SIXTY SECOND LEGISLATURE - REGULAR SESSION

 

 

ONE HUNDRED THIRD DAY

 

 

House Chamber, Olympia, Friday, April 22, 2011

 


The House was called to order at 10:00 a.m. by the Speaker (Representative Moeller presiding).  The Clerk called the roll and a quorum was present.

 

The flags were escorted to the rostrum by a Sergeant at Arms Color Guard, Pages Evan Overstreet and Max Wasser.  The Speaker (Representative Moeller presiding) led the Chamber in the Pledge of Allegiance.  The prayer was offered by Representative Laurie Jinkins.

 

Reading of the Journal of the previous day was dispensed with and it was ordered to stand approved.

 

MESSAGES FROM THE SENATE

 

April 21, 2011

MR. SPEAKER:

 

The Senate concurred in the House amendment to the following bill and passed the bill as amended by the House:  

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5531

and the same is herewith transmitted.

Thomas Hoemann, Secretary

 

April 21, 2011

MR. SPEAKER:

 

The Senate concurred in the House amendment(s) to the following bills and passed the bills as amended by the House:  

ENGROSSED SENATE BILL 5005

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5023

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5204

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5271

SENATE BILL 5304

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5487

SENATE BILL 5625

SENATE BILL 5628

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5656

SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5662

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5691

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5708

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5722

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5748

SENATE JOINT MEMORIAL 8008

and the same are herewith transmitted.

Thomas Hoemann, Secretary

 

April 21, 2011

MR. SPEAKER:

 

The Senate receded from its amendment(s) to SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1899, and passed the bill without said amendments.

and the same is herewith transmitted.

Thomas Hoemann, Secretary

 

April 21, 2011

MR. SPEAKER:

 

The Senate concurred in the House amendment(s) to the following bills and passed the bills as amended by the House:  

SENATE BILL 5044

ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5073

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5187

SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5636

ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5769

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5791

and the same are herewith transmitted.

Thomas Hoemann, Secretary

 

April 22, 2011

MR. SPEAKER:

 

The Senate has passed SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2021 and the same is herewith transmitted.

Thomas Hoemann, Secretary

 

April 22, 2011

MR. SPEAKER:

 

The President has signed:

HOUSE BILL 1000

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1008

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1026

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1037

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1046

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1053

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1127

SECOND SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1128

HOUSE BILL 1229

ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1267

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1295

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1311

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1312

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1332

ENGROSSED HOUSE BILL 1382

HOUSE BILL 1418

HOUSE BILL 1419

HOUSE BILL 1544

ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1546

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1547

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1560

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1570

HOUSE BILL 1594

ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1599

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1635

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1691

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1725

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1774

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1790

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1874

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1899

SECOND SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1903

HOUSE BILL 1916

HOUSE BILL 1953

ENGROSSED HOUSE BILL 1969

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2017

HOUSE BILL 2019

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2021

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 4404

and the same are herewith transmitted.

Thomas Hoemann, Secretary

 

April 22, 2011

MR. SPEAKER:

 

The President has signed:

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5457

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5836

and the same are herewith transmitted.

Thomas Hoemann, Secretary

 

April 22, 2011

MR. SPEAKER:

 

The Senate has adopted the report of the Conference Committee on SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5836, and has passed the bill as recommended by the Conference Committee.

and the same are herewith transmitted.

Thomas Hoemann, Secretary

 

April 22, 2011

MR. SPEAKER:

 

The President has signed:

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5457

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5836

and the same are herewith transmitted.

Thomas Hoemann, Secretary

 

April 22, 2011

MR. SPEAKER:

 

The Senate has adopted the report of the Conference Committee on ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5457, and has passed the bill as recommended by the Conference Committee.

and the same is herewith transmitted.

Thomas Hoemann, Secretary

 

INTRODUCTIONS AND FIRST READING

 

HB 2105 by Representatives Appleton, Moscoso, Green and Hunt

 

AN ACT Relating to eliminating restrictions on causes of action by workers injured in employment; amending RCW 51.04.010 and 51.32.010; and repealing RCW 51.24.020.

 

Referred to Committee on Labor & Workforce Development.

 

HB 2106 by Representatives Frockt, Anderson, Liias, Hurst, Lytton, Billig, Morris, Eddy, Roberts, Moeller, Stanford, McCoy and Zeiger

 

AN ACT Relating to a high occupancy vehicle lane exemption for plug-in vehicles; adding a new section to chapter 46.61 RCW; and providing an expiration date.

 

Referred to Committee on Transportation.

 

HB 2107 by Representatives Miloscia, Green, Ormsby, Sells, Hasegawa, Moscoso and Kelley

 

AN ACT Relating to implementing performance measures and improvement plans for the workers' compensation system, including the occupational safety and health program, to improve administration and efficiency; and adding a new section to chapter 51.04 RCW.

 

Referred to Committee on Labor & Workforce Development.

 

There being no objection, the bills listed on the day’s introduction sheet under the fourth order of business were referred to the committees so designated.

 

REPORTS OF STANDING COMMITTEES

 

April 15, 20110)

HB 1371             Prime Sponsor, Representative Darneille: Addressing boards and commissions.  Reported by Committee on Ways & Means

 

MAJORITY recommendation:  The second substitute bill be substituted therefor and the second substitute bill do pass and do not pass the substitute bill by Committee on State Government & Tribal Affairs.  Signed by Representatives Hunter, Chair; Darneille, Vice Chair; Hasegawa, Vice Chair; Carlyle; Cody; Dickerson; Haigh; Haler; Hinkle; Hudgins; Hunt; Kagi; Kenney; Ormsby; Parker; Pettigrew; Seaquist; Springer and Sullivan.

 

MINORITY recommendation:  Do not pass.  Signed by Representatives Alexander, Ranking Minority Member; Bailey, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Dammeier, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Orcutt, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Chandler; Schmick and Wilcox.

 

Passed to Committee on Rules for second reading.

 

April 21, 20110)

2ESB 5638         Prime Sponsor, Senator Keiser: Concerning the exemption of flood control zone districts that are coextensive with a county from certain limitations upon regular property tax levies. (REVISED FOR ENGROSSED: Concerning the exemption of certain taxing districts. )  Reported by Committee on Ways & Means

 

MAJORITY recommendation:  Do pass as amended.

 

                Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert the following:

"Sec. 1.  RCW 84.52.010 and 2009 c 551 s 7 are each amended to read as follows:

(1) Except as is permitted under RCW 84.55.050, all taxes ((shall)) must be levied or voted in specific amounts.

(2) The rate percent of all taxes for state and county purposes, and purposes of taxing districts coextensive with the county, ((shall)) must be determined, calculated and fixed by the county assessors of the respective counties, within the limitations provided by law, upon the assessed valuation of the property of the county, as shown by the completed tax rolls of the county, and the rate percent of all taxes levied for purposes of taxing districts within any county ((shall)) must be determined, calculated and fixed by the county assessors of the respective counties, within the limitations provided by law, upon the assessed valuation of the property of the taxing districts respectively.

(3) When a county assessor finds that the aggregate rate of tax levy on any property, that is subject to the limitations set forth in RCW 84.52.043 or 84.52.050, exceeds the limitations provided in either of these sections, the assessor ((shall)) must recompute and establish a consolidated levy in the following manner:

      (((1))) (a) The full certified rates of tax levy for state, county, county road district, and city or town purposes ((shall)) must be extended on the tax rolls in amounts not exceeding the limitations established by law; however any state levy ((shall)) takes precedence over all other levies and ((shall)) may not be reduced for any purpose other than that required by RCW 84.55.010.  If, as a result of the levies imposed under RCW 36.54.130, 84.34.230, 84.52.069, 84.52.105, the portion of the levy by a metropolitan park district that was protected under RCW 84.52.120, 84.52.125, 84.52.135, and 84.52.140, the combined rate of regular property tax levies that are subject to the one percent limitation exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property, then these levies ((shall)) must be reduced as follows:

      (((a))) (i) The portion of the levy by a metropolitan park district located in a county with a population of one million five hundred thousand or more that is protected under RCW 84.52.120 must be reduced until the combined rate no longer exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property or must be eliminated;
      (ii) If the combined rate of regular property tax levies that are subject to the one percent limitation still exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property, the levy imposed by a county under RCW 84.52.140 ((shall)) must be reduced until the combined rate no longer exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property or ((shall)) must be eliminated;

      (((b))) (iii) If the combined rate of regular property tax levies that are subject to the one percent limitation still exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property, the portion of the levy by a fire protection district that is protected under RCW 84.52.125 ((shall)) must be reduced until the combined rate no longer exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property or ((shall)) must be eliminated;

      (((c))) (iv) If the combined rate of regular property tax levies that are subject to the one percent limitation still exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property, the levy imposed by a county under RCW 84.52.135 must be reduced until the combined rate no longer exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property or must be eliminated;

      (((d))) (v) If the combined rate of regular property tax levies that are subject to the one percent limitation still exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property, the levy imposed by a ferry district under RCW 36.54.130 must be reduced until the combined rate no longer exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property or must be eliminated;

      (((e))) (vi) If the combined rate of regular property tax levies that are subject to the one percent limitation still exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property, the portion of the levy by a metropolitan park district with a population of one hundred fifty thousand or more that is protected under RCW 84.52.120 ((shall)) must be reduced until the combined rate no longer exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property or ((shall)) must be eliminated;

      (((f))) (vii) If the combined rate of regular property tax levies that are subject to the one percent limitation still exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property, then the levies imposed under RCW 84.34.230, 84.52.105, and any portion of the levy imposed under RCW 84.52.069 that is in excess of thirty cents per thousand dollars of assessed value, ((shall)) must be reduced on a pro rata basis until the combined rate no longer exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property or ((shall)) must be eliminated; and

      (((g))) (viii) If the combined rate of regular property tax levies that are subject to the one percent limitation still exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property, then the thirty cents per thousand dollars of assessed value of tax levy imposed under RCW 84.52.069 ((shall)) must be reduced until the combined rate no longer exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property or must be eliminated.

      (((2))) (b) The certified rates of tax levy subject to these limitations by all junior taxing districts imposing taxes on such property ((shall)) must be reduced or eliminated as follows to bring the consolidated levy of taxes on such property within the provisions of these limitations:

      (((a))) (i) First, the certified property tax levy rates of those junior taxing districts authorized under RCW 36.68.525, 36.69.145, 35.95A.100, and 67.38.130 ((shall)) must be reduced on a pro rata basis or eliminated;

      (((b))) (ii) Second, if the consolidated tax levy rate still exceeds these limitations, the certified property tax levy rates of flood control zone districts ((shall)) must be reduced on a pro rata basis or eliminated;

      (((c))) (iii) Third, if the consolidated tax levy rate still exceeds these limitations, the certified property tax levy rates of all other junior taxing districts, other than fire protection districts, regional fire protection service authorities, library districts, the first fifty cent per thousand dollars of assessed valuation levies for metropolitan park districts, and the first fifty cent per thousand dollars of assessed valuation levies for public hospital districts, ((shall)) must be reduced on a pro rata basis or eliminated;

      (((d))) (iv) Fourth, if the consolidated tax levy rate still exceeds these limitations, the first fifty cent per thousand dollars of assessed valuation levies for metropolitan park districts created on or after January 1, 2002, ((shall)) must be reduced on a pro rata basis or eliminated;

      (((e))) (v) Fifth, if the consolidated tax levy rate still exceeds these limitations, the certified property tax levy rates authorized to fire protection districts under RCW 52.16.140 and 52.16.160 and regional fire protection service authorities under RCW 52.26.140(1) (b) and (c) ((shall)) must be reduced on a pro rata basis or eliminated; and

      (((f))) (vi) Sixth, if the consolidated tax levy rate still exceeds these limitations, the certified property tax levy rates authorized for fire protection districts under RCW 52.16.130, regional fire protection service authorities under RCW 52.26.140(1)(a), library districts, metropolitan park districts created before January 1, 2002, under their first fifty cent per thousand dollars of assessed valuation levy, and public hospital districts under their first fifty cent per thousand dollars of assessed valuation levy, ((shall)) must be reduced on a pro rata basis or eliminated.

Sec. 2.  RCW 84.52.010 and 2009 c 551 s 7 are each amended to read as follows:

(1) Except as is permitted under RCW 84.55.050, all taxes ((shall)) must be levied or voted in specific amounts.

(2) The rate percent of all taxes for state and county purposes, and purposes of taxing districts coextensive with the county, ((shall)) must be determined, calculated and fixed by the county assessors of the respective counties, within the limitations provided by law, upon the assessed valuation of the property of the county, as shown by the completed tax rolls of the county, and the rate percent of all taxes levied for purposes of taxing districts within any county ((shall)) must be determined, calculated and fixed by the county assessors of the respective counties, within the limitations provided by law, upon the assessed valuation of the property of the taxing districts respectively.

(3) When a county assessor finds that the aggregate rate of tax levy on any property, that is subject to the limitations set forth in RCW 84.52.043 or 84.52.050, exceeds the limitations provided in either of these sections, the assessor ((shall)) must recompute and establish a consolidated levy in the following manner:

      (((1))) (a) The full certified rates of tax levy for state, county, county road district, and city or town purposes ((shall)) must be extended on the tax rolls in amounts not exceeding the limitations established by law; however any state levy ((shall)) takes precedence over all other levies and ((shall)) may not be reduced for any purpose other than that required by RCW 84.55.010.  If, as a result of the levies imposed under RCW 36.54.130, 84.34.230, 84.52.069, 84.52.105, the portion of the levy by a metropolitan park district that was protected under RCW 84.52.120, 84.52.125, 84.52.135, and 84.52.140, and the protected portion of the levy under RCW 86.15.160 by flood control zone districts in a county with a population of seven hundred seventy- five thousand or more that are coextensive with a county, the combined rate of regular property tax levies that are subject to the one percent limitation exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property, then these levies ((shall)) must be reduced as follows:

      (((a))) (i) The portion of the levy by a metropolitan park district located in a county with a population of one million five hundred thousand or more that is protected under RCW 84.52.120 must be reduced until the combined rate no longer exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property or must be eliminated;
      (ii) If the combined rate of regular property tax levies that are subject to the one percent limitation still exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property, the protected portion of the levy imposed under RCW 86.15.160 by a flood control zone district in a county with a population of seven hundred seventy-five thousand or more that is coextensive with a county must be reduced until the combined rate no longer exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property or must be eliminated;
      (iii) If the combined rate of regular property tax levies that are subject to the one percent limitation still exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property, the levy imposed by a county under RCW 84.52.140 ((shall)) must be reduced until the combined rate no longer exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property or ((shall)) must be eliminated;

      (((b))) (iv) If the combined rate of regular property tax levies that are subject to the one percent limitation still exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property, the portion of the levy by a fire protection district that is protected under RCW 84.52.125 ((shall)) must be reduced until the combined rate no longer exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property or shall be eliminated;

      (((c))) (v) If the combined rate of regular property tax levies that are subject to the one percent limitation still exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property, the levy imposed by a county under RCW 84.52.135 must be reduced until the combined rate no longer exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property or must be eliminated;

      (((d))) (vi) If the combined rate of regular property tax levies that are subject to the one percent limitation still exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property, the levy imposed by a ferry district under RCW 36.54.130 must be reduced until the combined rate no longer exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property or must be eliminated;

      (((e))) (vii) If the combined rate of regular property tax levies that are subject to the one percent limitation still exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property, the portion of the levy by a metropolitan park district that is protected under RCW 84.52.120 ((shall)) must be reduced until the combined rate no longer exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property or ((shall)) must be eliminated;

      (((f))) (viii) If the combined rate of regular property tax levies that are subject to the one percent limitation still exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property, then the levies imposed under RCW 84.34.230, 84.52.105, and any portion of the levy imposed under RCW 84.52.069 that is in excess of thirty cents per thousand dollars of assessed value, ((shall)) must be reduced on a pro rata basis until the combined rate no longer exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property or ((shall)) must be eliminated; and

      (((g))) (ix) If the combined rate of regular property tax levies that are subject to the one percent limitation still exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property, then the thirty cents per thousand dollars of assessed value of tax levy imposed under RCW 84.52.069 ((shall)) must be reduced until the combined rate no longer exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property or eliminated.

      (((2))) (b) The certified rates of tax levy subject to these limitations by all junior taxing districts imposing taxes on such property ((shall)) must be reduced or eliminated as follows to bring the consolidated levy of taxes on such property within the provisions of these limitations:

      (((a))) (i) First, the certified property tax levy rates of those junior taxing districts authorized under RCW 36.68.525, 36.69.145, 35.95A.100, and 67.38.130 ((shall)) must be reduced on a pro rata basis or eliminated;

      (((b))) (ii) Second, if the consolidated tax levy rate still exceeds these limitations, the certified property tax levy rates of flood control zone districts ((shall)) must be reduced on a pro rata basis or eliminated;

      (((c))) (iii) Third, if the consolidated tax levy rate still exceeds these limitations, the certified property tax levy rates of all other junior taxing districts, other than fire protection districts, regional fire protection service authorities, library districts, the first fifty cent per thousand dollars of assessed valuation levies for metropolitan park districts, and the first fifty cent per thousand dollars of assessed valuation levies for public hospital districts, ((shall)) must be reduced on a pro rata basis or eliminated;

      (((d))) (iv) Fourth, if the consolidated tax levy rate still exceeds these limitations, the first fifty cent per thousand dollars of assessed valuation levies for metropolitan park districts created on or after January 1, 2002, ((shall)) must be reduced on a pro rata basis or eliminated;

      (((e))) (v) Fifth, if the consolidated tax levy rate still exceeds these limitations, the certified property tax levy rates authorized to fire protection districts under RCW 52.16.140 and 52.16.160 and regional fire protection service authorities under RCW 52.26.140(1) (b) and (c) ((shall)) must be reduced on a pro rata basis or eliminated; and

      (((f))) (vi) Sixth, if the consolidated tax levy rate still exceeds these limitations, the certified property tax levy rates authorized for fire protection districts under RCW 52.16.130, regional fire protection service authorities under RCW 52.26.140(1)(a), library districts, metropolitan park districts created before January 1, 2002, under their first fifty cent per thousand dollars of assessed valuation levy, and public hospital districts under their first fifty cent per thousand dollars of assessed valuation levy, ((shall)) must be reduced on a pro rata basis or eliminated.

Sec. 3.  RCW 84.52.120 and 1995 c 99 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:

      A metropolitan park district with a population of one hundred fifty thousand or more, or any metropolitan park district located in a county with a population of one million five hundred thousand or more, may submit a ballot proposition to voters of the district authorizing the protection of the district's tax levy from prorationing under RCW 84.52.010(((2))) (3)(b) by imposing all or any portion of the district's twenty-five cent per thousand dollars of assessed valuation tax levy outside of the five dollar and ninety cent per thousand dollar of assessed valuation limitation established under RCW 84.52.043(2), if those taxes otherwise would be prorated under RCW 84.52.010(((2)(c))) (3)(b)(iii), for taxes imposed in any year on or before the first day of January six years after the ballot proposition is approved.  A simple majority vote of voters voting on the proposition is required for approval.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 4.  This act applies to taxes levied for collection in 2012 through 2017.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 5.  (1) Section 1 of this act takes effect if chapter . . . (HB 1969), Laws of 2011 is not enacted into law by August 1, 2011.

      (2) Section 2 of this act takes effect if chapter . . . (HB 1969), Laws of 2011 is enacted into law by August 1, 2011.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 6.  This act expires January 1, 2018."

                Correct the title.

 

Signed by Representatives Hunter, Chair; Darneille, Vice Chair; Hasegawa, Vice Chair; Carlyle; Cody; Dickerson; Haigh; Hudgins; Hunt; Kagi; Kenney; Ormsby; Pettigrew; Seaquist; Springer and Sullivan.

 

MINORITY recommendation:  Do not pass.  Signed by Representatives Alexander, Ranking Minority Member; Bailey, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Dammeier, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Orcutt, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Chandler; Haler; Hinkle; Parker; Ross; Schmick and Wilcox.

 

Passed to Committee on Rules for second reading.

 

There being no objection, the bills listed on the day’s committee reports under the fifth order of business were referred to the committees so designated.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SECOND ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5742, by Senate Committee on Transportation (originally sponsored by Senators Haugen, Ranker and Shin)

 

      Concerning the administration and distribution of Washington state ferry system revenue. Revised for 1st Substitute: Providing funding and cost saving measures for the Washington state ferry system. (REVISED FOR ENGROSSED:Concerning the Washington state ferry system. )

 

      The bill was read the second time.

 

There being no objection, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

 

      Representatives Clibborn, Armstrong and Walsh spoke in favor of the passage of the bill.

 

      Representative Orcutt spoke against the passage of the bill.

 

MOTIONS

 

On motion of Representative Van De Wege, Representative Hunter was excused.  On motion of Representative Hinkle, Representative Crouse was excused.

 

The Speaker (Representative Moeller presiding) stated the question before the House to be the final passage of Second Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 5742.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Clerk called the roll on the final passage of Second Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 5742, and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas, 76; Nays, 20; Absent, 0; Excused, 2.

      Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Angel, Appleton, Armstrong, Asay, Bailey, Billig, Blake, Carlyle, Clibborn, Cody, Darneille, DeBolt, Dickerson, Dunshee, Eddy, Fagan, Finn, Fitzgibbon, Frockt, Goodman, Green, Haigh, Haler, Hasegawa, Hinkle, Hope, Hudgins, Hunt, Hurst, Jinkins, Johnson, Kagi, Kelley, Kenney, Kirby, Klippert, Ladenburg, Liias, Lytton, Maxwell, McCoy, Miloscia, Moeller, Morris, Moscoso, Nealey, Ormsby, Orwall, Parker, Pedersen, Pettigrew, Reykdal, Roberts, Rodne, Rolfes, Ross, Ryu, Santos, Schmick, Seaquist, Sells, Smith, Springer, Stanford, Sullivan, Takko, Tharinger, Upthegrove, Van De Wege, Walsh, Warnick, Wilcox, Wylie, Zeiger and Mr. Speaker.

      Voting nay: Representatives Ahern, Alexander, Buys, Chandler, Condotta, Dahlquist, Dammeier, Hargrove, Harris, Kretz, Kristiansen, McCune, Orcutt, Overstreet, Pearson, Probst, Rivers, Shea, Short and Taylor.

      Excused: Representatives Crouse and Hunter.

 

SECOND ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5742, having received the necessary constitutional majority, was declared passed.

 

MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE

April 22, 2011

MR. SPEAKER:

 

The Senate has adopted the report of the Conference Committee on SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1793, and has passed the bill as recommended by the Conference Committee.

and the same is herewith transmitted.

Thomas Hoemann, Secretary

 

THIRD READING

 

CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT

April 20, 2011

Substitute House Bill No. 1793

Includes “New Item”: YES

Mr. Speaker:

 

We of your Conference Committee, to whom was referred SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1793, , restricting to juvenile records, have had the same under consideration and we recommend that:

 

All previous amendments not be adopted and that the attached striking amendment be adopted and that the bill due pass as recommended by the conference committee.

0) 

                Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert the following:

"NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1.  The legislature finds that:

      (1) One of the goals of the juvenile justice system is to rehabilitate juvenile offenders and promote their successful reintegration into society.  Without opportunities to reintegrate, juveniles suffer increased recidivism and decreased economic function.

      (2) The public has an interest in accessing information relating to juvenile records for public safety and research purposes.

      (3) The public's legitimate interest in accessing personal information must be balanced with the rehabilitative goals of the juvenile justice system.  All benefit when former juvenile offenders, after paying their debt to society, reintegrate and contribute to their local communities as productive citizens.

      (4) It is the intent of the legislature to balance the rehabilitative and reintegration needs of an effective juvenile justice system with the public's need to access personal information for public safety and research purposes.

Sec. 2.  RCW 19.182.040 and 1993 c 476 s 6 are each amended to read as follows:

      (1) Except as authorized under subsection (2) of this section, no consumer reporting agency may make a consumer report containing any of the following items of information:

      (a) Bankruptcies that, from date of adjudication of the most recent bankruptcy, antedate the report by more than ten years;

      (b) Suits and judgments that, from date of entry, antedate the report by more than seven years or until the governing statute of limitations has expired, whichever is the longer period;

      (c) Paid tax liens that, from date of payment, antedate the report by more than seven years;

      (d) Accounts placed for collection or charged to profit and loss that antedate the report by more than seven years;

      (e) Records of arrest, indictment, or conviction of an adult for a crime that, from date of disposition, release, or parole, antedate the report by more than seven years;

      (f) Juvenile records, as defined in RCW 13.50.010(1)(c), when the subject of the records is twenty-one years of age or older at the time of the report; and
      (g) Any other adverse item of information that antedates the report by more than seven years.

      (2) Subsection (1)(a) through (e) and (g) of this section is not applicable in the case of a consumer report to be used in connection with:

      (a) A credit transaction involving, or that may reasonably be expected to involve, a principal amount of fifty thousand dollars or more;

      (b) The underwriting of life insurance involving, or that may reasonably be expected to involve, a face amount of fifty thousand dollars or more; or

      (c) The employment of an individual at an annual salary that equals, or that may reasonably be expected to equal, twenty thousand dollars or more.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 3.  (1)(a) A joint legislative task force on juvenile record sealing is established, with members as provided in this subsection.

      (i) The president of the senate shall appoint two members from each of the two largest caucuses of the senate;

      (ii) The speaker of the house of representatives shall appoint two members from each of the two largest caucuses of the house of representatives;

      (iii) A representative of the administrative office of the courts;

      (iv) A representative of the judicial information systems data dissemination committee;

      (v) A representative of the association of counties, specifically county clerks;

      (vi) A representative of the Washington association of prosecuting attorneys;

      (vii) A representative of the Washington state patrol;

      (viii) A representative from the juvenile law section of the Washington state bar association;

      (ix) A representative of the Washington defenders' association;

      (x) A representative of the juvenile rehabilitation administration within the department of social and health services; and

      (xi) A representative of the juvenile court administrator's association.

      (b) The task force shall choose one of the legislative members from the senate and one of the legislative members from the house of representatives to cochair the task force.  The legislative members shall convene the first meeting of the task force.

      (2) The task force shall determine how to cost-effectively restrict public access to juvenile records when an individual has met the statutory requirements of RCW 13.50.050(12) and without requiring individuals who are the subject of the records to file a motion to seal the records in juvenile court; whether and how to restrict access to diversion records; and other juvenile criminal record access issues that may arise during the work of the task force.

      (3) Staff support for the task force must be provided by the senate committee services and the house of representatives office of program research.

      (4) The task force shall report its findings and recommendations to the governor and the appropriate committees of the legislature by December 15, 2011.

      (5) This section expires January 1, 2012.

Sec. 4.  RCW 13.50.050 and 2010 c 150 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:

      (1) This section governs records relating to the commission of juvenile offenses, including records relating to diversions.

      (2) The official juvenile court file of any alleged or proven juvenile offender shall be open to public inspection, unless sealed pursuant to subsection (12) of this section.

      (3) All records other than the official juvenile court file are confidential and may be released only as provided in this section, RCW 13.50.010, 13.40.215, and 4.24.550.

      (4) Except as otherwise provided in this section and RCW 13.50.010, records retained or produced by any juvenile justice or care agency may be released to other participants in the juvenile justice or care system only when an investigation or case involving the juvenile in question is being pursued by the other participant or when that other participant is assigned the responsibility for supervising the juvenile.

      (5) Except as provided in RCW 4.24.550, information not in an official juvenile court file concerning a juvenile or a juvenile's family may be released to the public only when that information could not reasonably be expected to identify the juvenile or the juvenile's family.

      (6) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the release, to the juvenile or his or her attorney, of law enforcement and prosecuting attorneys' records pertaining to investigation, diversion, and prosecution of juvenile offenses shall be governed by the rules of discovery and other rules of law applicable in adult criminal investigations and prosecutions.

      (7) Upon the decision to arrest or the arrest, law enforcement and prosecuting attorneys may cooperate with schools in releasing information to a school pertaining to the investigation, diversion, and prosecution of a juvenile attending the school.  Upon the decision to arrest or the arrest, incident reports may be released unless releasing the records would jeopardize the investigation or prosecution or endanger witnesses.  If release of incident reports would jeopardize the investigation or prosecution or endanger witnesses, law enforcement and prosecuting attorneys may release information to the maximum extent possible to assist schools in protecting other students, staff, and school property.

      (8) The juvenile court and the prosecutor may set up and maintain a central recordkeeping system which may receive information on all alleged juvenile offenders against whom a complaint has been filed pursuant to RCW 13.40.070 whether or not their cases are currently pending before the court.  The central recordkeeping system may be computerized.  If a complaint has been referred to a diversion unit, the diversion unit shall promptly report to the juvenile court or the prosecuting attorney when the juvenile has agreed to diversion.  An offense shall not be reported as criminal history in any central recordkeeping system without notification by the diversion unit of the date on which the offender agreed to diversion.

      (9) Upon request of the victim of a crime or the victim's immediate family, the identity of an alleged or proven juvenile offender alleged or found to have committed a crime against the victim and the identity of the alleged or proven juvenile offender's parent, guardian, or custodian and the circumstance of the alleged or proven crime shall be released to the victim of the crime or the victim's immediate family.

      (10) Subject to the rules of discovery applicable in adult criminal prosecutions, the juvenile offense records of an adult criminal defendant or witness in an adult criminal proceeding shall be released upon request to prosecution and defense counsel after a charge has actually been filed.  The juvenile offense records of any adult convicted of a crime and placed under the supervision of the adult corrections system shall be released upon request to the adult corrections system.

      (11) In any case in which an information has been filed pursuant to RCW 13.40.100 or a complaint has been filed with the prosecutor and referred for diversion pursuant to RCW 13.40.070, the person the subject of the information or complaint may file a motion with the court to have the court vacate its order and findings, if any, and, subject to subsection (23) of this section, order the sealing of the official juvenile court file, the social file, and records of the court and of any other agency in the case.

      (12)(a) The court shall not grant any motion to seal records for class A offenses made pursuant to subsection (11) of this section that is filed on or after July 1, 1997, unless:

      (i) Since the last date of release from confinement, including full-time residential treatment, if any, or entry of disposition, the person has spent five consecutive years in the community without committing any offense or crime that subsequently results in an adjudication or conviction;

      (ii) No proceeding is pending against the moving party seeking the conviction of a juvenile offense or a criminal offense;

      (iii) No proceeding is pending seeking the formation of a diversion agreement with that person;

      (iv) The person has not been convicted of a sex offense; and

      (v) Full restitution has been paid.

      (b) The court shall not grant any motion to seal records for class B, C, gross misdemeanor and misdemeanor offenses and diversions made under subsection (11) of this section unless:

      (i) Since the date of last release from confinement, including full-time residential treatment, if any, entry of disposition, or completion of the diversion agreement, the person has spent two consecutive years in the community without being convicted of any offense or crime;

      (ii) No proceeding is pending against the moving party seeking the conviction of a juvenile offense or a criminal offense;

      (iii) No proceeding is pending seeking the formation of a diversion agreement with that person;

      (iv) The person has not been convicted of a sex offense; and

      (v) Full restitution has been paid.

      (13) The person making a motion pursuant to subsection (11) of this section shall give reasonable notice of the motion to the prosecution and to any person or agency whose files are sought to be sealed.

      (14)(a) If the court grants the motion to seal made pursuant to subsection (11) of this section, it shall, subject to subsection (23) of this section, order sealed the official juvenile court file, the social file, and other records relating to the case as are named in the order.  Thereafter, the proceedings in the case shall be treated as if they never occurred, and the subject of the records may reply accordingly to any inquiry about the events, records of which are sealed.  Any agency shall reply to any inquiry concerning confidential or sealed records that records are confidential, and no information can be given about the existence or nonexistence of records concerning an individual.

(b) In the event the subject of the juvenile records receives a full and unconditional pardon, the proceedings in the matter upon which the pardon has been granted shall be treated as if they never occurred, and the subject of the records may reply accordingly to any inquiry about the events upon which the pardon was received.  Any agency shall reply to any inquiry concerning the records pertaining to the events for which the subject received a pardon that records are confidential, and no information can be given about the existence or nonexistence of records concerning an individual.

      (15) Inspection of the files and records included in the order to seal may thereafter be permitted only by order of the court upon motion made by the person who is the subject of the information or complaint, except as otherwise provided in RCW 13.50.010(8) and subsection (23) of this section.

      (16) Any adjudication of a juvenile offense or a crime subsequent to sealing has the effect of nullifying the sealing order.  Any charging of an adult felony subsequent to the sealing has the effect of nullifying the sealing order for the purposes of chapter 9.94A RCW.  The administrative office of the courts shall ensure that the superior court judicial information system provides prosecutors access to information on the existence of sealed juvenile records.

      (17)(a)(i) Subject to subsection (23) of this section, all records maintained by any court or law enforcement agency, including the juvenile court, local law enforcement, the Washington state patrol, and the prosecutor's office, shall be automatically destroyed within ninety days of becoming eligible for destruction.  Juvenile records are eligible for destruction when:

      (A) The person who is the subject of the information or complaint is at least eighteen years of age;

      (B) His or her criminal history consists entirely of one diversion agreement or counsel and release entered on or after June 12, 2008;

      (C) Two years have elapsed since completion of the agreement or counsel and release;

      (D) No proceeding is pending against the person seeking the conviction of a criminal offense; and

      (E) There is no restitution owing in the case.

      (ii) No less than quarterly, the administrative office of the courts shall provide a report to the juvenile courts of those individuals whose records may be eligible for destruction.  The juvenile court shall verify eligibility and notify the Washington state patrol and the appropriate local law enforcement agency and prosecutor's office of the records to be destroyed.  The requirement to destroy records under this subsection is not dependent on a court hearing or the issuance of a court order to destroy records.

      (iii) The state and local governments and their officers and employees are not liable for civil damages for the failure to destroy records pursuant to this section.

      (b) All records maintained by any court or law enforcement agency, including the juvenile court, local law enforcement, the Washington state patrol, and the prosecutor's office, shall be automatically destroyed within thirty days of being notified by the governor's office that the subject of those records received a full and unconditional pardon by the governor.
      (c) A person eighteen years of age or older whose criminal history consists entirely of one diversion agreement or counsel and release entered prior to June 12, 2008, may request that the court order the records in his or her case destroyed.  The request shall be granted, subject to subsection (23) of this section, if the court finds that two years have elapsed since completion of the agreement or counsel and release.

      (((c))) (d) A person twenty-three years of age or older whose criminal history consists of only referrals for diversion may request that the court order the records in those cases destroyed.  The request shall be granted, subject to subsection (23) of this section, if the court finds that all diversion agreements have been successfully completed and no proceeding is pending against the person seeking the conviction of a criminal offense.

      (18) If the court grants the motion to destroy records made pursuant to subsection (17)(((b) or)) (c) or (d) of this section, it shall, subject to subsection (23) of this section, order the official juvenile court file, the social file, and any other records named in the order to be destroyed.

      (19) The person making the motion pursuant to subsection (17)(((b) or)) (c) or (d) of this section shall give reasonable notice of the motion to the prosecuting attorney and to any agency whose records are sought to be destroyed.

      (20) Any juvenile to whom the provisions of this section may apply shall be given written notice of his or her rights under this section at the time of his or her disposition hearing or during the diversion process.

