Health coverage offered by a health carrier, the Public Employees Benefits Board, the School Employees Benefits Board, a Medicaid managed care plan, or a behavioral health administrative services organization must reimburse providers for health care services provided through telemedicine or store-and-forward technology if:
Additional requirements apply for audio-only telemedicine, including that the provider have an established relationship with the patient. An established relationship exists if the person has had at least one in-person appointment within the past year with the audio-only telemedicine provider or a provider in the same clinic or the covered person was referred by another provider who has had at least one in-person appointment with the person within the past year and has given relevant medical information to the audio-only telemedicine provider. The established relationship requirement takes effect January 1, 2023.
In 2021 the Collaborative for the Advancement of Telemedicine (Collaborative) was directed to study the need for an established relationship for audio-only telemedicine. The Collaborative's recommendations included:
The definition of "established relationship" for purposes of audio-only telemedicine is changed by:
For purposes of the provisions in the definition relating to behavioral health, behavioral health services are services included in the essential health benefits category of "Mental Health and Substance Use Disorder Services, Including Behavioral Health Treatment."
The Senate amendment: (1) allows a previous appointment to be conducted using audio-video telemedicine in order to demonstrate an established relationship for purposes of audio-only telemedicine reimbursement for non-behavioral health services and (2) expires this provision on January 1, 2024.
(In support) This bill clarifies the definition of "established relationship" and represents a compromise between different stakeholder positions. For many patients, there is no annual checkup, so extending the window to three years is helpful. Allowing the patient to be seen by a clinician in the same medical group is also helpful. This bill will improve patient access without sacrificing quality. The language about the health record should be tightened.
(Opposed) None.
(Other) The word "appointment" in this bill is concerning. Many providers see patients without an appointment, but those providers have established relationships with their patients. This part of the bill may cause reimbursement to be denied. Also, the term "health record" is problematic because there is no single health record. There are multiple health records among multiple providers. The language about health records should be cleaned up. The two-year time extension is acceptable.