H-1624              _______________________________________________

 

                                                    HOUSE BILL NO. 817

                        _______________________________________________

 

State of Washington                              49th Legislature                              1985 Regular Session

 

By Representative Smitherman

 

 

Read first time 2/8/85 and referred to Committee on Environmental Affairs.

 

 


AN ACT Relating to hydraulic projects; and amending RCW 90.58.180 and 75.20.100.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

 

        Sec. 1.  Section 18, chapter 286, Laws of 1971 ex. sess. as last amended by section 2, chapter 51, Laws of 1975-'76 2nd ex. sess. and RCW 90.58.180 are each amended to read as follows:

          (1) Any person aggrieved by the granting, denying, or rescinding of a permit on shorelines of the state pursuant to RCW 90.58.140 as now or hereafter amended or by the approval or denial of a hydraulics project pursuant to RCW 75.20.100 may seek review from the shorelines hearings board by filing a request for the same within thirty days of the date of filing as defined in RCW 90.58.140(6) as now or hereafter amended or as required by RCW 75.20.100.

Concurrently with the filing of any request for review with the board as provided in this section pertaining to a final order of a local government, the requestor shall file a copy of his request with the department and the attorney general.  If it appears to the department or the attorney general that the requestor has valid reasons to seek review, either the department or the attorney general may certify the request within thirty days after its receipt to the shorelines hearings board following which the board shall then, but not otherwise, review the matter covered by the requestor:  PROVIDED, That the failure to obtain such certification shall not preclude the requestor from obtaining a review in the superior court under any right to review otherwise available to the requestor.  The department and the attorney general may intervene to protect the public interest and insure that the provisions of this chapter are complied with at any time within  fifteen days from the date of the  receipt by the department or the attorney general of a copy of the request for review filed pursuant to this section.  The shorelines hearings board shall initially schedule review proceedings on such requests for review without regard as to whether such requests have or have not been certified or as to whether the period for the department or the attorney general to intervene has or has not expired, unless such review is to begin within thirty days of such scheduling.  If at the end of the thirty day period for certification neither the department nor the attorney general has certified a request for review, the hearings board shall remove the request from its review schedule.

          (2) The department or the attorney general may obtain review of any final order granting a permit, or granting or denying an application for a permit issued by a local government by filing a written request with the shorelines  hearings board and the appropriate local government within  thirty days from the date the final order was filed as provided in RCW 90.58.140(6) as now or hereafter amended.

          (3) The review proceedings authorized in subsections (1) and (2) of this section are subject to the provisions of chapter 34.04 RCW pertaining to procedures in contested cases.   Judicial review of such proceedings of the shorelines hearings board may be had as provided in chapter 34.04 RCW.

          (4) Local government may appeal to the shorelines hearings board any rules, regulations, guidelines, designations, or master programs for shorelines of the state adopted or approved by the department within thirty days of the date of the adoption or approval.  The board shall make a final decision within sixty days following the hearing held thereon.

          (a) In an appeal relating to a master program for shorelines, the board, after full consideration of the positions of the local government and the department, shall determine the validity of the master program.  If the board determines that said program:

          (i) Is clearly erroneous in light of the policy of this chapter; or

          (ii) Constitutes an implementation of this chapter in violation of constitutional or statutory provisions; or

          (iii) Is arbitrary and capricious; or

          (iv) Was developed without fully considering and evaluating all proposed master programs submitted to the department by the local government; or

          (v) Was not adopted in accordance with required procedures;

the board shall enter a final decision declaring the program invalid, remanding the master program to the department with a statement of the reasons in support of the determination, and directing the department to adopt, after a thorough consultation with the affected local government, a new master program.  Unless the board makes one or more of the determinations as hereinbefore provided, the board shall find the master program to be valid and enter a final decision to that effect.

          (b) In an appeal relating to a master program for shorelines of state-wide significance the board shall approve the master program adopted by the department unless a local government shall, by clear and convincing evidence and argument, persuade the board that the master program approved by the department is inconsistent with the policy of RCW 90.58.020 and the applicable guidelines.

          (c) In an appeal relating to rules, regulations, guidelines, master programs of state-wide significance, and designations, the standard of review provided in RCW 34.04.070 shall apply.

