The Public Disclosure Commission (PDC) was created to provide timely public access to information about the financing of political campaigns, lobbyist expenditures, and the financial affairs of public officials and candidates, and to ensure compliance with contribution limits and other campaign finance restrictions. The PDC is led by five commissioners and an Executive Director appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the state Senate.
Under campaign finance laws, a person is prohibited from sponsoring, with actual malice, a political advertisement or electioneering communication constituting libel or defamation per se when the advertisement or communication:
Campaign finance laws define actual malice as acting with knowledge of falsity or with reckless disregard as to truth or falsity. "Libel or defamation per se" is defined as statements that tend to: (1) expose a living person to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, or to deprive him or her of the benefit of public confidence or social intercourse, or to injure him or her in his or her business or occupation, or (2) injure any person, corporation, or association in his, her, or its business or occupation.
A political advertisement (ad) includes any advertising displays, newspaper ads, billboards, signs, brochures, articles, tabloids, flyers, letters, radio, television presentations, digital communication, or other means of mass communication used for the purpose of appealing, directly or indirectly, for votes or for financial or other support or opposition in any election campaign. An electioneering communication is any broadcast, cable or satellite television, radio transmission, digital communication, United States Postal Service mailing, billboard, newspaper, or periodical that:
A violation of the prohibition on sponsoring political advertisements or electioneering communication constituting libel or defamation per se must be proven by clear and convincing evidence. Damages are presumed, and do not need to be proven, if a violation is found.
Violations of campaign finance laws may result in civil penalties, sanctions, or criminal prosecution.
A new cause of action is created for candidates who are the subject of synthetic media in electioneering communication.
Synthetic media is defined as an image, audio recording, or video recording of an individual's appearance, speech, or conduct that has been intentionally manipulated to create a realistic but false image, audio, or video that:
A candidate who is the subject of synthetic media in an electioneering communication may bring a cause of action against a person who sponsored, with actual malice, the electioneering communication containing the synthetic media. Such candidate may seek injunctive relief or other equitable relief to prohibit the distribution of the synthetic media, and general or special damages against the sponsor or a broadcasting station if applicable. A candidate bringing such actions bears the burden of proof by clear and convincing evidence. The prevailing party may be awarded reasonable attorneys' fees and costs.
Including a disclosure with the electioneering communication that contains synthetic media is an affirmative defense in a cause of action brought under this act if the disclosure contains the statement "This (image/video/audio) has been manipulated," and meets the following criteria:
A broadcasting station or other medium may be liable in a cause of action brought under the act if the broadcasting station or other medium:
A provider or user of an interactive computer service may not be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider, but may be liable in a cause of action brought under the act in the same way as a broadcasting station or other medium. An "interactive computer service" means a system that provides or enables computer access by multiple users to a computer server. An "information content provider" is any person or entity that is responsible for the creation or development of information provided through the internet or an interactive computer service.
The Public Disclosure Commission (PDC) may adopt rules for the purpose of this act, but a violation of the provisions of this act alone do not constitute a violation of campaign finance laws and the PDC does not have jurisdiction over violations of this act.
The substitute bill makes changes to the original bill, including:
Deep fakes are becoming increasingly prevalent and increasingly realistic. This creates a growing concern over how they might be used in negative ways to impact elections. This act is a preventative measure to stop those negative impacts before they become a real threat. It also levels the playing field for political candidates. The bill does not infringe on free speech, it just requires a disclosure and allows candidates to protect themselves by creating a civil cause of action.