      (21) Nothing in this section may be construed to prevent a crime victim or a member of the victim's family from divulging the identity of the alleged or proven juvenile offender or his or her family when necessary in a civil proceeding.

      (22) Any juvenile justice or care agency may, subject to the limitations in subsection (23) of this section and (a) and (b) of this subsection, develop procedures for the routine destruction of records relating to juvenile offenses and diversions.

      (a) Records may be routinely destroyed only when the person the subject of the information or complaint has attained twenty-three years of age or older or pursuant to subsection (17)(a) of this section.

      (b) The court may not routinely destroy the official juvenile court file or recordings or transcripts of any proceedings.

      (23) Except for subsection (17)(b) of this section, no identifying information held by the Washington state patrol in accordance with chapter 43.43 RCW is subject to destruction or sealing under this section.  For the purposes of this subsection, identifying information includes photographs, fingerprints, palmprints, soleprints, toeprints and any other data that identifies a person by physical characteristics, name, birthdate or address, but does not include information regarding criminal activity, arrest, charging, diversion, conviction or other information about a person's treatment by the criminal justice system or about the person's behavior.

      (24) Information identifying child victims under age eighteen who are victims of sexual assaults by juvenile offenders is confidential and not subject to release to the press or public without the permission of the child victim or the child's legal guardian.  Identifying information includes the child victim's name, addresses, location, photographs, and in cases in which the child victim is a relative of the alleged perpetrator, identification of the relationship between the child and the alleged perpetrator.  Information identifying a child victim of sexual assault may be released to law enforcement, prosecutors, judges, defense attorneys, or private or governmental agencies that provide services to the child victim of sexual assault.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 5.  RCW 13.50.050 (14)(b) and (17)(b) apply to all records of a full and unconditional pardon and should be applied retroactively as well as prospectively.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 6.  If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected."

On page 1, line 1 of the title, after "records;" strike the remainder of the title and insert "amending RCW 19.182.040 and 13.50.050; creating new sections; and providing an expiration date."

 

and that the bill do pass as recommended by the Conference Committee:

 

Senators Harper and Hargrove

Representatives Dickerson, Darneille and Walsh

 

There being no objection, the House adopted the conference committee report on SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1793 and advanced the bill as recommended by the conference committee to final passage.

 

FINAL PASSAGE OF HOUSE BILL AS

RECOMMENDED BY CONFERENCE COMMITTEE

 

Representatives Darneille and Walsh spoke in favor of the passage of the bill as recommended by the conference committee.

 

The Speaker (Representative Moeller presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1793 as recommended by the conference committee.

 

ROLL CALL

 

The Clerk called the roll on the final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1793, as recommended by the conference committee, and the bill passed the House by the following votes:  Yeas, 65; Nays, 31; Absent, 0; Excused, 2.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appleton, Armstrong, Billig, Blake, Carlyle, Clibborn, Cody, Darneille, Dickerson, Dunshee, Eddy, Fagan, Finn, Fitzgibbon, Frockt, Goodman, Green, Haigh, Hasegawa, Hope, Hudgins, Hunt, Hurst, Jinkins, Johnson, Kagi, Kelley, Kenney, Kirby, Ladenburg, Liias, Lytton, Maxwell, McCoy, Miloscia, Moeller, Morris, Moscoso, Nealey, Ormsby, Orwall, Pedersen, Pettigrew, Probst, Reykdal, Roberts, Rodne, Rolfes, Ross, Ryu, Santos, Schmick, Seaquist, Sells, Springer, Stanford, Sullivan, Takko, Tharinger, Upthegrove, Van De Wege, Walsh, Wylie and Mr. Speaker.

Voting nay: Representatives Ahern, Alexander, Angel, Asay, Bailey, Buys, Chandler, Condotta, Dahlquist, Dammeier, DeBolt, Haler, Hargrove, Harris, Hinkle, Klippert, Kretz, Kristiansen, McCune, Orcutt, Overstreet, Parker, Pearson, Rivers, Shea, Short, Smith, Taylor, Warnick, Wilcox and Zeiger.

Excused: Representatives Crouse and Hunter.

 

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1793, as recommended by the conference committee, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

 

MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE

April 20, 2011

Mr. Speaker:

 

The Senate has passed ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1175with the following amendment:

0)

Formatting changed to accommodate text.


 

 


 

Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert the following:

"2011-2013 FISCAL BIENNIUM

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1.  (1) The transportation budget of the state is hereby adopted and, subject to the provisions set forth, the several amounts specified, or as much thereof as may be necessary to accomplish the purposes designated, are hereby appropriated from the several accounts and funds named to the designated state agencies and offices for employee compensation and other expenses, for capital projects, and for other specified purposes, including the payment of any final judgments arising out of such activities, for the period ending June 30, 2013.

      (2) Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the definitions in this subsection apply throughout this act.

      (a) "Fiscal year 2012" or "FY 2012" means the fiscal year ending June 30, 2012.

      (b) "Fiscal year 2013" or "FY 2013" means the fiscal year ending June 30, 2013.

      (c) "FTE" means full-time equivalent.

      (d) "Lapse" or "revert" means the amount shall return to an unappropriated status.

      (e) "Provided solely" means the specified amount may be spent only for the specified purpose.  Unless otherwise specifically authorized in this act, any portion of an amount provided solely for a specified purpose that is not expended subject to the specified conditions and limitations to fulfill the specified purpose shall lapse.

      (f) "Reappropriation" means appropriation and, unless the context clearly provides otherwise, is subject to the relevant conditions and limitations applicable to appropriations.

      (g) "LEAP" means the legislative evaluation and accountability program committee.

2011-2013 FISCAL BIENNIUM
GENERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES-OPERATING

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 101.  FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION

Motor Vehicle Account--State Appropriation................................................................................................................................... $430,000

 

      The appropriation in this section is subject to the following conditions and limitations:  The entire appropriation is provided solely for staffing costs to be dedicated to state transportation activities.  Staff hired to support transportation activities must have practical experience with complex construction projects.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 102.  FOR THE UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

Grade Crossing Protective Account‑-State

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................... $504,000

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 103.  FOR THE OFFICE OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation................................................................................................................................ $2,216,000

Puget Sound Ferry Operations Account‑-State

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................ $4,624,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION.............................................................................................................................................. $6,840,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) The office of financial management, in consultation with the transportation committees of the legislature, shall conduct a budget evaluation study for the new traffic management center proposed by the department of transportation.  The study must consider data resulting from the plan identified in section 604 of this act.  The budget evaluation study team approach using value engineering techniques must be utilized by the office of financial management in conducting the study.  The office of financial management shall select the budget evaluation study team members, contract for the study, and report the results to the transportation committees of the legislature and the department of transportation in a timely manner following the study.  Options reviewed must include use of existing facilities, including the Wheeler building data center in Olympia.  Funds allocated for the new traffic management center must be used by the office of financial management through an interagency agreement with the department of transportation to cover the cost of the study.

      (2) $4,480,000 of the Puget Sound ferry operations account--state appropriation is provided solely for marine insurance.  The appropriation is intended to fully fund a two-year policy, and the office of financial management shall increase the deductible to $10,000,000 and reduce components of the policy in order to keep the total cost of the two-year policy at or below the appropriation in this subsection.

      (3) The office of financial management shall review the department of transportation's predesign requirements for Washington state ferry vessel and terminal projects and modify the requirements such that the requirements continue to meet legal mandates without placing an undue burden on the department.

      (4) The office of financial management shall provide to the transportation committees of the legislature, on a quarterly basis, a listing of all demands to bargain with respect to ferry labor relations and the issue that gave rise to the demand to bargain.

      (5) $840,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided out of funds set aside out of statewide fuel taxes distributed to counties according to RCW 46.68.120(3) solely for the office of financial management to contract with the Washington state association of counties to identify, evaluate, and implement performance measures associated with county transportation activities.  The performance measures must include, at a minimum, those related to safety, system preservation, mobility, environmental protection, and project completion.  A report on the county transportation performance implementation project must be provided to the transportation committees of the legislature by December 31, 2012.

      (6) $169,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for the office of regulatory assistance integrated permitting project.

      (7) $40,000 of the Puget Sound ferry operations account--state appropriation is provided solely for the state's share of the marine salary survey.

      (8) The office of financial management shall study the available data regarding statewide transit, bicycle, and pedestrian trips and recommend additional performance measures that will effectively measure the state's performance in increasing transit ridership and bicycle and pedestrian trips.  The office of financial management shall report its findings and recommendations to the transportation committees of the legislature by November 15, 2011, and integrate the new performance measures into the report prepared by the office of financial management pursuant to RCW 47.04.280 regarding progress towards achieving Washington state's transportation system policy goals.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 104.  FOR THE STATE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation................................................................................................................................... $986,000

 

      The appropriation in this section is subject to the following conditions and limitations:  The entire appropriation in this section is provided solely for road maintenance purposes.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 105.  FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation................................................................................................................................ $1,210,000

 

      The appropriation in this section is subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) $351,000 of the motor vehicle account‑-state appropriation is provided solely for costs associated with the motor fuel quality program.

      (2) $686,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely to test the quality of biofuel.  The department must test fuel quality at the biofuel manufacturer, distributor, and retailer.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 106.  FOR THE LEGISLATIVE EVALUATION AND ACCOUNTABILITY PROGRAM COMMITTEE

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation................................................................................................................................... $513,000

TRANSPORTATION AGENCIES-OPERATING

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 201.  FOR THE WASHINGTON TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION

Highway Safety Account‑-State Appropriation.............................................................................................................................. $3,003,000

Highway Safety Account‑-Federal Appropriation........................................................................................................................ $42,625,000

Highway Safety Account--Local Appropriation.................................................................................................................................. $50,000

School Zone Safety Account‑-State Appropriation........................................................................................................................ $3,340,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION............................................................................................................................................ $49,018,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) $1,673,900 of the highway safety account--federal appropriation is provided solely for the conclusion of the target zero trooper pilot program, which the commission has developed and implemented in collaboration with the Washington state patrol.  The pilot program must continue to demonstrate the effectiveness of intense, high visibility, driving under the influence enforcement in Washington.  The commission shall continue to apply to the national highway traffic safety administration for federal highway safety grants to cover the cost of the pilot program.

      (2) The commission may oversee pilot projects implementing the use of automated traffic safety cameras to detect speed violations within cities west of the Cascade mountains that have a population over one hundred ninety-five thousand.  For the purposes of pilot projects in this subsection, no more than one automated traffic safety camera may be used to detect speed violations within any one jurisdiction.

      (a) The commission shall comply with RCW 46.63.170 in administering the pilot projects.

      (b) In order to ensure adequate time in the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium to evaluate the effectiveness of the pilot projects, any projects authorized by the commission must be authorized by December 31, 2011.

      (c) By January 1, 2013, the commission shall provide a report to the legislature regarding the use, public acceptance, outcomes, and other relevant issues regarding automated traffic safety cameras demonstrated by the pilot projects.

      (3) $460,000 of the highway safety account--state appropriation is provided solely for the implementation of chapter ... (Engrossed Second Substitute House Bill No. 1789), Laws of 2011 (addressing DUI accountability).  If chapter ... (Engrossed Second Substitute House Bill No. 1789), Laws of 2011 is not enacted by June 30, 2011, the amount provided in this subsection lapses.

      (4) The commission shall conduct a review of the literature on potential safety benefits realized from drivers using their headlights and windshield wipers simultaneously and shall report to the transportation committees of the legislature by December 1, 2011.

      (5) $22,000,000 of the highway safety account--federal appropriation is provided solely for federal funds that may be obligated to the commission pursuant to 23 U.S.C. Sec. 164 during the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 202.  FOR THE COUNTY ROAD ADMINISTRATION BOARD

Rural Arterial Trust Account‑-State Appropriation........................................................................................................................... $948,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation................................................................................................................................ $2,161,000

County Arterial Preservation Account‑-State

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................ $1,480,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION.............................................................................................................................................. $4,589,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:  The county road administration board shall submit a report to the transportation committees of the legislature by December 1, 2011, on the implementation of the recommendations that resulted from the evaluation of efficiencies in the delivery of transportation funding and services to local governments that was required under section 204(8), chapter 247, Laws of 2010.  The report must include a description of how recommendations were implemented, what efficiencies were achieved, and an explanation of any recommendations that were not implemented.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 203.  FOR THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BOARD

Transportation Improvement Account‑-State

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................ $3,707,000

 

      The appropriation in this section is subject to the following conditions and limitations:  The transportation improvement board shall submit a report to the transportation committees of the legislature by December 1, 2011, on the implementation of the recommendations that resulted from the evaluation of efficiencies in the delivery of transportation funding and services to local governments that was required under section 204(8), chapter 247, Laws of 2010.  The report must include a description of how recommendations were implemented, what efficiencies were achieved, and an explanation of any recommendations that were not implemented.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 204.  FOR THE JOINT TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation................................................................................................................................ $2,060,000

 

      The appropriation in this section is subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) $200,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is for a study of Washington state ferries fares that recommends the most appropriate fare media for use with the reservation system and the implementation of demand management pricing and interoperability with other payment methods.  The study must include direct collaboration with transportation commission members.

      (2) $150,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is for a study of the management organization structure at the Washington state ferries.  The study results must make recommendations on changes to the organizational structure that will result in more efficient operations and a more balanced management organization structure scaled to the workforce.

      (3) $200,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is from the cities statewide fuel tax distributions under RCW 46.68.110(2) for the joint transportation committee to study and make recommendations on RCW 90.03.525.  The study must include:  (a) An inventory of state highways subject to the federal clean water act (40 C.F.R. Parts 122 through 124) (national pollutant discharge elimination system) that are within city boundaries; (b) a survey of cities that impose storm water fees or charges to the department of transportation, or otherwise manage storm water runoff from state highways within their jurisdiction; (c) case studies from a representative cross-section of cities on how the department and cities have used RCW 90.03.525; and (d) recommendations on how to achieve efficiencies in the cost and management of state highway storm water runoff within cities under RCW 90.03.525.

      (4) $425,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is for the joint transportation committee to conduct a study to evaluate the potential for financing state transportation projects using public- private partnerships.  The study must compare the costs, advantages, and disadvantages of various forms of public-private partnerships with conventional financing.  Projects to be evaluated include Interstate 405, state route number 509, state route number 167, the Columbia River crossing, and the Monroe bypass.  At a minimum, the study must identify the public interest in the financing and construction of transportation projects, the public interest in the operation of transportation projects, and the provisions in public-private partnership agreements that best protect the public interest.  To the extent possible, the study must identify the lowest-cost and best-value model for each project that best protects the public interest.  In addition, the study must evaluate whether public-private partnerships serve the defined public interest including, but not limited to, the advantage and disadvantage of risk allocation, the effects of private versus public financing on the state's bonding capacity, the state's ability to retain public ownership of the asset, the process that would allow for the most transparency during the negotiation of terms of a public-private partnership agreement, and the state's ability to oversee the private entity's management of the asset.  The study must identify any barriers to the implementation of funding models that best protect the public interest, including statutory and constitutional barriers.  The committee shall issue a report of its evaluation to the house of representatives and senate transportation committees by December 16, 2011.

      (5) $100,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is for an investigation of the use of liquid natural gas on existing Washington state ferry vessels as well as the 144-car class vessels and report to the legislature by December 31, 2011.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 205.  FOR THE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation................................................................................................................................ $2,142,000

Multimodal Transportation Account‑-State Appropriation.............................................................................................................. $112,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION.............................................................................................................................................. $2,254,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) Consistent with RCW 43.135.055, 47.60.290, and 47.60.315, during the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium, the legislature authorizes the transportation commission to periodically review and, if necessary, adjust the schedule of fares for the Washington state ferry system only in amounts not greater than those sufficient to generate the amount of revenue required by the biennial transportation budget.  When adjusting ferry fares, the commission must consider input from affected ferry users by public hearing and by review with the affected ferry advisory committees, in addition to the data gathered from the current ferry user survey.

      (2) Consistent with RCW 43.135.055 and 47.46.100, during the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium, the legislature authorizes the transportation commission to periodically review and, if necessary, adjust the schedule of toll charges applicable to the Tacoma Narrows bridge only in amounts not greater than those sufficient to support (a) any required costs for operating and maintaining the toll bridge, including the cost of insurance, (b) any amount required by law to meet the redemption of bonds and applicable interest payments, and (c) repayment of the motor vehicle fund.

      (3) The total appropriation provided in this section includes funding to conduct a survey to gather data on users of the statewide transportation system, including the state ferry system, as required under chapter ... (Substitute Senate Bill No. 5128), Laws of 2011 (statewide transportation planning).  However, if chapter ... (Substitute Senate Bill No. 5128), Laws of 2011 is not enacted by June 30, 2011, $169,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation lapses.

      (4) Consistent with its authority in RCW 47.56.840, the transportation commission shall consider the need for a citizen advisory group that provides oversight on new tolled facilities.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 206.  FOR THE FREIGHT MOBILITY STRATEGIC INVESTMENT BOARD

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation................................................................................................................................... $702,000

 

      The appropriation in this section is subject to the following conditions and limitations:  The freight mobility strategic investment board shall submit a report to the transportation committees of the legislature by December 1, 2011, on the implementation of the recommendations that resulted from the evaluation of efficiencies in the delivery of transportation funding and services to local governments that was required under section 204(8), chapter 247, Laws of 2010.  The report must include a description of how recommendations were implemented, what efficiencies were achieved, and an explanation of any recommendations that were not implemented.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 207.  FOR THE WASHINGTON STATE PATROL

Vehicle Licensing Fraud Account--State Appropriation..................................................................................................................... $100,000

State Patrol Highway Account‑-State

      Appropriation........................................................................................................................................................................ $349,812,000

State Patrol Highway Account‑-Federal

      Appropriation.......................................................................................................................................................................... $10,903,000

State Patrol Highway Account‑-Private/Local

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................ $3,369,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION.......................................................................................................................................... $364,184,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) Washington state patrol officers engaged in off-duty uniformed employment providing traffic control services to the department of transportation or other state agencies may use state patrol vehicles for the purpose of that employment, subject to guidelines adopted by the chief of the Washington state patrol.  The Washington state patrol must be reimbursed for the use of the vehicle at the prevailing state employee rate for mileage and hours of usage, subject to guidelines developed by the chief of the Washington state patrol.  Cessna pilots funded from the state patrol highway account who are certified to fly the King Airs may pilot those aircraft for general fund purposes with the general fund reimbursing the state patrol highway account an hourly rate to cover the costs incurred during the flights since the aviation section is no longer part of the Washington state patrol cost allocation system as of July 1, 2009.

      (2) The Washington state patrol shall continue to collaborate with the Washington traffic safety commission on the target zero trooper pilot program referenced in section 201(1) of this act.

      (3) $370,000 of the state patrol highway account--state appropriation is provided solely for costs associated with the pilot program described under section 216(5) of this act.  The Washington state patrol may incur costs related only to the assignment of cadets and necessary computer equipment and to the reimbursement of the Washington state department of transportation for contract costs.  The appropriation in this subsection must be funded from the portion of the automated traffic safety camera fines deposited into the state patrol highway account; however, if the fines deposited into the state patrol highway account from automated traffic safety camera infractions do not reach three hundred seventy thousand dollars, the department of transportation shall remit funds necessary to the Washington state patrol to ensure the completion of the pilot program.  The Washington state patrol may not incur overtime as a result of this pilot program.  The Washington state patrol shall not assign troopers to operate or deploy the pilot program equipment used in the roadway construction zones.

      (4) $12,655,000 of the total appropriation is provided solely for automobile fuel in the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium.  The Washington state patrol shall analyze their fuel consumption and submit a report to the legislative transportation committees by December 31, 2011, on fuel conservation methods that could be used to minimize costs and ensure that the Washington state patrol is managing fuel consumption effectively.

      (5) $7,421,000 of the total appropriation is provided solely for the purchase of pursuit vehicles.

      (6) $6,611,000 of the total appropriation is provided solely for vehicle repair and maintenance costs of vehicles used for highway purposes.

      (7) $1,724,000 of the total appropriation is provided solely for the purchase of mission vehicles used for highway purposes in the commercial vehicle and traffic investigation sections of the Washington state patrol.

      (8) $1,200,000 of the total appropriation is provided solely for outfitting officers.  The Washington state patrol shall prepare a cost-benefit analysis of the standard trooper uniform as compared to a battle dress uniform and uniforms used by other states and jurisdictions.  The Washington state patrol shall report the results of the analysis to the transportation committees of the legislature by December 1, 2011.

      (9) The Washington state patrol shall not account for or record locally provided DUI cost reimbursement payments as expenditure credits to the state patrol highway account.  The patrol shall report the amount of expected locally provided DUI cost reimbursements to the office of financial management and transportation committees of the legislature by September 30th of each year.

      (10) During the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium, the Washington state patrol shall continue to perform traffic accident investigations on Thurston county roads, and shall work with Thurston county to transition the traffic accident investigations on Thurston county roads to Thurston county by July 1, 2013.

      (11) $100,000 of the vehicle licensing fraud account--state appropriation is provided solely to support the transportation portion of the vehicle license fraud program during the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 208.  FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING

Marine Fuel Tax Refund Account‑-State Appropriation..................................................................................................................... $32,000

Motorcycle Safety Education Account‑-State

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................ $4,411,000

Wildlife Account‑-State Appropriation.............................................................................................................................................. $859,000

Highway Safety Account‑-State Appropriation.......................................................................................................................... $149,904,000

Highway Safety Account‑-Federal Appropriation.......................................................................................................................... $2,884,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation.............................................................................................................................. $78,586,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-Private/Local Appropriation................................................................................................................... $1,721,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-Federal Appropriation................................................................................................................................ $242,000

Department of Licensing Services Account‑-State

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................ $5,815,000

Ignition Interlock Device Revolving Account--State

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................ $1,315,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION.......................................................................................................................................... $245,769,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) $62,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for the implementation of chapter ... (Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 5251), Laws of 2011 (electric vehicle fee).  If chapter ... (Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 5251), Laws of 2011 is not enacted by June 30, 2011, the amount provided in this subsection lapses.

      (2) $231,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for the implementation of chapter ... (Substitute Senate Bill No. 5800), Laws of 2011 (off-road motorcycles).  If chapter ... (Substitute Senate Bill No. 5800), Laws of 2011 is not enacted by June 30, 2011, the amount provided in this subsection lapses.

      (3) $193,000 of the department of licensing services account--state appropriation is provided solely for a phased implementation of chapter ... (Substitute House Bill No. 1046), Laws of 2011 (vehicle and vessel quick titles).  Funding is contingent upon revenues associated with the vehicle and vessel quick title program paying all direct and indirect expenditures associated with the department's implementation of this subsection.  If chapter ... (Substitute House Bill No. 1046), Laws of 2011 is not enacted by June 30, 2011, the amount provided in this subsection lapses.

      (4) The department may seek federal funds to implement a driver's license and identicard biometric matching system pilot program to verify the identity of applicants for, and holders of, drivers' licenses and identicards if applicants are provided the opportunity to opt out of participating in the program, which meets the requirement of RCW 46.20.037 that such a program be voluntary.  If funds are received, the department shall report any benefits or problems identified during the course of the pilot program to the transportation committees of the legislature upon the completion of the program.

      (5) $1,938,000 of the highway safety account--federal appropriation is for federal funds that may be received during the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium.  Upon receipt of the funds, the department shall provide a report on the use of the funds to the transportation committees of the legislature and the office of financial management.

      (6) By December 31, 2011, the department shall submit to the office of financial management and the transportation committees of the legislature draft legislation that rewrites the tow truck statutes (chapter 46.55 RCW) in plain language and is revenue and policy neutral.

      (7) $128,000 of the highway safety account--state appropriation is provided solely for the implementation of chapter ... (Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1635), Laws of 2011 (driver's license exams).  If chapter ... (Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1635), Laws of 2011 is not enacted by June 30, 2011, the amount provided in this subsection lapses.

      (8) $68,000 of the highway safety account--state appropriation is provided solely for the implementation of chapter ... (Engrossed Second Substitute House Bill No. 1789), Laws of 2011 (driving under the influence).  If chapter ... (Engrossed Second Substitute House Bill No. 1789), Laws of 2011 is not enacted by June 30, 2011, the amount provided in this subsection lapses.

      (9) $63,000 of the highway safety account--state appropriation is provided solely for the implementation of chapter ... (Substitute House Bill No. 1237), Laws of 2011 (selective service system).  If chapter ... (Substitute House Bill No. 1237), Laws of 2011 is not enacted by June 30, 2011, the amount provided in this subsection lapses.

      (10) $340,000 of the motor vehicle account--private/local appropriation is provided solely for the implementation of chapter ... (Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 5457), Laws of 2011 (congestion reduction charge).  If chapter ... (Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 5457), Laws of 2011 is not enacted by June 30, 2011, the amount provided in this subsection lapses.

      (11) $648,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation is provided solely for the implementation of chapter ... (House Bill No. 1229), Laws of 2011 (commercial drivers' licenses).  If chapter ... (House Bill No. 1229), Laws of 2011 is not enacted by June 30, 2011, the amount provided in this subsection lapses.

      (12) $1,738,000 of the department of licensing services account--state appropriation is provided solely for purchasing equipment for field licensing service offices and subagent offices.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 209.  FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-TOLL OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE-PROGRAM B

High Occupancy Toll Lanes Operations Account‑-State

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................ $1,295,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation................................................................................................................................... $550,000

Tacoma Narrows Toll Bridge Account‑-State

      Appropriation.......................................................................................................................................................................... $23,429,000

State Route Number 520 Corridor Account--State

      Appropriation.......................................................................................................................................................................... $27,295,000

State Route Number 520 Civil Penalties

      Account--State Appropriation.................................................................................................................................................. $4,622,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION............................................................................................................................................ $57,191,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) The department shall make detailed quarterly expenditure reports available to the transportation commission and to the public on the department's web site using current department resources.  The reports must include a summary of toll revenue by facility on all operating toll facilities and high occupancy toll lane systems, and an itemized depiction of the use of that revenue.

      (2) $4,622,000 of the state route number 520 civil penalties account--state appropriation and $1,458,000 of the Tacoma Narrows toll bridge account--state appropriation are provided solely for expenditures related to the toll adjudication process.  The department shall report quarterly on the civil penalty process to the office of financial management and the house of representatives and senate transportation committees beginning September 30, 2011.  The reports must include a summary table for each toll facility that includes:  The number of notices of civil penalty issued; the number of recipients who pay before the notice becomes a penalty; the number of recipients who request a hearing and the number who do not respond; workload costs related to hearings; the cost and effectiveness of debt collection activities; and revenues generated from notices of civil penalty.

      (3) It is the intent of the legislature that transitioning to a statewide tolling operations center and preparing for all-electronic tolling on certain toll facilities will have no adverse revenue or expenditure impact on the Tacoma Narrows toll bridge account.  Any increased costs related to this transition shall not be allocated to the Tacoma Narrows toll bridge account.  All costs associated with the toll adjudication process are anticipated to be covered by revenue collected from the toll adjudication process.

      (4) The department shall ensure that, at no cost to the Tacoma Narrows toll bridge account, new electronic tolling tag readers are installed on the Tacoma Narrows bridge as soon as practicable that are able to read existing and new electronic tolling tags.

      (5) $17,786,000 of the state route number 520 corridor account--state appropriation is provided solely for nonvendor costs associated with tolling the state route number 520 bridge.  Funds from the state route number 520 corridor account--state appropriation shall not be used to pay for items prohibited by Executive Order No. 1057, including subscriptions to technical publications, employee educational expenses, professional membership dues and fees, employee recognition and safety awards, meeting meals and light refreshments, commute trip reduction incentives, and employee travel.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 210.  FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY-PROGRAM C

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation.............................................................................................................................. $69,107,000

Transportation Partnership Account--State

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................ $1,460,000

Multimodal Transportation Account‑-State

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................... $363,000

Transportation 2003 Account (Nickel Account)--State

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................ $1,460,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION............................................................................................................................................ $72,390,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) The department shall consult with the office of financial management and the department of information services to:  (a) Ensure that the department's current and future system development is consistent with the overall direction of other key state systems; and (b) when possible, use or develop common statewide information systems to encourage coordination and integration of information used by the department and other state agencies and to avoid duplication.

      (2) $1,460,000 of the transportation partnership account--state appropriation and $1,460,000 of the transportation 2003 account (nickel account)--state appropriation are provided solely for maintaining the department's project management reporting system.

      (3) $210,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for the department's compliance with its national pollution discharge elimination system permit.

      (4) Beginning December 1, 2011, and on a quarterly basis thereafter, the department shall report to the office of financial management and the transportation committees of the legislature on the status of the development and integration of the time, leave, and labor distribution system identified in section 601 of this act.  The first report must include a detailed work plan for the development and integration of the system, including timelines and budget milestones.  At a minimum, the ensuing reports must indicate the status of the work as it compares to the work plan, any discrepancies, and proposed adjustments necessary to bring the project back on schedule or budget if necessary.  It is the intent of the legislature that the state auditor will provide advice based on the auditor's technical knowledge and expertise in the implementation and acquisition of the time, leave, and labor distribution system.  It is further the intent of the legislature that if any portion of the system is leveraged in the future for the time, leave, and labor distribution of any other agencies, the motor vehicle account will be reimbursed proportionally for the development of the system since the funds from the motor vehicle account must be used exclusively for highway purposes in conformance with Article II, section 40 of the state Constitution.  This must be accomplished through a loan arrangement with the current interest rate under the terms set by the office of the state treasurer at the time the system is deployed to additional agencies.  If the motor vehicle account is not reimbursed for future use of the system, it is the intent of the legislature that reductions will be made to central service agency charges accordingly.

      (5) $502,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely to provide support for the transportation executive information system.

      (6) If chapter ... (Substitute House Bill No. 1720), Laws of 2011 (department of enterprise services) is enacted, the department shall work with the department of enterprise services to:

      (a) Make enhancements to the 511 traveler information system to provide a more timely and user friendly format; and

      (b) Develop or purchase software that would allow public transportation users to enter in their start and end locations using a computer or mobile device to determine the public transportation options available to them.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 211.  FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-FACILITY MAINTENANCE, OPERATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION-PROGRAM D-OPERATING

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation.............................................................................................................................. $25,851,000

 

      The appropriation in this section is subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) The department shall submit a predesign proposal for a new traffic management center to the office of financial management consistent with the process followed by nontransportation capital construction projects.  The department shall not award a contract for construction of a new traffic management center until the predesign proposal has been submitted and the office of financial management has completed a budget evaluation study that indicates a new building is the recommended option for accommodating additional traffic management operations.

      (2) $850,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for the department's compliance with its national pollution discharge elimination system permit.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 212.  FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-AVIATION-PROGRAM F

Aeronautics Account‑-State Appropriation.................................................................................................................................... $6,066,000

Aeronautics Account‑-Federal Appropriation................................................................................................................................. $2,150,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION.............................................................................................................................................. $8,216,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:  $200,000 of the aeronautics account--state appropriation is a reappropriation provided solely to complete runway preservation projects.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 213.  FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-PROGRAM DELIVERY MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT-PROGRAM H

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation.............................................................................................................................. $47,418,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-Federal Appropriation................................................................................................................................ $500,000

Multimodal Transportation Account‑-State

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................... $250,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION............................................................................................................................................ $48,168,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) The department shall provide updated information on six project milestones for all active projects, funded in part or in whole with 2005 transportation partnership account funds or 2003 nickel account funds, on a quarterly basis in the transportation executive information system.  The department shall also provide updated information on six project milestones for projects funded with preexisting funds and that are agreed to by the legislature, office of financial management, and the department, on a quarterly basis.

      (2) $3,754,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for the department's compliance with its national pollution discharge elimination system permit.

      (3) It is the intent of the legislature that the real estate services division of the department will recover the cost of its efforts from future sale proceeds.

      (4) The legislature recognizes that the Dryden pit site (WSDOT Inventory Control (IC) No. 2-04-00103) is unused state-owned real property under the jurisdiction of the department of transportation, and that the public would benefit significantly from the complete enjoyment of the natural scenic beauty and recreational opportunities available at the site.  Therefore, pursuant to RCW 47.12.080, the legislature declares that transferring the property to the department of fish and wildlife for recreational use and fish and wildlife restoration efforts is consistent with the public interest in order to preserve the area for the use of the public and the betterment of the natural environment.  The department of transportation shall work with the department of fish and wildlife, and shall transfer and convey the Dryden pit site to the department of fish and wildlife as is for an adjusted fair market value reflecting site conditions, the proceeds of which must be deposited in the motor vehicle fund.  The department of transportation is not responsible for any costs associated with the cleanup or transfer of this property.  By July 1, 2011, and annually thereafter until the entire Dryden pit property has been transferred, the department shall submit a status report regarding the transaction to the chairs of the legislative transportation committees.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 214.  FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIPS-PROGRAM K

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation................................................................................................................................... $622,000

Multimodal Transportation Account--State Appropriation.............................................................................................................. $110,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION................................................................................................................................................. $732,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:  The department shall conduct a study on the potential to generate revenue from off-premise outdoor advertising signs that are erected or maintained adjacent and visible to the interstate system highways, primary system highways, or scenic system highways.  The study must provide an evaluation of the market for outdoor advertising signs, including an evaluation of the number of potential advertisers and the amount charged by other jurisdictions for sign permits, and must provide a recommendation for a revised fee structure that recognizes the market value for off-premise signs and considers charging differential fees based on the size, type, and location of the sign.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 215.  FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE-PROGRAM M

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation............................................................................................................................ $380,327,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-Federal Appropriation............................................................................................................................. $7,000,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION.......................................................................................................................................... $387,327,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) The department shall request an unanticipated receipt for any federal moneys received for emergency snow and ice removal and shall place an equal amount of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation into unallotted status.  This exchange shall not affect the amount of funding available for snow and ice removal.

      (2) $7,000,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for third-party damages to the highway system where the responsible party is known and reimbursement is anticipated.  The department shall request additional appropriation authority for any funds received for reimbursements of third-party damages that are in excess of this appropriation.

      (3) $7,000,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation is for unanticipated federal funds that may be received during the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium.  Upon receipt of the funds, the department shall provide a report on the use of the funds to the transportation committees of the legislature and the office of financial management.

      (4) The department may work with the department of corrections to utilize corrections crews for the purposes of litter pickup on state highways.

      (5) $4,530,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for the department's compliance with its national pollution discharge elimination system permit.

      (6) The department shall continue to report maintenance accountability process (MAP) targets and achievements on an annual basis.  The department shall use available funding to target and deliver a minimum MAP grade of C for the activity of roadway striping.

      (7) $6,884,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for the high priority maintenance backlog.  Addressing the maintenance backlog must result in increased levels of service.  If chapter . . . (Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 5251), Laws of 2011 (electric vehicle fee) is not enacted by June 30, 2011, $500,000 of the appropriation provided in this subsection lapses.

      (8) $317,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for maintaining a new active traffic management system on Interstate 5, Interstate 90, and state route number 520.  The department shall track the costs associated with these systems on a corridor basis and report to the transportation committees of the legislature on the costs and benefits of the systems by December 1, 2011.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 216.  FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-TRAFFIC OPERATIONS-PROGRAM Q-OPERATING

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation.............................................................................................................................. $50,166,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-Federal Appropriation............................................................................................................................. $2,050,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-Private/Local Appropriation...................................................................................................................... $127,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION............................................................................................................................................ $52,343,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) $6,000,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for low-cost enhancements.  The department shall give priority to low-cost enhancement projects that improve safety or provide congestion relief.  The department shall prioritize low-cost enhancement projects on a statewide rather than regional basis.  By September 1st of each even-numbered year, the department shall provide a report to the legislature listing all low-cost enhancement projects prioritized on a statewide rather than regional basis completed in the prior year.

