S-3337               _______________________________________________

 

                                                   SENATE BILL NO. 6540

                        _______________________________________________

 

State of Washington                              50th Legislature                              1988 Regular Session

 

By Senator Smitherman

 

 

Read first time 1/25/88 and referred to Committee on Environment & Natural Resources.

 

 


AN ACT Relating to the transfer of authority to the pollution control hearings board; amending RCW 34.12.020, 43.21B.005, 43.21B.110, 43.21C.075, 90.58.030, 90.58.140, 90.58.175, 90.58.180, 90.58.190, 90.58.210, and 90.62.080; creating new sections; and repealing RCW 90.58.170.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

 

          NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1.     The shorelines hearings board is hereby abolished and its powers, duties, and functions are hereby transferred to the pollution control hearings board.

 

          NEW SECTION.  Sec. 2.     All reports, documents, surveys, books, records, files, papers, or written material and office equipment in the possession of the shorelines hearings board shall be delivered to the custody of the pollution control hearings board.  Whenever any question arises regarding such transfer, the director of financial management shall make a determination as to the proper allocation and certify the same to the boards concerned.

 

          NEW SECTION.  Sec. 3.     All rules and all pending cases before the shorelines hearings board shall be transferred to the jurisdiction of the pollution control hearings board.

 

          NEW SECTION.  Sec. 4.     The transfer of the powers, duties, and functions of the shorelines hearings board shall not affect the validity of any act performed prior to the effective date of this section.

 

          NEW SECTION.  Sec. 5.     Reimbursable expenses incurred by members of the shorelines hearings board after the effective date of this section shall be paid by the pollution control hearings board.

 

        Sec. 6.  Section 2, chapter 67, Laws of 1981 as amended by section 1, chapter 189, Laws of 1982 and RCW 34.12.020 are each amended to read as follows:

          Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the definitions in this section apply throughout this chapter.

          (1) "Office" means the office of administrative hearings.

          (2) "Administrative law judge" means any person appointed by the chief administrative law judge to conduct or preside over hearings as provided in this chapter.

          (3) "Hearing" means a "contested case" within the meaning of RCW 34.04.010(3) conducted by a state agency.

          (4) "State agency" means any state board, commission, department, or officer authorized by law to make rules or to adjudicate contested cases, except those in the legislative or judicial branches, the pollution control hearings board, ((the shorelines hearings board,)) the forest practices appeals board, the environmental hearings office, the board of industrial insurance appeals, the state personnel board, the higher education personnel board, the public employment relations commission, personnel appeals board, and the board of tax appeals.

 

        Sec. 7.  Section 2, chapter 47, Laws of 1979 ex. sess. as amended by section 3, chapter 173, Laws of 1986 and RCW 43.21B.005 are each amended to read as follows:

          There is created an environmental hearings office of the state of Washington.  The environmental hearings office shall consist of the pollution control hearings board created in RCW 43.21B.010, the forest practices appeals board created in RCW 76.09.210, ((the shorelines hearings board created  in RCW 90.58.170,)) and the hydraulic appeals board created in RCW 75.20.130.  The chairman of the pollution control hearings board shall be the chief executive officer of the environmental hearings office.  Membership, powers, functions, and duties of the pollution control hearings board, the forest practices appeals board, ((the shorelines hearings board,)) and the hydraulic appeals board shall be as provided by law.

          The chief executive officer of the environmental hearings office may appoint, discharge, and fix the compensation of such staff as may be necessary or may contract for required services.  Employees of the environmental hearings office shall serve each board at the direction of the chief executive officer of the environmental hearings office.

 

        Sec. 8.  Section 41, chapter 62, Laws of 1970 ex. sess. as amended by section 10, chapter 109, Laws of 1987 and RCW 43.21B.110 are each amended to read as follows:

          (1) The hearings board shall only have jurisdiction to hear and decide appeals from the following decisions of the department, the director, and the air pollution control boards or authorities as established pursuant to chapter 70.94 RCW, local governments, or local health departments:

(a) Civil penalties imposed pursuant to RCW 70.94.431, 70.105.080, 70.107.050, 90.03.---!sc ,1(RCW 43.83B.335 as recodified by chapter 109, Laws of 1987), 90.48.144, and 90.48.350.

          (b) Orders issued pursuant to RCW 43.27A.190, 70.94.211, 70.94.332, 70.105.095, 86.16.020, 90.14.130, and 90.48.120.

          (c) The issuance, modification, or termination of any permit, certificate, or license by the department or any air authority in the exercise of its jurisdiction, including the issuance or termination of a waste disposal permit, the denial of an application for a waste disposal permit, or the modification of the conditions or the terms of a waste disposal permit.

