State law limits the amount of money that individuals and groups, including corporations and political committees, may contribute to a candidate who is running for office. Those limits are set in statute and adjusted for inflation by the Public Disclosure Commission (PDC). Currently, the limits are set at $2,000 per election for statewide executive, judicial, and port commissioner candidates, and $1,000 per election for state legislative and local office candidates.
Contributions by one person or entity, including a political committee, may be aggregated for purposes of the campaign contribution limit in certain circumstances:
The PDC has enacted rules to clarify when two entities are treated as a single entity and share a contribution limit. Examples of affiliated entities include: a corporation and its subsidiary; a national union and a state body of the union; and a trade association and a local unit of the association. In addition, two or more entities are treated as a single entity if one is established, financed, maintained, or controlled by the other. The PDC uses a multifactor test to determine this, which includes consideration of the ownership of voting stock, the authority to participate in governance, overlapping membership, and the provision or funding of goods and services for less than full value.
Additional provisions are created to aggregate certain contributions for purposes of campaign contribution limits:
Any limited liability company (LLC) that has registered with the Secretary of State, and is not classified as a corporation under federal tax codes, may make campaign contributions only if the company has: (1) been in existence for at least a year; and (2) electronically filed a declaration with the PDC stating that the LLC is a legitimate business with a legitimate business interest, and it was not created for the sole purpose of making contributions. The PDC must develop a method for filing this declaration and it must be made public on its website.
The substitute bill removes provisions that aggregate contributions based on whether an individual or entity "directs or controls" another entity. It replaces them with provisions that aggregate contributions based on whether an entity is majority-owned, established, financed, maintained, or controlled by an individual or majority of persons.
(In support) This bill is a targeted and surgical fix to end a loophole in campaign finance laws. A single donor can create shell LLCs, donate to them, and then have all the LLCs max out their contribution to the same candidate. That effectively allows one donor to go over the limit by spreading donations out through different entities. This bill would required aggregation of campaign contributions to prevent that. The state must continue to lead in campaign finance transparency and combat undue influence to enable more equitable elections.
(Opposed) None.