      (2) $145,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for the department to continue a pilot tow truck incentive program and to expand the program to other areas of the state.  The department may provide incentive payments to towing companies that meet clearance goals on accidents that involve heavy trucks.

      (3) During the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium, the department shall implement a pilot program that expands private transportation providers' access to high occupancy vehicle lanes.  Under the pilot program, when the department reserves a portion of a highway based on the number of passengers in a vehicle, the following vehicles must be authorized to use the reserved portion of the highway if the vehicle has the capacity to carry eight or more passengers, regardless of the number of passengers in the vehicle:  (a) Auto transportation company vehicles regulated under chapter 81.68 RCW; (b) passenger charter carrier vehicles regulated under chapter 81.70 RCW, except marked or unmarked stretch limousines and stretch sport utility vehicles as defined under department of licensing rules; (c) private nonprofit transportation provider vehicles regulated under chapter 81.66 RCW; and (d) private employer transportation service vehicles.  For purposes of this subsection, "private employer transportation service" means regularly scheduled, fixed-route transportation service that is offered by an employer for the benefit of its employees.  By June 30, 2013, the department shall report to the transportation committees of the legislature on whether private transportation provider use of high occupancy vehicle lanes under the pilot program reduces the speeds of high occupancy vehicle lanes.  Nothing in this subsection is intended to authorize the conversion of public infrastructure to private, for-profit purposes or to otherwise create an entitlement or other claim by private users to public infrastructure.  If chapter ... (Substitute Senate Bill No. 5836), Laws of 2011 is enacted by June 30, 2011, this subsection is null and void.

      (4) $9,000,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for the department's incident response program.

      (5) The department, in consultation with the Washington state patrol, must continue a pilot program for the patrol to issue infractions based on information from automated traffic safety cameras in roadway construction zones on state highways.  The department must report to the joint transportation committee by January 1, 2012, and January 1, 2013, on the status of this pilot program.  For the purpose of this pilot program, during the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium, a roadway construction zone includes areas where public employees or private contractors may be present or where a driving condition exists that would make it unsafe to drive at higher speeds, such as, when the department is redirecting or realigning lanes on any public roadway pursuant to ongoing construction.  The department shall use the following guidelines to administer the program:

      (a) Automated traffic safety cameras may only take pictures of the vehicle and vehicle license plate and only while an infraction is occurring.  The picture must not reveal the face of the driver or of passengers in the vehicle;

      (b) The department shall plainly mark the locations where the automated traffic safety cameras are used by placing signs on locations that clearly indicate to a driver that he or she is entering a roadway construction zone where traffic laws are enforced by an automated traffic safety camera;

      (c) Notices of infractions must be mailed to the registered owner of a vehicle within fourteen days of the infraction occurring;

      (d) The owner of the vehicle is not responsible for the violation if the owner of the vehicle, within fourteen days of receiving notification of the violation, mails to the patrol, a declaration under penalty of perjury, stating that the vehicle involved was, at the time, stolen or in the care, custody, or control of some person other than the registered owner, or any other extenuating circumstances;

      (e) For purposes of the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium pilot program, infractions detected through the use of automated traffic safety cameras are not part of the registered owner's driving record under RCW 46.52.101 and 46.52.120.  Additionally, infractions generated by the use of automated traffic safety cameras must be processed in the same manner as parking infractions for the purposes of RCW 3.50.100, 35.20.220, 46.16A.120, and 46.20.270(3).  However, the amount of the fine issued under this subsection (5) for an infraction generated through the use of an automated traffic safety camera is one hundred thirty-seven dollars.  The court shall remit thirty-two dollars of the fine to the state treasurer for deposit into the state patrol highway account; and

      (f) If a notice of infraction is sent to the registered owner and the registered owner is a rental car business, the infraction must be dismissed against the business if it mails to the patrol, within fourteen days of receiving the notice, a declaration under penalty of perjury of the name and known mailing address of the individual driving or renting the vehicle when the infraction occurred.  If the business is unable to determine who was driving or renting the vehicle at the time the infraction occurred, the business must sign a declaration under penalty of perjury to this effect.  The declaration must be mailed to the patrol within fourteen days of receiving the notice of traffic infraction.  Timely mailing of this declaration to the issuing agency relieves a rental car business of any liability under this section for the notice of infraction.  A declaration form suitable for this purpose must be included with each automated traffic infraction notice issued, along with instructions for its completion and use.

      (6) The department shall track the costs associated with active traffic management systems on a corridor basis and report to the transportation committees of the legislature on the cost and benefits of the systems by December 1, 2011.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 217.  FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT-PROGRAM S

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation.............................................................................................................................. $28,430,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-Federal Appropriation.................................................................................................................................. $30,000

Multimodal Transportation Account‑-State

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................... $973,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION............................................................................................................................................ $29,433,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:  The department shall utilize existing resources and customer service staff to develop and implement new policies and procedures to ensure compliance with new federal passenger vessel Americans with disabilities act requirements.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 218.  FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-TRANSPORTATION PLANNING, DATA, AND RESEARCH-PROGRAM T

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation.............................................................................................................................. $23,394,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-Federal Appropriation........................................................................................................................... $21,885,000

Multimodal Transportation Account‑-State

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................... $662,000

Multimodal Transportation Account‑-Federal

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................ $3,559,000

Multimodal Transportation Account‑-Private/Local

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................... $100,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION............................................................................................................................................ $49,600,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) $70,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is a reappropriation provided solely for a corridor study of state route number 516 from the eastern border of Maple Valley to state route number 167 to determine whether improvements are needed and the costs of any needed improvements.

      (2) $200,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for extending the freight database pilot project that began in 2009.  Global positioning system (GPS) data is intended to help guide freight investment decisions and track highway project effectiveness as it relates to freight traffic.

      (3) Within available resources, the department must collaborate with the affected metropolitan planning organizations, regional transportation planning organizations, transit agencies, and private transportation providers to develop a plan to reduce vehicle demand, increase public transportation options, and reduce vehicle miles traveled on corridors affected by growth at Joint Base Lewis-McChord.

      (4) As part of their ongoing regional transportation planning, the regional transportation planning organizations across the state shall work together to provide a comprehensive framework for sources and uses of next-stage investments in transportation needed to improve structural conditions and ongoing operations and lay the groundwork for the transportation systems to support the long-term economic vitality of the state.  This planning must include all forms of transportation to reflect the state's interests, including:  Highways, streets, and roads; ferries; public transportation; systems for freight; and walking and biking systems.  The department shall support this planning by providing information on potential state transportation uses and an analysis of potential sources of revenue to implement investments.  In carrying out this planning, regional transportation planning organizations must be broadly inclusive of business, civic, labor, governmental, and environmental interests in regional communities across the state.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 219.  FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-CHARGES FROM OTHER AGENCIES-PROGRAM U

Motor Vehicle Account--State Appropriation.............................................................................................................................. $85,209,000

Motor Vehicle Account--Federal Appropriation................................................................................................................................ $400,000

Multimodal Transportation Account--State

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................ $3,320,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION............................................................................................................................................ $88,929,000

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) The office of financial management must provide a detailed accounting of the revenues and expenditures of the self-insurance fund to the transportation committees of the legislature on December 31st and June 30th of each year.

      (2) Payments in this section represent charges from other state agencies to the department of transportation.

      (a) FOR PAYMENT OF OFFICE OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

DIVISION OF RISK MANAGEMENT FEES.............................................................................................................................. $1,639,000

      (b) FOR PAYMENT OF COSTS OF THE OFFICE OF THE

STATE AUDITOR............................................................................................................................................................................ $937,000

      (c) FOR PAYMENT OF COSTS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF

GENERAL ADMINISTRATION.................................................................................................................................................. $6,060,000

      (d) FOR PAYMENT OF COSTS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF

PERSONNEL................................................................................................................................................................................... $6,347,000

      (e) FOR PAYMENT OF SELF-INSURANCE LIABILITY

PREMIUMS AND ADMINISTRATION................................................................................................................................... $44,418,000

      (f) FOR ARCHIVES AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT........................................................................................................ $623,000

      (g) FOR OFFICE OF MINORITIES AND WOMEN BUSINESS

ENTERPRISES................................................................................................................................................................................ $1,008,000

      (h) FOR USE OF FINANCIAL AND REPORTING SYSTEMS

PROVIDED BY THE OFFICE OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT.......................................................................................... $1,143,000

      (i) FOR POLICY AND SYSTEM ASSISTANCE FROM THE

DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION SERVICES...................................................................................................................... $1,980,000

      (j) FOR LEGAL SERVICE PROVIDED BY THE ATTORNEY

GENERAL'S OFFICE..................................................................................................................................................................... $8,526,000

      (k) FOR LEGAL SERVICE PROVIDED BY THE ATTORNEY

GENERAL'S OFFICE FOR THE SECOND PHASE OF THE BOLDT

LITIGATION..................................................................................................................................................................................... $672,000

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 220.  FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION-PROGRAM V

State Vehicle Parking Account--State Appropriation......................................................................................................................... $452,000

Regional Mobility Grant Program Account‑-State

      Appropriation.......................................................................................................................................................................... $48,942,000

Multimodal Transportation Account‑-State

      Appropriation.......................................................................................................................................................................... $41,706,000

Multimodal Transportation Account‑-Federal

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................ $2,582,000

Multimodal Transportation Account‑-Private/Local

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................ $1,027,000

Rural Mobility Grant Program Account--State

      Appropriation.......................................................................................................................................................................... $17,000,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION.......................................................................................................................................... $111,709,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) $25,000,000 of the multimodal transportation account--state appropriation is provided solely for a grant program for special needs transportation provided by transit agencies and nonprofit providers of transportation.

      (a) $5,500,000 of the amount provided in this subsection is provided solely for grants to nonprofit providers of special needs transportation.  Grants for nonprofit providers must be based on need, including the availability of other providers of service in the area, efforts to coordinate trips among providers and riders, and the cost effectiveness of trips provided.

      (b) $19,500,000 of the amount provided in this subsection is provided solely for grants to transit agencies to transport persons with special transportation needs.  To receive a grant, the transit agency must have a maintenance of effort for special needs transportation that is no less than the previous year's maintenance of effort for special needs transportation.  Grants for transit agencies must be prorated based on the amount expended for demand response service and route deviated service in calendar year 2009 as reported in the "Summary of Public Transportation - 2009" published by the department of transportation.  No transit agency may receive more than thirty percent of these distributions.

      (2) Funds are provided for the rural mobility grant program as follows:

      (a) $8,500,000 of the rural mobility grant program account--state appropriation is provided solely for grants for those transit systems serving small cities and rural areas as identified in the "Summary of Public Transportation - 2009" published by the department of transportation.  Noncompetitive grants must be distributed to the transit systems serving small cities and rural areas in a manner similar to past disparity equalization programs.  If the funding provided in this subsection (2)(a) exceeds the amount required for recipient counties to reach eighty percent of the average per capita sales tax, funds in excess of that amount may be used for the competitive grant process established in (b) of this subsection.

      (b) $8,500,000 of the rural mobility grant program account--state appropriation is provided solely to providers of rural mobility service in areas not served or underserved by transit agencies through a competitive grant process.

      (3)(a) $6,000,000 of the multimodal transportation account--state appropriation is provided solely for a vanpool grant program for:  (a) Public transit agencies to add vanpools or replace vans; and (b) incentives for employers to increase employee vanpool use.  The grant program for public transit agencies will cover capital costs only; operating costs for public transit agencies are not eligible for funding under this grant program.  Additional employees may not be hired from the funds provided in this section for the vanpool grant program, and supplanting of transit funds currently funding vanpools is not allowed.  The department shall encourage grant applicants and recipients to leverage funds other than state funds.

      (b) At least $1,600,000 of the amount provided in this subsection must be used for vanpool grants in congested corridors.

      (c) $520,000 of the amount provided in this subsection is provided solely for the purchase of additional vans for use by vanpools serving soldiers and civilian employees at Joint Base Lewis-McChord.

      (4) $8,942,000 of the regional mobility grant program account--state appropriation is reappropriated and provided solely for the regional mobility grant projects identified in LEAP Transportation Document 2007-B, as developed April 20, 2007, or LEAP Transportation Document 2009-B, as developed April 24, 2009.  The department shall continue to review all projects receiving grant awards under this program at least semiannually to determine whether the projects are making satisfactory progress.  The department shall promptly close out grants when projects have been completed, and any remaining funds must be used only to fund projects identified in:  LEAP Transportation Document 2007-B, as developed April 20, 2007; LEAP Transportation Document 2009-B, as developed April 24, 2009; or LEAP Transportation Document 2011-B, as developed April 19, 2011.  It is the intent of the legislature to appropriate funds through the regional mobility grant program only for projects that will be completed on schedule and that all funds in the regional mobility grant program be used as soon as practicable to advance eligible projects.

      (5)(a) $40,000,000 of the regional mobility grant program account--state appropriation is provided solely for the regional mobility grant projects identified in LEAP Transportation Document 2011-B, as developed April 19, 2011.  The department shall review all projects receiving grant awards under this program at least semiannually to determine whether the projects are making satisfactory progress.  Any project that has been awarded funds, but does not report activity on the project within one year of the grant award, must be reviewed by the department to determine whether the grant should be terminated.  The department shall promptly close out grants when projects have been completed, and any remaining funds must be used only to fund projects identified in LEAP Transportation Document 2011-B, as developed April 19, 2011.  The department shall provide annual status reports on December 15, 2011, and December 15, 2012, to the office of financial management and the transportation committees of the legislature regarding the projects receiving the grants.  It is the intent of the legislature to appropriate funds through the regional mobility grant program only for projects that will be completed on schedule.

      (b) In order to be eligible to receive a grant under (a) of this subsection during the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium, a transit agency must establish a process for private transportation providers to apply for the use of park and ride facilities.  For purposes of this subsection, (i) "private transportation provider" means:  An auto transportation company regulated under chapter 81.68 RCW; a passenger charter carrier regulated under chapter 81.70 RCW, except marked or unmarked stretch limousines and stretch sport utility vehicles as defined under department of licensing rules; a private nonprofit transportation provider regulated under chapter 81.66 RCW; or a private employer transportation service provider; and (ii) "private employer transportation service" means regularly scheduled, fixed-route transportation service that is offered by an employer for the benefit of its employees.

      (6) $2,309,000 of the multimodal transportation account--state appropriation is provided solely for the tri-county connection service for Island, Skagit, and Whatcom transit agencies.

      (7) $200,000 of the multimodal transportation account--state appropriation is contingent on the timely development of an annual report summarizing the status of public transportation systems as identified under RCW 35.58.2796.

      (8) Funds provided for the commute trip reduction program may also be used for the growth and transportation efficiency center program.

      (9) An affected urban growth area that has not previously implemented a commute trip reduction program is exempt from the requirements in RCW 70.94.527 if a solution to address the state highway deficiency that exceeds the person hours of delay threshold has been funded and is in progress during the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 221.  FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-MARINE-PROGRAM X

Puget Sound Ferry Operations Account‑-State

      Appropriation........................................................................................................................................................................ $467,773,000

 

      The appropriation in this section is subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) The office of financial management budget instructions require agencies to recast enacted budgets into activities.  The Washington state ferries shall include a greater level of detail in its 2011-2013 supplemental and 2013-2015 omnibus transportation appropriations act requests, as determined jointly by the office of financial management, the Washington state ferries, and the transportation committees of the legislature.  This level of detail must include the administrative functions in the operating as well as capital programs.

      (2) When purchasing uniforms that are required by collective bargaining agreements, the department shall contract with the lowest cost provider.

      (3) The legislature finds that measuring the performance of the Washington state ferries requires the measurement of quality, timeliness, and unit cost of services delivered to customers.  Consequently, the department must develop a set of metrics that measure that performance and report to the transportation committees of the legislature and the office of financial management on the development of these measurements along with recommendations to the 2012 legislature on which measurements must become a part of the next omnibus transportation appropriations act.  If chapter ... (Substitute House Bill No. 1516), Laws of 2011 (state ferry system management) is enacted, the report under this subsection is not required.

      (4) The department shall continue to identify and implement process changes that will improve on-time performance on a route-by-route basis.  These changes must include considering the slowing down of vessels for fuel economy purposes and touch-and-go sailings on peak runs.  The department shall report its findings to the transportation committees of the legislature by December 1, 2011.

      (5) Until a reservation system is operational on the San Juan islands inner-island route, the department shall provide the same priority loading benefits on the San Juan islands inner-island route to home health care workers as are currently provided to patients traveling for purposes of receiving medical treatment.

      (6) The department shall request from the United States coast guard variable minimum staffing levels on all of its vessels by December 31, 2011.

      (7) The department shall provide fiscal year reports to the transportation committees of the legislature outlining wages and benefits provided to employees.

      (8) The department shall provide support to the legislative evaluation and accountability program committee's work of upgrading the transportation executive information system to include more detailed information for ferry projects.

      (9) Appropriations used for labor costs may be used only for obligations under applicable collective bargaining agreements, civil service laws, court orders, and judgments.

      (10) The department shall continue to provide service to Sidney, British Columbia and shall explore the option of purchasing a foreign built vehicle and passenger ferry vessel either with safety of life at sea (SOLAS) certification or the ability to be retrofitted for SOLAS certification to operate solely on the Anacortes to Sidney, British Columbia route currently served by vessels of the Washington state ferries fleet.  The vessel should have the capability of carrying at least one hundred standard vehicles and approximately four hundred to five hundred passengers.  Further, the department shall explore the possibilities of contracting a commercial company to operate the vessel exclusively on this route so long as the contractor's employees assigned to the vessel are represented by the same employee organizations as the Washington state ferries.  The department shall report back to the transportation committees of the legislature regarding:  The availability of a vessel; the cost of the vessel, including transport to the Puget Sound region; and the need for any statutory changes for the operation of the Sydney, British Columbia service by a private company.

      (11) For the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium, the department of transportation may enter into a distributor controlled fuel hedging program.

      (12) The department shall target service reductions totaling $4,000,000, such that the shortening of shoulder seasons and eliminations of off-peak runs on all routes are considered.  Prior to implementing the reductions, the department shall consult with ferry employees and ferry advisory committees to determine which reductions would impact the fewest number of riders.  The reductions must be identified and implementation must begin no later than the fall 2011 schedule.

      (13) $135,248,000 of the Puget Sound ferry operations account--state appropriation is provided solely for auto ferry vessel operating fuel in the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium.

      (14) $150,000 of the Puget Sound ferry operations account--state appropriation is provided solely for the department to increase recreation and tourist ridership by entering into agreements for marketing and outreach strategies with local economic development agencies.  The department shall identify the number of tourist and recreation riders on the applicable ferry routes both before and after implementation of marketing and outreach strategies developed through the agreements.  The department shall report results of the marketing and outreach strategies to the transportation committees of the legislature by October 15, 2012.

      (15) The Washington state ferries shall participate in the facilities plan included in section 604 of this act and shall include an investigation and identification of less costly relocation options for the Seattle headquarters office.  The department shall include relocation options for the Washington state ferries Seattle headquarters office in the facilities plan.  Until September 1, 2012, the department may not enter into a lease renewal for the Seattle headquarters office.

      (16) The department, office of financial management, and transportation committees of the legislature shall make recommendations regarding an appropriate budget structure for the Washington state ferries.  The recommendation may include a potential restructuring of the Washington state ferries budget.  The recommendation must facilitate transparency in reporting and budgeting as well as provide the opportunity to link revenue sources with expenditures.  Findings and recommendations must be reported to the office of financial management and the joint transportation committee by September 1, 2011.

      (17) Two Kwa-di-tabil class ferry vessels must be placed on the Port Townsend/Coupeville (Keystone) route to provide service at the same levels provided when the steel electric vessels were in service.  After the vessels as funded under section 308(7) of this act are in service, the two most appropriate of these vessels for the Port Townsend/Coupeville (Keystone) route must be placed on the route.  $100,000 of the Puget Sound ferry operations account--state appropriation is provided solely for the additional staffing required to maintain a reservation system at this route when the second vessel is in service.

      (18) The department shall link all vessel asset condition reports with its vessel life-cycle cost model in such a way that it will lend itself to integration with a vessel asset management system.  Each quarter the department shall complete the activity of linking the asset condition of one class of vessels to the life-cycle cost model, beginning with the jumbo mark II class, followed by the Issaquah class, the jumbo mark I class, the super class, and finally the Kwa-di-tabil class.  The department shall continue to regularly inspect life-cycle cost model assets and link the resulting asset condition reports with its vessel life-cycle cost model as the assessments are completed.  The department shall provide the transportation committees of the legislature with progress reports of this activity as the work for each class of vessels has been completed.  This activity must be completed with the results reported to the transportation committees of the legislature by June 1, 2012.  The department's 2013-2015 budget request must be developed using the updated life-cycle cost model and must also provide a project scope for implementing a vessel asset management system.

      (19) $706,000 of the Puget Sound ferry operations account--state appropriation is provided solely for terminal operations to implement new federal passenger vessel Americans with disabilities act requirements.

      (20) $152,000 of the Puget Sound ferry operations account--state appropriation is provided solely for the department's compliance with its national pollution discharge elimination system permit.

      (21) If chapter ... (Substitute House Bill No. 2053), Laws of 2011 (additive transportation funding) is not enacted by June 30, 2011, the $4,000,000 in service reductions identified in subsection (12) of this section must be restored and an identical amount must be reduced from the amount provided for the second 144-car vessel identified in section 308(8) of this act.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 222.  FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-RAIL-PROGRAM Y--OPERATING

Multimodal Transportation Account‑-State

      Appropriation.......................................................................................................................................................................... $29,688,000

Multimodal Transportation Account--Federal

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................... $300,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION............................................................................................................................................ $29,988,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) $24,091,000 of the multimodal transportation account--state appropriation is provided solely for the Amtrak service contract and Talgo maintenance contract associated with providing and maintaining state-supported passenger rail service.  The department is directed to continue to pursue efforts to reduce costs, increase ridership, and review fares or fare schedules.  Within thirty days of each annual cost/revenue reconciliation under the Amtrak service contract, the department shall report annual credits to the office of financial management and the legislative transportation committees.  Annual credits from Amtrak to the department including, but not limited to, credits for increased revenue due to higher ridership, and fare or fare schedule adjustments, must be used to offset corresponding amounts of the multimodal transportation account--state appropriation, which must be placed in reserve.  Upon completion of the rail platform project in the city of Stanwood, the department shall continue to provide daily Amtrak Cascades service to the city.

      (2) Amtrak Cascade runs may not be eliminated.

      (3) The department shall plan for a third roundtrip Cascades train between Seattle and Vancouver, B.C.

      (4) The department shall conduct a pilot program by partnering with the travel industry on the Amtrak Cascades service between Vancouver, British Columbia, and Seattle to test opportunities for increasing ridership, maximizing farebox recovery, and stimulating private investment.  The pilot program must run from July 1, 2011, to June 30, 2012.  The department shall report on the results of the pilot program to the office of financial management and the legislature by September 30, 2012.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 223.  FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-LOCAL PROGRAMS-PROGRAM Z-OPERATING

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation................................................................................................................................ $8,853,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-Federal Appropriation............................................................................................................................. $2,567,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION............................................................................................................................................ $11,420,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:  The department shall submit a report to the transportation committees of the legislature by December 1, 2011, on the implementation of the recommendations that resulted from the evaluation of efficiencies in the delivery of transportation funding and services to local governments that was required under section 204(8), chapter 247, Laws of 2010.  The report must include a description of how recommendations were implemented, what efficiencies were achieved, and an explanation of any recommendations that were not implemented.

TRANSPORTATION AGENCIES-CAPITAL

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 301.  FOR THE WASHINGTON STATE PATROL

State Patrol Highway Account--State Appropriation..................................................................................................................... $6,487,000

 

      The appropriation in this section is subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) $653,000 of the state patrol highway account--state appropriation is provided solely for the following minor works projects:  $200,000 for emergency infrastructure repairs; $75,000 for water and sewer upgrades; $210,000 for emergency backup system replacement; $85,000 for chiller replacement; and $83,000 for roof replacements.

      (2) $3,226,000 of the state patrol highway account--state appropriation is provided solely for the Shelton academy of the Washington state patrol for the new waste water treatment lines, waste water plants, water lines, and water systems.  However, $2,129,000 of this amount is contingent on the department of corrections receiving funding for its portion of the regional water project in the 2011-2013 omnibus capital appropriations act.  If this funding is not provided by June 30, 2011, $2,129,000 of the appropriation provided in this subsection lapses.

      (3) $421,000 of the state patrol highway account--state appropriation is provided solely for the reappropriation of the Shelton regional water project.

      (4) $2,187,000 of the total appropriation is provided solely for mobile office platforms.

      (5) It is the intent of the legislature that the omnibus operating appropriations act provide funding for the portion of any applicable debt service payments, resulting from financial contracts identified under section 601 of this act, that are attributable to the general fund as identified in the Washington state patrol's cost allocation model.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 302.  FOR THE COUNTY ROAD ADMINISTRATION BOARD

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation................................................................................................................................... $874,000

Rural Arterial Trust Account‑-State Appropriation...................................................................................................................... $37,417,000

County Arterial Preservation Account‑-State

      Appropriation.......................................................................................................................................................................... $29,360,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION............................................................................................................................................ $67,651,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) $874,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation may be used for county ferry projects as developed pursuant to RCW 47.56.725(4).

      (2) $37,417,000 of the rural arterial trust account--state appropriation is provided solely for county road preservation grant projects as approved by the county road administration board.  These funds may be used to assist counties recovering from federally declared emergencies by providing capitalization advances and local match for federal emergency funding, and may only be made using existing fund balances.  It is the intent of the legislature that the rural arterial trust account be managed based on cash flow.  The county road administration board shall specifically identify any of the selected projects and shall include information concerning the selected projects in its next annual report to the legislature.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 303.  FOR THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BOARD

Small City Pavement and Sidewalk Account‑-State

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................ $3,812,000

Transportation Improvement Account‑-State

      Appropriation........................................................................................................................................................................ $201,050,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION.......................................................................................................................................... $204,862,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:  The transportation improvement account--state appropriation includes up to $22,143,000 in proceeds from the sale of bonds authorized in RCW 47.26.500.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 304.  FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-PROGRAM D-(DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-ONLY PROJECTS)-CAPITAL

Motor Vehicle Account--State Appropriation................................................................................................................................ $5,433,000

 

      The appropriation in this section is subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) $1,364,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for the Olympic region site acquisition debt service payments and administrative costs associated with capital improvement and preservation project and financial management.

      (2) $3,669,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for high priority safety projects that are directly linked to employee safety, environmental risk, or minor works that prevent facility deterioration.

      (3) $400,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for the department's compliance with its national pollution discharge elimination system permit.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 305.  FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-IMPROVEMENTS-PROGRAM I

Multimodal Transportation Account--State

      Appropriation................................................................................................................................................................................... $1,000

Transportation Partnership Account‑-State

      Appropriation..................................................................................................................................................................... $1,991,547,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation.............................................................................................................................. $86,139,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-Federal Appropriation......................................................................................................................... $450,691,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-Private/Local

      Appropriation.......................................................................................................................................................................... $50,485,000

Transportation 2003 Account (Nickel Account)‑-State

      Appropriation........................................................................................................................................................................ $436,005,000

State Route Number 520 Corridor Account--State

      Appropriation..................................................................................................................................................................... $1,019,460,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION....................................................................................................................................... $4,034,328,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) Except as provided otherwise in this section, the entire transportation 2003 account (nickel account) appropriation and the entire transportation partnership account appropriation are provided solely for the projects and activities as listed by fund, project, and amount in LEAP Transportation Document 2011-1 as developed April 19, 2011, Program - Highway Improvement Program (I).  However, limited transfers of specific line-item project appropriations may occur between projects for those amounts listed subject to the conditions and limitations in section 603 of this act.

      (2) The department shall, on a quarterly basis beginning July 1, 2011, provide to the office of financial management and the legislature reports providing the status on each active project funded in part or whole by the transportation 2003 account (nickel account) or the transportation partnership account.  Funding provided at a programmatic level for transportation partnership account and transportation 2003 account (nickel account) projects relating to bridge rail, guard rail, fish passage barrier removal, and roadside safety projects must be reported on a programmatic basis.  Projects within this programmatic level funding must be completed on a priority basis and scoped to be completed within the current programmatic budget.  Report formatting and elements must be consistent with the October 2009 quarterly project report.  The department shall also provide the information required under this subsection on a quarterly basis.

      (3) Within the motor vehicle account--state appropriation and motor vehicle account--federal appropriation, the department may transfer funds between programs I and P, except for funds that are otherwise restricted in this act.

      (4) The department shall apply for surface transportation program enhancement funds to be expended in lieu of or in addition to state funds for eligible costs of projects in programs I and P including, but not limited to, the state route number 518, state route number 520, Columbia river crossing, and Alaskan Way viaduct projects.

      (5) The department shall apply for the competitive portion of federal transit administration funds for eligible transit-related costs of the state route number 520 bridge replacement and HOV project and the Columbia river crossing project.  The federal funds described in this subsection must not include those federal transit administration funds distributed by formula.  The department shall provide a report regarding this effort to the legislature by October 1, 2011.

      (6) Any redistributed federal funds received by the department must, to the greatest extent possible, be applied first to offset planned expenditures of state funds, and second, to offset planned expenditures of federal funds, on projects as identified in the LEAP transportation documents described in this act.  If the redistributed federal funds cannot be used in this manner, the department must consult with the joint transportation committee prior to obligating any redistributed federal funds.

      (7) The department shall work with the department of archaeology and historic preservation to ensure that the cultural resources investigation is properly conducted on all mega-highway projects and large ferry terminal projects.  These projects must be conducted with active archaeological management.  Additionally, the department shall establish a scientific peer review of independent archaeologists that are knowledgeable about the region and its cultural resources.

      (8) For highway construction projects where the department considers agricultural lands of long-term commercial significance, as defined in RCW 36.70A.030, in reviewing and selecting sites to meet environmental mitigation requirements under the national environmental policy act (42 U.S.C. Sec. 4321 et seq.) and the state environmental policy act (chapter 43.21C RCW), the department shall, to the greatest extent possible, consider using public land first.  If public lands are not available that meet the required environmental mitigation needs, the department may use other sites while making every effort to avoid any net loss of agricultural lands that have a designation of long-term commercial significance.

      (9) $361,000 of the transportation partnership account--state appropriation and $1,245,000 of the transportation 2003 account (nickel account)--state appropriation are provided solely for project 0BI4ENV, Environmental Mitigation Reserve - Nickel/TPA project, as indicated in the LEAP transportation document referenced in subsection (1) of this section.  Funds may be used only for environmental mitigation work that is required by permits that were issued for projects funded by the transportation partnership account or transportation 2003 account (nickel account).  As part of the 2012 budget submittal, the department shall provide a list of all projects and associated amounts that are being charged to project OBI4ENV during the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium.

      (10) The transportation 2003 account (nickel account)--state appropriation includes up to $361,005,000 in proceeds from the sale of bonds authorized by RCW 47.10.861.

      (11) The transportation partnership account--state appropriation includes up to $1,427,696,000 in proceeds from the sale of bonds authorized in RCW 47.10.873.

      (12) The motor vehicle account--state appropriation includes up to $66,373,000 in proceeds from the sale of bonds authorized in RCW 47.10.843.

      (13) The state route number 520 corridor account--state appropriation includes up to $987,717,000 in proceeds from the sale of bonds authorized in RCW 47.10.879.

      (14) $391,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation and $4,027,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation are provided solely for the US 2 High Priority Safety project (100224I).  Expenditure of these funds is for safety projects on state route number 2 between Monroe and Gold Bar, which may include median rumble strips, traffic cameras, and electronic message signs.

      (15) $687,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation, $16,308,000 of the motor vehicle account--private/local appropriation, and $22,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation are provided solely for the US 2/Bickford Avenue - Intersection Safety Improvements project (100210E).

      (16) $435,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for environmental work on the Belfair Bypass project (300344C).

      (17) $108,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation and $3,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation are provided solely for the I-5/Vicinity of Joint Base Lewis-McChord -Install Ramp Meters project (300596M).

      (18) $253,444,000 of the transportation partnership account--state appropriation and $66,034,000 of the transportation 2003 account (nickel account)--state appropriation are provided solely for the I-5/Tacoma HOV Improvements (Nickel/TPA) project (300504A).  The use of funds in this subsection to renovate any buildings is subject to the requirements of section 604 of this act.  The department shall report to the legislature and the office of financial management on any costs associated with building renovations funded in this subsection.

      (19)(a) $8,321,000 of the transportation partnership account--state appropriation and $31,380,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation are provided solely for the I-5/Columbia River Crossing project (400506A).  Of this amount, $200,000 of the transportation partnership account--state appropriation is provided solely for the department to work with the department of archaeology and historic preservation to ensure that the cultural resources investigation is properly conducted on the Columbia river crossing project.  This project must be conducted with active archaeological management and result in one report that spans the single cultural area in Oregon and Washington.  Additionally, the department shall establish a scientific peer review of independent archaeologists that are knowledgeable about the region and its cultural resources.  No funding from any account may be expended until written confirmation has been received by the department that the state of Oregon is providing an equal amount of additional funding to the project.

      (b) Consistent with the draft environmental impact statement and the Columbia river crossing project's independent review panel report, the Columbia river crossing project's financial plan must include recognition of state transportation funding contributions from both Washington and Oregon, federal transportation funding, and a funding contribution from toll bond proceeds.  Following the refinement of the finance plan as recommended by the independent review panel, the department may seek authorization from the legislature to collect tolls on the existing Columbia river crossing or on a replacement crossing over Interstate 5.

      (20) $107,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation and $27,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation are provided solely for the SR 9/SR 204 Intersection Improvement project (L2000040).

      (21) $2,134,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation and $47,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation are provided solely for the US 12/Nine Mile Hill to Woodward Canyon Vic -Build New Highway project (501210T).

      (22) $294,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation and $13,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation are provided solely for the SR 16/Rosedale Street NW Vicinity - Frontage Road project (301639C).  The frontage road must be built for driving speeds of no more than thirty-five miles per hour.

      (23) $1,000,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation is provided solely for the SR 20/Race Road to Jacob's Road safety project (L2200042).

      (24) $24,002,000 of the transportation partnership account--state appropriation is provided solely for the SR 28/ US 2 and US 97 Eastmont Avenue Extension project (202800D).

      (25) $569,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation and $9,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation are provided solely for design and right-of-way work on the I-82/Red Mountain Vicinity project (508208M).  The department shall continue to work with the local partners in developing transportation solutions necessary for the economic growth in the Red Mountain American viticulture area of Benton county.

      (26) $1,500,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation is provided solely for the I-90 Comprehensive Tolling Study project (100067T).

      (27) $9,422,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation and $193,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation are provided solely for the I-90/Sullivan Road to Barker Road - Additional Lanes project (609049N).

