The Ethics in Public Service Act.
The Ethics in Public Service Act (Ethics Act) prohibits state officers and state employees from using their public employment for personal gain or private advantage, or creating the appearance of such impropriety. Some prohibited activities include:
The Ethics Act is enforced by the state ethics boards. Any person may initiate a complaint, and state employees who file complaints have whistleblower protections. Each branch of government has its own board that investigates, conducts hearings, and issues civil sanctions for its respective employees' violations of these ethics rules. The Attorney General may investigate persons not under the jurisdiction of an ethics board who were involved in unlawful transactions.
Election Year Freeze.
Under the Ethics Act, certain communications by legislators are prohibited during a specified period in an election year. This prohibition is known as the "election year freeze." Beginning on the first day of the candidacy filing period, i.e., the Monday two weeks before Memorial Day, through the date of the certification of the general election, the official legislative website of a legislator seeking reelection or election to any public office may not be altered.
In addition, a legislator who is a candidate may not mail or email a constituent during the first day of the candidacy filing period through the date of certification of the general election. There are exemptions for routine legislative correspondence, letters responding to constituents, and congratulatory letters. Congratulatory letters may be sent when a constituent has received an award or honor of extraordinary distinction of a type that is sufficiently infrequent to be noteworthy to a reasonable person, such as an Eagle Scout award or the Medal of Honor.
Language is added to the Ethics Act to specify that the act is not violated when a legislator sends:
(In support) This is a straightforward and simple bill. The current rules around legislators sending congratulatory letters and letters of recommendation are complex and every member interprets them differently. This bill takes guidance from the Legislative Ethics Board and sets it in statute, giving very clear guidance.
(Opposed) None.