_______________________________________________

 

                                          ENGROSSED SENATE BILL NO. 6705

                        _______________________________________________

 

State of Washington                              50th Legislature                              1988 Regular Session

 

By Senators Craswell, Rasmussen, Nelson and Johnson

 

 

Read first time 2/1/88 and referred to Committee on Children & Family Services.

 

 


AN ACT Relating to dependent children; and amending RCW 13.34.130 and 26.44.063.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

 

        Sec. 1.  Section 4, chapter 188, Laws of 1984 and RCW 13.34.130 are each amended to read as follows:

          If, after a fact-finding hearing pursuant to RCW 13.34.110, as now or hereafter amended, it has been proven by a preponderance of the evidence that the child is dependent within the meaning of RCW 13.34.030(2); after consideration of the predisposition report prepared pursuant to RCW 13.34.110 and after a disposition hearing has been held pursuant to RCW 13.34.110, the court shall enter an order of disposition pursuant to this section.

          (1) The court shall order one of the following dispositions of the case:

          (a) Order a disposition other than removal of the child from his or her home, which shall provide a program designed to alleviate the immediate danger to the child, to mitigate or cure any damage the child has already suffered, and to aid the parents so that the child will not be endangered in the future.  In selecting a program, the court should choose those services that least interfere with family autonomy, provided that the services are adequate to protect the child.

          (b) Order that the child be removed from his or her home and ordered into the custody, control, and care of a relative or the department of social and health services or a licensed child placing agency for placement in a foster family home or group care facility licensed pursuant to chapter 74.15 RCW or in a home not required to be licensed pursuant to chapter 74.15 RCW.  Such an order may be made only if the court finds that reasonable efforts have been made to prevent or eliminate the need for removal of the child from the child's home and to make it possible for the child to return home and that:

          (i) There is no parent or guardian available to care for such child;

          (ii) The child is unwilling to reside in the custody of the child's parent, guardian, or legal custodian;

          (iii) The parent, guardian, or legal custodian is not willing to take custody of the child;

          (iv) A manifest danger exists that the child will suffer serious abuse or neglect if the child is not removed from the home and an order under RCW 26.44.063 would not protect the child from danger; or

          (v) The extent of the child's disability is such that the parent, guardian, or legal custodian is unable to provide the necessary care for the child and the parent, guardian, or legal custodian has determined that the child would benefit from placement outside of the home.

          (2) Whenever a child is ordered removed from the child's home, the agency charged with his or her care shall provide the court with a specific plan as to where the child will be placed, what steps will be taken to return the child home, and what actions the agency will take to maintain parent-child ties.

          (a) The agency plan shall specify what services the parents will be offered in order to enable them to resume custody and what requirements the parents must meet in order to resume custody.

          (b) The agency shall be required to encourage the maximum parent-child contact possible, including regular visitation and participation by the parents in the care of the child while the child is in placement.

          (c) A child shall be placed as close to the child's home as possible, preferably in the child's own neighborhood, unless the court finds that placement at a greater distance is necessary to promote the child's or parents' well-being.

          (d) The agency charged with supervising a child in placement shall provide all reasonable services that are available within the agency, or within the community, or those services which the department of social and health services has existing contracts to purchase.  It shall report to the court if it is unable to provide such services.

          (3) The status of all children found to be dependent shall be reviewed by the court at least every six months at a hearing in which it shall be determined whether court supervision should continue.

          (a) A child shall not be returned home at the review hearing unless the court finds that a reason for removal as set forth in this section no longer exists.  The parents, guardian, or legal custodian shall report to the court the efforts they have made to correct the conditions which led to removal.  If a child is returned, casework supervision shall continue for a period of six months, at which time there shall be a hearing on the need for continued intervention.

          (b) If the child is not returned home, the court shall establish in writing:

          (i) Whether reasonable services have been provided to or offered to the parties to facilitate reunion;

          (ii) The extent to which the parents have visited the child and any reasons why visitation has not occurred or has been infrequent;

          (iii) Whether the agency is satisfied with the cooperation given to it by the parents;

          (iv) Whether additional services are needed to facilitate the return of the child to the child's parents; if so, the court shall order that reasonable services be offered; and

          (v) When return of the child can be expected.

          (c) The court at the review hearing may order that a petition seeking termination of the parent and child relationship be filed.

 

        Sec. 2.  Section 1, chapter 35, Laws of 1985 and RCW 26.44.063 are each amended to read as follows:

          (1) It is the intent of the legislature to minimize trauma to a child involved in an allegation of sexual or physical abuse.  The legislature declares that removing the child from the home often has the effect of further traumatizing the child.  It is, therefore, the legislature's intent that the alleged offender, rather than the child, shall be removed from the home and that this should be done at the earliest possible point of intervention.

          (2) In any judicial proceeding in which it is alleged that a child has been subjected to sexual or physical abuse, if the court finds reasonable grounds to believe that an incident of sexual or physical abuse has occurred, the court may, on its own motion, or the motion of the guardian ad litem or other parties, issue a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction restraining or enjoining the person accused of committing the abuse from:

          (a) Molesting or disturbing the peace of the alleged victim;

          (b) Entering the family home of the alleged victim except as specifically authorized by the court; or

          (c) Having any contact with the alleged victim, except as specifically authorized by the court.

          (((2))) (3) In issuing a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction, the court may impose any additional restrictions that the court in its discretion determines are necessary to protect the child from further abuse or emotional trauma pending final resolution of the abuse allegations.

          (((3))) (4) The court shall issue a temporary restraining order prohibiting a person from entering the family home if the court finds that the order would eliminate the need for an out-of-home placement to protect the child's right to nurturance, health, and safety.

          (5) The court may issue a temporary restraining order without requiring notice to the party to be restrained or other parties only if it finds on the basis of the moving affidavit or other evidence that irreparable injury could result if an order is not issued until the time for responding has elapsed.

          (((4))) (6) A temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction:

          (a) Does not prejudice the rights of a party or any child which are to be adjudicated at subsequent hearings in the proceeding; and

          (b) May be revoked or modified.

          (((5))) (7) The person having physical custody of the child shall have an affirmative duty to assist in the enforcement of the restraining order including but not limited to a  duty to notify the court as soon as practicable of any violation of the order, a duty to request the assistance of law enforcement officers to enforce the order, and a duty to notify the department of social and health services of any violation of the order as soon as practicable if the department is a party to the action.  Failure by the custodial party to discharge these affirmative duties shall be subject to contempt proceedings.

 

          NEW SECTION.  Sec. 3.     When a peace officer responds to a call alleging that a child has been subjected to sexual or physical abuse or that a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction has been violated, and the officer has probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed, the peace officer shall have the authority to arrest the person without a warrant pursuant to RCW 10.31.100.