          (d) Decisions of local health departments regarding the grant or denial of solid waste permits pursuant to chapter 70.95 RCW.

          (e) Decisions of local governments regarding shorelines of the state or master program under chapter 90.58 RCW and decisions of the department regarding permits, master programs, and rules and guidelines adopted under chapter 90.58 RCW.

          (f) Any other decision by the department or an air authority which pursuant to law must be decided as a contested case under chapter 34.04 RCW.

          (2) The following hearings shall not be conducted by the hearings board:

          (a) ((Hearings required by law to be conducted by the shorelines hearings board pursuant to chapter 90.58 RCW.

          (b))) Hearings conducted by the department pursuant to RCW 70.94.332, 70.94.390, 70.94.395, 70.94.400, 70.94.405, 70.94.410, and 90.44.180.

          (((c))) (b) Proceedings by the department relating to general adjudications of water rights pursuant to chapter 90.03 or 90.44 RCW.

          (((d))) (c) Hearings conducted by the department to adopt, modify, or repeal rules.

          (3) Review of rules and regulations adopted by the hearings board shall be subject to review in accordance with the provisions of the administrative procedure act, chapter 34.04 RCW.

 

        Sec. 9.  Section 4, chapter 117, Laws of 1983 and RCW 43.21C.075 are each amended to read as follows:

          (1) Because a major purpose of this chapter is to combine environmental considerations with public decisions, any appeal brought under this chapter shall be linked to a specific governmental action.  The State Environmental Policy Act provides a basis for challenging whether governmental action is in compliance with the substantive and procedural provisions of this chapter.  The State Environmental Policy Act is not intended to create a cause of action unrelated to a specific governmental action.

          (2) Unless otherwise provided by this section:

          (a) Appeals under this chapter shall be of the governmental action together with its accompanying environmental determinations.

          (b) Appeals of environmental determinations made (or lacking) under this chapter shall be commenced within the time required to appeal the governmental action which is subject to environmental review.

          (3) If an agency has a procedure for appeals of agency environmental determinations made under this chapter, such procedure:

          (a) Shall not allow more than one agency appeal proceeding on a procedural determination (the adequacy of a determination of significance/nonsignificance or of a final environmental impact statement), consistent with any state statutory requirements for appeals to local legislative bodies.  The appeal proceeding on a determination of significance/nonsignificance may occur before the agency's final decision on a proposed action.  Such an appeal shall also be allowed for a determination of significance/nonsignificance which may be issued by the agency after supplemental review;

          (b) Shall consolidate appeal of procedural issues and of substantive determinations made under this chapter (such as a decision to require particular mitigation measures or to deny a proposal) by providing for simultaneous appeal of an agency decision on a proposal and any environmental determinations made under this chapter, with the exception of the threshold determination appeal as provided in (a) of this subsection or an appeal to the local legislative authority under RCW 43.21C.060 or other applicable state statutes;

          (c) Shall provide for the preparation of a record for use in any subsequent appeal proceedings, and shall provide for any subsequent appeal proceedings to be conducted on the record, consistent with other applicable law.  An adequate record consists of findings and conclusions, testimony under oath, and taped or written transcript.  An electronically recorded transcript will suffice for purposes of review under this paragraph; and

          (d) Shall provide that procedural determinations made by the responsible official shall be entitled to substantial weight.

          (4) If a person aggrieved by an agency action has the right to judicial appeal and if an agency has an appeal procedure, such person shall, prior to seeking any judicial review, use such procedure if any such procedure is available, unless expressly provided otherwise by state statute.

          (5) RCW 43.21C.080 establishes an optional "notice of action" procedure which, if used, imposes a time period for appealing decisions under this chapter.  Some statutes and ordinances contain time periods for challenging governmental actions which are subject to review under this chapter, such as various local land use approvals (the "underlying governmental action").  This section does not modify  any such time periods.  This section governs when a judicial appeal must be brought under this chapter where a "notice of action" is used, and/or where there is another time period which is required by statute or ordinance for challenging the underlying governmental action.  In this subsection, the term "appeal" refers to a judicial appeal only.

          (a) If there is a time period for appealing the underlying governmental action, appeals under this chapter shall be commenced within thirty days.  The agency shall give official notice stating the date and place for commencing an appeal.  If there is an agency proceeding under subsection (3) of this section, the appellant shall, prior to commencing a judicial appeal, submit to the responsible official a notice of intent to commence a judicial appeal.  This notice of intent shall be given within the time period for commencing a judicial appeal on the underlying governmental action.

          (b) A notice of action under RCW 43.21C.080 may be used.  If a notice of action is used, judicial appeals shall be commenced within the time period specified by RCW 43.21C.080, unless there is a time period for appealing the underlying governmental action in which case (a) of this subsection shall apply.

