The Critical Access Hospital Program allows hospitals under Washington's medical assistance programs to receive payment for hospital services based on allowable costs, rather than a set amount per diagnosis or procedure, and to have more flexibility in staffing. There are 39 hospitals in Washington that are federally certified by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) as Critical Access Hospitals. These are hospitals with 25 beds or fewer that are generally located in rural areas. They must deliver continuous emergency department services, and they may not have an average length of stay of more than 96 hours per patient. Most Critical Access Hospitals are operated by public hospital districts.
Beginning July 1, 2024, through December 31, 2028, Medicaid payments for acute care services provided by a hospital are increased to 120 percent of the hospital's fee-for-service rate for inpatient services and 200 percent of the hospital's fee-for-service rate for outpatient services, when services are provided by a hospital that:
The increase in Medicaid payments expires on the date that the CMS approves the Hospital Safety Net Program as established in statute and as amended by Substitute House Bill 1850 (SHB 1850), at which time the Health Care Authority (HCA) must provide written notice to affected parties, the Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives, the Secretary of the Senate, the Office of the Code Reviser, and others as deemed appropriate by the HCA.
(In support) This bill is important to the lower Yakima Valley. This bill will help to save the Astria Toppenish Hospital (ATH), which is a very small hospital that has been there for a long time and is in risk of closing. The services provided by ATH are critical to the Yakima tribe and the Hispanic community in the surrounding area. This bill will help ATH, which lost its enhanced Medicaid reimbursement in 2021 and is facing increased costs. Because of its financial state, ATH was forced to close its maternity unit in December 2022. Statistics show that ATH is the most racially inclusive hospital in the state, and it serves a very ethnically diverse population. The community served by ATH has very high Medicaid rates, and many people in the community are at or below 200 percent of the federal poverty level. Most rural hospitals are Critical Access Hospitals and receive payments for allowable costs, but ATH is not eligible to be a Critical Access Hospital and is paid fee-for-service rates that are below the cost of care. There is a disparity between ATH's reimbursement rates and those for other rural hospitals. This bill has a five-year end date, so there will be time to review its effects. The Yakima community members have a strong relationship with ATH, and it is a major referral center for outpatient procedures. Many patients of ATH are not able to seek care at other hospitals, which would be too far away. This bill will preserve health access and correct inequity faced by members of the surrounding community.
(Opposed) None.
(In support) Washington has a rural hospital in financial crisis that falls through the cracks for health care funding. The Legislature recognized this crisis by increasing Medicaid reimbursement rates in the 2020 Supplemental Operating Budget, but that funding expired. The crisis is a direct result of losing the enhanced rates, exceptional pandemic-driven cost increases, and years of inadequate Medicaid rates with the highest Medicaid payor mix in the state. Most rural hospitals are critical access hospitals (CAHs) and receive payment based on allowable costs, but this hospital does not. As a non-CAH hospital, payments are based on fee-for-service Medicaid payments which are much lower than costs. These Medicaid rates have not increased in 20 years.
This is the only hospital on native land with a community of 67 percent minorities. This community needs care, and this hospital is their only hope. This is a health equity issue leading to the devastating closure of a maternity unit. The hospital's community is one of the poorest and ethnically diverse in the state serving the highest Medicaid client base. However, Medicaid and Medicare rates do not keep up with costs. Please help this little hospital have a big impact on care in our state.
The state's work on the Hospital Safety Net Program (HSNP) may reduce the need for this bill. The HSNP payments would reach the level of funding needed, pending approval from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. A contingency clause should be added to this bill so that it does not take effect if the HSNP is approved to save state funding, but the hospital needs to know it will be taken care of regardless. The payments from the HSNP will not be made until April of 2024, so gap funding is appreciated.
(Opposed) None.