          (5) Rules, regulations, designations, master programs, and guidelines shall be subject to review in superior court, if authorized pursuant to RCW 34.04.070:  PROVIDED, That no review shall be granted by a superior court on petition from a local government unless the local government shall first have obtained review under subsection (4) of this section and the petition for court review is filed within three months after the date of final decision by the shorelines hearings board.

 

        Sec. 2.  Section 75.20.100, chapter 12, Laws of 1955 as last amended by section 75, chapter 46, Laws of 1983 1st ex. sess. and RCW 75.20.100 are each amended to read as follows:

          In the event that any person or government agency desires to construct any form of hydraulic project or other work that will use, divert, obstruct, or change the natural flow or bed of any river or stream or that will utilize any of the salt or fresh waters of the state or materials from the stream beds, such person or government agency shall, before commencing construction or work thereon and to ensure the proper protection of fish life, secure the written approval of the department having jurisdiction of the site as to the adequacy of the means proposed for the protection of fish life.  This approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.  The appropriate department shall grant or deny approval within forty-five calendar days of the receipt of a complete application  and notice of compliance with any applicable requirements of the state environmental policy act, made in the manner prescribed in this section.  The applicant may document receipt of application by filing in person or by registered mail.  A complete application for approval shall contain general plans for the overall project, complete plans and specifications of the proposed construction or work within the mean higher high water line in salt water or within the ordinary high water line in fresh water, and complete plans and specifications for the proper protection of fish life.  The department having jurisdiction of the site is prohibited from conducting hearings on applications for hydraulic project approval.  The forty-five day requirement shall be suspended if (1) after ten working days of receipt of the application, the applicant remains unavailable or unable to arrange for a timely field evaluation of the proposed project; (2) the site is physically inaccessible for inspection; or (3) the applicant requests delay.  Immediately upon determination that the forty-five day period is suspended, the appropriate department shall notify the applicant in writing of the reasons for the delay.  Approval is valid for a period of up to five years from date of issuance.  The permittee must demonstrate substantial progress on construction of that portion of the project relating to the hydraulic permit within two years of the date of issuance.  If approval is denied, the appropriate department shall provide the applicant, in writing, a statement of the specific reasons why and how the proposed project would adversely affect fish life.  Protection of fish life shall be the only ground upon which approval may be denied  or conditioned.  ((Chapter 34.04 RCW applies to any denial of project approval, conditional approval, or requirements for project modification upon which approval may be contingent.)) Any ruling on an application for hydraulic project approval by the department having jurisdiction, whether approval or denial, shall, concurrently with the transmittal to the applicant, be filed with the department of ecology and the attorney general.  The ruling shall become final unless, no later than thirty days after the date of filing, a person aggrieved by the ruling appeals to the shorelines hearings board.

 If any person or government agency commences construction on any hydraulic works or projects subject to this section without first having obtained written approval of the appropriate department as to the adequacy of the means proposed for the protection of fish life, or if any person or government agency fails to follow or carry out any of the requirements or conditions as are made a part of such approval, the person or director of the agency is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.  If any such person or government agency is convicted of violating any of the provisions of this section and continues construction on any such works or projects without fully complying with the provisions hereof, such works or projects are hereby declared a public nuisance and shall be subject to abatement as such.  For the purposes of this section, "bed" shall mean that portion of a river or stream and the shorelands within ordinary high water lines.

          For each application, the departments shall mutually agree on which one department shall administer the provisions of this section, in order to avoid duplication of effort.  The department designated to act shall cooperate with the other department in order to protect all species of fish life found at the project site.  If a department receives an application concerning a site not in its jurisdiction, it shall transmit the application to the appropriate department within three days and notify the applicant.

          In case of an emergency arising from weather or stream flow conditions or other natural conditions, the department of fisheries or department of game, through their authorized representatives, shall issue immediately upon request oral permits to a riparian owner or lessee for removing any obstructions, repairing existing structures, restoring stream banks, or to protect property threatened by the stream without the necessity of obtaining a written permit prior to commencing work.  Conditions of an oral permit shall be reduced to writing within thirty days and complied with as provided for in this section.