          (c) Notwithstanding RCW 43.21C.080(1), if there is a time period for appealing the underlying governmental action, a notice of action may be published within such time period.

          (6)(a) Judicial review of an appeal decision made by an agency under RCW 43.21C.075(5) shall be on the record, consistent with other applicable law.

          (b) A taped or written transcript may be used.  If a taped transcript is to be reviewed, a record shall identify the location on the taped transcript of testimony and evidence to be reviewed.  Parties are encouraged to designate only those portions of the testimony necessary to present the issues raised on review, but if a party alleges that a finding of fact is not supported by evidence, the party should include in the record all evidence relevant to the disputed finding.  Any other party may designate additional portions of the taped transcript relating to issues raised on review.  A party may provide a written transcript of portions of the testimony at the party's own expense or apply to that court for an order requiring the party seeking review to pay for additional portions of the written transcript.

          (c) Judicial review under this chapter shall without exception be of the governmental action together with its accompanying environmental determinations.

          (7) ((Jurisdiction over the review of determinations under this chapter in an appeal before an agency or superior court shall upon consent of the parties be transferred in whole or part to the shorelines hearings board.  The shorelines hearings board shall hear the matter and sign the final order expeditiously.  The superior court shall certify the final order of the shorelines hearings board and said certified final order may only be appealed to an appellate court.

          (8))) For purposes of this section and RCW 43.21C.080, the words "action", "decision", and "determination" mean substantive agency action including any accompanying procedural determinations under this chapter (except where the word "action" means "appeal" in RCW 43.21C.080(2) and (3)).  The word "action" in this section and RCW 43.21C.080 does not mean a procedural determination by itself made under this chapter.  The word "determination" includes any environmental document required by this chapter and state or local implementing rules.  The word "agency" refers to any state or local unit of government.  The word "appeal" refers to administrative, legislative, or judicial appeals.

          (((9))) (8) The court in its discretion may award reasonable attorney's fees of up to one thousand dollars in the aggregate to the prevailing party, including a governmental agency, on issues arising out of this chapter if the court makes specific findings that the legal position of a party is frivolous and without reasonable basis.

 

        Sec. 10.  Section 3, chapter 286, Laws of 1971 ex. sess. as last amended by section 1, chapter 474, Laws of 1987 and RCW 90.58.030 are each amended to read as follows:

          As used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires, the following definitions and concepts apply:

          (1) Administration:

          (a) "Department" means the department of ecology;

          (b) "Director" means the director of the department of ecology;

          (c) "Local government" means any county, incorporated city, or town which contains within its boundaries any lands or waters subject to this chapter;

          (d) "Person" means an individual, partnership, corporation, association, organization, cooperative, public or municipal corporation, or agency of the state or local governmental unit however designated;

          (e) "Hearing board" means the ((shoreline)) pollution control hearings board ((established by this chapter)) under RCW 43.21B.010.

          (2) Geographical:

          (a) "Extreme low tide" means the lowest line on the land reached by a receding tide;

          (b) "Ordinary high water mark" on all lakes, streams, and tidal water is that mark that will be found by examining the bed and banks and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual, and so long continued in all ordinary years, as to mark upon the soil a character distinct from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation as that condition exists on June 1, 1971, as it may naturally change thereafter, or as it may change thereafter in accordance with permits issued by a local government or the department:  PROVIDED, That in any area where the ordinary high water mark cannot be found, the ordinary high water mark adjoining salt water shall be the line of mean higher high tide and the ordinary high water mark adjoining fresh water shall be the line of mean high water;

          (c) "Shorelines of the state" are the total of all "shorelines" and "shorelines of state-wide significance" within the state;

          (d) "Shorelines" means all of the water areas of the state, including reservoirs, and their associated wetlands, together with the lands underlying them; except (i) shorelines of state-wide significance; (ii) shorelines on segments of streams upstream of a point where the mean annual flow is twenty cubic feet per second or less and the wetlands associated with such upstream segments; and (iii) shorelines on lakes less than twenty acres in size and wetlands associated with such small lakes;

          (e) "Shorelines of state-wide significance" means the following shorelines of the state:

          (i) The area between the ordinary high water mark and the western boundary of the state from Cape Disappointment on the south to Cape Flattery on the north, including harbors, bays, estuaries, and inlets;

          (ii) Those areas of Puget Sound and adjacent salt waters and the Strait of Juan de Fuca between the ordinary high water mark and the line of extreme low tide as follows:

