Generally, any public or private landowners, hydroelectric project owners, or others in lawful possession and control of any lands, including water areas, who allow members of the public to use such areas for the purposes of outdoor recreation without charging a fee, with certain exceptions identified in statute, are not liable for unintentional injuries to users of such areas. The law establishing this exemption from liability is sometimes referred to as the recreational immunity statute.
The following are not considered fees for the purposes of the recreational immunity statute:
The term "recreation" includes the following forms of recreation, among others:
A permit or license, or any related application or processing fee, issued by the Department of Natural Resources for an organized event or commercial use is not considered a fee for the purposes of the recreational immunity statute.
The substitute bill specifies that only permits, licenses, and associated fees issued by the Department of Natural Resources for organized events and commercial uses are not considered fees under the recreational immunity statute.
(In support) This bill gives the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) the authority to charge fees for use of the property without losing their recreational immunity, in the same way that current law applies to other public agencies like the Department of Fish and Wildlife. The DNR receives more than 100 requests to hold special events on DNR lands but does not have a fee structure to issue permits. If the DNR charges a fee for these events on DNR lands, the DNR will lose the exemption under the recreational immunity statute. This bill will create consistency, improve transparency, and may bring some revenue to the DNR to help defray the costs that the DNR absorbs when events occur on their lands. Any fee structure would go through the rulemaking process, that includes public review, and be approved by the Board of Natural Resources. Some of the DNR lands are in frontcountry rather than backcountry. The Forest Service is able to charge similar fees, so it makes sense that the DNR should also have that ability.
(Opposed) None.
Philip Wolff; Nathaniel Rees, The Mountaineers; Nicky Pasi, Mountains to Sound Greenway Trust; Brian Considine and Andrea Martin, Department of Natural Resources; Scott Richards, The Nature Conservancy; and David Dunphy.