      (28) Up to $8,000,000 in savings realized on the I-90/Snoqualmie Pass East - Hyak to Keechelus Dam - Corridor project (509009B) may be used for design work on the next two-mile segment of the corridor.  Any additional savings on this project must remain on the corridor.  $590,000 of the funds appropriated for this project may be used to purchase land currently owned by the state parks department.  Project funds may not be used to build or improve buildings until the plan described in section 604 of this act is complete.

      (29) $932,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation is provided solely for the US 97A/North of Wenatchee - Wildlife Fence project (209790B).

      (30) The department shall reconvene an expert review panel of no more than three members as described under RCW 47.01.400 for the purpose of updating the work that was previously completed by the panel on the Alaskan Way viaduct replacement project and to ensure that an appropriate and viable financial plan is created and regularly reviewed.  The expert review panel must be selected cooperatively by the chairs of the senate and house of representatives transportation committees, the secretary of transportation, and the governor.  The expert review panel must report findings and recommendations to the transportation committees of the legislature, the governor's Alaskan Way viaduct project oversight committee, and the transportation commission by October 2011, and annually thereafter until the project is operationally complete.

      (31) It is important that the public and policymakers have accurate and timely access to information related to the Alaskan Way viaduct replacement project as it proceeds to, and during, the construction of all aspects of the project including, but not limited to, information regarding costs, schedules, contracts, project status, and neighborhood impacts.  Therefore, it is the intent of the legislature that the state, city, and county departments of transportation establish a single source of accountability for integration, coordination, tracking, and information of all requisite components of the replacement project, which must include, at a minimum:

      (a) A master schedule of all subprojects included in the full replacement project or program; and

      (b) A single point of contact for the public, media, stakeholders, and other interested parties.

      (32) Within the amounts provided in this section, $20,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation and $980,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation are provided solely for the department to continue work on a comprehensive tolling study of the state route number 167 corridor (project 316718S).  As funding allows, the department shall also continue work on a comprehensive tolling study of the state route number 509 corridor.

      (33)(a) $131,303,000 of the transportation partnership account--state appropriation, $51,410,000 of the transportation 2003 account (nickel account)--state appropriation, and $10,000,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation are provided solely for the I-405/Kirkland Vicinity Stage 2 - Widening project (8BI1002).  This project must be completed as soon as practicable as a design-build project and must be constructed with a footprint that would accommodate potential future express toll lanes.

      (b) As part of the project, the department shall conduct a traffic and revenue analysis and complete a financial plan to provide additional information on the revenues, expenditures, and financing options available for active traffic management and congestion relief in the Interstate 405 and state route number 167 corridors.  A report must be provided to the transportation committees of the legislature and the office of financial management by January 2012.  However, this subsection (33)(b) is null and void if chapter . . . (Engrossed House Bill No. 1382), Laws of 2011 (I-405 express toll lanes) is enacted by June 30, 2011.

      (34) Funding for a signal at state route number 507 and Yew Street is included in the appropriation for intersection and spot improvements (0BI2002).

      (35) $226,809,000 of the transportation partnership account--state appropriation and $1,019,460,000 of the state route number 520 corridor account--state appropriation are provided solely for the state route number 520 bridge replacement and HOV program (8BI1003).  When developing the financial plan for the program, the department shall assume that all maintenance and operation costs for the new facility are to be covered by tolls collected on the toll facility, and not by the motor vehicle account.

      (36) $650,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation is provided solely for the SR 522 Improvements/61st Avenue NE and NE 181st Street project (L1000055).

      (37) $300,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation is provided solely for the SR 523 Corridor study (L1000059).

      (38) The department shall consider using the city of Mukilteo's off-site mitigation program in the event any projects on state route number 525 or 526 require environmental mitigation.

      (39) Any savings on projects on the state route number 532 corridor must be used within the corridor to begin work on flood prevention and raising portions of the highway above flood and storm influences.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 306.  FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-PRESERVATION-PROGRAM P

Transportation Partnership Account‑-State

      Appropriation.......................................................................................................................................................................... $34,182,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation.............................................................................................................................. $67,790,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-Federal Appropriation......................................................................................................................... $632,489,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-Private/Local Appropriation................................................................................................................. $19,253,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION.......................................................................................................................................... $753,714,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) Except as provided otherwise in this section, the entire transportation 2003 account (nickel account) appropriation and the entire transportation partnership account appropriation are provided solely for the projects and activities as listed by fund, project, and amount in LEAP Transportation Document 2011-1 as developed April 19, 2011, Program - Highway Preservation Program (P).  However, limited transfers of specific line-item project appropriations may occur between projects for those amounts listed subject to the conditions and limitations in section 603 of this act.

      (2) The department shall, on a quarterly basis beginning July 1, 2011, provide to the office of financial management and the legislature reports providing the status on each active project funded in part or whole by the transportation 2003 account (nickel account) or the transportation partnership account.  Funding provided at a programmatic level for transportation partnership account projects relating to seismic bridges must be reported on a programmatic basis.  Projects within this programmatic level funding must be completed on a priority basis and scoped to be completed within the current programmatic budget.  The department shall work with the office of financial management and the transportation committees of the legislature to agree on report formatting and elements.  Elements must include, but not be limited to, project scope, schedule, and costs.  The department shall also provide the information required under this subsection on a quarterly basis.

      (3) The department of transportation shall continue to implement the lowest life-cycle cost planning approach to pavement management throughout the state to encourage the most effective and efficient use of pavement preservation funds.  Emphasis should be placed on increasing the number of roads addressed on time and reducing the number of roads past due.

      (4) Any redistributed federal funds received by the department must, to the greatest extent possible, be applied first to offset planned expenditures of state funds, and second, to offset planned expenditures of federal funds, on projects as identified in the LEAP transportation documents described in this act.  If the redistributed federal funds cannot be used in this manner, the department must consult with the joint transportation committee prior to obligating any redistributed federal funds.

      (5) Within the motor vehicle account--state appropriation and motor vehicle account--federal appropriation, the department may transfer funds between programs I and P, except for funds that are otherwise restricted in this act.

      (6) The department shall apply for surface transportation program enhancement funds to be expended in lieu of or in addition to state funds for eligible costs of projects in programs I and P.

      (7) The motor vehicle account--state appropriation includes up to $17,652,000 in proceeds from the sale of bonds authorized in RCW 47.10.843.

      (8) The department must work with cities and counties to develop a comparison of direct and indirect labor costs, overhead rates, and other costs for high-cost bridge inspections charged by the state, counties, and other entities.  The comparison is due to the transportation committees of the legislature on September 1, 2011.

      (9) $277,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation and $10,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation are provided solely for the environmental impact statement and preliminary planning for the replacement of the state route number 9 Snohomish river bridge (project L2000018).

      (10) $9,641,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation, $2,000,000 of the motor vehicle account--private/local appropriation, and $361,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation are provided solely for the SR 21/Keller Ferry - Replace Boat project (602110J).

      (11) $3,093,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation is provided solely for the I-90/Ritzville to Tokio - Paving of Outside Lanes project (609041G).

      (12) $2,733,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation and $114,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation are provided solely for the SR 167/Puyallup River Bridge Replacement project (316725A).  This project must be completed as a design-build project.  The department must work with local jurisdictions and the community during the environmental review process to develop appropriate esthetic design elements, at no additional cost to the department, and traffic management plans pertaining to this project.  The department must report to the transportation committees of the legislature on estimated cost and/or time savings realized as a result of using the design-build process.

      (13) $295,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation and $5,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation are provided solely for the SR 906/Travelers Rest - Building Renovation project (090600A).

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 307.  FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-TRAFFIC OPERATIONS-PROGRAM Q-CAPITAL

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation................................................................................................................................ $6,439,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-Federal Appropriation............................................................................................................................. $5,600,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION............................................................................................................................................ $12,039,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:  $1,000,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation for project 000005Q is provided solely for state matching funds for federally selected competitive grants or congressional earmark projects.  These moneys must be placed into reserve status until such time as federal funds are secured that require a state match.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 308.  FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION--WASHINGTON STATE FERRIES CONSTRUCTION--PROGRAM W

Puget Sound Capital Construction Account--State

      Appropriation.......................................................................................................................................................................... $68,013,000

Puget Sound Capital Construction Account--Federal

      Appropriation.......................................................................................................................................................................... $41,500,000

Transportation 2003 Account (Nickel Account)--State

      Appropriation........................................................................................................................................................................ $118,027,000

Transportation Partnership Account--State

      Appropriation.......................................................................................................................................................................... $12,536,000

Multimodal Transportation Account--State

      Appropriation.......................................................................................................................................................................... $43,265,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION.......................................................................................................................................... $283,341,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) $68,013,000 of the Puget Sound capital construction account--state appropriation, $41,500,000 of the Puget Sound capital construction account--federal appropriation, $12,536,000 of the transportation partnership account--state appropriation, $118,027,000 of the transportation 2003 account (nickel account)--state appropriation, and $43,265,000 of the multimodal transportation account--state appropriation are provided solely for ferry projects, as listed in LEAP Transportation Document 2011-2 ALL PROJECTS as developed April 19, 2011, Program - Washington State Ferries Capital Program (W).

      (2) The department shall work with the department of archaeology and historic preservation to ensure that the cultural resources investigation is properly conducted on all large ferry terminal projects.  These projects must be conducted with active archaeological management.

      (3) The multimodal transportation account--state appropriation includes up to $43,265,000 in proceeds from the sale of bonds authorized in RCW 47.10.867.

      (4) The transportation 2003 account (nickel account)--state appropriation includes up to $82,143,000 in proceeds from the sale of bonds authorized in RCW 47.10.861.

      (5) The Puget Sound capital construction account--state appropriation includes up to $52,516,000 in proceeds from the sale of bonds authorized in RCW 47.10.843.

      (6) Appropriations used for labor costs may be used only for obligations under applicable collective bargaining agreements, civil service laws, court orders, and judgments.

      (7) $20,906,000 of the transportation 2003 account (nickel account)--state appropriation, $9,711,000 of the multimodal transportation account--state appropriation, and $1,537,000 of the Puget Sound capital construction account--state appropriation are provided solely for the acquisition of new Kwa-di-tabil class ferry vessels subject to the conditions of RCW 47.56.780.

      (8) $33,404,000 of the multimodal transportation account--state appropriation, $2,000,000 of the Puget Sound capital construction account--state appropriation, $11,500,000 of the transportation partnership account--state appropriation, and $81,085,000 of the transportation 2003 account (nickel account)--state appropriation are provided solely for the acquisition of two 144-car vessels contingent upon new and sufficient resources.  Of these amounts, $123,828,000 is provided solely for the first 144-car vessel.  The department shall use as much already procured equipment as practicable on the 144-car vessel.  The vendor must present to the joint transportation committee and the office of financial management, by August 15, 2011, a list of options that will result in significant cost savings changes in terms of construction or the long-term maintenance and operations of the vessel.  The vendor must allow for exercising the options without a penalty.  If neither chapter ... (Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 5742), Laws of 2011 nor chapter ... (House Bill No. 2083), Laws of 2011 is enacted by June 30, 2011, $75,000,000 of the transportation 2003 account (nickel account)--state appropriation in this subsection lapses.

      (9) The department shall provide to the office of financial management and the legislature quarterly reports providing the status on each project listed in this section and in the project lists submitted pursuant to this act and on any additional projects for which the department has expended funds during the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium.  Elements must include, but not be limited to, project scope, schedule, and costs.  The department shall also provide the information required under this subsection via the transportation executive information system.  The quarterly report regarding the status of projects identified on the list referenced in subsection (1) of this section must be developed according to an earned value method of project monitoring.

      (10) The department shall review and adjust its capital program staffing levels to ensure staffing is at the most efficient level necessary to implement the capital program in the omnibus transportation appropriations act.  The review must include a comparison to the findings of the 2009 capital staffing levels report.  The Washington state ferries shall report this review and adjustment to the office of financial management and the house and senate transportation committees of the legislature by July 2012.

      (11) $3,932,000 of the total appropriation is provided solely for continued permitting work on the Mukilteo ferry terminal (project 952515P).  The department shall seek additional federal funding for this project.  Prior to beginning terminal improvements, the department shall report to the legislature on the final environmental impact statement by December 31, 2012.  The report must include an overview of the costs and benefits of each of the alternatives considered, as well as an identification of costs and a funding plan for the preferred alternative.

      (12) The department shall conduct an analysis of the Eagle Harbor slips to determine the cost benefit of replacing or repairing existing structures with new structures including, but not limited to, dolphins and wingwalls.  A report on this analysis is due to the legislature by December 31, 2011.

      (13) The department shall review all terminal project cost estimates to identify projects where similar design requirements could result in reduced preliminary engineering or miscellaneous items costs.  The department shall report to the legislature by September 1, 2011.  The report must use programmatic design and include estimated cost savings by reducing repetitive design costs or miscellaneous costs, or both, applied to projects.

      (14) $2,000,000 of the Puget Sound capital construction account--state appropriation is provided solely for emergency capital repair costs.  Funds may be spent only after approval from the office of financial management.

      (15) $7,167,000 of the Puget Sound capital construction account--state appropriation is provided solely for the reservation and communications system project.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 309.  FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-RAIL-PROGRAM Y-CAPITAL

Essential Rail Assistance Account--State

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................ $1,000,000

Transportation Infrastructure Account‑-State

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................ $5,838,000

Multimodal Transportation Account--State

      Appropriation.......................................................................................................................................................................... $52,000,000

Multimodal Transportation Account‑-Federal

      Appropriation........................................................................................................................................................................ $366,314,000

Multimodal Transportation Account--Private/Local

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................ $1,292,000

            TOTAL APPROPRIATION.......................................................................................................................................... $426,444,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1)(a) Except as provided otherwise in this section, the entire appropriations in this section are provided solely for the projects and activities as listed by project and amount in LEAP Transportation Document 2011-2 ALL PROJECTS as developed April 19, 2011, Program -Rail Capital Program (Y).

      (b) Within the amounts provided in this section, $2,903,000 of the transportation infrastructure account--state appropriation is for low-interest loans through the freight rail investment bank program for specific projects listed as recipients of these loans in the LEAP transportation document identified in (a) of this subsection.  The department shall issue freight rail investment bank program loans with a repayment period of no more than ten years, and only so much interest as is necessary to recoup the department's costs to administer the loans.

      (c) Within the amounts provided in this section, $1,754,000 of the multimodal transportation account--state appropriation and $1,000,000 of the essential rail assistance account--state appropriation are for statewide emergent freight rail assistance projects identified in the LEAP transportation document identified in (a) of this subsection.

      (2)(a) If any funds remain in the program reserves (F01001A & F01000A) for the program and projects listed in subsection (1)(b) and (c) of this section, the department shall issue a call for projects for the freight rail investment bank (FRIB) loan program and the emergent freight rail assistance program (FRAP) grants, and shall evaluate the applications according to the cost-benefit methodology developed during the 2008 interim using the legislative priorities specified in (c) of this subsection.  Unsuccessful FRAP grant applicants should be encouraged to apply to the FRIB loan program, if eligible.  By November 1, 2011, the department shall submit a prioritized list of recommended projects to the office of financial management and the transportation committees of the legislature.

      (b) When the department identifies a prospective rail project that may have strategic significance for the state, or at the request of a proponent of a prospective rail project or a member of the legislature, the department shall evaluate the prospective project according to the cost-benefit methodology developed during the 2008 interim using the legislative priorities specified in (c) of this subsection.  The department shall report its cost-benefit evaluation of the prospective rail project, as well as the department's best estimate of an appropriate construction schedule and total project costs, to the office of financial management and the transportation committees of the legislature.

      (c) The legislative priorities to be used in the cost-benefit methodology are, in order of relative importance:

      (i) Economic, safety, or environmental advantages of freight movement by rail compared to alternative modes;

      (ii) Self-sustaining economic development that creates family-wage jobs;

      (iii) Preservation of transportation corridors that would otherwise be lost;

      (iv) Increased access to efficient and cost-effective transport to market for Washington's agricultural and industrial products;

      (v) Better integration and cooperation within the regional, national, and international systems of freight distribution; and

      (vi) Mitigation of impacts of increased rail traffic on communities.

      (3) The department is directed to expend unallocated federal rail crossing funds in lieu of or in addition to state funds for eligible costs of projects in program Y.

      (4) The department shall provide quarterly reports to the office of financial management and the transportation committees of the legislature regarding applications that the department submits for federal funds and the status of such applications.

      (5) The department shall, on a quarterly basis, provide to the office of financial management and the legislature reports providing the status on active projects identified in the LEAP transportation document described in subsection (1)(a) of this section.  Report formatting and elements must be consistent with the October 2009 quarterly project report.

      (6) The multimodal transportation account--state appropriation includes up to $19,684,000 in proceeds from the sale of bonds authorized in RCW 47.10.867.

      (7) When the balance of that portion of the miscellaneous program account apportioned to the department for the grain train program reaches $1,180,000, the department shall acquire additional grain train railcars.

      (8) $1,087,000 of the multimodal transportation account--state appropriation is provided solely as state matching funds for successful grant applications to either the federal rail line relocation and improvement program (project 798999D) or new federal high-speed rail grants.

      (9) The Burlington Northern Santa Fe Skagit river bridge is an integral part of the rail system.  Constructed in 1916, the bridge does not meet current design standards and is at risk during flood events that occur on the Skagit river.  The department shall work with Burlington Northern Santa Fe and local jurisdictions to secure federal funding for the Skagit river bridge and to develop an appropriate replacement plan and schedule.

      (10) $339,139,000 of the multimodal transportation account--federal appropriation and $5,099,000 of the multimodal transportation account--state appropriation are provided solely for expenditures related to passenger high-speed rail grants.  At one and one-half percent of the total project funds, the multimodal transportation account--state funds are provided solely for expenditures that are not federally reimbursable.  Funding in this subsection is the initial portion of multiyear high-speed rail program grants awarded to Washington state for high-speed intercity passenger rail investments.  Funding will allow for two additional round trips between Seattle and Portland and other rail improvements.

      (11) $750,000 of the multimodal transportation account--state appropriation is provided solely for the Port of Royal Slope rehabilitation project (L1000053).  Funding is contingent upon the project completing the rail cost-benefit methodology process developed during the 2008 interim using the legislative priorities outlined in subsection (2)(c) of this section.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 310.  FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-LOCAL PROGRAMS-PROGRAM Z-CAPITAL

Highway Infrastructure Account‑-State Appropriation..................................................................................................................... $207,000

Highway Infrastructure Account‑-Federal

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................ $1,602,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation................................................................................................................................ $3,754,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-Federal Appropriation........................................................................................................................... $31,856,000

Freight Mobility Investment Account‑-State

      Appropriation.......................................................................................................................................................................... $11,278,000

Transportation Partnership Account‑-State

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................ $6,035,000

Freight Mobility Multimodal Account‑-State

      Appropriation.......................................................................................................................................................................... $15,117,000

Freight Mobility Multimodal Account‑-Local

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................ $4,752,000

Multimodal Transportation Account‑-State

      Appropriation.......................................................................................................................................................................... $18,453,000

Passenger Ferry Account--State Appropriation.............................................................................................................................. $1,115,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION............................................................................................................................................ $94,169,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) The department shall, on a quarterly basis beginning July 1, 2011, provide to the office of financial management and the legislature reports providing the status on each active project funded in part or whole by the transportation 2003 account (nickel account) or the transportation partnership account.  Report formatting and elements must be consistent with the October 2009 quarterly project report.  The department shall also provide the information required under this subsection on a quarterly basis via the transportation executive information system.

      (2) $1,115,000 of the passenger ferry account--state appropriation is provided solely for near and long-term costs of capital improvements and operating expenses that are consistent with the business plan approved by the governor for passenger ferry service.

      (3) The department shall apply for surface transportation program enhancement funds to be expended in lieu of or in addition to state funds for eligible costs of projects in local programs, program Z--capital.

      (4) Federal funds may be transferred from program Z to programs I and P and state funds must be transferred from programs I and P to program Z to replace those federal funds in a dollar-for-dollar match.  Fund transfers authorized under this subsection shall not affect project prioritization status.  Appropriations must initially be allotted as appropriated in this act.  The department may not transfer funds as authorized under this subsection without approval of the office of financial management.  The department shall submit a report on those projects receiving fund transfers to the office of financial management and the transportation committees of the legislature by December 1, 2011, and December 1, 2012.

      (5) The city of Winthrop may utilize a design-build process for the Winthrop bike path project.

      (6) $11,557,000 of the multimodal transportation account--state appropriation, $12,136,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation, and $5,195,000 of the transportation partnership account--state appropriation are provided solely for the pedestrian and bicycle safety program projects and safe routes to schools program projects identified in:  LEAP Transportation Document 2011-A, pedestrian and bicycle safety program projects and safe routes to schools program projects, as developed April 19, 2011; LEAP Transportation Document 2009-A, pedestrian and bicycle safety program projects and safe routes to schools program projects, as developed March 30, 2009; LEAP Transportation Document 2007-A, pedestrian and bicycle safety program projects and safe routes to schools program projects, as developed April 20, 2007; and LEAP Transportation Document 2006-B, pedestrian and bicycle safety program projects and safe routes to schools program projects, as developed March 8, 2006.  Projects must be allocated funding based on order of priority.  The department shall review all projects receiving grant awards under this program at least semiannually to determine whether the projects are making satisfactory progress.  Any project that has been awarded funds, but does not report activity on the project within one year of the grant award must be reviewed by the department to determine whether the grant should be terminated.  The department shall promptly close out grants when projects have been completed, and identify where unused grant funds remain because actual project costs were lower than estimated in the grant award.

      (7) Except as provided otherwise in this section, the entire appropriations in this section are provided solely for the projects and activities as listed by project and amount in LEAP Transportation Document 2011-2 ALL PROJECTS as developed April 19, 2011, Program -Local Program (Z).

      (8) For the 2011-2013 project appropriations, unless otherwise provided in this act, the director of the office of financial management may authorize a transfer of appropriation authority between projects managed by the freight mobility strategic investment board in order for the board to manage project spending and efficiently deliver all projects in the respective program.

      (9) With each department budget submittal, the department shall provide an update on the status of the repayment of the twenty million dollars of unobligated federal funds authority advanced by the department in September 2010 to the city of Tacoma for the Murray Morgan/11th Street bridge project.

      (10) The department shall prepare a list of main street projects, consistent with chapter ... (Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1071), Laws of 2011, for approval in the 2013-2015 fiscal biennium.  In order to ensure that any proposed list of projects is consistent with legislative intent, the department shall provide a report to the joint transportation committee by December 1, 2011.  The report must identify the eligible segments of main streets highways, the department's proposed project selection and ranking method, criteria to be considered, and a plan for soliciting project proposals.

      (11) $267,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation and $2,859,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation are provided solely for completion of the US 101 northeast peninsula safety rest area and associated roadway improvements east of Port Angeles at the Deer Park scenic view point (3LP187A).  The department must surplus any right-of-way previously purchased for this project near Sequim.  Approval to proceed with construction is contingent on surplus of previously purchased right-of-way.

      (12) Up to $3,650,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation and $23,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation are provided solely to reimburse the cities of Kirkland and Redmond for pavement and bridge deck rehabilitation on state route number 908 (1LP611A).  These funds may not be expended unless the cities sign an agreement stating that the cities agree to take ownership of state route number 908 in its entirety and agree that the payment of these funds represents the entire state commitment to the cities for state route number 908 expenditures.

      (13) $225,000 of the multimodal transportation account--state appropriation is provided solely for the Shell Valley emergency road and bicycle/pedestrian path (L1000036).

      (14) $150,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for flood reduction solutions on state route number 522 caused by the lower McAleer and Lyon creek basins (L1000041).

      (15) $896,000 of the multimodal transportation account--state appropriation is provided solely for realignment of Parker Road and construction of secondary access off of state route number 20 (L2200040).

      (16) An additional $2,500,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation is provided solely for the Strander Blvd/SW 27th St Connection project (1LP902F), which amount is reflected in the LEAP transportation document identified in subsection (7) of this section.  These funds may only be committed if needed, may not be used to supplant any other committed project partnership funding, and must be the last funds expended.

      (17) $500,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation is provided solely for safety improvements at the intersection of South Wapato and McDonald Road (L1000052).

      (18) $2,000,000 of the multimodal transportation account--state appropriation is provided solely for the state route number 432 rail realignment and highway improvements project (L1000056).

      (19) $500,000 of the multimodal transportation account--state appropriation is provided solely for a multimodal corridor plan on state route number 520 between Interstate 405 and Avondale Road in Redmond (L1000054).

      (20) $100,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation is provided solely for state route number 164 and Auburn Way South pedestrian improvements (L1000057).

      (21) $115,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation is provided solely for median street lighting on state route number 410 (L1000058).

      (22) $60,000 of the multimodal transportation account--state appropriation is provided solely for a cross docking study for the port of Douglas county (L1000060).

      (23) $100,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation is provided solely for city of Auburn - 8th and R Street NE intersection improvements (L2200043).

      (24) $65,000 of the multimodal transportation account--state appropriation is provided solely for the Puget Sound regional council to further the implementation of multimodal concurrency practice through a transit service overlay zone implemented at the local level (L1000061).  This approach will improve the linkage of land use and transportation investment decisions, improve the efficiency of transit service by encouraging transit-supportive development, provide incentives for developers, and support integrated regional growth, economic development, and transportation plans.  In carrying out this work, the council shall involve representatives from cities and counties, developers, transit agencies, and other interested stakeholders, and shall consult with other regional transportation planning organizations across the state.  The council shall report the results of their work and recommendations to the joint transportation committee by December 2011, with a final report to the transportation committees of the legislature by January 31, 2012.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 311.  FEDERAL FUNDS RECEIVED FOR CAPITAL PROJECT EXPENDITURES

      To the greatest extent practicable, the department of transportation shall expend federal funds received for capital project expenditures before state funds.

TRANSFERS AND DISTRIBUTIONS

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 401.  FOR THE STATE TREASURER-BOND RETIREMENT AND INTEREST, AND ONGOING BOND REGISTRATION AND TRANSFER CHARGES:  FOR BOND SALES DISCOUNTS AND DEBT TO BE PAID BY MOTOR VEHICLE ACCOUNT AND TRANSPORTATION FUND REVENUE

Highway Bond Retirement Account--State Appropriation......................................................................................................... $920,560,000

Ferry Bond Retirement Account--State Appropriation................................................................................................................ $31,801,000

State Route Number 520 Corridor Account--State

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................ $1,075,000

Transportation Improvement Board Bond Retirement

      Account--State Appropriation................................................................................................................................................ $16,544,000

Nondebt-Limit Reimbursable Account Appropriation.................................................................................................................. $25,200,000

Transportation Partnership Account--State

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................ $3,142,000

Motor Vehicle Account--State Appropriation................................................................................................................................... $333,000

 Transportation 2003 Account (Nickel Account)--State

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................ $1,140,000

Transportation Improvement Account--State Appropriation.............................................................................................................. $29,000

Multimodal Transportation Account--State

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................... $138,000

Toll Facility Bond Retirement Account--State

      Appropriation.......................................................................................................................................................................... $33,792,000

Toll Facility Bond Retirement Account--Federal

      Appropriation.......................................................................................................................................................................... $14,649,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION....................................................................................................................................... $1,048,403,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) $4,610,000 of the highway bond retirement account--state appropriation is provided solely for debt service on bonds issued to construct a ferry boat vessel with a carrying capacity of one hundred forty-four cars.  If neither chapter ... (House Bill No. 2083), Laws of 2011 nor chapter ... (Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 5742) is enacted by June 30, 2011, the amount provided in this subsection lapses.

      (2) $165,000 of the transportation 2003 account (nickel account)--state appropriation is provided solely for discounts on bonds sold to construct a ferry boat vessel with a carrying capacity of one hundred forty-four cars.  If neither chapter ... (House Bill No. 2083), Laws of 2011 nor chapter ... (Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 5742) is enacted by June 30, 2011, the amount provided in this subsection lapses.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 402.  FOR THE STATE TREASURER-BOND RETIREMENT AND INTEREST, AND ONGOING BOND REGISTRATION AND TRANSFER CHARGES:  FOR BOND SALE EXPENSES AND FISCAL AGENT CHARGES

State Route Number 520 Corridor Account--State

      Appropriation................................................................................................................................................................................. $68,000

Transportation Partnership Account--State

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................... $608,000

Motor Vehicle Account--State Appropriation..................................................................................................................................... $60,000

Transportation 2003 Account (Nickel Account)--State

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................... $219,000

Transportation Improvement Account--State Appropriation................................................................................................................ $5,000

 Multimodal Transportation Account--State

      Appropriation................................................................................................................................................................................. $26,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION................................................................................................................................................. $986,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:  $30,000 of the transportation 2003 account (nickel account)--state appropriation is provided solely for expenses associated with bonds sold to construct a ferry boat vessel with a carrying capacity of one hundred forty-four cars.  If neither chapter ... (House Bill No. 2083), Laws of 2011 nor chapter ... (Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 5742) is enacted by June 30, 2011, the amount provided in this subsection lapses.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 403.  FOR THE STATE TREASURER-BOND RETIREMENT AND INTEREST, AND ONGOING BOND REGISTRATION AND TRANSFER CHARGES:  FOR MVFT BONDS AND TRANSFERS

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation:  For

      transfer to the Puget Sound Capital Construction

      Account.................................................................................................................................................................................... $52,516,000

 

      The department of transportation is authorized to sell up to $52,516,000 in bonds authorized by RCW 47.10.843 for vessel and terminal acquisition, major and minor improvements, and long lead-time materials acquisition for the Washington state ferries.  Of the authorized amounts, $14,500,000 is provided solely for expenditures made during the fiscal biennium ending June 30, 2011.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 404.  FOR THE STATE TREASURER-STATE REVENUES FOR DISTRIBUTION

Motor Vehicle Account--State Appropriation for motor

      vehicle fuel tax distributions to cities and

      counties.................................................................................................................................................................................. $478,155,000

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 405.  FOR THE STATE TREASURER-TRANSFERS

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation:  For

      motor vehicle fuel tax refunds and statutory

      transfers.............................................................................................................................................................................. $1,246,357,000

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 406.  FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING- TRANSFERS

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation:  For

      motor vehicle fuel tax refunds and transfers.......................................................................................................................... $127,984,000

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 407.  FOR THE STATE TREASURER-ADMINISTRATIVE TRANSFERS

      (1) Tacoma Narrows Toll Bridge Account--State

Appropriation:  For transfer to the Motor Vehicle

Account--State.................................................................................................................................................................................... $543,000

      (2) Motor Vehicle Account--State Appropriation:

For transfer to the Puget Sound Ferry Operations

Account--State............................................................................................................................................................................... $46,500,000

      (3) Recreational Vehicle Account--State

Appropriation:  For transfer to the Motor Vehicle

Account--State................................................................................................................................................................................. $1,450,000

      (4) License Plate Technology Account--State

Appropriation:  For transfer to the Highway Safety

Account--State................................................................................................................................................................................. $3,200,000

      (5) Multimodal Transportation Account--State

Appropriation:  For transfer to the Puget Sound

Ferry Operations Account--State.................................................................................................................................................. $43,000,000

      (6) Highway Safety Account--State Appropriation:

For transfer to the Motor Vehicle Account--State......................................................................................................................... $23,000,000

      (7) Department of Licensing Services Account--State

Appropriation:  For transfer to the Motor Vehicle

Account--State.................................................................................................................................................................................... $400,000

      (8) Advanced Right-of-Way Revolving Fund:  For transfer

to the Motor Vehicle Account--State............................................................................................................................................... $5,000,000

      (9) State Route Number 520 Civil Penalties

Account--State Appropriation:  For transfer to the

State Route Number 520 Corridor Account--State............................................................................................................................. $754,000

      (10) Rural Mobility Grant Program Account--State

Appropriation:  For transfer to the Multimodal

Transportation Account--State........................................................................................................................................................ $3,000,000

      (11) Motor Vehicle Account--State Appropriation:

For transfer to the State Patrol Highway Account--

State................................................................................................................................................................................................ $14,000,000

      (12) State Route Number 520 Corridor Account--State Appropriation:  For transfer to the Motor Vehicle Account--State, in an amount equal to funds dispersed during the 2009-2011 fiscal biennium authorized under section 805(7) of this act.

      (13) Motor Vehicle Account--State Appropriation:

For transfer to the Special Category C Account--State................................................................................................................... $1,500,000

      (14) Regional Mobility Grant Program Account--State

Appropriation:  For transfer to the Multimodal

Transportation Account--State........................................................................................................................................................ $1,000,000

      (15) State Patrol Highway Account--State

Appropriation:  For transfer to the Vehicle

Licensing Fraud Account..................................................................................................................................................................... $100,000

      (16) State Route Number 520 Corridor Account--State

Appropriation:  For transfer to the Motor Vehicle

Account............................................................................................................................................................................................ $2,435,000

      (17) The transfers identified in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (a) The amount transferred in subsection (1) of this section represents repayment of operating loans and reserve payments provided to the Tacoma Narrows toll bridge account from the motor vehicle account in the 2005-2007 fiscal biennium.

      (b) The transfer in subsection (9) of this section represents toll revenue collected from toll violations.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 408.  STATUTORY APPROPRIATIONS

      In addition to the amounts appropriated in this act for revenue for distribution, state contributions to the law enforcement officers' and firefighters' retirement system, and bond retirement and interest including ongoing bond registration and transfer charges, transfers, interest on registered warrants, and certificates of indebtedness, there is also appropriated such further amounts as may be required or available for these purposes under any statutory formula or under any proper bond covenant made under law.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 409.  The department of transportation is authorized to undertake federal advance construction projects under the provisions of 23 U.S.C. Sec. 115 in order to maintain progress in meeting approved highway construction and preservation objectives.  The legislature recognizes that the use of state funds may be required to temporarily fund expenditures of the federal appropriations for the highway construction and preservation programs for federal advance construction projects prior to conversion to federal funding.

COMPENSATION

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 501.  COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS

      Provisions or terms and conditions of collective bargaining agreements contained in this act are described in general terms.  The collective bargaining agreements or terms and conditions contained in this section and sections 502 through 505 of this act may also be funded by expenditures from nonappropriated accounts.  If positions are funded with lidded grants or dedicated fund sources with insufficient revenue, additional funding from other sources is not provided.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 502.  COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS--WSP TROOPERS ASSOCIATION

      No agreement has been reached between the governor and the Washington state patrol trooper's association under chapter 41.56 RCW for the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium.  Appropriations for the Washington state patrol in this act are sufficient to fund the provisions of the 2009-2011 agreement.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 503.  COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS--WSP LIEUTENANTS ASSOCIATION

      No agreement has been reached between the governor and the Washington state patrol lieutenant's association under chapter 41.56 RCW for the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium.  Appropriations for the Washington state patrol in this act are sufficient to fund the provisions of the 2009-2011 agreement.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 504.  DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MARINE DIVISION COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS--IBU, METAL TRADES, OPEIU, MEBA-UL, MEBA-L, MM&P, FASSPA, SEIU LOCAL NO. 6

      (1) Agreements have been reached between the governor and the following unions effective July 1, 2011:  Inlandboatmen's union of the pacific; Puget Sound metal trades council; office and professional employees international union local No. 8; marine engineers' beneficial association (unlicensed engine room employees); marine engineers' beneficial association (licensed engineer officers); masters, mates, and pilots; ferry agents, supervisors, and project administrators association and service employees international union local No. 6 under chapter 47.64 RCW for the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium.