          (A) Nisqually Delta‑-from DeWolf Bight to Tatsolo Point,

          (B) Birch Bay‑-from Point Whitehorn to Birch Point,

          (C) Hood Canal‑-from Tala Point to Foulweather Bluff,

          (D) Skagit Bay and adjacent area‑-from Brown Point to Yokeko Point, and

          (E) Padilla Bay‑-from March Point to William Point;

          (iii) Those areas of Puget Sound and the Strait of Juan de Fuca and adjacent salt waters north to the Canadian line and lying seaward from the line of extreme low tide;

          (iv) Those lakes, whether natural, artificial, or a combination thereof, with a surface acreage of one thousand acres or more measured at the ordinary high water mark;

          (v) Those natural rivers or segments thereof as follows:

          (A) Any west of the crest of the Cascade range downstream of a point where the mean annual flow is measured at one thousand cubic feet per second or more,

          (B) Any east of the crest of the Cascade range downstream of a point where the annual flow is measured at two hundred cubic feet per second or more, or those portions of rivers east of the crest of the Cascade range downstream from the first three hundred square miles of drainage area, whichever is longer;

          (vi) Those wetlands associated with (i), (ii), (iv), and (v) of this subsection (2)(e);

          (f) "Wetlands" or "wetland areas" means those lands extending landward for two hundred feet in all directions as measured on a horizontal plane from the ordinary high water mark; floodways and contiguous floodplain areas landward two hundred feet from such floodways; and all marshes, bogs, swamps, and river deltas associated with the streams, lakes, and tidal waters which are subject to the provisions of this chapter; the same to be designated as to location by the department of ecology:  PROVIDED, That any county or city may determine that portion of a one-hundred-year-flood plain to be included in its master program as long as such portion includes, as a minimum, the floodway and the adjacent land extending landward two hundred feet therefrom;

          (g) "Floodway" means those portions of the area of a river valley lying streamward from the outer limits of a watercourse upon which flood waters are carried during periods of flooding that occur with reasonable regularity, although not necessarily annually, said floodway being identified, under normal condition, by changes in surface soil conditions or changes in types or quality of vegetative ground cover condition.  The floodway shall not include those lands that can reasonably be expected to be protected from flood waters by flood control devices maintained by or maintained under license from the federal government, the state, or a political subdivision of the state.

          (3) Procedural terms:

          (a) "Guidelines" means those standards adopted to implement the policy of this chapter for regulation of use of the shorelines of the state prior to adoption of master programs.  Such standards shall also provide criteria to local governments and the department in developing master programs;

          (b) "Master program" shall mean the comprehensive use plan for a described area, and the use regulations together with maps, diagrams, charts, or other descriptive material and text, a statement of desired goals, and standards developed in accordance with the policies enunciated in RCW 90.58.020;

          (c) "State master program" is the cumulative total of all master programs approved or adopted by the department of ecology;

          (d) "Development" means a use consisting of the construction or exterior alteration of structures; dredging; drilling; dumping; filling; removal of any sand, gravel, or minerals; bulkheading; driving of piling; placing of obstructions; or any project of a permanent or temporary nature which interferes with the normal public use of the surface of the waters overlying lands subject to this chapter at any state of water level;

          (e) "Substantial development" shall mean any development of which the total cost or fair market value exceeds two thousand five hundred dollars, or any development which materially interferes with the normal public use of the water or shorelines of the state; except that the following shall not be considered substantial developments for the purpose of this chapter:

          (i) Normal maintenance or repair of existing structures or developments, including damage by accident, fire, or elements;

          (ii) Construction of the normal protective bulkhead common to single family residences;

          (iii) Emergency construction necessary to protect property from damage by the elements;

          (iv) Construction and practices normal or necessary for farming, irrigation, and ranching activities, including agricultural service roads and utilities on wetlands, and the construction and maintenance of irrigation structures including but not limited to head gates, pumping facilities, and irrigation channels:  PROVIDED, That a feedlot of any size, all processing plants, other activities of a commercial nature, alteration of the contour of the wetlands by leveling or filling other than that which results from normal cultivation, shall not be considered normal or necessary farming or ranching activities.  A feedlot shall be an enclosure or facility used or capable of being used for feeding livestock hay, grain, silage, or other livestock feed, but shall not include land for growing crops or vegetation for livestock feeding and/or grazing, nor shall it include normal livestock wintering operations;

          (v) Construction or modification of navigational aids such as channel markers and anchor buoys;

          (vi) Construction on wetlands by an owner, lessee, or contract purchaser of a single family residence for his own use or for the use of his family, which residence does not exceed a height of thirty-five feet above average grade level and which meets all requirements of the state agency or local government having jurisdiction thereof, other than requirements imposed pursuant to this chapter;

