Co-Response.
Co-response is when first responders, such as fire and police, are paired with non-law enforcement behavioral health professionals when responding to emergency situations involving behavioral or mental health crises. Co-response teams can perform follow up services, case management, outreach, transportation, and resource navigation. The Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs implements the Mental Health Field Response Grant Program which provides grants to local law enforcement agencies to fund co-response programs.
Co-Responder Outreach Alliance.
The Co-Responders Outreach Alliance (CROA) is a statewide nonpartisan organization of first responders, behavioral health professionals, and project managers working in the co-response field. The organization was created in 2018 and represents police and fire agencies from across the state.
Subject to the availability of amounts appropriated for this specific purpose, the University of Washington (UW) must, in consultation with the CROA and other stakeholders in the field of co-response:
Stakeholders may include: the Washington Association of Designated Crisis Responders; state associations representing police, fire, and emergency medical services personnel; the Washington Council on Behavioral Health; the state enhanced 911 system; 988 crisis call centers; and the Peer Workforce Alliance.
(In support) There have been efforts to look at the way law enforcement officers in Washington interact with community members to help them get services rather than putting them through the revolving door of the criminal justice system. These services are currently done on an ad hoc basis. There are effective programs but they are scattered. There has been enough experience now to formalize the process of co-response. The goal is to have a unified team. The CROA and law enforcement are a natural alliance. This bill ensures that teams go out and work in the most beneficial way. Stakeholders are supportive of the bill because of the value of creating a standardized process around co-response safety and de-escalation. The CROA is made up of law enforcement and behavioral health clinicians.
(Opposed) The main issue with the bill is rooted in the problem it is trying to solve. Any training for assessing trauma should not use coercive practices. Such practices have harmful consequences including physical trauma. They are so widely used that they seem to be unavoidable. Using non-consensual tactics is a violation, and co-response methods will continue to be misused unless this is addressed. The response should be person first instead of co-response. There is no evidence that coercive practices offer any benefit. Components that are non-coercive should be included in the training and lead the way with preventing trauma.