      (2) Funding is reduced to reflect a reduction to overtime calculation, travel pay for relief employees, and reduced vacation leave accruals.

      (3) Except for office and professional employees international union local No. 8, funding is reduced to reflect a three percent temporary salary reduction for all employees for fiscal years 2012 and 2013 through June 29, 2013.  Entry level rates for employees under the inlandboatmen's union of the pacific and service employees international union local No. 6 are not subject to the three percent temporary salary reduction.

      (4) For employees covered under the office and professional employees international union local No. 8 agreement, funding is reduced to reflect a three percent temporary salary reduction for all employees whose monthly full-time equivalent salary is two thousand five hundred dollars or more per month for fiscal years 2012 and 2013 through June 29, 2013.  Temporary salary reduction leave is granted for employees covered under the office and professional employees international union local No. 8 agreement for the term of the 2011-2013 agreement.

      (5) Effective June 30, 2013, the salary schedules effective July 1, 2009, through June 29, 2011, will be reinstated for all of the agreements.

      (6) Appropriations in this act reflect funding to staff vessels according to United States coast guard certificates of inspection per the agreement noted in subsection (1) of this section.

      (7) Appropriations in this act do not reflect funding to fund state employee health benefits for employees represented by the super coalition on health benefits or employees outside of the super coalition on health benefits.  Acceptance of the super coalition on health benefits agreement will be contingent upon sufficient funding in the 2011-2013 omnibus operating appropriations act.  Funding for health benefits for employees outside of the super coalition on health benefits will be in accordance with appropriations in the 2011-2013 omnibus operating appropriations act.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 505.  DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MARINE DIVISION COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS--TERMS AND CONDITIONS

      No agreement has been reached between the governor and the masters, mates, and pilots marine operations watch supervisors under chapter 47.64 RCW for the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium.  Appropriations in this act reflect funding to maintain the provisions or terms and conditions of the 2009-2011 agreements for fiscal year 2012.  Fiscal year 2013 appropriations are reduced to reflect management priorities in collective bargaining.

IMPLEMENTING PROVISIONS

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 601.  ACQUISITION OF PROPERTIES AND FACILITIES THROUGH FINANCIAL CONTRACTS

      (1) The following agencies may enter into financial contracts, paid from any funds of an agency, appropriated or nonappropriated, for the purposes indicated and in not more than the principal amounts indicated, plus financing expenses and required reserves pursuant to chapter 39.94 RCW.  When securing properties under this section, agencies shall use the most economical financial contract option available, including long-term leases, lease-purchase agreements, lease-development with option to purchase agreements, or financial contracts using certificates of participation.  Expenditures made by an agency for one of the indicated purposes before the issue date of the authorized financial contract and any certificates of participation therein are intended to be reimbursed from proceeds of the financial contract and any certificates of participation therein to the extent provided in the agency's financing plan approved by the state finance committee.

      (2) State agencies may enter into agreements with the department of general administration and the state treasurer's office to develop requests to the legislature for the acquisition of properties and facilities through financial contracts.  The agreements may include charges for services rendered.

      (a) Department of transportation:  Enter into a financing contract for up to $10,824,000 plus financing expenses and required reserves pursuant to chapter 39.94 RCW for the acquisition and implementation of a time, leave, and labor distribution system that is integrated with the state's accounting and human resource management systems.

      (b) Department of licensing:  Enter into a financing contract for up to $7,414,000 plus financing expenses and required reserves pursuant to chapter 39.94 RCW for the purchase of a prorate and fuel tax system.

      (c) Washington state patrol:  (i) Enter into a financing contract for up to $8,241,000 plus financing expenses and required reserves pursuant to chapter 39.94 RCW to purchase and install mobile office platforms in state patrol and pursuit vehicles.

      (ii) Enter into a financing contract for up to $40,100,000 plus financing expenses and required reserves pursuant to chapter 39.94 RCW to purchase equipment and engineering services to convert to a narrowband digital system.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 602.  MEGA-PROJECT REPORTING

      Mega-projects are defined as individual or groups of related projects that cost $1,000,000,000 or more.  These projects include, but are not limited to:  Alaskan Way viaduct, SR 520, SR 167, I-405, North Spokane corridor, I-5 Tacoma HOV, I-90 Snoqualmie Pass, and the Columbia river crossing.  The department of transportation shall track mega-projects and report the financial status and schedule of these projects at least once a year to the transportation committees of the legislature and the office of financial management.  The design of mega-projects must be evaluated considering cost, capacity, safety, mobility needs, and how well the design of the facility fits within its urban environment.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 603.  FUND TRANSFERS

      (1) The transportation 2003 projects or improvements and the 2005 transportation partnership projects or improvements are listed in LEAP Transportation Document 2011-1 as developed April 19, 2011, which consists of a list of specific projects by fund source and amount over a sixteen-year period.  Current fiscal biennium funding for each project is a line-item appropriation, while the outer year funding allocations represent a sixteen-year plan.  The department is expected to use the flexibility provided in this section to assist in the delivery and completion of all transportation partnership account and transportation 2003 account (nickel account) projects on the LEAP transportation documents referenced in this act.  For the 2009-2011 and 2011-2013 project appropriations, unless otherwise provided in this act, the director of financial management may authorize a transfer of appropriation authority between projects funded with transportation 2003 account (nickel account) appropriations, or transportation partnership account appropriations, in order to manage project spending and efficiently deliver all projects in the respective program under the following conditions and limitations:

      (a) Transfers may only be made within each specific fund source referenced on the respective project list;

      (b) Transfers from a project may not be made as a result of the reduction of the scope of a project or be made to support increases in the scope of a project;

      (c) Each transfer between projects may only occur if the director of financial management finds that any resulting change will not hinder the completion of the projects as approved by the legislature.  Until the legislature reconvenes to consider the 2012 supplemental transportation budget, any unexpended 2009-2011 appropriation balance as approved by the office of financial management, in consultation with the legislative staff of the house of representatives and senate transportation committees, may be considered when transferring funds between projects;

      (d) Transfers from a project may be made if the funds appropriated to the project are in excess of the amount needed to complete the project;

      (e) Transfers may not occur for projects not identified on the applicable project list;

      (f) Transfers may not be made while the legislature is in session; and

      (g) Transfers between projects may be made by the department of transportation until the transfer amount by project exceeds two hundred fifty thousand dollars, or ten percent of the total project, whichever is less.  These transfers must be reported quarterly to the director of financial management and the chairs of the house of representatives and senate transportation committees.

      (2) At the time the department submits a request to transfer funds under this section, a copy of the request must be submitted to the transportation committees of the legislature.

      (3) The office of financial management shall work with legislative staff of the house of representatives and senate transportation committees to review the requested transfers in a timely manner.

      (4) The office of financial management shall document approved transfers and schedule changes in the transportation executive information system, compare changes to the legislative baseline funding and schedules identified by project identification number identified in the LEAP transportation documents referenced in this act, and transmit revised project lists to chairs of the transportation committees of the legislature on a quarterly basis.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 604.  (1) The department of transportation shall prepare a plan to improve the oversight of real estate procurement and management practices across all departmental programs and regions, including the Washington state ferries.  The plan must be submitted to the governor and the joint transportation committee by September 1, 2012.  The plan must include:

      (a) An inventory of all currently owned and leased office space, tunnel and bridge operations and maintenance facilities, and traffic management centers;

      (b) A list of all facilities that will be needed for tunnel and bridge operations or maintenance in the next ten years and the funding source that is assumed for these facilities;

      (c) A prioritized list of all buildings that are planned to be constructed, renovated, or remodeled in the next ten years and the funding source that is assumed for these facility improvements;

      (d) A list of options for consolidating staff, equipment, and operations activities to reduce costs.  This list must include an evaluation of the costs and benefits of owning properties as compared to leasing them using a life-cycle cost analysis; and

      (e) A process and plan for regularly evaluating needs for office space, tunnel and bridge operations and maintenance facilities, and traffic management.

      (2) Except as provided otherwise in the act, until September 1, 2012, the department of transportation may not enter into new leases, equal value exchanges, or property acquisitions for office needs without first consulting with the office of financial management and the joint transportation committee.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 605.  Executive Order number 05-05, archaeological and cultural resources, was issued effective November 10, 2005.  Agencies and higher education institutions that issue grants or loans for capital projects shall comply with the requirements set forth in this executive order.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 606.  FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

      As part of its annual budget submittal, the department shall provide an annual update to the legislature and the office of financial management that:

      (1) Compares the original project cost estimates approved in the transportation 2003 and 2005 transportation partnership project lists to the completed cost of the project, or the most recent legislatively approved budget and total project costs for projects not yet completed;

      (2) Identifies highway projects that may be reduced in scope and still achieve a functional benefit;

      (3) Identifies highway projects that have experienced scope increases and that can be reduced in scope;

      (4) Identifies highway projects that have lost significant local or regional contributions that were essential to completing the project; and

      (5) Identifies contingency amounts allocated to projects.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 607.  FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

      As part of its 2012 supplemental budget submittal, the department shall provide a report to the legislature and the office of financial management that:

      (1) Identifies, by capital project, the amount of state funding that has been reappropriated from the 2009-2011 fiscal biennium into the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium; and

      (2) Identifies, for each project, the amount of cost savings or increases in funding that have been identified as compared to the 2011 enacted transportation budget.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 608.  STAFFING LEVELS

      (1) As the department of transportation completes delivery of the projects funded by the 2003 and 2005 transportation revenue packages, it is clear that the current staffing levels necessary to deliver these projects are not sustainable into the future.  Therefore, the department is directed to quickly move forward to develop and implement new business practices so that a smaller, more nimble state workforce can effectively and efficiently deliver transportation improvement programs as they are approved in the future, in strong partnership with the private sector, while protecting the public's interests and assets.

      (2) To this end, the department of transportation is directed to reduce the size of its engineering and technical workforce to a level sustained by current law revenue levels currently estimated at two thousand FTEs by the end of the 2013-2015 fiscal biennium.  The department's current two thousand eight hundred FTE engineering and technical workforce levels for highway construction will be reduced in the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium, with a target of two thousand four hundred FTEs by June 30, 2013, and to a level of two thousand FTEs by June 30, 2015.

      (3) In order to successfully deliver the highway construction program as funded, the department of transportation may continue to contract out engineering and technical services.  In addition, the department may continue the incentive program for retirements and employee separations.  The department shall report quarterly to the office of financial management and the transportation committees of the legislature on its progress and plans to reduce highway construction workforce levels to two thousand FTEs by June 2015.  This report must also be posted on the department's web site.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 609.  VOLUNTARY RETIREMENT, SEPARATION, AND DOWNSHIFTING INCENTIVES

      As a management tool to reduce costs and make more effective use of resources, while improving employee productivity and morale, agencies may implement a voluntary retirement, separation, and/or downshifting incentive program that is cost neutral or results in cost savings over a two-year period following the commencement of the program, provided that such a program is approved by the director of financial management.

      Agencies participating in this authorization may offer voluntary retirement, separation, and/or downshifting incentives and options according to procedures and guidelines established by the office of financial management, in consultation with the department of personnel and the department of retirement systems.  The options may include, but are not limited to, financial incentives for:  Voluntary separation or retirement, voluntary leave-without-pay, voluntary workweek or work hour reduction, voluntary downward movement, or temporary separation for development purposes.  An employee does not have a contractual right to a financial incentive offered pursuant to this section.

      Offers must be reviewed and monitored jointly by the department of personnel and the department of retirement systems.  Agencies are required to submit a report by June 30, 2013, to the legislature and the office of financial management on the outcome of their approved incentive program.  The report must include information on the details of the program, including resulting service delivery changes, agency efficiencies, the cost of the incentive per participant, the total cost to the state, and the projected or actual net dollar savings over the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 610.  (1) The department of transportation shall provide a report to the joint transportation committee by August 1, 2011, providing recommendations on the department's future business model, staffing scenarios, and methods of program and project delivery.  The report must:

      (a) Detail the sustainable staffing level by program to deliver core functions of the department in the context of forecasted resources as of March 2011;

      (b) Analyze the effect new funding scenarios would have on the sustainable staffing levels for core functions and recommend appropriate staffing levels;

      (c) Describe how the department's sustainable staffing levels would be affected by new funding scenarios and any other actions the department would need to deliver the program associated with the new funding; and

      (d) Evaluate alternative program and project delivery methods to improve efficiency and effectiveness and provide recommendations on legislative changes, if necessary, for their implementation.

      (2) The department shall provide stakeholder involvement opportunities in the development of the report.  There must be a minimum of two such meetings:  One for the purpose of providing contextual and background information; and a second for review and comment of conclusions and recommendations.  Stakeholders must include labor, private engineering contractors, general business interests, representatives of various transportation modes, and others groups as appropriate.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 611.  FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

      The department is given the authority to provide up to $3,000,000 in toll credits to Kitsap transit for its role in new passenger-only ferry service and ferry corridor-related projects.  The number of toll credits provided to Kitsap transit must be equal to, but no more than, the number sufficient to meet federal match requirements for grant funding for passenger-only ferry service, but shall not exceed the amount authorized in this section.

MISCELLANEOUS 2011-2013 FISCAL BIENNIUM

Sec. 701.  RCW 47.29.170 and 2009 c 470 s 702 are each amended to read as follows:

      Before accepting any unsolicited project proposals, the commission must adopt rules to facilitate the acceptance, review, evaluation, and selection of unsolicited project proposals.  These rules must include the following:

      (1) Provisions that specify unsolicited proposals must meet predetermined criteria;

      (2) Provisions governing procedures for the cessation of negotiations and consideration;

      (3) Provisions outlining that unsolicited proposals are subject to a two-step process that begins with concept proposals and would only advance to the second step, which are fully detailed proposals, if the commission so directed;

      (4) Provisions that require concept proposals to include at least the following information:  Proposers' qualifications and experience; description of the proposed project and impact; proposed project financing; and known public benefits and opposition; and

      (5) Provisions that specify the process to be followed if the commission is interested in the concept proposal, which must include provisions:

      (a) Requiring that information regarding the potential project would be published for a period of not less than thirty days, during which time entities could express interest in submitting a proposal;

      (b) Specifying that if letters of interest were received during the thirty days, then an additional sixty days for submission of the fully detailed proposal would be allowed; and

      (c) Procedures for what will happen if there are insufficient proposals submitted or if there are no letters of interest submitted in the appropriate time frame.

      The commission may adopt other rules as necessary to avoid conflicts with existing laws, statutes, or contractual obligations of the state.

      The commission may not accept or consider any unsolicited proposals before July 1, ((2011)) 2013.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 702.  To the extent that any appropriation authorizes expenditures of state funds from the motor vehicle account, special category C account, Tacoma Narrows toll bridge account, transportation 2003 account (nickel account), transportation partnership account, transportation improvement account, Puget Sound capital construction account, multimodal transportation account, state route number 520 corridor account, or other transportation capital project account in the state treasury for a state transportation program that is specified to be funded with proceeds from the sale of bonds authorized in chapter 47.10 RCW, the legislature declares that any such expenditures made prior to the issue date of the applicable transportation bonds for that state transportation program are intended to be reimbursed from proceeds of those transportation bonds in a maximum amount equal to the amount of such appropriation.

Sec. 703.  RCW 46.18.060 and 2010 1st sp.s. c 7 s 94 and 2010 c 161 s 604 are each reenacted and amended to read as follows:

      (1) The department must review and either approve or reject special license plate applications submitted by sponsoring organizations.

      (2) Duties of the department include, but are not limited to, the following:

      (a) Review and approve the annual financial reports submitted by sponsoring organizations with active special license plate series and present those annual financial reports to the ((senate and house transportation committees)) joint transportation committee;

      (b) Report annually to the ((senate and house of representatives transportation committees)) joint transportation committee on the special license plate applications that were considered by the department;

      (c) Issue approval and rejection notification letters to sponsoring organizations, the department, the ((chairs of the senate and house of representatives transportation committees)) executive committee of the joint transportation committee, and the legislative sponsors identified in each application.  The letters must be issued within seven days of making a determination on the status of an application; and

      (d) Review annually the number of plates sold for each special license plate series created after January 1, 2003.  The department may submit a recommendation to discontinue a special plate series to the ((chairs of the senate and house of representatives transportation committees)) executive committee of the joint transportation committee.

      (3) Except as provided in RCW 46.18.245, in order to assess the effects and impact of the proliferation of special license plates, the legislature declares a temporary moratorium on the issuance of any additional plates until July 1, ((2011)) 2013.  During this period of time, the department is prohibited from accepting, reviewing, processing, or approving any applications.  Additionally, a special license plate may not be enacted by the legislature during the moratorium, unless the proposed license plate has been approved by the former special license plate review board before February 15, 2005.

Sec. 704.  RCW 46.63.170 and 2010 c 161 s 1127 are each amended to read as follows:

      (1) The use of automated traffic safety cameras for issuance of notices of infraction is subject to the following requirements:

      (a) The appropriate local legislative authority must first enact an ordinance allowing for their use to detect one or more of the following:  Stoplight, railroad crossing, or school speed zone violations.  At a minimum, the local ordinance must contain the restrictions described in this section and provisions for public notice and signage.  Cities and counties using automated traffic safety cameras before July 24, 2005, are subject to the restrictions described in this section, but are not required to enact an authorizing ordinance.

      (b) Use of automated traffic safety cameras is restricted to two-arterial intersections, railroad crossings, and school speed zones only.

      (c) During the ((2009-2011)) 2011-2013 fiscal biennium, automated traffic safety cameras may be used to detect speed violations for the purposes of ((section 201(2), chapter 470, Laws of 2009)) section 201(2) of this act if the local legislative authority first enacts an ordinance authorizing the use of cameras to detect speed violations.

      (d) Automated traffic safety cameras may only take pictures of the vehicle and vehicle license plate and only while an infraction is occurring.  The picture must not reveal the face of the driver or of passengers in the vehicle.

      (e) A notice of infraction must be mailed to the registered owner of the vehicle within fourteen days of the violation, or to the renter of a vehicle within fourteen days of establishing the renter's name and address under subsection (3)(a) of this section.  The law enforcement officer issuing the notice of infraction shall include with it a certificate or facsimile thereof, based upon inspection of photographs, microphotographs, or electronic images produced by an automated traffic safety camera, stating the facts supporting the notice of infraction.  This certificate or facsimile is prima facie evidence of the facts contained in it and is admissible in a proceeding charging a violation under this chapter.  The photographs, microphotographs, or electronic images evidencing the violation must be available for inspection and admission into evidence in a proceeding to adjudicate the liability for the infraction.  A person receiving a notice of infraction based on evidence detected by an automated traffic safety camera may respond to the notice by mail.

      (f) The registered owner of a vehicle is responsible for an infraction under RCW 46.63.030(1)(e) unless the registered owner overcomes the presumption in RCW 46.63.075, or, in the case of a rental car business, satisfies the conditions under subsection (3) of this section.  If appropriate under the circumstances, a renter identified under subsection (3)(a) of this section is responsible for an infraction.

      (g) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, all photographs, microphotographs, or electronic images prepared under this section are for the exclusive use of law enforcement in the discharge of duties under this section and are not open to the public and may not be used in a court in a pending action or proceeding unless the action or proceeding relates to a violation under this section.  No photograph, microphotograph, or electronic image may be used for any purpose other than enforcement of violations under this section nor retained longer than necessary to enforce this section.

      (h) All locations where an automated traffic safety camera is used must be clearly marked by placing signs in locations that clearly indicate to a driver that he or she is entering a zone where traffic laws are enforced by an automated traffic safety camera.

      (i) If a county or city has established an authorized automated traffic safety camera program under this section, the compensation paid to the manufacturer or vendor of the equipment used must be based only upon the value of the equipment and services provided or rendered in support of the system, and may not be based upon a portion of the fine or civil penalty imposed or the revenue generated by the equipment.

      (2) Infractions detected through the use of automated traffic safety cameras are not part of the registered owner's driving record under RCW 46.52.101 and 46.52.120.  Additionally, infractions generated by the use of automated traffic safety cameras under this section shall be processed in the same manner as parking infractions, including for the purposes of RCW 3.50.100, 35.20.220, 46.16A.120, and 46.20.270(3).  However, the amount of the fine issued for an infraction generated through the use of an automated traffic safety camera shall not exceed the amount of a fine issued for other parking infractions within the jurisdiction.

      (3) If the registered owner of the vehicle is a rental car business, the law enforcement agency shall, before a notice of infraction being issued under this section, provide a written notice to the rental car business that a notice of infraction may be issued to the rental car business if the rental car business does not, within eighteen days of receiving the written notice, provide to the issuing agency by return mail:

      (a) A statement under oath stating the name and known mailing address of the individual driving or renting the vehicle when the infraction occurred; or

      (b) A statement under oath that the business is unable to determine who was driving or renting the vehicle at the time the infraction occurred because the vehicle was stolen at the time of the infraction.  A statement provided under this subsection must be accompanied by a copy of a filed police report regarding the vehicle theft; or

      (c) In lieu of identifying the vehicle operator, the rental car business may pay the applicable penalty.

      Timely mailing of this statement to the issuing law enforcement agency relieves a rental car business of any liability under this chapter for the notice of infraction.

      (4) Nothing in this section prohibits a law enforcement officer from issuing a notice of traffic infraction to a person in control of a vehicle at the time a violation occurs under RCW 46.63.030(1) (a), (b), or (c).

      (5) For the purposes of this section, "automated traffic safety camera" means a device that uses a vehicle sensor installed to work in conjunction with an intersection traffic control system, a railroad grade crossing control system, or a speed measuring device, and a camera synchronized to automatically record one or more sequenced photographs, microphotographs, or electronic images of the rear of a motor vehicle at the time the vehicle fails to stop when facing a steady red traffic control signal or an activated railroad grade crossing control signal, or exceeds a speed limit in a school speed zone as detected by a speed measuring device.  During the ((2009-2011)) 2011-2013 fiscal biennium, an automated traffic safety camera includes a camera used to detect speed violations for the purposes of ((section 201(2), chapter 470, Laws of 2009)) section 201(2) of this act.

      (6) During the ((2009-2011)) 2011-2013 fiscal biennium, this section does not apply to automated traffic safety cameras for the purposes of ((section 218(2), chapter 470, Laws of 2009)) section 216(5) of this act.

Sec. 705.  RCW 46.63.160 and 2010 c 249 s 6 are each amended to read as follows:

      (1) This section applies only to civil penalties for nonpayment of tolls detected through use of photo toll systems.

      (2) Nothing in this section prohibits a law enforcement officer from issuing a notice of traffic infraction to a person in control of a vehicle at the time a violation occurs under RCW 46.63.030(1) (a), (b), or (c).

      (3) A notice of civil penalty may be issued by the department of transportation when a toll is assessed through use of a photo toll system and the toll is not paid by the toll payment due date, which is eighty days from the date the vehicle uses the toll facility and incurs the toll charge.

      (4) Any registered owner or renter of a vehicle traveling upon a toll facility operated under chapter 47.56 or 47.46 RCW is subject to a civil penalty governed by the administrative procedures set forth in this section when the vehicle incurs a toll charge and the toll is not paid by the toll payment due date, which is eighty days from the date the vehicle uses the toll facility and incurs the toll charge.

      (5) Consistent with chapter 34.05 RCW, the department of transportation shall develop an administrative adjudication process to review appeals of civil penalties issued by the department of transportation for toll nonpayment detected through the use of a photo toll system under this section.

      (6) The use of a photo toll system is subject to the following requirements:

      (a) Photo toll systems may take photographs, digital photographs, microphotographs, videotapes, or other recorded images of the vehicle and vehicle license plate only.

      (b) A notice of civil penalty must include with it a certificate or facsimile thereof, based upon inspection of photographs, microphotographs, videotape, or other recorded images produced by a photo toll system, stating the facts supporting the notice of civil penalty.  This certificate or facsimile is prima facie evidence of the facts contained in it and is admissible in a proceeding established under subsection (5) of this section.  The photographs, digital photographs, microphotographs, videotape, or other recorded images evidencing the toll nonpayment civil penalty must be available for inspection and admission into evidence in a proceeding to adjudicate the liability for the civil penalty.

      (c) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, all photographs, digital photographs, microphotographs, videotape, other recorded images, or other records identifying a specific instance of travel prepared under this chapter are for the exclusive use of the tolling agency for toll collection and enforcement purposes and are not open to the public and may not be used in a court in a pending action or proceeding unless the action or proceeding relates to a civil penalty under this chapter.  No photograph, digital photograph, microphotograph, videotape, other recorded image, or other record identifying a specific instance of travel may be used for any purpose other than toll collection or enforcement of civil penalties under this  section.  Records identifying a specific instance of travel by a specific person or vehicle must be retained only as required to ensure payment and enforcement of tolls and to comply with state records retention policies.

      (d) All locations where a photo toll system is used must be clearly marked by placing signs in locations that clearly indicate to a driver that he or she is entering a zone where tolls are assessed and enforced by a photo toll system.

      (e) Within existing resources, the department of transportation shall conduct education and outreach efforts at least six months prior to activating an all-electronic photo toll system.  Methods of outreach shall include a department presence at community meetings in the vicinity of a toll facility, signage, and information published in local media.  Information provided shall include notice of when all electronic photo tolling shall begin and methods of payment.  Additionally, the department shall provide quarterly reporting on education and outreach efforts and other data related to the issuance of civil penalties.

      (7) Civil penalties for toll nonpayment detected through the use of photo toll systems must be issued to the registered owner of the vehicle identified by the photo toll system, but are not part of the registered owner's driving record under RCW 46.52.101 and 46.52.120.

      (8) The civil penalty for toll nonpayment detected through the use of a photo toll system is forty dollars plus the photo toll and associated fees.

      (9) Except as provided otherwise in this subsection, all civil penalties, including the photo toll and associated fees, collected under this section must be deposited into the toll facility account of the facility on which the toll was assessed.  However, ((beginning on July 1, 2011)) through June 30, 2013, civil penalties deposited into the Tacoma Narrows toll bridge account created under RCW 47.56.165 that are in excess of amounts necessary to support the toll adjudication process applicable to toll collection on the Tacoma Narrows bridge must first be allocated toward repayment of operating loans and reserve payments provided to the account from the motor vehicle account under section 1005(15), chapter 518, Laws of 2007.  Additionally, all civil penalties, resulting from nonpayment of tolls on the state route number 520 corridor, shall be deposited into the state route number 520 civil penalties account created under section 4, chapter 248, Laws of 2010 but only if chapter 248, Laws of 2010 is enacted by June 30, 2010.

      (10) If the registered owner of the vehicle is a rental car business, the department of transportation shall, before a toll bill is issued, provide a written notice to the rental car business that a toll bill may be issued to the rental car business if the rental car business does not, within thirty days of the mailing of the written notice, provide to the issuing agency by return mail:

      (a) A statement under oath stating the name and known mailing address of the individual driving or renting the vehicle when the toll was assessed; or

      (b) A statement under oath that the business is unable to determine who was driving or renting the vehicle at the time the toll was assessed because the vehicle was stolen at the time the toll was assessed.  A statement provided under this subsection must be accompanied by a copy of a filed police report regarding the vehicle theft; or

      (c) In lieu of identifying the vehicle operator, the rental car business may pay the applicable toll and fee.

      Timely mailing of this statement to the issuing agency relieves a rental car business of any liability under this section for the payment of the toll.

      (11) Consistent with chapter 34.05 RCW, the department of transportation shall develop rules to implement this section.

      (12) For the purposes of this section, "photo toll system" means the system defined in RCW 47.56.010 and 47.46.020.

Sec. 706.  RCW 43.19.642 and 2010 c 247 s 701 are each amended to read as follows:

      (1) Effective June 1, 2006, for agencies complying with the ultra-low sulfur diesel mandate of the United States environmental protection agency for on-highway diesel fuel, agencies shall use biodiesel as an additive to ultra-low sulfur diesel for lubricity, provided that the use of a lubricity additive is warranted and that the use of biodiesel is comparable in performance and cost with other available lubricity additives.  The amount of biodiesel added to the ultra-low sulfur diesel fuel shall be not less than two percent.

      (2) Effective June 1, 2009, state agencies are required to use a minimum of twenty percent biodiesel as compared to total volume of all diesel purchases made by the agencies for the operation of the agencies' diesel‑powered vessels, vehicles, and construction equipment.

      (3) All state agencies using biodiesel fuel shall, beginning on July 1, 2006, file biannual reports with the department of general administration documenting the use of the fuel and a description of how any problems encountered were resolved.

      (4) For the 2009-2011 fiscal biennium, all fuel purchased by the Washington state ferries at Harbor Island for the operation of the Washington state ferries diesel powered vessels must be a minimum of five percent biodiesel blend so long as the per gallon price of diesel containing a five percent biodiesel blend level does not exceed the per gallon price of diesel by more than five percent.  If the per gallon price of diesel containing a five percent biodiesel blend level exceeds the per gallon price of diesel by more than five percent, the requirements of this section do not apply to vessel fuel purchases by the Washington state ferries.

      (5) By December 1, 2009, the department of general administration shall:

      (a) Report to the legislature on the average true price differential for biodiesel by blend and location; and

      (b) Examine alternative fuel procurement methods that work to address potential market barriers for in-state biodiesel producers and report these findings to the legislature.

(6) During the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium, this section does not apply to fuel purchased by the Washington state ferries.

Sec. 707.  RCW 43.19.534 and 2009 c 470 s 717 are each amended to read as follows:

      (1) State agencies, the legislature, and departments shall purchase for their use all goods and services required by the legislature, agencies, or departments that are produced or provided in whole or in part from class II inmate work programs operated by the department of corrections through state contract.  These goods and services shall not be purchased from any other source unless, upon application by the department or agency:  (a) The department of general administration finds that the articles or products do not meet the reasonable requirements of the agency or department, (b) are not of equal or better quality, or (c) the price of the product or service is higher than that produced by the private sector.  However, the criteria contained in (a), (b), and (c) of this section for purchasing goods and services from sources other than correctional industries do not apply to goods and services produced by correctional industries that primarily replace goods manufactured or services obtained from outside the state.  The department of corrections and department of general administration shall adopt administrative rules that implement this section.

      (2) During the 2009-2011 and 2011-2013 fiscal ((biennium)) biennia, and in conformance with section 223(11), chapter 470, Laws of 2009 and section 221(2) of this act, this section does not apply to the purchase of uniforms by the Washington state ferries.

Sec. 708.  RCW 47.01.380 and 2009 c 470 s 705 are each amended to read as follows:

      The department shall not commence construction on any part of the state route number 520 bridge replacement and HOV project until a record of decision has been reached providing reasonable assurance that project impacts will be avoided, minimized, or mitigated as much as practicable to protect against further adverse impacts on neighborhood environmental quality as a result of repairs and improvements made to the state route number 520 bridge and its connecting roadways, and that any such impacts will be addressed through engineering design choices, mitigation measures, or a combination of both.  The requirements of this section shall not apply to off‑site pontoon construction supporting the state route number 520 bridge replacement and HOV project.  The requirements of this section shall not apply during the 2009-2011 and 2011-2013 fiscal ((biennium)) biennia.

Sec. 709.  RCW 47.56.403 and 2005 c 312 s 3 are each amended to read as follows:

      (1) The department may provide for the establishment, construction, and operation of a pilot project of high occupancy toll lanes on state route 167 high occupancy vehicle lanes within King county.  The department may issue, buy, and redeem bonds, and deposit and expend them; secure and remit financial and other assistance in the construction of high occupancy toll lanes, carry insurance, and handle any other matters pertaining to the high occupancy toll lane pilot project.

      (2) Tolls for high occupancy toll lanes will be established as follows:

      (a) The schedule of toll charges for high occupancy toll lanes must be established by the transportation commission and collected in a manner determined by the commission.

      (b) Toll charges shall not be assessed on transit buses and vanpool vehicles owned or operated by any public agency.

      (c) The department shall establish performance standards for the state route 167 high occupancy toll lane pilot project.  The department must automatically adjust the toll charge, using dynamic tolling, to ensure that toll-paying single-occupant vehicle users are only permitted to enter the lane to the extent that average vehicle speeds in the lane remain above forty-five miles per hour at least ninety percent of the time during peak hours.  The toll charge may vary in amount by time of day, level of traffic congestion within the highway facility, vehicle occupancy, or other criteria, as the commission may deem appropriate.  The commission may also vary toll charges for single-occupant inherently low-emission vehicles such as those powered by electric batteries, natural gas, propane, or other clean burning fuels.

      (d) The commission shall periodically review the toll charges to determine if the toll charges are effectively maintaining travel time, speed, and reliability on the highway facilities.

      (3) The department shall monitor the state route 167 high occupancy toll lane pilot project and shall annually report to the transportation commission and the legislature on operations and findings.  At a minimum, the department shall provide facility use data and review the impacts on:

      (a) Freeway efficiency and safety;

      (b) Effectiveness for transit;

      (c) Person and vehicle movements by mode;

      (d) Ability to finance improvements and transportation services through tolls; and

      (e) The impacts on all highway users.  The department shall analyze aggregate use data and conduct, as needed, separate surveys to assess usage of the facility in relation to geographic, socioeconomic, and demographic information within the corridor in order to ascertain actual and perceived questions of equitable use of the facility.

      (4) The department shall modify the pilot project to address identified safety issues and mitigate negative impacts to high occupancy vehicle lane users.

      (5) Authorization to impose high occupancy vehicle tolls for the state route 167 high occupancy toll pilot project expires if either of the following two conditions apply:

      (a) If no contracts have been let by the department to begin construction of the toll facilities associated with this pilot project within four years of July 24, 2005; or

      (b) ((Four years after toll collection begins under this section)) If high occupancy vehicle tolls are being collected on June 30, 2013.

      (6) The department of transportation shall adopt rules that allow automatic vehicle identification transponders used for electronic toll collection to be compatible with other electronic payment devices or transponders from the Washington state ferry system, other public transportation systems, or other toll collection systems to the extent that technology permits.

      (7) The conversion of a single existing high occupancy vehicle lane to a high occupancy toll lane as proposed for SR-167 must be taken as the exception for this pilot project.

      (8) A violation of the lane restrictions applicable to the high occupancy toll lanes established under this section is a traffic infraction.

      (9) Procurement activity associated with this pilot project shall be open and competitive in accordance with chapter 39.29 RCW.

Sec. 710.  RCW 47.28.030 and 2010 c 283 s 9 and 2010 c 5 s 11 are each reenacted and amended to read as follows:

      (1)(a) A state highway shall be constructed, altered, repaired, or improved, and improvements located on property acquired for right‑of‑way purposes may be repaired or renovated pending the use of such right‑of‑way for highway purposes, by contract or state forces.  The work or portions thereof may be done by state forces when the estimated costs thereof are less than fifty thousand dollars and effective July 1, 2005, sixty thousand dollars.

      (b) When delay of performance of such work would jeopardize a state highway or constitute a danger to the traveling public, the work may be done by state forces when the estimated cost thereof is less than eighty thousand dollars and effective July 1, 2005, one hundred thousand dollars.

      (c) When the department of transportation determines to do the work by state forces, it shall enter a statement upon its records to that effect, stating the reasons therefor.

      (d) To enable a larger number of small businesses and veteran, minority, and women contractors to effectively compete for department of transportation contracts, the department may adopt rules providing for bids and award of contracts for the performance of work, or furnishing equipment, materials, supplies, or operating services whenever any work is to be performed and the engineer's estimate indicates the cost of the work would not exceed eighty thousand dollars and effective July 1, 2005, one hundred thousand dollars.