          (vii) Construction of a dock, including a community dock, designed for pleasure craft only, for the private noncommercial use of the owner, lessee, or contract purchaser of single and multiple family residences, the cost of which does not exceed two thousand five hundred dollars;

          (viii) Operation, maintenance, or construction of canals, waterways, drains, reservoirs, or other facilities that now exist or are hereafter created or developed as a part of an irrigation system for the primary purpose of making use of system waters, including return flow and artificially stored ground water for the irrigation of lands;

          (ix) The marking of property lines or corners on state owned lands, when such marking does not significantly interfere with normal public use of the surface of the water;

          (x) Operation and maintenance of any system of dikes, ditches, drains, or other facilities existing on September 8, 1975, which were created, developed, or utilized primarily as a part of an agricultural drainage or diking system;

          (xi) Any action commenced prior to December 31, 1982, pertaining to (A) the restoration of interim transportation services as may be necessary as a consequence of the destruction of the Hood Canal bridge, including, but not limited to, improvements to highways, development of park and ride facilities, and development of ferry terminal facilities until a new or reconstructed Hood Canal bridge is open to traffic; and (B) the reconstruction of a permanent bridge at the site of the original Hood Canal bridge.

 

        Sec. 11.  Section 14, chapter 286, Laws of 1971 ex. sess. as last amended by section 386, chapter 7, Laws of 1984 and RCW 90.58.140 are each amended to read as follows:

          (1) A development shall not be undertaken on the shorelines of the state unless it is consistent with the policy of this chapter and, after adoption or approval, as appropriate, the applicable guidelines, rules, or master program.

          (2) A substantial development shall not be undertaken on shorelines of the state without first obtaining a permit from the government entity having administrative jurisdiction under this chapter.

          A permit shall be granted:

          (a) From June 1, 1971, until such time as an applicable master program has become effective, only when the development proposed is consistent with:  (i) The policy of RCW 90.58.020; and (ii) after their adoption, the guidelines and rules of the department; and (iii) so far as can be ascertained, the master program being developed for the area;

          (b) After adoption or approval, as appropriate, by the department of an applicable master program, only when the development proposed is consistent with the applicable master program and the  provisions of chapter 90.58 RCW.

          (3) The local government shall establish a program, consistent with rules adopted by the department, for the administration and enforcement of the permit system provided in this section.  The administration of the system so established shall be performed exclusively by the local government.

          (4) The local government shall require notification of the public of all applications for permits governed by any permit system established pursuant to subsection (3) of this section by ensuring that:

          (a) A notice of such an application is published at least once a week on the same day of the week for two consecutive weeks in a legal newspaper of general circulation within the area in which the development is proposed; and

          (b) Additional notice of such an application is given by at least one of the following methods:

          (i) Mailing of the notice to the latest recorded real property owners as shown by the records of the county assessor within at least three hundred feet of the boundary of the property upon which the substantial development is proposed;

          (ii) Posting of the notice in a conspicuous manner on the property upon which the project is to be constructed; or

          (iii) Any other manner deemed appropriate by local authorities to accomplish the objectives of reasonable notice to adjacent landowners and the public.

           The notices shall include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments concerning an application, or desiring to receive a copy of the final order concerning an application as expeditiously as possible after the issuance of the order, may submit the comments or requests for orders to the local government within thirty days of the last date the notice is to be published pursuant to subsection (a) of this subsection.  The local government shall forward, in a timely manner following the issuance of an order, a copy of the order to each person who submits a request for the order.

          If a hearing is to be held on an application, notices of such a hearing shall include a statement that any person may submit oral or written comments on an application at the hearing.

          (5) The system shall include provisions to assure that construction pursuant to a permit will not begin or be authorized until  thirty days from the date the final order was filed as provided in subsection (6) of this section; or until all review proceedings are terminated if the proceedings were initiated within thirty days from the date of filing as defined in subsection (6) of this section except as follows:

          (a) In the case of any permit issued to the state of Washington, department of transportation, for the construction and modification of the SR 90 (I-90) bridges across Lake Washington, the construction may begin after thirty days from the date of filing;

