR to evaluate its response. Other agencies will likely do so as well. These AARs will inform the task force's analysis.
(In support) Representative Lovick, prime sponsor; Ilani Nurick; Julia Gorton, Washington Hospitality Association; Jaime Bodden, Washington State Association of Local Public Health Officials; and Shawn D'Amelio, Washington Home Care Association.
(Other) Robert Ezelle, Military Department; and Erika Henry, Department of Health.