Salmon Recovery.
Several species of salmon, as well as Puget Sound steelhead trout, are listed as either threatened or endangered under the federal Endangered Species Act. The Governor's Salmon Recovery Office, administered through the Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO), is responsible for coordinating state strategy for salmon recovery. The Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW) is responsible for managing the state's fish and wildlife resources. Several other state agencies, including the Departments of Ecology and Natural Resources, the State Conservation Commission, and the RCO, either have regulatory authority with respect to various aspects of natural resource and land management related to salmon recovery, administering grant funding for salmon recovery projects, or both.
The Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee.
The Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee (JLARC) is a statutorily created body consisting of eight members from the Senate and eight members from the House of Representatives, with no more than four members from each house from the same political party. The JLARC conducts a variety of analyses including performance audits, program evaluations, and sunset reviews.
At the end of each legislative session in an odd-numbered year, JLARC must develop and approve a performance audit work plan for the ensuing biennium. The work plan must include a description of each audit and its cost. When considering the work plan, JLARC must consider:
The Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee (JLARC) must conduct a performance audit of salmon planning and recovery efforts within four watersheds in Washington. Two of the watersheds identified by JLARC for the performance audit must be located east of the Cascade Mountains, and two must be located west of the Cascade Mountains. Within these watersheds, the performance audit must identify:
The audit must be completed by December 31, 2026.
(In support) Washington is celebrating 50 years of salmon comanagement since the Boldt Decision was issued. This study will help assess where Washington is regarding salmon recovery and help policymakers become salmon talkers. There is a need for metrics and to understand who is in charge of the salmon, but it is hard to know what metrics to consider until it is clear where Washington stands with respect to salmon recovery. Salmon are important to both the economy of Washington and the identity of Washingtonians. There is a need for a statewide plan. Current bureaucratic processes put Tribes in the same position as the public instead of in the role of comanagers and makes upholding treaty obligations difficult. The Lummi Tribe have been stewards of the land since time immemorial and continue work to recover salmon and habitat, including adopting a 10-year hatchery plan to return salmon populations to the more abundant numbers of the 1980s. The Lummi Tribe has also been engaged in fixing habitat problems that the Tribe did not create. There is hope that this analysis would lead to greater access to salmon recovery funding for Tribes, actual recovery of salmon, and finding a different system that honors the role of Tribes as comanagers.
(Opposed) None.
(Other) There is a need for a review of salmon recovery in Washington, but this is not the way to do it. The Boldt Decision is not decisive on commercial use of land. There are already metrics and millions of dollars have been spent on culverts and landscaping projects purported to be salmon habitat recovery projects. Local Tribes do have authority with regard to salmon recovery projects.
(In support) Representative Debra Lekanoff, prime sponsor; and Lisa Wilson, Lummi Nation.