Mammograms are screening tests used for early breast cancer detection and for breast evaluation. State law requires that all disability, group disability, health maintenance organization, and health service contractor (collectively known as health carriers) plans provide coverage for screening or diagnostic mammography services upon the recommendation of the patient's physician or advanced registered nurse practitioner. These provisions provide that the coverage requirements may not be construed to prevent deductible or copayment provisions.
Under the Affordable Care Act, health benefit plans must provide, at a minimum, coverage with no cost sharing, for preventive or wellness services that have a rating of A or B in the current recommendations of the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). The USPSTF currently recommends, at a B grade, biennial screening mammography for women aged 50 to 74 years.
For nongrandfathered health plans issued or renewed on or after January 1, 2024, that include coverage of supplemental and diagnostic breast examinations, health carriers may not impose cost sharing on these examinations. For health plans that are offered as a qualifying health plan for a health savings account, the health carrier must establish the plan's cost sharing for coverage of these examinations at the minimum level necessary to preserve the enrollee's ability to claim tax exempt contributions from their health savings account under federal laws and regulations. The provisions related to preventing deductible and copayment provisions are removed from the requirements to provide coverage for screening and diagnostic mammography services.
A "diagnostic breast examination" is a medically necessary and appropriate examination of the breast, including an examination using diagnostic mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, breast magnetic resonance imaging, or breast ultrasound, that is used to evaluate an abnormality that is seen or suspected from a screening examination or detected by another means. A "supplemental breast examination" is a medically necessary and appropriate examination of the breast, including an examination using breast magnetic resonance imaging or breast ultrasound, that is used to screen for breast cancer when there is no abnormality seen or suspected and based on personal or family medical history or additional risk factors.
The amended bill:
(In support) Some individuals are diagnosed with breast cancer after finding lumps themselves after being too busy to get a mammogram. After confirming a lump with a mammogram, a lot more testing is needed to figure out what the lump is and where it is located. Many women cannot afford the cost sharing for these services and so they may avoid follow-up tests. If women wait too long for the follow-up tests, then the cancer will be further along and the treatment more expensive. Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers in women and when it is caught late it is deadly. Because of delays in care during the pandemic, cancers are being detected late and at later stages, which means that treatment options are more limited, more invasive, and more expensive.
The changes that were made in this bill and the House version of the bill were made at the request of the Office of the Insurance Commissioner and have not changed the policy or the fiscal note. The policy of the this bill and the House version is the exact same and this bill includes an intent section which makes it clear that the bill does not include a new mandate for services because the services are already included in the benchmark plan. The changes made to the Senate bill included adding digital breast tomosynthesis to the definition of a supplemental breast examination in addition to a diagnostic breast examination, but it should only be included in the definition of diagnostic breast examination.
(Opposed) This is one of a variety of bills that the Legislature has considered this session that has a potential impact on the cost of health care and premiums. While it is important to note a distinction between this bill as a cost sharing bill and a benefit mandate, there is still a premium impact. California vetoed a similar bill because of the cost of $117 million, which would be less in Washington due to the population. This bill is premature because of the ongoing United States Preventative Services Task Force review. The appropriate place for this is in the essential health benefits bill.