      (2) The rules adopted under this section:

      (a) Shall provide for competitive bids to the extent that competitive sources are available except when delay of performance would jeopardize life or property or inconvenience the traveling public; and

      (b) Need not require the furnishing of a bid deposit nor a performance bond, but if a performance bond is not required then progress payments to the contractor may be required to be made based on submittal of paid invoices to substantiate proof that disbursements have been made to laborers, material suppliers, mechanics, and subcontractors from the previous partial payment; and

      (c) May establish prequalification standards and procedures as an alternative to those set forth in RCW 47.28.070, but the prequalification standards and procedures under RCW 47.28.070 shall always be sufficient.

      (3) The department of transportation shall comply with such goals and rules as may be adopted by the office of minority and women's business enterprises to implement chapter 39.19 RCW with respect to contracts entered into under this chapter.  The department may adopt such rules as may be necessary to comply with the rules adopted by the office of minority and women's business enterprises under chapter 39.19 RCW.

      (4)(a) For the period of March 15, 2010, through June 30, ((2011)) 2013, work for less than one hundred twenty thousand dollars may be performed on ferry vessels and terminals by state forces.

      (b) The department shall hire a disinterested, third party to conduct an independent analysis to identify methods of reducing out-of-service times for vessel maintenance, preservation, and improvement projects.  The analysis must include options that consider consolidating work while vessels are at shipyards by having state forces perform services traditionally performed at Eagle Harbor at the shipyard and decreasing the allowable time at shipyards.  The analysis must also compare the out-of-service vessel times of performing services by state forces versus contracting out those services which in turn must be used to form a recommendation as to what the threshold of work performed on ferry vessels and terminals by state forces should be.  This analysis must be presented to the transportation committees of the senate and house of representatives by December 1, 2010.

      (c) The department shall develop a proposed ferry vessel maintenance, preservation, and improvement program and present it to the transportation committees of the senate and house of representatives by December 1, 2010.  The proposed program must:

      (i) Improve the basis for budgeting vessel maintenance, preservation, and improvement costs and for projecting those costs into a sixteen-year financial plan;

      (ii) Limit the amount of planned out-of-service time to the greatest extent possible, including options associated with department staff as well as commercial shipyards; and

      (iii) Be based on the service plan in the capital plan, recognizing that vessel preservation and improvement needs may vary by route.

      (d) In developing the proposed ferry vessel maintenance, preservation, and improvement program, the department shall consider the following, related to reducing vessel out-of-service time:

      (i) The costs compared to benefits of Eagle Harbor repair and maintenance facility operations options to include staffing costs and benefits in terms of reduced out-of-service time;

      (ii) The maintenance requirements for on-vessel staff, including the benefits of a systemwide standard;

      (iii) The costs compared to benefits of staff performing preservation or maintenance work, or both, while the vessel is underway, tied up between sailings, or not deployed;

      (iv) A review of the department's vessel maintenance, preservation, and improvement program contracting process and contractual requirements;

      (v) The costs compared to benefits of allowing for increased costs associated with expedited delivery;

      (vi) A method for comparing the anticipated out-of-service time of proposed projects and other projects planned during the same construction period;

      (vii) Coordination with required United States coast guard dry dockings;

      (viii) A method for comparing how proposed projects relate to the service requirements of the route on which the vessel normally operates; and

      (ix) A method for evaluating the ongoing maintenance and preservation costs associated with proposed improvement projects.

Sec. 711.  RCW 43.105.330 and 2006 c 76 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:

      (1) The board shall appoint a state interoperability executive committee, the membership of which must include, but not be limited to, representatives of the military department, the Washington state patrol, the department of transportation, the department of information services, the department of natural resources, city and county governments, state and local fire chiefs, police chiefs, and sheriffs, and state and local emergency management directors.  The chair and legislative members of the board will serve as nonvoting ex officio members of the committee.  Voting membership may not exceed fifteen members.

      (2) The chair of the board shall appoint the chair of the committee from among the voting members of the committee.

      (3) The state interoperability executive committee has the following responsibilities:

      (a) Develop policies and make recommendations to the board for technical standards for state wireless radio communications systems, including emergency communications systems.  The standards must address, among other things, the interoperability of systems, taking into account both existing and future systems and technologies;

      (b) Coordinate and manage on behalf of the board the licensing and use of state-designated and state-licensed radio frequencies, including the spectrum used for public safety and emergency communications, and serve as the point of contact with the federal communications commission on matters relating to allocation, use, and licensing of radio spectrum;

      (c) ((Coordinate the purchasing of all state wireless radio communications system equipment to ensure that:
      (i) After the transition from a radio over internet protocol network, any new trunked system shall be, at a minimum, project25;
      (ii) Any new system that requires advanced digital features shall be, at a minimum, project-25; and
      (iii) Any new system or equipment purchases shall be, at a minimum, upgradeable to project-25;
      (d))) Seek support, including possible federal or other funding, for state-sponsored wireless communications systems;

      (((e))) (d) Develop recommendations for legislation that may be required to promote interoperability of state wireless communications systems;

      (((f))) (e) Foster cooperation and coordination among public safety and emergency response organizations;

      (((g))) (f) Work with wireless communications groups and associations to ensure interoperability among all public safety and emergency response wireless communications systems; and

      (((h))) (g) Perform such other duties as may be assigned by the board to promote interoperability of wireless communications systems.

(4) During the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium, the requirement that any state or local entity must purchase radios or communication systems that are the P25 communication standard is suspended.

Sec. 712.  RCW 47.64.170 and 2010 c 283 s 11 are each amended to read as follows:

      (1) Any ferry employee organization certified as the bargaining representative shall be the exclusive representative of all ferry employees in the bargaining unit and shall represent all such employees fairly.

      (2) A ferry employee organization or organizations and the governor may each designate any individual as its representative to engage in collective bargaining negotiations.

      (3) Negotiating sessions, including strategy meetings of the employer or employee organizations, mediation, and the deliberative process of arbitrators are exempt from the provisions of chapter 42.30 RCW.  Hearings conducted by arbitrators may be open to the public by mutual consent of the parties.

      (4) Terms of any collective bargaining agreement may be enforced by civil action in Thurston county superior court upon the initiative of either party.

      (5) Ferry system employees or any employee organization shall not negotiate or attempt to negotiate directly with anyone other than the person who has been appointed or authorized a bargaining representative for the purpose of bargaining with the ferry employees or their representative.

      (6)(a) Within ten working days after the first Monday in September of every odd-numbered year, the parties shall attempt to agree on an interest arbitrator to be used if the parties are not successful in negotiating a comprehensive collective bargaining agreement.  If the parties cannot agree on an arbitrator within the ten-day period, either party may request a list of seven arbitrators from the federal mediation and conciliation service.  The parties shall select an interest arbitrator using the coin toss/alternate strike method within thirty calendar days of receipt of the list.  Immediately upon selecting an interest arbitrator, the parties shall cooperate to reserve dates with the arbitrator for potential arbitration between August 1st and September 15th of the following even‑numbered year.  The parties shall also prepare a schedule of at least five negotiation dates for the following year, absent an agreement to the contrary.  The parties shall execute a written agreement before November 1st of each odd-numbered year setting forth the name of the arbitrator and the dates reserved for bargaining and arbitration.  This subsection (6)(a) imposes minimum obligations only and is not intended to define or limit a party's full, good faith bargaining obligation under other sections of this chapter.

      (b) The negotiation of a proposed collective bargaining agreement by representatives of the employer and a ferry employee organization shall commence on or about February 1st of every even-numbered year.

      (c) For negotiations covering the 2009-2011 biennium and subsequent biennia, the time periods specified in this section, and in RCW 47.64.210 and 47.64.300 through 47.64.320, must ensure conclusion of all agreements on or before October 1st of the even-numbered year next preceding the biennial budget period during which the agreement should take effect.  These time periods may only be altered by mutual agreement of the parties in writing.  Any such agreement and any impasse procedures agreed to by the parties under RCW 47.64.200 must include an agreement regarding the new time periods that will allow final resolution by negotiations or arbitration by October 1st of each even-numbered year.

      (7) It is the intent of this section that the collective bargaining agreement or arbitrator's award shall commence on July 1st of each odd-numbered year and shall terminate on June 30th of the next odd-numbered year to coincide with the ensuing biennial budget year, as defined by RCW 43.88.020(7), to the extent practical.  It is further the intent of this section that all collective bargaining agreements be concluded by October 1st of the even-numbered year before the commencement of the biennial budget year during which the agreements are to be in effect.  After the expiration date of a collective bargaining agreement negotiated under this chapter, except to the extent provided in subsection (11) of this section and RCW 47.64.270(4), all of the terms and conditions specified in the collective bargaining agreement remain in effect until the effective date of a subsequently negotiated agreement, not to exceed one year from the expiration date stated in the agreement.  Thereafter, the employer may unilaterally implement according to law.

      (8) The office of financial management shall conduct a salary survey, for use in collective bargaining and arbitration, which must be conducted through a contract with a firm nationally recognized in the field of human resources management consulting.

      (9) Except as provided in subsection (11) of this section:

      (a) The governor shall submit a request either for funds necessary to implement the collective bargaining agreements including, but not limited to, the compensation and fringe benefit provisions or for legislation necessary to implement the agreement, or both.  Requests for funds necessary to implement the collective bargaining agreements shall not be submitted to the legislature by the governor unless such requests:

      (i) Have been submitted to the director of the office of financial management by October 1st before the legislative session at which the requests are to be considered; and

      (ii) Have been certified by the director of the office of financial management as being feasible financially for the state.

      (b) The governor shall submit a request either for funds necessary to implement the arbitration awards or for legislation necessary to implement the arbitration awards, or both.  Requests for funds necessary to implement the arbitration awards shall not be submitted to the legislature by the governor unless such requests:

      (i) Have been submitted to the director of the office of financial management by October 1st before the legislative session at which the requests are to be considered; and

      (ii) Have been certified by the director of the office of financial management as being feasible financially for the state.

      (c) The legislature shall approve or reject the submission of the request for funds necessary to implement the collective bargaining agreements or arbitration awards as a whole for each agreement or award.  The legislature shall not consider a request for funds to implement a collective bargaining agreement or arbitration award unless the request is transmitted to the legislature as part of the governor's budget document submitted under RCW 43.88.030 and 43.88.060.  If the legislature rejects or fails to act on the submission, either party may reopen all or part of the agreement and award or the exclusive bargaining representative may seek to implement the procedures provided for in RCW 47.64.210 and 47.64.300.

      (10) If, after the compensation and fringe benefit provisions of an agreement are approved by the legislature, a significant revenue shortfall occurs resulting in reduced appropriations, as declared by proclamation of the governor or by resolution of the legislature, both parties shall immediately enter into collective bargaining for a mutually agreed upon modification of the agreement.

(11)(a) For the collective bargaining agreements negotiated for the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium, the legislature may consider a request for funds to implement a collective bargaining agreement even if the request for funds was not received by the office of financial management by October 1st and was not transmitted to the legislature as part of the governor's budget document submitted under RCW 43.88.030 and 43.88.060.
      (b) For the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium, a collective bargaining agreement related to employee health care benefits negotiated between the employer and coalition pursuant to RCW 41.80.020(3) regarding the dollar amount expended on behalf of each employee must be a separate agreement for which the governor may request funds necessary to implement the agreement.  If such an agreement is negotiated and funded by the legislature, this agreement will supersede any terms and conditions of an expired 2009-2011 biennial master collective bargaining agreement under this chapter regarding health care benefits.

Sec. 713.  RCW 47.64.270 and 2010 c 283 s 13 are each amended to read as follows:

      (1) The employer and one coalition of all the exclusive bargaining representatives subject to this chapter and chapter 41.80 RCW shall conduct negotiations regarding the dollar amount expended on behalf of each employee for health care benefits.

      (2) Absent a collective bargaining agreement to the contrary, the department of transportation shall provide contributions to insurance and health care plans for ferry system employees and dependents, as determined by the state health care authority, under chapter 41.05 RCW.

      (3) The employer and employee organizations may collectively bargain for insurance plans other than health care benefits, and employer contributions may exceed that of other state agencies as provided in RCW 41.05.050.

(4) For the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium, a collective bargaining agreement related to employee health care benefits negotiated between the employer and coalition pursuant to RCW 41.80.020(3) regarding the dollar amount expended on behalf of each employee must be a separate agreement for which the governor may request funds necessary to implement the agreement.  If such an agreement is negotiated and funded by the legislature, this agreement will supersede any terms and conditions of an expired 2009-2011 biennial collective bargaining agreement under this chapter regarding health care benefits.

Sec. 714.  RCW 47.64.280 and 2010 c 283 s 14 are each amended to read as follows:

      (1) There is created the marine employees' commission.  The governor shall appoint the commission with the consent of the senate.  The commission shall consist of three members:  One member to be appointed from labor, one member from industry, and one member from the public who has significant knowledge of maritime affairs.  The public member shall be chair of the commission.  One of the original members shall be appointed for a term of three years, one for a term of four years, and one for a term of five years.  Their successors shall be appointed for terms of five years each, except that any person chosen to fill a vacancy shall be appointed only for the unexpired term of the member whom he or she succeeds.  Commission members are eligible for reappointment.  Any member of the commission may be removed by the governor, upon notice and hearing, for neglect of duty or malfeasance in office, but for no other cause.  Commission members are not eligible for state retirement under chapter 41.40 RCW by virtue of their service on the commission.  Members of the commission shall be compensated in accordance with RCW 43.03.250 and shall receive reimbursement for official travel and other expenses at the same rate and on the same terms as provided for the transportation commission by RCW 47.01.061.  The payments shall be made from the Puget Sound ferry operations account.

      (2) The commission shall:  (a) Adjust all complaints, grievances, and disputes between labor and management arising out of the operation of the ferry system as provided in RCW 47.64.150; (b) provide for impasse mediation as required in RCW 47.64.210; and (c) perform those duties required in RCW 47.64.300.  However, through June 30, 2013, the commission's duties identified in this subsection are subject to the availability of amounts appropriated for these specific purposes.

      (3)(a) In adjudicating all complaints, grievances, and disputes, the party claiming labor disputes shall, in writing, notify the commission, which shall make careful inquiry into the cause thereof and issue an order advising the ferry employee, or the ferry employee organization representing him or her, and the department of transportation, as to the decision of the commission.

      (b) The parties are entitled to offer evidence relating to disputes at all hearings conducted by the commission.  The orders and awards of the commission are final and binding upon any ferry employee or employees or their representative affected thereby and upon the department.

      (c) The commission shall adopt rules of procedure under chapter 34.05 RCW.

      (d) The commission has the authority to subpoena any ferry employee or employees, or their representatives, and any member or representative of the department, and any witnesses.  The commission may require attendance of witnesses and the production of all pertinent records at any hearings held by the commission.  The subpoenas of the commission are enforceable by order of any superior court in the state of Washington for the county within which the proceeding may be pending.  The commission may hire staff as necessary, appoint consultants, enter into contracts, and conduct studies as reasonably necessary to carry out this chapter.

Sec. 715.  RCW 46.68.170 and 2009 c 470 s 701 are each amended to read as follows:

      There is hereby created in the motor vehicle fund the RV account.  All moneys hereafter deposited in said account shall be used by the department of transportation for the construction, maintenance, and operation of recreational vehicle sanitary disposal systems at safety rest areas in accordance with the department's highway system plan as prescribed in chapter 47.06 RCW.  During the ((2007-2009 and)) 2009‑2011 and 2011-2013 fiscal biennia, the legislature may transfer from the RV account to the motor vehicle fund such amounts as reflect the excess fund balance of the RV account to accomplish the purposes identified in this section.

Sec. 716.  RCW 46.68.370 and 2010 c 161 s 818 are each amended to read as follows:

      The license plate technology account is created in the state treasury.  All receipts collected under RCW 46.17.015 must be deposited into this account.  Expenditures from this account must support current and future license plate technology and systems integration upgrades for both the department and correctional industries.  Moneys in the account may be spent only after appropriation.  Additionally, the moneys in this account may be used to reimburse the motor vehicle account for any appropriation made to implement the digital license plate system.  During the ((20092011)) 2011-2013 fiscal biennium, the legislature may transfer from the license plate technology account to the highway safety account such amounts as reflect the excess fund balance of the license plate technology account.

Sec. 717.  RCW 47.12.244 and 2009 c 470 s 709 are each amended to read as follows:

      There is created the "advance right-of-way revolving fund" in the custody of the treasurer, into which the department is authorized to deposit directly and expend without appropriation:

      (1) An initial deposit of ten million dollars from the motor vehicle fund included in the department of transportation's 1991‑93 budget;

      (2) All moneys received by the department as rental income from real properties that are not subject to federal aid reimbursement, except moneys received from rental of capital facilities properties as defined in chapter 47.13 RCW; and

      (3) Any federal moneys available for acquisition of right-of-way for future construction under the provisions of section 108 of Title 23, United States Code.

      During the ((2007-2009 and)) 2009‑2011 and 2011-2013 fiscal biennia, the legislature may transfer from the advance right‑of‑way revolving fund to the motor vehicle account amounts as reflect the excess fund balance of the advance right‑of‑way revolving fund.

Sec. 718.  RCW 46.68.060 and 2009 c 470 s 711 are each amended to read as follows:

      There is hereby created in the state treasury a fund to be known as the highway safety fund to the credit of which shall be deposited all moneys directed by law to be deposited therein.  This fund shall be used for carrying out the provisions of law relating to driver licensing, driver improvement, financial responsibility, cost of furnishing abstracts of driving records and maintaining such case records, and to carry out the purposes set forth in RCW 43.59.010.  During the ((2007-2009 and)) 2009‑2011 and 2011-2013 fiscal biennia, the legislature may transfer from the highway safety fund to the motor vehicle fund and the multimodal transportation account such amounts as reflect the excess fund balance of the highway safety fund.

Sec. 719.  RCW 46.68.220 and 2010 c 161 s 807 are each amended to read as follows:

      The department of licensing services account is created in the motor vehicle fund.  All receipts from service fees received under RCW 46.17.025 must be deposited into the account.  Moneys in the account may be spent only after appropriation.  Expenditures from the account may be used only for:

      (1) Information and service delivery systems for the department;

      (2) Reimbursement of county licensing activities; and

      (3) County auditor or other agent and subagent support including, but not limited to, the replacement of department-owned equipment in the possession of county auditors or other agents and subagents appointed by the director.  During the ((2007-2009 and 2009-2011)) 2011-2013 fiscal ((biennia)) biennium, the legislature may transfer from the department of licensing services account such amounts as reflect the excess fund balance of the account.

Sec. 720.  RCW 47.56.876 and 2010 c 248 s 5 are each amended to read as follows:

      (1) A special account to be known as the state route number 520 civil penalties account is created in the state treasury.  All state route number 520 bridge replacement and HOV program civil penalties generated from the nonpayment of tolls on the state route number 520 corridor must be deposited into the account, as provided under RCW 47.56.870(4)(b)(vii).  Moneys in the account may be spent only after appropriation.  Expenditures from the account may be used to fund any project within the state route number 520 bridge replacement and HOV program, including mitigation.  During the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium, the legislature may transfer from the state route number 520 civil penalties account to the state route number 520 corridor account such amounts as reflect the excess fund balance of the state route number 520 civil penalties account.  Funds transferred must be used solely for capital expenditures for the state route number 520 bridge replacement and HOV project (8BI1003).

      (2) This section is contingent on the enactment by June 30, 2010, of either chapter 249, Laws of 2010 or chapter . . . (Substitute House Bill No. 2897), Laws of 2010, but if the enacted bill does not designate the department as the toll penalty adjudicating agency, this section is null and void.

Sec. 721.  RCW 46.68.--- and 2011 c ... (SHB 1897) s 1 are each amended to read as follows:

      (1) The rural mobility grant program account is created in the state treasury.  Moneys in the account may be spent only after appropriation.  Expenditures from the account may be used only for the grants provided under section 2 ((of this act)), chapter ... (SHB 1897), Laws of 2011.

      (2) Beginning September 2011, by the last day of September, December, March, and June of each year, the state treasurer shall transfer from the multimodal transportation account to the rural mobility grant program account two million five hundred thousand dollars.

(3) During the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium, the legislature may transfer from the rural mobility grant program account to the multimodal transportation account such amounts as reflect the excess fund balance of the rural mobility grant program account.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 722.  2010 c 161 s 1126 is repealed.

2009-2011 FISCAL BIENNIUM
TRANSPORTATION AGENCIES-OPERATING

Sec. 801.  2010 c 247 s 205 (uncodified) is amended to read as follows:

FOR THE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation........................................................................................................................... (($2,328,000))

      $2,157,000

Multimodal Transportation Account‑-State Appropriation......................................................................................................... (($112,000))

      $111,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION........................................................................................................................................ (($2,440,000))

      $2,268,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) Pursuant to RCW 43.135.055, during the 2009-11 fiscal biennium, the transportation commission shall periodically review and, if necessary, modify the schedule of fares for the Washington state ferry system.  The transportation commission may increase ferry fares,  except no fare schedule modifications may be made prior to September 1, 2009.  For purposes of this subsection, "modify" includes increases or decreases to the schedule.

      (2) Pursuant to RCW 43.135.055, during the 2009-11 fiscal biennium, the transportation commission shall periodically review and, if necessary, modify a schedule of toll charges applicable to the state route number 167 high occupancy toll lane pilot project, as required under RCW 47.56.403.  For purposes of this subsection, "modify" includes increases or decreases to the schedule.

      (3) Pursuant to RCW 43.135.055, during the 2009-11 fiscal biennium, the transportation commission shall periodically review and, if necessary, modify the schedule of toll charges applicable to the Tacoma Narrows bridge, taking into consideration the recommendations of the citizen advisory committee created under RCW 47.46.091.  For purposes of this subsection, "modify" includes increases or decreases to the schedule.

      (4) The commission may name state ferry vessels consistent with its authority to name state transportation facilities under RCW 47.01.420.  When naming or renaming state ferry vessels, the commission shall investigate selling the naming rights and shall make recommendations to the legislature regarding this option.

      (5) $350,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for consultant support services to assist the commission in updating the statewide transportation plan.  The updated plan must be submitted to the legislature by December 1, 2010.

      (6) If the commission considers implementing a ferry fuel surcharge, it must first submit an analysis and business plan to the office of financial management and either the joint transportation committee or the transportation committees of the legislature.  The commission may impose a ferry fuel surcharge effective July 1, 2011.  When implementing a ferry fuel surcharge, the commission must regard ferry fuel surcharges as fare policy changes and thus, ferry fuel surcharges should be included in all public procedures and processes currently used for fare pricing per RCW 47.60.290.

      (7) The commission shall work with the department of transportation's economic partnerships (Program K) in conducting a best practices review of nontoll, public-private partnerships.  The purpose of this review is to identify the policies and procedures that would be appropriate for application in Washington state.  The commission must report its findings and recommendations, including draft legislation if warranted, to the house of representatives and senate transportation committees by January 2011.

      (8) As part of its development of the statewide transportation plan, the commission shall review prioritized projects, including preservation and maintenance projects, from regional transportation and metropolitan planning organizations to identify statewide transportation needs.   The review should include a brief description and status of each project along with the funding required and associated timeline from start to completion.  The commission shall submit the review, along with recommendations, to the house of representatives and senate transportation committees by January 2011.

Sec. 802.  2010 c 247 s 207 (uncodified) is amended to read as follows:

FOR THE WASHINGTON STATE PATROL-FIELD OPERATIONS BUREAU

State Patrol Highway Account‑-State

      Appropriation.................................................................................................................................................................. (($227,958,000))

      $224,558,000

State Patrol Highway Account‑-Federal

      Appropriation.......................................................................................................................................................................... $10,903,000

State Patrol Highway Account‑-Private/Local

      Appropriation......................................................................................................................................................................... (($867,000))

      $939,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION.................................................................................................................................... (($239,728,000))

      $236,400,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) Washington state patrol officers engaged in off-duty uniformed employment providing traffic control services to the department of transportation or other state agencies may use state patrol vehicles for the purpose of that employment, subject to guidelines adopted by the chief of the Washington state patrol.  The Washington state patrol shall be reimbursed for the use of the vehicle at the prevailing state employee rate for mileage and hours of usage, subject to guidelines developed by the chief of the Washington state patrol, and Cessna pilots funded from the state patrol highway account who are certified to fly the King Airs may pilot those aircraft for general fund purposes with the general fund reimbursing the state patrol highway account an hourly rate to cover the costs incurred during the flights since the aviation section will no longer be part of the Washington state patrol cost allocation system as of July 1, 2009.

      (2) The patrol shall not account for or record locally provided DUI cost reimbursement payments as expenditure credits to the state patrol highway account.  The patrol shall report the amount of expected locally provided DUI cost reimbursements to the office of financial management and transportation committees of the legislature by September 30th of each year.

      (3) During the 2009-11 fiscal biennium, the Washington state patrol shall continue to perform traffic accident investigations on Thurston county roads, and shall work with the county to transition the traffic accident investigations on Thurston county roads to the county by July 1, 2011.

      (4) Within existing resources, the Washington state patrol shall make every reasonable effort to increase the enrollment in each academy class that commences during the 2009-11 fiscal biennium to fifty-five cadets.

      (5) The Washington state patrol shall collaborate with the Washington traffic safety commission to develop and implement the target zero trooper pilot program referenced in section 201 of this act.

      (6) $370,000 of the state patrol highway account--state appropriation is provided solely for costs associated with the pilot program described under section 218(2) of this act.  The Washington state patrol may incur costs related only to the assignment of cadets and necessary computer equipment and to the reimbursement of the Washington state department of transportation for contract costs.  The appropriation in this subsection must be funded from the portion of the automated traffic safety camera fines deposited into the state patrol highway account; however, if the fines deposited into the state patrol highway account from automated traffic safety camera infractions do not reach three hundred seventy thousand dollars, the department of transportation shall remit funds necessary to the Washington state patrol to ensure the completion of the pilot program.  The Washington state patrol may not incur overtime as a result of this pilot program.  The Washington state patrol shall not assign troopers to operate or deploy the pilot program equipment used in the roadway construction zones.

      (7) If, as a result of lower than average rate of attrition among troopers, the Washington state patrol postpones the year 2011 training for trooper cadets beyond June 30, 2011, funding provided in section 207, chapter 470, Laws of 2009 for the class must be used to fund the salaries and benefits associated with the existing commissioned Washington state patrol troopers that are funded within the field operations bureau.

      (8) $2,832,000 of the state patrol highway account--state appropriation is provided solely for the aerial traffic enforcement program.  The Washington state patrol shall evaluate the costs associated with aerial traffic highway enforcement to determine if the costs are accurately apportioned between the state patrol highway account and the general fund.  It is the intent of the legislature that the state patrol highway account incurs costs that result only from highway enforcement activities and that the general fund incurs costs associated with the King Airs.  The Washington state patrol shall report the results of the evaluation to the legislature by June 30, 2010.

      (9) For the remainder of the 2009-11 fiscal biennium, the Washington state patrol shall continue to work with Island county on traffic accident investigations.

      (10) $3,601,000 of the state patrol highway account--state appropriation is provided solely for the costs associated with a basic trooper class.

(11) After May 1, 2011, unless specifically prohibited, the Washington state patrol may transfer state patrol highway account--state appropriations for the 2009-2011 fiscal biennium between operating programs after approval by the director of the office of financial management.  However, the state patrol shall not transfer state moneys that are provided solely for a specified purpose.

Sec. 803.  2010 c 247 s 208 (uncodified) is amended to read as follows:

FOR THE WASHINGTON STATE PATROL-INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES BUREAU

State Patrol Highway Account‑-State Appropriation................................................................................................................ (($1,648,000))

      $1,196,000
      The appropriation in this section is subject to the following conditions and limitations:  After May 1, 2011, unless specifically prohibited, the Washington state patrol may transfer state patrol highway account--state appropriations for the 2009-2011 fiscal biennium between operating programs after approval by the director of the office of financial management.  However, the state patrol shall not transfer state moneys that are provided solely for a specified purpose.

Sec. 804.  2010 c 247 s 209 (uncodified) is amended to read as follows:

FOR THE WASHINGTON STATE PATROL-TECHNICAL SERVICES BUREAU

State Patrol Highway Account‑-State Appropriation............................................................................................................ (($108,560,000))

      $105,488,000

State Patrol Highway Account‑-Private/Local

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................ $2,510,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION.................................................................................................................................... (($111,070,000))

      $107,998,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) The Washington state patrol shall work with the risk management division in the office of financial management in compiling the Washington state patrol's data for establishing the agency's risk management insurance premiums to the tort claims account.  The office of financial management and the Washington state patrol shall submit a report to the legislative transportation committees by December 31st of each year on the number of claims, estimated claims to be paid, method of calculation, and the adjustment in the premium.

      (2) (($10,425,000)) $10,676,000 of the total appropriation is provided solely for automobile fuel in the 2009-11 fiscal biennium.

      (3) $7,421,000 of the total appropriation is provided solely for the purchase of pursuit vehicles.

      (4) $6,611,000 of the total appropriation is provided solely for vehicle repair and maintenance costs of vehicles used for highway purposes.

      (5) $1,724,000 of the total appropriation is provided solely for the purchase of mission vehicles used for highway purposes in the commercial vehicle and traffic investigation sections of the Washington state patrol.

      (6) The Washington state patrol may submit information technology-related requests for funding only if the patrol has coordinated with the department of information services as required under section 601 of this act.

      (7) (($345,000 of the state patrol highway account--state appropriation is provided solely for the implementation of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1445 (domestic partners/Washington state patrol retirement system).  If Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1445 is not enacted by June 30, 2009, the amount provided in this subsection shall lapse)) After May 1, 2011, unless specifically prohibited, the Washington state patrol may transfer state patrol highway account--state appropriations for the 2009-2011 fiscal biennium between operating programs after approval by the director of the office of financial management.  However, the state patrol shall not transfer state moneys that are provided solely for a specified purpose.

Sec. 805.  2010 c 247 s 211 (uncodified) is amended to read as follows:

FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-TOLL OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE-PROGRAM B

High Occupancy Toll Lanes Operations Account‑-State

      Appropriation...................................................................................................................................................................... (($2,852,000))

      $2,732,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation.............................................................................................................................. (($575,000))

      $2,945,000

Tacoma Narrows Toll Bridge Account‑-State

      Appropriation.......................................................................................................................................................................... $26,543,000

State Route Number 520 Corridor Account--State

      Appropriation.................................................................................................................................................................... (($28,000,000))

      $736,000

State Route Number 520 Civil Penalties

      Account--State Appropriation............................................................................................................................................. (($2,130,000))

      $130,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION...................................................................................................................................... (($60,100,000))

      $33,086,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) The department shall make detailed quarterly expenditure reports available to the transportation commission and to the public on the department's web site using current department resources.  The reports must include a summary of revenue generated by tolls on the Tacoma Narrows bridge and an itemized depiction of the use of that revenue.

      (2) The department shall work with the office of financial management to review insurance coverage, deductibles, and limitations on tolled facilities to assure that the assets are well protected at a reasonable cost.  Results from this review must be used to negotiate any future new or extended insurance agreements.

      (3) (($28,000,000)) $736,000 of the state route number 520 corridor account--state appropriation is provided solely for the costs directly related to tolling the state route number 520 floating bridge.  ((Of this amount, $8,000,000 must be retained in unallotted status, and may only be released by the office of financial management after consultation with the joint transportation committee.))

      (4) The department shall consider transitioning to all electronic tolling on the Tacoma Narrows bridge toll facility and discontinuing a cash toll option.

      (5) (($2,130,000)) $130,000 of the state route number 520 civil penalties account--state appropriation and $140,000 of the Tacoma Narrows toll bridge account--state appropriation are provided solely for expenditures related to the toll adjudication process.  The amount provided in this subsection is contingent on the enactment by June 30, 2010, of either Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6499 or Substitute House Bill No. 2897; however, if the enacted bill does not specify the department as the toll penalty adjudicating agency, the amounts provided in this subsection lapse.

      (6) The department shall review, and revise where appropriate, current signage and ingress/egress locations on the state route number 167 high occupancy toll lanes pilot project.  The department shall continue to work with the Washington state patrol on educating the public on the rules of the road related to crossing a double white line.  The department shall continue to monitor the performance of the high occupancy toll lanes to ensure that driving conditions for high occupancy vehicles that share these lanes are not significantly changed.

(7) Up to $2,435,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely as an expenditure reserve in the event that toll revenue collection on the state route number 520 floating bridge is delayed beyond April 2, 2011.  This appropriation must remain in unallotted status and may be released by the office of financial management only to cover shortfalls in the state route number 520 corridor account due to delayed toll revenue collection in order to support the activities funded in subsection (3) of this section.  Repayment from the state route number 520 corridor account to the motor vehicle account regarding this appropriation is assumed in the 2011-2013 biennial transportation budget.

Sec. 806.  2010 c 247 s 212 (uncodified) is amended to read as follows:

FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY-PROGRAM C

Transportation Partnership Account--State

      Appropriation...................................................................................................................................................................... (($2,675,000))

      $2,425,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation......................................................................................................................... (($68,650,000))

      $67,546,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-Federal Appropriation................................................................................................................................ $240,000

Multimodal Transportation Account‑-State

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................... $363,000

Transportation 2003 Account (Nickel Account)--State

      Appropriation...................................................................................................................................................................... (($2,676,000))

      $2,426,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION...................................................................................................................................... (($74,604,000))

      $73,000,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) The department shall consult with the office of financial management and the department of information services to:  (a) Ensure that the department's current and future system development is consistent with the overall direction of other key state systems; and (b) when possible, use or develop common statewide information systems to encourage coordination and integration of information used by the department and other state agencies and to avoid duplication.

      (2) (($1,216,000)) $966,000 of the transportation partnership account--state appropriation and (($1,216,000)) $966,000 of the transportation 2003 account (nickel account)--state appropriation are provided solely for the department to develop a project management and reporting system which is a collection of integrated tools for capital construction project managers to use to perform all the necessary tasks associated with project management.  The department shall integrate commercial off-the-shelf software with existing department systems and enhanced approaches to data management to provide web-based access for multi-level reporting and improved business work flows and reporting.  On a quarterly basis, the department shall report to the office of financial management and the transportation committees of the legislature on the status of the development and integration of the system.  At a minimum, the reports shall indicate the status of the work as it compares to the work plan, any discrepancies, and proposed adjustments necessary to bring the project back on schedule or budget if necessary.

      (3) The department may submit information technology-related requests for funding only if the department has coordinated with the department of information services as required under section 601 of this act.

      (4) $573,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for the department to maintain the investment in the electronic fare system at Washington's ferry terminals.  Investment in the electronic fare system must include the following:  Replacement of critical hardware components that are at risk of failure; implementation of software to allow ORCA cards to be used for vehicles; repair of the turnstiles to ensure that the turnstiles properly record ORCA credit and debit card charges; and dedication of a communication line for transmission of ORCA data to the clearinghouse.

Sec. 807.  2010 c 247 s 213 (uncodified) is amended to read as follows:

FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-FACILITY MAINTENANCE, OPERATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION-PROGRAM D-OPERATING

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation......................................................................................................................... (($25,292,000))

      $24,639,000

Sec. 808.  2010 c 247 s 214 (uncodified) is amended to read as follows:

FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-AVIATION-PROGRAM F

Aeronautics Account‑-State Appropriation............................................................................................................................... (($5,960,000))

      $5,761,000

Aeronautics Account‑-Federal Appropriation................................................................................................................................. $2,150,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION........................................................................................................................................ (($8,110,000))

      $7,911,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) $50,000 of the aeronautics account--state appropriation is a reappropriation provided solely to pay any outstanding obligations of the aviation planning council, which expires July 1, 2009.