          (b) If a permit is granted by the local government and (i) the granting of the permit is appealed to the ((shorelines)) pollution control hearings board within thirty days of the date of filing, (ii) the hearings board approves the granting of the permit by the local government or approves a portion of the substantial development for which the local government issued the permit, and (iii) an appeal for judicial review of the hearings board decision is filed pursuant to chapter 34.04 RCW, the permittee may request, within ten days of the filing of the appeal with the court, a hearing before the court to determine whether construction may begin pursuant to the permit approved by the hearings board or to a revised permit issued pursuant to the order of the hearings board.  If, at the conclusion of the hearing, the court finds that construction pursuant to such a permit would not involve a significant, irreversible damaging of the environment, the court may allow the permittee to begin the construction pursuant to the approved or revised permit as the court deems appropriate.  The court may require the permittee to post bonds, in the name of the local government that issued the permit, sufficient to remove the substantial development or to restore the environment if the permit is ultimately disapproved by the courts, or to alter the substantial development if the alteration is ultimately ordered by the courts.  Construction pursuant to a permit revised at the direction of the hearings board may begin only on that portion of the substantial development for which the local government had originally issued the permit, and construction pursuant to such a revised permit on other portions of the substantial development may not begin until after all review proceedings are terminated.  In such a hearing before the court, the burden of proving whether the construction may involve significant irreversible damage to the environment and demonstrating whether such construction would or would not be appropriate is on the appellant;

          (c) If a permit is granted by the local government and the granting of the permit is appealed directly to the superior court for judicial review pursuant to the proviso in RCW 90.58.180(1), the permittee may request the court to remand the appeal to the ((shorelines)) pollution control hearings board, in which case the appeal shall be so remanded and construction pursuant to such a permit shall be governed by the provisions of subsection (b) of this subsection or may otherwise begin after review proceedings before the hearings board are terminated if judicial review is not thereafter requested pursuant to chapter 34.04 RCW;

          If a permittee begins construction pursuant to subsections (a), (b), or (c) of this subsection, the construction is begun at the permittee's own risk.  If, as a result of judicial review, the courts order the removal of any portion of the construction or the restoration of any portion of the environment involved or require the alteration of any portion of a substantial development constructed pursuant to a permit, the permittee is barred from recovering damages or costs involved in adhering to such requirements from the local government that granted the permit, the hearings board, or any appellant or intervener.

          (6) Any ruling on an application for a permit under the authority of this section, whether it is an approval or a denial, shall, concurrently with the transmittal of the ruling to the applicant, be filed with the department and the attorney general.  With regard to a permit other than a permit governed by subsection (12) of this section, "date of filing" as used herein means the date of actual receipt by the department.  With regard to a permit for a variance or a conditional use, "date of filing" means the date a decision of the department rendered on the permit pursuant to subsection (12) of this section is transmitted by the department to the local government.  The department shall notify in writing the local government and the applicant of the date of filing.

          (7) Applicants for permits under this section have the burden of proving that a proposed substantial development is consistent with the criteria that must be met before a permit is granted.  In any review of the granting or denial of an application for a permit as provided in RCW 90.58.180 (1) and (2), the person requesting the review has the burden of proof.

          (8) Any permit may, after a hearing with adequate notice to the permittee and the public, be rescinded by the issuing authority upon the finding that a permittee has not complied with conditions of a permit.  If the department is of the opinion that noncompliance exists, the department shall provide written notice to the local government and the permittee.  If the department is of the opinion that the noncompliance continues to exist thirty days after the date of the notice, and the local government has taken no action to rescind the permit, the department may petition the hearings board for a rescission of the permit upon written notice of the petition to the local government and the permittee if the request by the department is made to the hearings board within fifteen days of the termination of the thirty-day notice to the local government.

          (9) The holder of a certification from the governor pursuant to chapter 80.50 RCW shall not be required to obtain a permit under this section.

          (10) A permit shall not be required for any development on shorelines of the state included within a preliminary or final plat approved by the applicable state agency or local government before April 1, 1971, if:

          (a) The final plat was approved after April 13, 1961, or the preliminary plat was approved after April 30, 1969; and

          (b) The development is completed within two years after June 1, 1971.

          (11) The applicable state agency or local government is authorized to approve a final plat with respect to shorelines of the state included within a preliminary plat approved after April 30, 1969, and before April 1, 1971:  PROVIDED, That any substantial development within the platted shorelines of the state is authorized by a permit granted pursuant to this section, or does not require a permit as provided in subsection  (10) of this section, or does not require a permit because of substantial development occurred before June 1, 1971.

          (12) Any permit for a variance or a conditional use by local government under approved master programs must be submitted to the department for its approval or disapproval.

 

        Sec. 12.  Section 3, chapter 203, Laws of 1973 1st ex. sess. and RCW 90.58.175 are each amended to read as follows:

          The ((shorelines)) pollution control hearings board may adopt rules and regulations governing the administrative practice and procedure in and before the board.

 

        Sec. 13.  Section 18, chapter 286, Laws of 1971 ex. sess. as last amended by section 2, chapter 292, Laws of 1986 and RCW 90.58.180 are each amended to read as follows:

          (1) Any person aggrieved by the granting, denying, or rescinding of a permit on shorelines of the state pursuant to RCW 90.58.140 as now or hereafter amended may seek review ((from)) by the ((shorelines)) pollution control hearings board by filing a request for the same within thirty days of the date of filing as defined in RCW 90.58.140(6) as now or hereafter amended.

