School district boards of directors (school boards) must have policies for the selection and deletion of instructional materials. The policies must comply with specified requirements, including:
Recommendation of instructional materials are to be made by the IMC in accordance with school district policy, but final approval or disapproval decisions must be made by the school district board of directors.
School district instructional materials committees (IMCs) must include one or more parents of students, with the parent members equaling less than one-half of the total membership of the IMC. An exemption to the parent members requirement is included for school districts with fewer than 2,000 enrolled students that are unable to recruit parents to serve on an IMC.
School districts must ensure equitable opportunity for participation on IMCs by parents of enrolled students that reflect the demographics and learning needs in the district.
As compared to the original bill, the substitute bill:
(In support) This bill changes a "may have" to a "must have," regarding parental involvement in instructional materials committees (IMCs) and includes a reasonable carve out for small school districts. The hope is that the bill will engage parents and diffuse the frustration of some parents who may feel as though their voices are not being heard. The hope is also that it will challenge parents to become involved and that it will make education better.
This bill is a no-brainer?it seems natural that parents serve on IMCs. This bill was probably brought forward because of local issues.
This bill will be good for the state. More than 40,000 students have left public education in recent years. This bill will send a signal that parent involvement is important.
(Opposed) None.
(Other) School boards, rather than school district administrators, should have greater control over the composition of IMCs. Parents are structured to be the minority on IMCs and can be voted down by the other members.
The composition of IMCs should be controlled at the local level.
A variety of options for IMC participation is preferred. The exemption in the bill should be extended to large districts.
(In support) Representative Jim Walsh, prime sponsor; Liv Finne, Washington Policy Center; Sharon Damoff; and Jennifer Heine-Withee.
Julie Barrett, Conservative Ladies of Washington .