      (2) $150,000 of the aeronautics account--state appropriation is a reappropriation provided solely to complete runway preservation projects.

      (3) Within the amounts provided in this section, the department shall develop guidelines setting forth consultation procedures and a process to assist counties and cities to identify land uses that may be incompatible with airports and aircraft operations, and to encourage and facilitate the adoption and implementation of comprehensive plan policies and development regulations consistent with RCW 36.70.547 and 36.70A.510.

Sec. 809.  2010 c 247 s 215 (uncodified) is amended to read as follows:

FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-PROGRAM DELIVERY MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT-PROGRAM H

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation......................................................................................................................... (($49,331,000))

      $45,219,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-Federal Appropriation................................................................................................................................ $500,000

Multimodal Transportation Account‑-State

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................... $250,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION...................................................................................................................................... (($50,081,000))

      $45,969,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) The department shall develop a plan for all current and future surplus property parcels based on the recommendations from the surplus property legislative work group that were presented to the senate transportation committee on February 26, 2009.  The plan must include, at a minimum, strategies for maximizing the number of parcels sold, a schedule that optimizes proceeds, a recommended cash discount, a plan to report to the joint transportation committee, a recommendation for regional incentives, and a recommendation for equivalent value exchanges.  This plan must accompany the department's 2010 supplemental budget request.  If the department determines that all or a portion of real property or an interest in real property that was acquired through condemnation within the previous ten years is no longer necessary for a transportation purpose, the former owner has a right of repurchase as described in this subsection.  For the purposes of this subsection, "former owner" means the person or entity from whom the department acquired title.  At least ninety days prior to the date on which the property is intended to be sold by the department, the department must mail notice of the planned sale to the former owner of the property at the former owner's last known address or to a forwarding address if that owner has provided the department with a forwarding address.  If the former owner of the property's last known address, or forwarding address if a forwarding address has been provided, is no longer the former owner of the property's address, the right of repurchase is extinguished.  If the former owner notifies the department within thirty days of the date of the notice that the former owner intends to repurchase the property, the department shall proceed with the sale of the property to the former owner for fair market value and shall not list the property for sale to other owners.  If the former owner does not provide timely written notice to the department of the intent to exercise a repurchase right, or if the sale to the former owner is not completed within seven months of the date of notice that the former owner intends to repurchase the property, the right of repurchase is extinguished.  By December 1, 2010, the department shall report to the legislative transportation committees on the individuals and entities eligible to receive surplus property provided in RCW 47.12.063 to determine the frequency with which the department transfers property to those individuals and entities and the implications to the department.  It is the intent of the legislature that the list of individuals and entities eligible to receive surplus property be periodically evaluated to determine whether the list is appropriate and provides utility to the department.

      (2) The legislature recognizes that the Dryden pit site (WSDOT Inventory Control (IC) No. 2-04-00103) is unused state-owned real property under the jurisdiction of the department of transportation, and that the public would benefit significantly from the complete enjoyment of the natural scenic beauty and recreational opportunities available at the site.  Therefore, pursuant to RCW 47.12.080, the legislature declares that transferring the property to the department of fish and wildlife for recreational use and fish and wildlife restoration efforts is consistent with the public interest in order to preserve the area for the use of the public and the betterment of the natural environment.   The department of transportation shall work with the department of fish and wildlife, and shall transfer and convey the Dryden pit site to the department of fish and wildlife as is for an adjusted fair market value reflecting site conditions, the proceeds of which must be deposited in the motor vehicle fund.  The department of transportation is not responsible for any costs associated with the cleanup or transfer of this property.  By July 1, 2010, and annually thereafter until the entire Dryden pit property has been transferred, the department shall submit a status report regarding the transaction to the chairs of the legislative transportation committees.

      (3) $3,175,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for the department's compliance with its national pollution discharge elimination system permit.

      (4) The department shall provide updated information on six project milestones for all active projects, funded in part or in whole with 2005 transportation partnership account funds or 2003 nickel account funds, on a quarterly basis in the transportation executive information system (TEIS).  The department shall also provide updated information on six project milestones for projects, funded with preexisting funds and that are agreed to by the legislature, office of financial management, and the department, on a quarterly basis in TEIS.

Sec. 810.  2010 c 247 s 216 (uncodified) is amended to read as follows:

FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIPS-PROGRAM K

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation.............................................................................................................................. (($673,000))

      $643,000

Multimodal Transportation Account--State

             Appropriation................................................................................................................................................................... (($200,000))

      $90,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION........................................................................................................................................... (($873,000))

      $733,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) $200,000 of the multimodal transportation account--state appropriation is provided solely for the department to develop and implement public private partnerships at high priority terminals as identified in the January 12, 2009, final report on joint development opportunities at Washington state ferries terminals.  The department shall first consider a mutually beneficial agreement at the Edmonds terminal.

      (2) $50,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for the department to investigate the potential to generate revenue from web site sponsorships and similar ventures and, if feasible, pursue partnership opportunities.

      (3) (($75,000)) $45,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for the implementation of a pilot project allowing advertisements and sponsorships on select web pages.  The pilot project must be organized under the partnership model described in the department's web site monetizing feasibility study, which was prepared under subsection (2) of this section.  Once operational, the pilot project must operate for at least twelve consecutive months.  After twelve months of continuous operation, the department shall provide a report with recommendations on whether to continue project operations to the office of financial management and the chairs of the transportation committees.  The department may end the pilot project after less than twelve consecutive months of operation if insufficient bids or proposals are received from potential sponsors or advertisers.  For the purpose of this subsection, if a consultant contract is warranted, the consultant contract is deemed a revenue generation activity as that term is construed in section 602(2), chapter 3, Laws of 2010.

Sec. 811.  2010 c 247 s 217 (uncodified) is amended to read as follows:

FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE-PROGRAM M

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation....................................................................................................................... (($347,645,000))

      $349,778,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-Federal Appropriation............................................................................................................................. $7,000,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-Private/Local Appropriation.............................................................................................................. (($5,797,000))

      $7,997,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION.................................................................................................................................... (($360,442,000))

      $364,775,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) If portions of the appropriations in this section are required to fund maintenance work resulting from major disasters not covered by federal emergency funds such as fire, flooding, snow, and major slides, supplemental appropriations must be requested to restore state funding for ongoing maintenance activities.

      (2) The department shall request an unanticipated receipt for any federal moneys received for emergency snow and ice removal and shall place an equal amount of the motor vehicle account‑-state into unallotted status.  This exchange shall not affect the amount of funding available for snow and ice removal.

      (3) The department shall request an unanticipated receipt for any private or local funds received for reimbursements of third party damages that are in excess of the motor vehicle account‑-private/local appropriation.

      (4) $7,000,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation is for unanticipated federal funds that may be received during the 2009-11 fiscal biennium.  Upon receipt of the funds, the department shall provide a report on the use of the funds to the transportation committees of the legislature and the office of financial management.

      (5) The department may incur costs related to the maintenance of the decorative lights on the Tacoma Narrows bridge only if:

      (a) The nonprofit corporation, narrows bridge lights organization, maintains an account balance sufficient to reimburse the department for all costs; and

      (b) The department is reimbursed from the narrows bridge lights organization within three months from the date any maintenance work is performed.  If the narrows bridge lights organization is unable to reimburse the department for any future costs incurred, the lights must be removed at the expense of the narrows bridge lights organization subject to the terms of the contract.

      (6) The department may work with the department of corrections to utilize corrections crews for the purposes of litter pickup on state highways.

      (7) $650,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for increased asphalt costs.

      (8) $16,800,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for the high priority maintenance backlog.  Addressing the maintenance backlog must result in increased levels of service.

      (9) $750,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for the department's compliance with its national pollution discharge elimination system permit.

      (10) $317,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for maintaining a new active traffic management system on Interstate 5, Interstate 90, and SR 520.  The department shall track the costs associated with these systems on a corridor basis and report to the legislative transportation committees on the cost and benefits of the system.

      (11) $286,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for storm water assessment fees charged by local governments.

(12) $835,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for disaster-related maintenance expenditures that the department has incurred since the 2010 supplemental transportation budget on state route number 97A and state route number 401.

Sec. 812.  2010 c 247 s 218 (uncodified) is amended to read as follows:

FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-TRAFFIC OPERATIONS-PROGRAM Q-OPERATING

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation......................................................................................................................... (($51,128,000))

      $49,764,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-Federal Appropriation............................................................................................................................. $2,050,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-Private/Local Appropriation...................................................................................................................... $127,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION...................................................................................................................................... (($53,305,000))

      $51,941,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) $2,400,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for low-cost enhancements.  The department shall give priority to low-cost enhancement projects that improve safety or provide congestion relief.  The department shall prioritize low-cost enhancement projects on a statewide rather than regional basis.  By September 1st of each even-numbered year, the department shall provide a report to the legislature listing all low-cost enhancement projects prioritized on a statewide rather than regional basis completed in the prior year.

      (2) The department, in consultation with the Washington state patrol, may continue a pilot program for the patrol to issue infractions based on information from automated traffic safety cameras in roadway construction zones on state highways.  For the purpose of this pilot program, during the 2009-11 fiscal biennium, a roadway construction zone includes areas where public employees or private contractors are not present but where a driving condition exists that would make it unsafe to drive at higher speeds, such as, when the department is redirecting or realigning lanes on any public roadway pursuant to ongoing construction.  The department shall use the following guidelines to administer the program:

      (a) Automated traffic safety cameras may only take pictures of the vehicle and vehicle license plate and only while an infraction is occurring.  The picture must not reveal the face of the driver or of passengers in the vehicle;

      (b) The department shall plainly mark the locations where the automated traffic safety cameras are used by placing signs on locations that clearly indicate to a driver that he or she is entering a roadway construction zone where traffic laws are enforced by an automated traffic safety camera;

      (c) Notices of infractions must be mailed to the registered owner of a vehicle within fourteen days of the infraction occurring;

      (d) The owner of the vehicle is not responsible for the violation if the owner of the vehicle, within fourteen days of receiving notification of the violation, mails to the patrol, a declaration under penalty of perjury, stating that the vehicle involved was, at the time, stolen or in the care, custody, or control of some person other than the registered owner, or any other extenuating circumstances;

      (e) For purposes of the 2009-11 fiscal biennium pilot program, infractions detected through the use of automated traffic safety cameras are not part of the registered owner's driving record under RCW 46.52.101 and 46.52.120.  Additionally, infractions generated by the use of automated traffic safety cameras must be processed in the same manner as parking infractions for the purposes of RCW 3.50.100, 35.20.220, 46.16.216, and 46.20.270(3).  However, the amount of the fine issued under this subsection (2) for an infraction generated through the use of an automated traffic safety camera is one hundred thirty-seven dollars.  The court shall remit thirty-two dollars of the fine to the state treasurer for deposit into the state patrol highway account; and

      (f) If a notice of infraction is sent to the registered owner and the registered owner is a rental car business, the infraction must be dismissed against the business if it mails to the patrol, within fourteen days of receiving the notice, a declaration under penalty of perjury of the name and known mailing address of the individual driving or renting the vehicle when the infraction occurred.  If the business is unable to determine who was driving or renting the vehicle at the time the infraction occurred, the business must sign a declaration under penalty of perjury to this effect.  The declaration must be mailed to the patrol within fourteen days of receiving the notice of traffic infraction.  Timely mailing of this declaration to the issuing agency relieves a rental car business of any liability under this section for the notice of infraction.  A declaration form suitable for this purpose must be included with each automated traffic infraction notice issued, along with instructions for its completion and use.

      (3) The department shall implement a pilot project to evaluate the benefits of using electronic traffic flagging devices.  Electronic traffic flagging devices must be tested by the department at multiple sites and reviewed for efficiency and safety.  The department shall report to the transportation committees of the legislature on the best use and practices involving electronic traffic flagging devices, including recommendations for future use, by June 30, 2010.

      (4) $173,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for the department to continue a pilot tow truck incentive program and to expand the program to other areas of the state.  The department may provide incentive payments to towing companies that meet clearance goals on accidents that involve heavy trucks.  The department shall report to the office of financial management and the transportation committees of the legislature on the effectiveness of the clearance goals and submit recommendations to improve the pilot program with the department's 2010 supplemental omnibus transportation appropriations act submittal.  The tow truck incentive program may continue to provide incentives for quick clearance of traffic incidents involving large vehicles.  The department shall make recommendations as part of its biennial budget proposal for expanding the use of the incentive program.

      (5) $92,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for operating a new active traffic management system on Interstate 5, Interstate 90, and SR 520.  The department shall track the costs associated with these systems on a corridor basis and report to the legislative transportation committees on the cost and benefits of the system.

      (6) To the extent practicable, the department shall synchronize traffic lights on state route number 161 in the vicinity of Puyallup.

      (7) During the 2009-11 biennium, the department shall implement a pilot program that expands private transportation providers' access to high occupancy vehicle lanes.  Under the pilot program, when the department reserves a portion of a highway based on the number of passengers in a vehicle, the following vehicles must be authorized to use the reserved portion of the highway if the vehicle has the capacity to carry eight or more passengers, regardless of the number of passengers in the vehicle:  (a) Auto transportation company vehicles regulated under chapter 81.68 RCW; (b) passenger charter carrier vehicles regulated under chapter 81.70 RCW, except marked or unmarked stretch limousines and stretch sport utility vehicles as defined under department rules; (c) private nonprofit transportation provider vehicles regulated under chapter 81.66 RCW; and (d) private employer transportation service vehicles.  For purposes of this subsection, "private employer transportation service" means regularly scheduled, fixed-route transportation service that is offered by an employer for the benefit of its employees.  By June 30, 2011, the department shall report to the transportation committees of the legislature on whether private transportation provider use of high occupancy vehicle lanes under the pilot program reduces the speeds of high occupancy vehicle lanes.  Nothing in this subsection is intended to authorize the conversion of public infrastructure to private, for-profit purposes or to otherwise create an entitlement or other claim by private users to public infrastructure.

Sec. 813.  2010 c 247 s 219 (uncodified) is amended to read as follows:

FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT-PROGRAM S

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation......................................................................................................................... (($28,468,000))

      $27,968,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-Federal Appropriation.................................................................................................................................. $30,000

Multimodal Transportation Account‑-State

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................... $971,000

State Route Number 520 Corridor Account--State

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................... $264,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION...................................................................................................................................... (($29,733,000))

      $29,233,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:  $264,000 of the state route number 520 corridor account--state appropriation is provided solely for the costs directly related to tolling the state route number 520 floating bridge.  This amount must be retained in unallotted status, and may only be released by the office of financial management after consultation with the joint transportation committee.

Sec. 814.  2010 c 247 s 220 (uncodified) is amended to read as follows:

FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-TRANSPORTATION PLANNING, DATA, AND RESEARCH-PROGRAM T

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation......................................................................................................................... (($25,955,000))

      $25,384,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-Federal Appropriation........................................................................................................................... $22,002,000

Multimodal Transportation Account‑-State

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................ $1,090,000

Multimodal Transportation Account‑-Federal

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................ $3,287,000

Multimodal Transportation Account‑-Private/Local

      Appropriation................................................................................................................................................................................. $99,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION...................................................................................................................................... (($52,433,000))

      $51,862,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) $150,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation is provided solely for the costs to develop an electronic map-based computer application that will enable law enforcement officers and others to more easily locate collisions and other incidents in the field.

      (2) $400,000 of the multimodal transportation account--state appropriation is provided solely for a diesel multiple unit feasibility and initial planning study.  The study must evaluate potential service on the Stampede Pass line from Maple Valley to Auburn via Covington.  The study must evaluate the potential demand for service, the business model and capital needs for launching and running the line, and the need for improvements in switching, signaling, and tracking.  The study must also consider the interconnectivity benefits of, and potential for, future Amtrak Cascades stops in south King county and north Pierce county.  As part of its consideration, the department shall conduct a thorough market analysis of the potential for adding or changing stops on the Amtrak Cascades route.  The department shall amend the scope, schedule, and budget of the current study process to accommodate the market analysis.  A report on the study must be submitted to the legislature by September 30, 2010.

      (3) $365,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation and $81,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation are provided solely for the development of a freight database to help guide freight investment decisions and track project effectiveness.  The database must be based on truck movement tracked through geographic information system technology.  For the remainder of the biennium, the department may expand data collection to any highways that have high truck volumes.  TransNow shall contribute additional federal funds that are not appropriated in this act.  The department shall work with the freight mobility strategic investment board to implement this database.

      (4) $2,000,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for scoping unfunded state highway projects to ensure that a well-vetted project list is available for future program funding discussions.

      (a) It is the intent of the legislature that the funding provided in this subsection support the development of transportation solutions that benefit all state residents, including addressing the impacts of traffic diversion from tolled facilities.  It is further the intent of the legislature that the buying power of future revenue packages is maximized.

      (b) Scoping work must be consistent with achieving transportation system policy goals as stated in RCW 47.04.280.

      (c) The department shall provide cost-effective design solutions that achieve the desired functional outcomes.  This may be achieved by providing one or more design alternatives for legislative consideration, based on a reasonable range of assumptions about traffic volume and speeds.

      (d) Prior to the commencement of the 2011 legislative session, the department shall provide a report to the legislative transportation committees and the office of financial management that includes estimated costs and construction time frames.

      (5) (($150,000)) $80,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for a corridor study of state route number 516 from the eastern border of Maple Valley to state route number 167 to determine whether improvements are needed and the costs of any needed improvements.

      (6) $500,000 of the multimodal transportation account--federal appropriation is provided solely for continued support of the International Mobility and Trade Corridor project and for the department to work with the Whatcom council of governments to examine potential improvements to international border freight and passenger rail movement and the use of diesel multiple units.

      (7) $80,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely to continue existing work regarding feasibility of a new interchange between Rochester and Harrison Avenue on Interstate 5.

Sec. 815.  2010 c 247 s 221 (uncodified) is amended to read as follows:

FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION-PROGRAM V

Regional Mobility Grant Program Account‑-State

      Appropriation.................................................................................................................................................................... (($65,274,000))

      $56,332,000

Multimodal Transportation Account‑-State

      Appropriation.................................................................................................................................................................... (($65,667,000))

      $65,547,000

Multimodal Transportation Account‑-Federal

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................ $2,573,000

Multimodal Transportation Account‑-Private/Local

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................ $1,025,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION.................................................................................................................................... (($134,539,000))

      $125,477,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) $25,000,000 of the multimodal transportation account‑-state appropriation is provided solely for a grant program for special needs transportation provided by transit agencies and nonprofit providers of transportation.

      (a) $5,500,000 of the amount provided in this subsection is provided solely for grants to nonprofit providers of special needs transportation.  Grants for nonprofit providers shall be based on need, including the availability of other providers of service in the area, efforts to coordinate trips among providers and riders, and the cost effectiveness of trips provided.

      (b) $19,500,000 of the amount provided in this subsection is provided solely for grants to transit agencies to transport persons with special transportation needs.  To receive a grant, the transit agency must have a maintenance of effort for special needs transportation that is no less than the previous year's maintenance of effort for special needs transportation.  Grants for transit agencies shall be prorated based on the amount expended for demand response service and route deviated service in calendar year 2007 as reported in the "Summary of Public Transportation - 2007" published by the department of transportation.  No transit agency may receive more than thirty percent of these distributions.

      (2) Funds are provided for the rural mobility grant program as follows:

      (a) $8,500,000 of the multimodal transportation account‑-state appropriation is provided solely for grants for those transit systems serving small cities and rural areas as identified in the "Summary of Public Transportation - 2007" published by the department of transportation.  Noncompetitive grants must be distributed to the transit systems serving small cities and rural areas in a manner similar to past disparity equalization programs.

      (b) $8,500,000 of the multimodal transportation account‑-state appropriation is provided solely to providers of rural mobility service in areas not served or underserved by transit agencies through a competitive grant process.

      (3) $7,000,000 of the multimodal transportation account--state appropriation is provided solely for a vanpool grant program for:  (a) Public transit agencies to add vanpools or replace vans; and (b) incentives for employers to increase employee vanpool use.  The grant program for public transit agencies will cover capital costs only; operating costs for public transit agencies are not eligible for funding under this grant program.  Additional employees may not be hired from the funds provided in this section for the vanpool grant program, and supplanting of transit funds currently funding vanpools is not allowed.  The department shall encourage grant applicants and recipients to leverage funds other than state funds.  At least $1,600,000 of this amount must be used for vanpool grants in congested corridors.

      (4) (($400,000)) $280,000 of the multimodal transportation account--state appropriation is provided solely for a grant for a flexible carpooling pilot project program to be administered and monitored by the department.  Funds are appropriated for one time only.  The pilot project program must:  Test and implement at least one flexible carpooling system in a high-volume commuter area that enables carpooling without prearrangement; utilize technologies that, among other things, allow for transfer of ride credits between participants; and be a membership system that involves prescreening to ensure safety of the participants.  The program must include a pilot project that targets commuter traffic on the state route number 520 bridge.   The department shall submit to the legislature by December 2010 a report on the program results and any recommendations for additional flexible carpooling programs.

      (5) $3,318,000 of the multimodal transportation account--state appropriation and (($21,248,000)) $17,778,000 of the regional mobility grant program account--state appropriation are reappropriated and provided solely for the regional mobility grant projects identified on the LEAP Transportation Document 2007-B, as developed April 20, 2007, or the LEAP Transportation Document 2006-D, as developed March 8, 2006.  The department shall continue to review all projects receiving grant awards under this program at least semiannually to determine whether the projects are making satisfactory progress.  The department shall promptly close out grants when projects have been completed, and any remaining funds available to the office of transit mobility must be used only to fund projects on the LEAP Transportation Document 2006-D, as developed March 8, 2006; the LEAP Transportation Document 2007-B, as developed April 20, 2007; or the LEAP Transportation Document 2009-B, as developed April 24, 2009.  It is the intent of the legislature to appropriate funds through the regional mobility grant program only for projects that will be completed on schedule.  However, the Chuckanut park and ride project (101100G) is recognized as a crucial investment in the transportation system.  For this reason, the department shall not close out the grant for the Chuckanut park and ride project until Skagit transit has exhausted all other pending opportunities for federal and local funds.  If additional funds cannot be secured, the department shall consider this project a priority in the 2011-13 grant process.  The department shall make every effort to advance the Chuckanut park and ride project within existing resources.

      (6) (($33,429,000)) $32,882,000 of the regional mobility grant program account--state appropriation is provided solely for the regional mobility grant projects identified in LEAP Transportation Document 2009-B, as developed April 24, 2009.  The department shall review all projects receiving grant awards under this program at least semiannually to determine whether the projects are making satisfactory progress.  Any project that has been awarded funds, but does not report activity on the project within one year of the grant award, must be reviewed by the department to determine whether the grant should be terminated.  The department shall promptly close out grants when projects have been completed, and any remaining funds available to the office of transit mobility must be used only to fund projects identified in LEAP Transportation Document 2009-B, as developed April 24, 2009.  The department shall provide annual status reports on December 15, 2009, and December 15, 2010, to the office of financial management and the transportation committees of the legislature regarding the projects receiving the grants.  It is the intent of the legislature to appropriate funds through the regional mobility grant program only for projects that will be completed on schedule.

      (7) (($10,596,768)) $5,671,768 of the regional mobility grant program account--state appropriation must be obligated no later than December 31, 2010, and is provided solely for the following recommended contingency regional mobility grant projects identified in the 2009-11 omnibus transportation appropriations act, LEAP Transportation Document 2009-B, as developed April 24, 2009, as follows:

      (a) (($4,000,000)) $975,000 is provided solely for the Rainier/Jackson transit priority corridor improvements;

      (b) (($2,100,000)) $200,000 is provided solely for the state route number 522 west city limits to Northeast 180th stage 2A (91st Ave NE to west of 96th Ave NE) project; and

      (c) $4,496,768 is provided solely for the sound transit express bus expansion - Snohomish to King county project.

      (8) $300,000 of the multimodal transportation account--state appropriation is provided solely for a transportation demand management program, developed by the Whatcom council of governments, to further reduce drive-alone trips and maximize the use of sustainable transportation choices.  The community-based program must focus on all trips, not only commute trips, by providing education, assistance, and incentives to four target audiences:  (a) Large work sites; (b) employees of businesses in downtown areas; (c) school children; and (d) residents of Bellingham.

      (9) $130,000 of the multimodal transportation account-- state appropriation is provided solely to the department to distribute to support Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 2072 (special needs transportation).

      (a) $80,000 of the amount provided in this subsection is provided solely for implementation of the work group related to federal requirements in section 1, chapter . . . (Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 2072), Laws of 2009.

      (b) $50,000 of the amount provided in this subsection is provided solely to support the pilot project to be developed or implemented by the local coordinating coalition comprised of a single county, described in sections 9, 10, and 11, chapter . . . (Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 2072), Laws of 2009.  The department shall assist the local coordinating coalition to seek funding sufficient to fully fund the pilot project from a variety of sources including, but not limited to, the regional transit authority serving the county, the regional transportation planning organization serving the county, and other appropriate state and federal agencies and grants.  Development or implementation of the pilot project is contingent on securing funding sufficient to fully fund the pilot project.

      (c) If Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 2072 is not enacted by June 30, 2009, the amount provided in this subsection (9) lapses.  If Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 2072 is enacted by June 30, 2009, but a commitment from other sources to fully fund the pilot project described in (b) of this subsection has not been obtained by September 30, 2009, the amount provided in (b) of this subsection lapses.

      (10) Funds provided for the commute trip reduction program may also be used for the growth and transportation efficiency center program.

      (11) An affected urban growth area that has not previously implemented a commute trip reduction program is exempt from the requirements in RCW 70.94.527 if a solution to address the state highway deficiency that exceeds the person hours of delay threshold has been funded and is in progress during the 2009-11 fiscal biennium.

      (12) $2,309,000 of the multimodal transportation account--state appropriation is provided solely for the tri-county connection service for Island, Skagit, and Whatcom transit agencies.

Sec. 816.  2010 c 247 s 222 (uncodified) is amended to read as follows:

FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-MARINE-PROGRAM X

Puget Sound Ferry Operations Account‑-State

      Appropriation.................................................................................................................................................................. (($425,922,000))

      $446,961,000

 

      The appropriation in this section is subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) (($78,754,952)) $97,053,000 of the Puget Sound ferry operations account--state appropriation is provided solely for auto ferry vessel operating fuel in the 2009-11 fiscal biennium.  This appropriation is contingent upon the enactment of sections 716 and 701 of this act.  All fuel purchased by the Washington state ferries at Harbor Island truck terminal for the operation of the Washington state ferries diesel powered vessels must be a minimum of five percent biodiesel blend so long as the per gallon price of diesel containing a five percent biodiesel blend level does not exceed the per gallon price of diesel by more than five percent.

      (2) To protect the waters of Puget Sound, the department shall investigate nontoxic alternatives to fuel additives and other commercial products that are used to operate, maintain, and preserve vessels.

      (3) If, after the department's review of fares and pricing policies, the department proposes a fuel surcharge, the department must evaluate other cost savings and fuel price stabilization strategies that would be implemented before the imposition of a fuel surcharge.  The department shall report to the legislature and transportation commission on its progress of implementing new fuel forecasting and budgeting practices, price hedging contracts for fuel purchases, and fuel conservation strategies by November 30, 2010.

      (4) The department shall strive to significantly reduce the number of injuries suffered by Washington state ferries employees.  By December 15, 2009, the department shall submit to the office of financial management and the transportation committees of the legislature its implementation plan to reduce such injuries.

      (5) The department shall continue to provide service to Sidney, British Columbia.  The department may place a Sidney terminal departure surcharge on fares for out of state residents riding the Washington state ferry route that runs between Anacortes, Washington and Sidney, British Columbia, if the cost for landing/license fee, taxes, and additional amounts charged for docking are in excess of $280,000 CDN.  The surcharge must be limited to recovering amounts above $280,000 CDN.

      (6) The department shall analyze operational solutions to enhance service on the Bremerton to Seattle ferry run.  The Washington state ferries shall report its analysis to the transportation committees of the legislature by December 1, 2009.

      (7) The office of financial management budget instructions require agencies to recast enacted budgets into activities.  The Washington state ferries shall include a greater level of detail in its 2011-13 omnibus transportation appropriations act request, as determined jointly by the office of financial management, the Washington state ferries, and the legislative transportation committees.

      (8) (($4,794,000)) $6,116,000 of the Puget Sound ferry operations account--state appropriation is provided solely for commercial insurance for ferry assets.  The office of financial management, after consultation with the transportation committees of the legislature, must present a business plan for the Washington state ferry system's insurance coverage to the 2010 legislature.  The business plan must include a cost-benefit analysis of Washington state ferries' current commercial insurance purchased for ferry assets and a review of self-insurance for noncatastrophic events.

      (9) $1,100,000 of the Puget Sound ferry operations account--state appropriation is provided solely for a marketing program.  The department shall present a marketing program proposal to the transportation committees of the legislature during the 2010 legislative session before implementing this program.  Of this amount, $10,000 is for the city of Port Townsend and $10,000 is for the town of Coupeville for mitigation expenses related to only one vessel operating on the Port Townsend/Keystone ferry route.   The moneys provided to the city of Port Townsend and town of Coupeville are not contingent upon the required marketing proposal.

      (10) $350,000 of the Puget Sound ferry operations account--state appropriation is provided solely for two extra trips per day during the summer of 2009 season, beyond the current schedule, on the Port Townsend/Keystone route.

      (11) When purchasing uniforms that are required by collective bargaining agreements, the department shall contract with the lowest cost provider.

      (12) The legislature finds that measuring the performance of Washington state ferries requires the measurement of quality, timeliness, and unit cost of services delivered to customers.  Consequently, the department must develop a set of metrics that measure that performance and report to the transportation committees of the legislature and to the office of financial management on the development of these measurements along with recommendations to the 2010 legislature on which measurements must become a part of the next omnibus transportation appropriations act.

      (13) As a priority task, the department is directed to propose a comprehensive incident and accident investigation policy and appropriate procedures, and to provide the proposal to the legislature by November 1, 2009, using existing resources and staff expertise.  In addition to consulting with ferry system unions and the United States coast guard, the Washington state ferries is encouraged to solicit independent outside expertise on incident and accident investigation best practices as they may be found in other organizations with a similar concern for marine safety.  It is the intent of the legislature to enact the policies into law and to publish that law and procedures as a manual for Washington state ferries' accident/incident investigations.  Until that time, the Washington state ferry system must exercise particular diligence to assure that any incident or accident investigations are conducted within the spirit of the guidelines of this act.  The proposed policy must contain, at a minimum:

      (a) The definition of an incident and an accident and the type of investigation that is required by both types of events;

      (b) The process for appointing an investigating officer or officers and a description of the authorities and responsibilities of the investigating officer or officers.  The investigating officer or officers must:

      (i) Have the appropriate training and experience as determined by the policy;

      (ii) Not have been involved in the incident or accident so as to avoid any conflict of interest;

      (iii) Have full access to all persons, records, and relevant organizations that may have information about or may have contributed to, directly or indirectly, the incident or accident under investigation, in compliance with any affected employee's or employees' respective collective bargaining agreement and state laws and rules regarding public disclosure under chapter 42.56 RCW;

      (iv) Be provided with, if requested by the investigating officer or officers, appropriate outside technical expertise; and

      (v) Be provided with staff and legal support by the Washington state ferries as may be appropriate to the type of investigation;

      (c) The process of working with the affected employee or employees in accordance with the employee's or employees' respective collective bargaining agreement and the appropriate union officials, within protocols afforded to all public employees;

      (d) The process by which the United States coast guard is kept informed of, interacts with, and reviews the investigation;

      (e) The process for review, approval, and implementation of any approved recommendations within the department; and

      (f) The process for keeping the public informed of the investigation and its outcomes, in compliance with any affected employee's or employees' respective collective bargaining agreement and state laws and rules regarding public disclosure under chapter 42.56 RCW.

      (14) $7,300,000 of the Puget Sound ferry operations account--state appropriation is provided solely for the purposes of travel time associated with Washington state ferries employees.  However, if Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 3209 (managing costs of ferry system) is enacted by June 30, 2010, containing an appropriation for purposes of travel time associated with Washington state ferries employees, the amount provided in this subsection lapses.

      (15) $50,000 of the Puget Sound ferry operations account--state appropriation is provided solely to implement a mechanism to report on-time performance statistics.

      (a) The department shall conduct a study to identify process changes that would improve on-time performance on a route-by-route basis.  The study must include looking into the slowing down of vessels for fuel economy purposes and touch-and-go sailings on peak runs.  The department shall report its findings to the transportation committees of the senate and house of representatives by December 1, 2010.

      (b) The department shall, by November 1, 2010, report to the transportation committees of the legislature statistics regarding its on-time arrival and departure status on a route-by-route and month-by-month basis, as well as an annual route-by-route and systemwide basis, weighted by the number of customers on each sailing and distinguishing peak period on-time performance.  The statistics must include reasons for any delays over ten minutes from the scheduled time.  The statistics must be prominently displayed on the Washington state ferries' web site.  Each Washington state ferries vessel and terminal must prominently display the statistics as they relate to their specific route.

      (16) The department shall investigate outsourcing the call center functions planned for the ferry reservation system and report its findings to the transportation committees of the senate and house of representatives by December 15, 2010.

      (17) By July 1, 2010, the department shall provide to the governor and the transportation committees of the senate and house of representatives a listing of all benefits that Washington state ferries union employees receive that other state employees do not traditionally receive.  The listing must include any costs associated with these benefits.

Sec. 817.  2010 c 247 s 223 (uncodified) is amended to read as follows:

FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-RAIL-PROGRAM Y--OPERATING

Multimodal Transportation Account‑-State

      Appropriation.................................................................................................................................................................... (($37,371,000))

      $29,871,000
Multimodal Transportation Account--Federal
      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................... $100,000
                                                                                                                                                                             TOTAL APPROPRIATION.. $29,971,000

 

      The appropriations in this section ((is)) are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) (($31,591,000)) $24,091,000 of the multimodal transportation account--state appropriation is provided solely for the Amtrak service contract and Talgo maintenance contract associated with providing and maintaining the state-supported passenger rail service.  Upon completion of the rail platform project in the city of Stanwood, the department shall provide daily Amtrak Cascades service to the city.

      (2) Amtrak Cascade runs may not be eliminated.

      (3) The department shall begin planning for a third roundtrip Cascades train between Seattle and Vancouver, B.C. by 2010.

Sec. 818.  2010 c 247 s 224 (uncodified) is amended to read as follows:

FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-LOCAL PROGRAMS-PROGRAM Z-- OPERATING

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State

      Appropriation...................................................................................................................................................................... (($8,621,000))

      $8,618,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-Federal Appropriation............................................................................................................................. $2,545,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION...................................................................................................................................... (($11,166,000))

      $11,163,000

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 819.  A new section is added to 2010 c 247 (uncodified) to read as follows:

      The appropriations to the department of transportation in chapter 247, Laws of 2010 and this act must be expended for the programs and in the amounts specified in this act.  However, after May 1, 2011, unless specifically prohibited, the department may transfer state appropriations for the 2009-2011 fiscal biennium among operating programs after approval by the director of the office of financial management.  However, the department shall not transfer state moneys that are provided solely for a specific purpose.  The department shall not transfer funds, and the director of the office of financial management shall not approve the transfer unless the transfer is consistent with the objective of conserving, to the maximum extent possible, the expenditure of state funds and not federal funds.  The director of the office of financial management shall notify the appropriate transportation committees of the legislature prior to approving any allotment modifications or transfers under this section.  The written notification must include a narrative explanation and justification of the changes, along with expenditures and allotments by program and appropriation, both before and after any allotment modifications or transfers.

