HOUSE BILL REPORT

 

 

                               SHB 418

 

 

BYHouse Committee on Judiciary (originally sponsored by Representatives Armstrong, Schmidt, Holm, Brekke, Sutherland, Locke, Winsley and Todd; by request of Department of Social and Health Services)

 

 

Establishing a child support schedule commission.

 

 

House Committe on Judiciary

 

Majority Report:     The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass.  (12)

     Signed by Representatives Armstrong, Chair; Crane, Vice Chair; Appelwick, Hargrove, Heavey, Locke, Moyer, Niemi, Padden, Patrick, Schmidt and Wineberry.

 

Minority Report:     Do not pass.  (1)

     Signed by Representative Brough.

 

     House Staff:Harry Reinert (786-7110)

 

 

                    AS PASSED HOUSE MARCH 19, 1987

 

BACKGROUND:

 

Child support obligations in Washington may be established as a part of a dissolution of marriage proceeding, under the Uniform Parentage Act, or under the child support statute enacted in 1984.  The amount of child support which is owed may be arrived at through negotiation between the parties or may be set by the court having jurisdiction over the proceedings.  The dissolution of marriage statute provides that the court may award child support that is "reasonable or necessary."  The Uniform Parentage Act sets forth more specific circumstances that are to be considered in determining the level of support owed by the non-custodial parent.

 

In 1982 the Superior Court Judges Association adopted voluntary guidelines to be used by superior court judges in setting support awards. The Governor's Executive Task Force on Support Enforcement has recommended that the Legislature adopt a mandatory statutory child support standard.

 

SUMMARY:

 

A child support schedule commission is established.  The commission members include the secretary of the department of social and health services and nine other members, seven who are appointed by the governor.  The appointed members include a superior court judge, two attorneys, two individuals with interest or experience in child support economic data, and two persons who represent the affected populations.  The administrator for the courts and the attorney general are also members.  The office of support enforcement will provide clerical assistance to the commission.

 

The commission must recommend a child support schedule to the legislature by November 1, 1987.  The schedule must be based on updated economic data for Washington, provide for changes in child rearing costs based on a child's age, consider the need to provide funding for a child's primary residence, and provision for health care and child care expenses.  The commission is also directed to determine the type of income that should be considered, net or gross, establish a mechanism for taking into account voluntary unemployment or underemployment, and a parent's variable income.

 

EFFECT OF SENATE AMENDMENT(S)The amendment makes general technical changes.  It also requires that two members of the commission must be non-custodial parents.  It also adds a requirement that the schedule take account of the cost of living in each county.  The amendment requires each superior court to adopt a child support schedule by August 1, 1987.  The act will expire July 1, 1988 and takes effect immediately.

 

Fiscal Note:    Requested March 3, 1987.

 

House Committee ‑ Testified For:     Lucille Christenson, DSHS; Mark Weston, National Conference of State Legislatures; Beatrice Kriloff, Governor's Task Force on Support Enforcement; Barbara Wechsler, Governor's Task Force on Support Enforcement.

 

House Committee - Testified Against: None Presented.

 

House Committee - Testimony For:     Support payments are frequently set below the amount necessary to adequately support a child.  The current schedule used by the superior court judges is out of date and tends to act as a ceiling on the amount of support.  Child support payments frequently become part of the bargaining chips in negotiation in dissolution of marriage proceedings.  This is unfair to the children.

 

House Committee - Testimony Against: None Presented.

 

VOTE ON FINAL PASSAGE:

 

     Yeas 76; Nays 19; Absent 1; Excused 2

 

Voting Nay:     Representatives Allen, Amondson, Barnes, Beck, Brooks, Brough, Bumgarner, Chandler, Fuhrman, Hankins, May, Miller, Nealey, Patrick, Prince, C. Smith, D. Sommers, B. Williams and J. Williams

 

     Absent:    Representative Walker 

 

Excused:   Representatives Moyer and Pruitt