Concurrently with the filing of any request for review with the board as provided in this section pertaining to a final order of a local government, the requestor shall file a copy of his request with the department and the attorney general.  If it appears to the department or the attorney general that the requestor has valid reasons to seek review, either the department or the attorney general may certify the request within thirty days after its receipt to the ((shorelines)) pollution control hearings board following which the board shall then, but not otherwise, review the matter covered by the requestor:  PROVIDED, That the failure to obtain such certification shall not preclude the requestor from obtaining a review in the superior court under any right to review otherwise available to the requestor.  The department and the attorney general may intervene to protect the public interest and insure that the provisions of this chapter are complied with at any time within  fifteen days from the date of the  receipt by the department or the attorney general of a copy of the request for review filed pursuant to this section.  The ((shorelines)) pollution control hearings board shall initially schedule review proceedings on such requests for review without regard as to whether such requests have or have not been certified or as to whether the period for the department or the attorney general to intervene has or has not expired, unless such review is to begin within thirty days of such scheduling.  If at the end of the thirty day period for certification neither the department nor the attorney general has certified a request for review, the hearings board shall remove the request from its review schedule.

          (2) The department or the attorney general may obtain review of any final order granting a permit, or granting or denying an application for a permit issued by a local government by filing a written request with the ((shorelines)) pollution control  hearings board and the appropriate local government within  thirty days from the date the final order was filed as provided in RCW 90.58.140(6) as now or hereafter amended.

          (3) The review proceedings authorized in subsections (1) and (2) of this section are subject to the provisions of chapter 34.04 RCW pertaining to procedures in contested cases.  Judicial review of such proceedings of the ((shorelines)) pollution control hearings board may be had as provided in chapter 34.04 RCW.

          (4) Local government may appeal to the ((shorelines)) pollution control hearings board any rules, regulations, or guidelines adopted or approved by the department within thirty days of the date of the adoption or approval.  The board shall make a final decision within sixty days following the hearing held thereon.

           If the board determines that said rule, regulation, or guideline:

           (a) Is clearly erroneous in light of the policy of this chapter; or

          (b) Constitutes an implementation of this chapter in violation of constitutional or statutory provisions; or

           (c) Is arbitrary and capricious; or

           (d) Was developed without fully considering and evaluating all material submitted to the department by the local government; or

           (e) Was not adopted in accordance with required procedures;

the board shall enter a final decision declaring the rule, regulation, or guideline invalid, remanding the rule, regulation, or guideline to the department with a statement of the reasons in support of the determination, and directing the department to adopt, after a thorough consultation with the affected local government, a new rule, regulation, or guideline.  Unless the board makes one or more of the determinations as hereinbefore provided, the board shall find the rule, regulation, or guideline to be valid and enter a final decision to that effect.

          (5) Rules, regulations, and guidelines shall  be subject to review in superior court, if authorized pursuant to RCW 34.04.070:  PROVIDED, That no review shall be granted by a superior court on petition from a local government unless the local government shall first have obtained review under subsection (4) of this section and the petition is filed within three months after the date of final decision by the ((shorelines)) pollution control hearings board.

 

        Sec. 14.  Section 19, chapter 286, Laws of 1971 ex. sess. as amended by section 3, chapter 292, Laws of 1986 and RCW 90.58.190 are each amended to read as follows:

          (1) The department and each local government shall periodically review any master programs under its jurisdiction and make such adjustments thereto as are necessary.  Any adjustments proposed by a local government to its master program shall be forwarded to the department for review.  The department shall approve, reject, or propose modification to the adjustment.  If the department either rejects or proposes modification to the master program adjustment, it shall provide substantive written comments as to why the proposal is being rejected or modified.

          (2) Any local government aggrieved by the department's decision to approve, reject, or modify a proposed master program or master program adjustment may appeal the department's decision to the ((shorelines)) pollution control hearings board.  In an appeal relating to shorelines, the ((shorelines)) pollution control hearings board shall review the proposed master program or master program adjustment and, after full consideration of the presentations of the local government and the department, shall determine the validity of the local government's adjustment in light of the policy of RCW 90.58.020 and the applicable guidelines.  In an appeal relating to shorelines of state-wide significance, the board shall uphold the decision by the department unless a local government shall, by clear and convincing evidence and argument, persuade the board that the decision of the department is inconsistent with the policy of RCW 90.58.020 and the applicable guidelines.  Review by the hearings board shall be considered a contested case under chapter 34.04 RCW.  The aggrieved local government shall have the burden of proof in all such reviews.  Whenever possible, the review by the hearings board shall be heard within the county where the land subject to the proposed master program or master program adjustment is primarily located.  The department and any local government aggrieved by a final decision of the hearings board may appeal the decision to the superior court of Thurston county.

(3) A master program amendment shall become effective after the approval of the department or after the decision of the ((shorelines)) pollution control hearings board to uphold the master program or master program adjustment, provided that the board may remand the master program or master program adjustment to the local government or the department for modification prior to the final adoption of the master program or master program adjustment.

 

        Sec. 15.  Section 21, chapter 286, Laws of 1971 ex. sess. as amended by section 4, chapter 292, Laws of 1986 and RCW 90.58.210 are each amended to read as follows:

          (1) The attorney general or the attorney for the local government shall bring such injunctive, declaratory, or other actions as are necessary to insure that no uses are made of the shorelines of the state in conflict with the provisions and programs of this chapter, and to otherwise enforce the provisions of this chapter.

          (2) Any person who shall fail to conform to the terms of a permit issued under this chapter or who shall undertake development on the shorelines of the state without first obtaining any permit required under this chapter shall also be subject to a civil penalty not to exceed one thousand dollars for each violation.  Each permit violation or each day of continued development without a required permit shall constitute a separate violation.

          (3) The penalty provided for in this section shall be imposed by a notice in writing, either by certified mail with return receipt requested or by personal service, to the person incurring the same from the department or local government, describing the violation with reasonable particularity and ordering the act or acts constituting the violation or violations to cease and desist or, in appropriate cases, requiring necessary corrective action to be taken within a specific and reasonable time.

          (4) Within thirty days after the notice is received, the person incurring the penalty may apply in writing to the department for remission or mitigation of such penalty.  Upon receipt of the application, the department or local government may remit or mitigate the penalty upon whatever terms the department or local government in its discretion deems proper. Any penalty imposed pursuant to this section by the department shall be subject to review by the ((shorelines)) pollution control hearings board.  Any penalty imposed pursuant to this section by local government shall be subject to review by the local government legislative authority.  Any penalty jointly imposed by the department and local government shall be appealed to the ((shorelines)) pollution control hearings board.

 

        Sec. 16.  Section 8, chapter 185, Laws of 1973 1st ex. sess. as last amended by section 156, chapter 109, Laws of 1987 and RCW 90.62.080 are each amended to read as follows:

          (1) Any person aggrieved by any final decision of a state agency, as defined in RCW 90.62.020(8) as now or hereafter amended, contained in the document issued by the department pursuant to RCW 90.62.060(6) may obtain review thereof by filing a request, with the board, within thirty days of the transmittal under RCW 90.62.060(6) by the department of ecology of the document((, for all final decisions other than a final decision relating to the granting or denial of a substantial development permit pursuant to RCW 90.58.140 in which case the filing of such request shall be with the shorelines hearings board.  The board shall review all final decisions other than a final decision on a substantial development permit which shall be reviewed by the shorelines hearings board.  In the event a request for review includes a final decision involving a substantial development permit and other permits, there shall be single staged hearing of the permits by the boards.  The board shall be authorized to adopt rules and regulations implementing such staged hearings and the filing of requests so as to eliminate all unnecessary duplication)).

          (2) Any hearing held pursuant to this section by the pollution control hearings board ((or the shorelines hearings board or by the boards jointly)) shall be a de novo quasi judicial hearing and shall be conducted pursuant to the procedures provided in chapter 34.04 RCW.

          (3) The board ((or boards)) shall make written findings of fact based upon a preponderance of the evidence and shall prepare written conclusions of law and an order, which order may affirm with or without condition, remand for further proceedings, or reverse the appealed decision in accordance with the findings and conclusions.

          (4) Judicial review of decision((s)) of the board((s)) shall be controlled by RCW 43.21B.180 through 43.21B.190 except as they relate to decisions pertaining to substantial development permits under RCW 90.58.140 which shall be controlled by RCW 90.58.180.

          (5) (a) Any person aggrieved by and desiring to appeal any final decision of a local government contained in the document issued by the department pursuant to RCW 90.62.060(6) as now or hereafter amended shall obtain review thereof in the same manner as would apply had the local government not utilized the procedures provided by this chapter.

          (b) The provisions of subsection (5)(a) of this section shall not apply to a decision concerning any permit required by a "state agency" as that term is defined in RCW 90.62.020(8) as now or hereafter amended.

 

          NEW SECTION.  Sec. 17.  Section 17, chapter 286, Laws of 1971 ex. sess., section 6, chapter 47, Laws of 1979 ex. sess. and RCW 90.58.170 are each repealed.