TRANSPORTATION AGENCIES-CAPITAL

Sec. 901.  2009 c 470 s 301 (uncodified) is amended to read as follows:

FOR THE WASHINGTON STATE PATROL

State Patrol Highway Account‑-State Appropriation................................................................................................................ (($3,126,000))

      $2,481,000

 

      The appropriation in this section is subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) $1,626,000 of the state patrol highway account--state appropriation is provided solely for the following minor works projects:  $450,000 for Shelton training academy roofs; (($150,000 for HVAC control replacements;)) $168,000 for upgrades to scales; $50,000 for Bellevue electrical equipment upgrades; (($90,000)) $16,000 for South King detachment window replacement; $200,000 for the replacement of the Naselle radio tower, generator shelter, and fence; $200,000 for unforeseen emergency repairs; and $318,000 for the Shelton training academy drive course/skid pan repair.

      (2) (($1,500,000)) $1,079,000 of the state patrol highway account--state appropriation is provided solely for the Shelton academy of the Washington state patrol and is contingent upon a signed agreement between the city of Shelton, the department of corrections, and the Washington state patrol that provides for an on-going payment to these three entities, based on their percentage of the total investment in the project, from all hookup fees, late comer fees, LIDS, and all other initial fees collected for the new waste water treatment lines, waste water plants, water lines, and water systems.

Sec. 902.  2010 c 247 s 301 (uncodified) is amended to read as follows:

FOR THE COUNTY ROAD ADMINISTRATION BOARD

Rural Arterial Trust Account‑-State Appropriation................................................................................................................ (($73,000,000))

      $71,500,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation................................................................................................................................ $1,048,000

County Arterial Preservation Account‑-State

      Appropriation.................................................................................................................................................................... (($31,400,000))

      $30,400,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION.................................................................................................................................... (($105,448,000))

      $102,948,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) $1,048,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation may be used for county ferry projects as developed pursuant to RCW 47.56.725(4).

      (2) The appropriations in this section include funding to counties to assist them in efforts to recover from federally declared emergencies, by providing capitalization advances and local match for federal emergency funding as determined by the county road administration board.  The county road administration board shall specifically identify any such selected projects and shall include information concerning such selected projects in its next annual report to the legislature.

      (3) $22,000,000 of the rural arterial trust account--state appropriation is provided solely for additional grants for county road projects as approved by the county road administration board.

Sec. 903.  2010 c 247 s 302 (uncodified) is amended to read as follows:

FOR THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BOARD

Small City Pavement and Sidewalk Account‑-State

      Appropriation...................................................................................................................................................................... (($3,927,000))

      $3,737,000

Urban Arterial Trust Account‑-State Appropriation............................................................................................................. (($123,900,000))

      $121,900,000

Transportation Improvement Account‑-State

      Appropriation.................................................................................................................................................................... (($81,643,000))

      $80,643,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION.................................................................................................................................... (($209,470,000))

      $206,280,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) The transportation improvement account--state appropriation includes up to $7,143,000 in proceeds from the sale of bonds authorized in RCW 47.26.500.

      (2) The urban arterial trust account--state appropriation includes up to (($7,143,000)) $15,000,000 in proceeds from the sale of bonds authorized in RCW 47.26.420.

Sec. 904.  2009 c 470 s 305 (uncodified) is amended to read as follows:

FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-PROGRAM D (DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-ONLY PROJECTS)-CAPITAL

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation........................................................................................................................... (($4,810,000))

      $4,623,000

 

The appropriation in this section is subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) $1,198,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for the Olympic region site acquisition debt service payments and administrative costs associated with capital improvement and preservation project and financial management.

      (2) (($3,612,000)) $3,425,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for high priority safety projects that are directly linked to employee safety, environmental risk, or minor works that prevent facility deterioration.  This includes the administrative costs associated with those projects and the reconstruction of the Wandermere facility that was destroyed in the 2008-09 winter storms.

Sec. 905.  2010 c 247 s 303 (uncodified) is amended to read as follows:

FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-IMPROVEMENTS-PROGRAM I

Multimodal Transportation Account--State

      Appropriation........................................................................................................................................................................... (($98,000))

      $2,000

Transportation Partnership Account‑-State

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................... (($1,665,644,000))

      $1,325,624,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation......................................................................................................................... (($85,534,000))

      $66,880,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-Federal Appropriation................................................................................................................... (($570,107,000))

      $532,458,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-Private/Local

      Appropriation.................................................................................................................................................................... (($70,714,000))

      $83,270,000

Special Category C Account‑-State Appropriation....................................................................................................................... $25,221,000

Transportation 2003 Account (Nickel Account)‑-State

      Appropriation.................................................................................................................................................................. (($713,205,000))

      $590,797,000

Freight Mobility Multimodal Account--State

      Appropriation...................................................................................................................................................................... (($4,574,000))

      $4,575,000

Tacoma Narrows Toll Bridge Account--State

      Appropriation......................................................................................................................................................................... (($789,000))

      $797,000

State Route Number 520 Corridor Account--State

      Appropriation.................................................................................................................................................................. (($231,763,000))

      $229,838,000

((State Route Number 520 Civil Penalties Account--State
      Appropriation......................................................................................................................................................................... $1,190,000))

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION................................................................................................................................. (($3,368,839,000))

      $2,859,462,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) Except as provided otherwise in this section, the entire transportation 2003 account (nickel account) appropriation and the entire transportation partnership account appropriation are provided solely for the projects and activities as listed by fund, project, and amount in LEAP Transportation Document ((2010-1)) 2011-1 as developed ((March 8, 2010)) April 19, 2011, Program - Highway Improvement Program (I).  However, limited transfers of specific line-item project appropriations may occur between projects for those amounts listed subject to the conditions and limitations in section 603 ((of this act)), chapter . . . (Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1175), Laws of 2011.

      (2) (($163,385,000)) $158,094,000 of the transportation partnership account--state appropriation and (($231,763,000)) $229,838,000 of the state route number 520 corridor account--state appropriation are provided solely for the state route number 520 bridge replacement and HOV project.  The department shall submit an application for the eastside transit and HOV project to the supplemental discretionary grant program for regionally significant projects as provided in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.

      (3) As required under section 305(6), chapter 518, Laws of 2007, the department shall report by January 2010 to the transportation committees of the legislature on the findings of the King county noise reduction solutions pilot project.

      (4) Funding allocated for mitigation costs is provided solely for the purpose of project impact mitigation, and shall not be used to develop or otherwise participate in the environmental assessment process.

      (5) The department shall apply for surface transportation program (STP) enhancement funds to be expended in lieu of or in addition to state funds for eligible costs of projects in Programs I and P including, but not limited to, the SR 518, SR 520, Columbia river crossing, and Alaskan Way viaduct projects.

      (6) The department shall, on a quarterly basis beginning July 1, 2009, provide to the office of financial management and the legislature reports providing the status on each active project funded in part or whole by the transportation 2003 account (nickel account) or the transportation partnership account.  Funding provided at a programmatic level for transportation partnership account and transportation 2003 account (nickel account) projects relating to bridge rail, guard rail, fish passage barrier removal, and roadside safety projects should be reported on a programmatic basis.  Projects within this programmatic level funding should be completed on a priority basis and scoped to be completed within the current programmatic budget.  Report formatting and elements must be consistent with the October 2009 quarterly project report.  On a representative sample of new construction contracts valued at fifteen million dollars or more, the department must also use an earned value method of project monitoring.

      (7) The transportation 2003 account (nickel account)--state appropriation includes up to (($653,630,000)) $567,964,000 in proceeds from the sale of bonds authorized by RCW 47.10.861.

      (8) The transportation partnership account--state appropriation includes up to (($1,347,939,000)) $1,261,092,000 in proceeds from the sale of bonds authorized in RCW 47.10.873.

      (9) The special category C account--state appropriation includes up to (($25,221,000)) $25,056,000 in proceeds from the sale of bonds authorized in RCW 47.10.812.

      (10) The motor vehicle account--state appropriation includes up to (($43,000,000)) $42,960,000 in proceeds from the sale of bonds authorized in RCW 47.10.843.

      (11) The state route number 520 corridor account--state appropriation includes up to (($231,763,000)) $229,838,000 in proceeds from the sale of bonds authorized in RCW 47.10.879.

      (12) The department must prepare a tolling study for the Columbia river crossing project.  While conducting the study, the department must coordinate with the Oregon department of transportation to perform the following activities:

      (a) Evaluate the potential diversion of traffic from Interstate 5 to other parts of the transportation system when tolls are implemented on Interstate 5 in the vicinity of the Columbia river;

      (b) Evaluate the most advanced tolling technology to maintain travel time speed and reliability for users of the Interstate 5 bridge;

      (c) Evaluate available active traffic management technology to determine the most effective options for technology that could maintain travel time speed and reliability on the Interstate 5 bridge;

      (d) Confer with the project sponsor's council, as well as local and regional governing bodies adjacent to the Interstate 5 Columbia river crossing corridor and the Interstate 205 corridor regarding the implementation of tolls, the impacts that the implementation of tolls might have on the operation of the corridors, the diversion of traffic to local streets, and potential mitigation measures;

      (e) Regularly report to the Washington transportation commission regarding the progress of the study for the purpose of guiding the commission's potential toll setting on the facility;

      (f) Research and evaluate options for a potential toll-setting framework between the Oregon and Washington transportation commissions;

      (g) Conduct public work sessions and open houses to provide information to citizens, including users of the bridge and business and freight interests, regarding implementation of tolls on the Interstate 5 and to solicit citizen views on the following items:

      (i) Funding a portion of the Columbia river crossing project with tolls;

      (ii) Implementing variable tolling as a way to reduce congestion on the facility; and

      (iii) Tolling Interstate 205 separately as a management tool for the broader state and regional transportation system; and

      (h) Provide a report to the governor and the legislature by January 2010.

      (13)(a) By January 2010, the department must prepare a traffic and revenue study for Interstate 405 in King county and Snohomish county that includes funding for improvements and high occupancy toll lanes, as defined in RCW 47.56.401, for traffic management.  The department must develop a plan to operate up to two high occupancy toll lanes in each direction on Interstate 405.

      (b) For the facility listed in (a) of this subsection, the department must:

      (i) Confer with the mayors and city councils of jurisdictions in the vicinity of the project regarding the implementation of high occupancy toll lanes and the impacts that the implementation of these high occupancy toll lanes might have on the operation of the corridor and adjacent local streets;

      (ii) Conduct public work sessions and open houses to provide information to citizens regarding implementation of high occupancy toll lanes and to solicit citizen views;

      (iii) Regularly report to the Washington transportation commission regarding the progress of the study for the purpose of guiding the commission's toll setting on the facility; and

      (iv) Provide a report to the governor and the legislature by January 2010.

      (14) (($6,488,000)) $1,323,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation and (($5,000)) $3,628,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation are provided solely for project 100224I, US 2 high priority safety project.  Expenditure of these funds is for safety projects on state route number 2 between Monroe and Gold Bar, which may include median rumble strips, traffic cameras, and electronic message signs.

      (15) Expenditures for the state route number 99 Alaskan Way viaduct replacement project must be made in conformance with Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 5768.

      (16) The department shall conduct a public outreach process to identify and respond to community concerns regarding the Belfair bypass.  The process must include representatives from Mason county, the legislature, area businesses, and community members.  The department shall use this process to consider and develop design alternatives that alter the project's scope so that the community's needs are met within the project budget.  The department shall provide a report on the process and outcomes to the legislature by June 30, 2010.

      (17) The legislature is committed to the timely completion of R8A which supports the construction of sound transit's east link.  Following the completion of the independent analysis of the methodologies to value the reversible lanes on Interstate 90 which may be used for high capacity transit as directed in section 204 of this act, the department shall complete the process of negotiations with sound transit.  Such agreement shall be completed no later than December 1, 2009.

      (18) $250,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for the design and construction of a right turn lane to improve visibility and traffic flow on state route number 195 and Cheney-Spokane Road (project L1000001).

      (19) (($730,000)) $724,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation and (($16,000)) $17,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation are provided solely for the Westview school noise wall (project WESTV).

      (20) (($2,000)) $3,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation and $131,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation are provided solely for interchange design and planning work on US 12 at A Street and Tank Farm Road (project PASCO).

      (21) (($21,566,000)) $13,246,000 of the transportation partnership account--state appropriation, (($26,000)) $27,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation, (($30,000,000)) $40,000,000 of the motor vehicle account--private/local appropriation, and (($4,334,000)) $9,422,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation are provided solely for project 400506A, the I-5/Columbia river crossing/Vancouver project.  The funding described in this subsection includes a (($30,000,000)) $40,000,000 contribution from the state of Oregon.

      (22) It is important that the public and policymakers have accurate and timely access to information related to the Alaskan Way viaduct replacement project as it proceeds to, and during, the construction of all aspects of the project including, but not limited to, information regarding costs, schedules, contracts, project status, and neighborhood impacts.  Therefore, it is the intent of the legislature that the state, city, and county departments of transportation establish a single source of accountability for integration, coordination, tracking, and information of all requisite components of the replacement project, which must include, at a minimum:

      (a) A master schedule of all subprojects included in the full replacement project or program; and

      (b) A single point of contact for the public, media, stakeholders, and other interested parties.

      (23) The department shall evaluate a potential deep bore culvert for the state route number 305/Bjorgen creek fish barrier project identified as project 330514A in LEAP Transportation Document ALL PROJECTS 2009-2, as developed April 24, 2009.  The department shall evaluate whether a deep bore culvert will be a less costly alternative than a traditional culvert since a traditional culvert would require extensive road detours during construction.

      (24) Project number 330215A in the LEAP transportation document described in subsection (1) of this section is expanded to include safety and congestion improvements from the Key Peninsula Highway to the vicinity of Purdy.  The department shall consult with the Washington traffic safety commission to ensure that this project includes improvements at intersections and along the roadway to reduce the frequency and severity of collisions related to roadway conditions and traffic congestion.

      (25) (($8,890,000)) $5,831,000 of the transportation partnership account--state appropriation is provided solely for project 109040Q, the Interstate 90 Two Way Transit and HOV Improvements--Stage 2 and 3 project, as indicated in the LEAP transportation document referenced in subsection (1) of this section.

      (26) The department shall continue to work with the local partners in developing transportation solutions necessary for the economic growth in the Red Mountain American Viticulture Area of Benton county.

      (27) For highway construction projects where the department considers agricultural lands of long-term commercial significance, as defined in RCW 36.70A.030, in reviewing and selecting sites to meet environmental mitigation requirements under the national environmental policy act (42 U.S.C. Sec. 4321 et seq.) and the state environmental policy act (chapter 43.21C RCW), the department shall, to the greatest extent possible, consider using public land first.  If public lands are not available that meet the required environmental mitigation needs, the department may use other sites while making every effort to avoid any net loss of agricultural lands that have a designation of long-term commercial significance.

      (28) Within the motor vehicle account--state appropriation and motor vehicle account--federal appropriation, the department may transfer funds between programs I and P, except for funds that are otherwise restricted in this act.

      (29) Within the amounts provided in this section, $200,000 of the transportation partnership account--state appropriation is provided solely for the department to prepare a comprehensive tolling study of the state route number 167 corridor to determine the feasibility of administering tolls within the corridor, identified as project number 316718A in the LEAP transportation document described in subsection (1) of this section.  The department shall report to the joint transportation committee by September 30, 2010.  The department shall regularly report to the Washington transportation commission regarding the progress of the study for the purpose of guiding the commission's potential toll setting on the facility.  The elements of the study must include, at a minimum:

      (a) The potential for value pricing to generate revenues for needed transportation facilities within the corridor;

      (b) Maximizing the efficient operation of the corridor; and

      (c) Economic considerations for future system investments.

      (30) Within the amounts provided in this section, $200,000 of the transportation partnership account--state appropriation is provided solely for the department to prepare a comprehensive tolling study of the state route number 509 corridor to determine the feasibility of administering tolls within the corridor, identified as project number 850901F in the LEAP transportation document described in subsection (1) of this section.  The department shall report to the joint transportation committee by September 30, 2010.  The department shall regularly report to the Washington transportation commission regarding the progress of the study for the purpose of guiding the commission's potential toll setting on the facility.  The elements of the study must include, at a minimum:

      (a) The potential for value pricing to generate revenues for needed transportation facilities within the corridor;

      (b) Maximizing the efficient operation of the corridor; and

      (c) Economic considerations for future system investments.

      (31) Within the amounts provided in this section, $28,000,000 of the transportation partnership account--state appropriation is for project 600010A, as identified in the LEAP transportation document in subsection (1) of this section:  NSC-North Spokane corridor ((design and right-of-way - new alignment)).  Expenditure of these funds is for preliminary engineering and right-of-way purchasing to prepare for four lanes to be built from where existing construction ends at Francis Avenue for three miles to the Spokane river.  Additionally, any savings realized on project 600001A, as identified in the LEAP transportation document in subsection (1) of this section:  US 395/NSC-Francis Avenue to Farwell Road - New Alignment, must be applied to project 600010A.

      (32) $400,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for the department to conduct a state route number 2 route development plan (project L2000016) that will identify essential improvements needed between the port of Everett/Naval station and approaching the state route number 9 interchange near the city of Snohomish.

      (33) If the SR 26 - Intersection and Illumination Improvements are not completed by June 30, 2009, the department shall ensure that the improvements are completed as soon as practicable after June 30, 2009, and shall submit monthly progress reports on the improvements beginning July 1, 2009.

      (34) $200,000 of the transportation partnership account--state appropriation, identified on project number 400506A in the LEAP transportation document described in subsection (1) of this section, is provided solely for the department to work with the department of archaeology and historic preservation to ensure that the cultural resources investigation is properly conducted on the Columbia river crossing project.  This project must be conducted with active archaeological management and result in one report that spans the single cultural area in Oregon and Washington.  Additionally, the department shall establish a scientific peer review of independent archaeologists that are knowledgeable about the region and its cultural resources.

      (35) The department shall work with the department of archaeology and historic preservation to ensure that the cultural resources investigation is properly conducted on all mega-highway projects and large ferry terminal projects.  These projects must be conducted with active archaeological management.  Additionally, the department shall establish a scientific peer review of independent archaeologists that are knowledgeable about the region and its cultural resources.

      (36) Within the amounts provided in this section, $1,500,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for necessary work along the south side of SR 532, identified as project number 053255C in the LEAP transportation document described in subsection (1) of this section.

      (37) $10,000,000 of the transportation partnership account--state appropriation is provided solely for the Spokane street viaduct portion of project 809936Z, SR 99/Alaskan Way Viaduct – Replacement project as indicated in the LEAP transportation document referenced in subsection (1) of this section.

      (38) The department shall conduct a public outreach process to identify and respond to community concerns regarding the portion of John's Creek Road that connects state route number 3 and state route number 101.  The process must include representatives from Mason county, the legislature, area businesses, and community members.  The department shall use this process to consider, develop, and design a project scope so that the community's needs are met for the lowest cost.  The department shall provide a report on the process and outcomes to the legislature by June 30, 2010.

      (39) The department shall apply for the competitive portion of federal transit administration funds for eligible transit-related costs of the state route number 520 bridge replacement and HOV project and the Columbia river crossing project.  The federal funds described in this subsection must not include those federal transit administration funds distributed by formula.  The department shall provide a report regarding this effort to the legislature by January 1, 2010.

      (40) (($5,500,000)) $3,388,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation ((is)) and $1,405,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation are provided solely for the Alaskan Way Viaduct - Automatic Shutdown project, identified as project L1000034.

      (41) (($2,244,000)) $2,937,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation and (($122,000)) $163,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation are provided solely for the US 12/Nine Mile Hill to Woodward Canyon Vic -Build New Highway project, identified as project 501210T.

      (42) (($790,000)) $1,116,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation is provided solely for the Express Lanes System Concept Study project, identified as project 800020A.  As part of this project, the department shall prepare a comprehensive tolling study of the Interstate 5 express lanes to determine the feasibility of administering tolls within the corridor.  The department shall regularly report to the Washington transportation commission regarding the progress of the study.  The elements of the study must include, at a minimum:

      (i) The potential for value pricing to generate revenues for needed transportation facilities;

      (ii) Maximizing the efficient operation of the corridor;

      (iii) Economic considerations for future system investments; and

      (iv) An analysis of the impacts to the regional transportation system.

      (b) The department shall submit a final report on the study to the joint transportation committee by June 30, 2011.

      (((44) $226,000)) (43) $110,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation and (($9,000)) $5,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation are provided solely for the SR 16/Rosedale Street NW Vicinity - Frontage Road project (301639C).  These funds must not be expended before an agreement stating that the city of Gig Harbor will take ownership of the road has been signed.  The frontage road must be built for driving speeds of no more than thirty-five miles per hour.

      (((45))) (44) The department shall work with the Washington state transportation commission, the Oregon state department of transportation, and the Oregon state transportation commission to analyze and review potential options for a bistate, toll setting framework.  As part of the analysis, the department shall undertake the following actions:  Review statutory provisions and the governance structures of toll facilities in the United States that are located within two or more states; review relevant federal law regarding transportation facilities that are located within two or more states; consult with the state treasurers in Washington and Oregon regarding the appropriate structure for the issuance of debt for toll facilities that are located within two states; report findings and recommendations to the Columbia river project sponsor's council by October 1, 2010; and provide a final report to the governor and the legislature by June 30, 2011.

      (((46))) (45) $750,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for improvements from Allan Road to state route number 12 (501207Z).

      (((47) $500,000)) (46) $455,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for a traffic signal at the intersection of state route number 7 and state route number 702 (300738A).

      (((48) $750,000)) (47) $316,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for environmental work on the Belfair Bypass (project 300344C).

      (((49))) (48) The legislature finds that state route number 522 corridor provides an important link between Interstates 5 and 405 and will be impacted by diversion from tolling elsewhere in the region.  State route number 522 must be reviewed as part of the scoping work conducted under section 220(4) of this act.  As such, the legislature intends to provide additional funding for the corridor as a priority in the next revenue package.  The state will work with the affected cities and the federal government to secure the necessary resources to address the needs of this critical corridor.

      (((50) $500,000)) (49) $558,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for the US 12/SR 122/Mossyrock -Intersection project (401212R) for safety improvements.

      (((51))) (50) $200,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation is provided solely for project US 97A/North of Wenatchee - Wildlife Fence (209790B), and an offsetting reduction is anticipated in the 2011-13 biennium.

      (((52))) (51) If a planned roundabout in the vicinity of state route number 526 and 84th Street SW would divert commercial traffic onto neighborhood streets, the department may not proceed with improvements at state route number 526 and 84th Street SW until the traffic impacts in the vicinity of state route number 526 and 40th Avenue West are addressed.

      (((53))) (52) The department shall conduct a collision analysis corridor study on state route number 167 from milepost 0 to milepost 5 and report to the transportation committees of the legislature on the analysis results by December 1, 2010.

      (((54) $2,600,000)) (53) $357,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation is provided solely for the ITS Advanced Traveler Information System project in Whatcom county (100589B).

      (((55) $900,000)) (54) $94,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation is provided solely for the US 97/Cameron Lake Road intersection improvements project in Okanogan county (209700W).

      (((56) $400,000)) (55) $294,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation and (($100,000)) $74,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation are provided solely for the SR 9/SR 204 Intersection Improvement project (L2000040).

      (((57))) (56) The legislature finds that the state route number 12 widening from state route number 124 to Walla Walla is an important east-west corridor in the southeast region of the state.  Widening the highway to four lanes will increase safety and improve freight mobility.  Therefore, the legislature intends for the department to use up to two million dollars in future redistributed federal obligation authority that may be received by the department for right-of-way purchase for the US 12/Nine Mile Hill to Woodward Canyon Vicinity -Phase 7-A project (501210T).

Sec. 906.  2010 c 247 s 304 (uncodified) is amended to read as follows:

FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-PRESERVATION-PROGRAM P

Transportation Partnership Account‑-State

      Appropriation.................................................................................................................................................................... (($75,305,000))

      $67,381,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation......................................................................................................................... (($96,884,000))

      $92,733,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-Federal Appropriation................................................................................................................... (($556,705,000))

      $528,158,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-Private/Local Appropriation............................................................................................................ (($18,768,000))

      $19,675,000

Transportation 2003 Account (Nickel Account)‑-State

      Appropriation...................................................................................................................................................................... (($6,328,000))

      $6,148,000

Puyallup Tribal Settlement Account--State

      Appropriation...................................................................................................................................................................... (($6,636,000))

      $6,647,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION.................................................................................................................................... (($760,626,000))

      $720,742,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) Except as provided otherwise in this section, the entire transportation 2003 account (nickel account) appropriation and the entire transportation partnership account appropriation are provided solely for the projects and activities as listed by fund, project, and amount in LEAP Transportation Document ((2010-1)) 2011-1 as developed ((March 8, 2010)) April 19, 2011, Program - Highway Preservation Program (P).  However, limited transfers of specific line-item project appropriations may occur between projects for those amounts listed subject to the conditions and limitations in section 603 ((of this act)), chapter . . . (Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1175), Laws of 2011.

      (2) (($542,000)) $546,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation and (($453,000)) $188,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation are provided solely for project 602110F, SR 21/Keller ferry boat - Preservation.  Funds are provided solely for preservation work on the existing vessel, the Martha S.

      (3) The department shall apply for surface transportation program (STP) enhancement funds to be expended in lieu of or in addition to state funds for eligible costs of projects in Programs I and P.

      (4) (($6,636,000)) $6,647,000 of the Puyallup tribal settlement account--state appropriation is provided solely for costs associated with the Murray Morgan/11th Street bridge project.  The city of Tacoma may use the Puyallup tribal settlement account appropriation and other appropriated funds for bridge rehabilitation, bridge replacement, bridge demolition, and related mitigation.  The department's participation, including prior expenditures, may not exceed (($40,270,000)) $40,281,000.  The city of Tacoma has taken ownership of the bridge in its entirety, and the payment of these funds extinguishes any real or implied agreements regarding future bridge expenditures.

      (5) The department and the city of Tacoma must present to the legislature an agreement on the timing of the transfer of ownership of the Murray Morgan/11th Street bridge and any additional necessary state funding required to achieve the transfer and rehabilitation of the bridge by January 1, 2010.

      (6) The department shall, on a quarterly basis beginning July 1, 2009, provide to the office of financial management and the legislature reports providing the status on each active project funded in part or whole by the transportation 2003 account (nickel account) or the transportation partnership account.  Funding provided at a programmatic level for transportation partnership account projects relating to seismic bridges should be reported on a programmatic basis.  Projects within this programmatic level funding should be completed on a priority basis and scoped to be completed within the current programmatic budget.  The department shall work with the office of financial management and the transportation committees of the legislature to agree on report formatting and elements.  Elements must include, but not be limited to, project scope, schedule, and costs.  For new construction contracts valued at fifteen million dollars or more, the department must also use an earned value method of project monitoring.  The department shall also provide the information required under this subsection on a quarterly basis via the transportation executive information systems (TEIS).

      (7) The department of transportation shall continue to implement the lowest life cycle cost planning approach to pavement management throughout the state to encourage the most effective and efficient use of pavement preservation funds.  Emphasis should be placed on increasing the number of roads addressed on time and reducing the number of roads past due.

      (8)(a) The department shall conduct an analysis of state highway pavement replacement needs for the next ten years.  The report must  include:

      (i) The current backlog of asphalt and concrete pavement preservation projects;

      (ii) The level of investment needed to reduce or eliminate the backlog and resume the lowest life-cycle cost;

      (iii) Strategies for addressing the recent rapid escalation of asphalt prices, including alternatives to using hot mix asphalt;

      (iv) Criteria for determining which type of pavement will be used for specific projects, including annualized cost per mile, traffic volume per lane mile, and heavy truck traffic volume per lane mile; and

      (v) The use of recycled asphalt and concrete in state highway construction and the effect on highway pavement replacement needs.

      (b) Additionally, the department shall work with the department of ecology, the county road administration board, and the transportation improvement board to explore and explain the potential use of permeable asphalt and concrete pavement in state highway construction as an alternative method of storm water mitigation and the potential effects on highway pavement replacement needs.

      (c) The department shall submit the report to the office of financial management and the transportation committees of the legislature by September 1, 2010, in order to inform the development of the 2011-13 omnibus transportation appropriations act.

      (9) (($299,000)) $581,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation, (($23,425,000)) $25,207,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation, and (($373,000)) $273,000 of the transportation partnership account--state appropriation are provided solely for the SR 104/Hood Canal bridge - replace east half project, identified as project 310407B in the LEAP transportation document described in subsection (1) of this section.

      (10) Within the motor vehicle account--state appropriation and motor vehicle account--federal appropriation, the department may transfer funds between programs I and P, except for funds that are otherwise restricted in this act.

      (11) Within the amounts provided in this section, $1,510,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely to complete the rehabilitation of the SR 532/84th Avenue NW bridge deck.

      (12) (($1,440,000)) $1,160,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation and (($60,000)) $54,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation are provided solely for the environmental impact statement and preliminary planning for the replacement of the state route number 9 Snohomish river bridge (project L2000018).

      (13) (($12,503,000)) $13,833,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation and (($497,000)) $479,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation are provided solely for the SR 410/Nile Valley Landslide - Establish Interim Detour project (541002R).

      (14) (($4,239,000)) $3,933,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation and (($662,000)) $615,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation are provided solely for the SR 410/Nile Valley Landslide - Reconstruct Route project (541002T).

      (((16))) (15) The legislature anticipates a report in September 2010 that will outline the department's recommendation for developing a Keller Ferry replacement at the lowest cost.  The legislature supports the request to the federal government for federal aid for a replacement vessel and intends to provide reasonable matching amounts as necessary.

      (((17) $2,100,000)) (16) $194,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation is provided solely for the SR 21/Kettle River to Malo paving project in Ferry county (602117A).

Sec. 907.  2010 c 247 s 305 (uncodified) is amended to read as follows:

FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-TRAFFIC OPERATIONS-PROGRAM Q-CAPITAL

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation........................................................................................................................... (($8,158,000))

      $6,847,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-Federal Appropriation..................................................................................................................... (($18,037,000))

      $11,412,000

Motor Vehicle Account--Private/Local Appropriation................................................................................................................. (($173,000))

      $174,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION...................................................................................................................................... (($26,368,000))

      $18,433,000

Sec. 908.  2010 c 283 s 19 (uncodified) is amended to read as follows:

FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-WASHINGTON STATE FERRIES CONSTRUCTION-PROGRAM W

Puget Sound Capital Construction Account‑-State

      Appropriation.................................................................................................................................................................. (($126,824,000))

      $102,289,000

Puget Sound Capital Construction Account‑-Federal

      Appropriation.................................................................................................................................................................... (($60,364,000))

      $51,194,000

Puget Sound Capital Construction Account--Local

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................... $200,000

Transportation 2003 Account (Nickel Account)‑-State

      Appropriation.................................................................................................................................................................... (($51,734,000))

      $51,735,000

Transportation Partnership Account--State

      Appropriation.................................................................................................................................................................... (($66,879,000))

      $102,660,000

Multimodal Transportation Account--State

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................... $149,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION.................................................................................................................................... (($306,150,000))

      $308,227,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) (($126,824,000)) $102,289,000 of the Puget Sound capital construction account--state appropriation, (($60,364,000)) $51,194,000 of the Puget Sound capital construction account--federal appropriation, $200,000 of the Puget Sound capital construction account--local appropriation, (($66,879,000)) $102,660,000 of the transportation partnership account--state appropriation, (($51,734,000)) $51,735,000 of the transportation 2003 account (nickel account)--state appropriation, and $149,000 of the multimodal transportation account--state appropriation are provided solely for ferry capital projects, project support, and administration as listed in LEAP Transportation Document 2011-2 ALL PROJECTS ((2010-2)) as developed ((March 8, 2010)) April 19, 2011, Program -Washington State Ferries ((Construction)) Capital Program (W).  Of the total appropriation, a maximum of $10,627,000 may be used for administrative support, a maximum of (($8,184,000)) $7,635,000 may be used for terminal project support, and a maximum of $4,497,000 may be used for vessel project support.  Of the total appropriation, (($5,851,000)) $2,016,000 is provided solely for a reservation system and associated communications projects.

      (2) (($51,734,000)) $51,735,000 of the transportation 2003 account (nickel account)--state appropriation, (($63,100,000)) $99,891,000 of the transportation partnership account--state appropriation, and (($10,164,000)) $10,165,000 of the Puget Sound capital construction account--state appropriation are provided solely for the acquisition of three new Island Home class ferry vessels subject to the conditions of RCW 47.56.780.  The department shall pursue a contract for the second and third Island Home class ferry vessels with an option to purchase a fourth Island Home class ferry vessel.  However, if sufficient resources are available to build one 144-auto vessel prior to exercising the option to build the fourth Island Home class ferry vessel, procurement of the fourth Island Home class ferry vessel will be postponed and the department shall pursue procurement of a 144-auto vessel.

      (a) The first two Island Home class ferry vessels must be placed on the Port Townsend-Keystone route.

      (b) The department may add additional passenger capacity to one of the Island Home class ferry vessels to make it more flexible within the system in the future, if doing so does not require additional staffing on the vessel.

      (c) Cost savings from the following initiatives will be included in the funding of these vessels:  The department's review and update of the vessel life-cycle cost model as required under this section; and the implementation of technology efficiencies as required under section 602 of this act.

      (3)(a) $8,450,000 of the Puget Sound capital construction account--state appropriation ((and $2,450,000)), $2,000 of the Puget Sound capital construction account--federal appropriation, and $1,450,000 of the transportation partnership account--state appropriation are provided solely for the following projects related to the design of a 144-vehicle vessel class:  (i) (($1,380,000)) $700,000 is provided solely for completion of the contract for owner-furnished equipment; (ii) $8,320,000 is provided solely for completion of the technical design, detail design, and production drawings((, all of which must plan for an aluminum superstructure)); (iii) (($480,000)) $300,000 is provided solely for the storage of owner-furnished equipment; and (iv) a maximum of (($720,000)) $582,000 is for construction engineering.  In completing the contract for owner-furnished equipment, the department shall use as much of the already procured equipment as is practicable on the Island Home class ferry vessels if it is likely to be obsolete before it is used in procured 144-vehicle vessels.

      (b) The department shall conduct a cost-benefit study on alternative furnishings and fittings for the 144-vehicle vessel class.  The study must review the proposed interior furnishings and fittings for the long-term maintenance and out-of-service vessel costs and, if appropriate, propose alternative interior furnishings and fittings that will decrease long-term maintenance and out-of-service vessel costs.  The study must include a projection of out-of-service time and a life-cycle cost analysis of planned out-of-service time, including the impact on fleet size.  The department must submit the study to the joint transportation committee by August 1, 2010.

      (((c) The department shall identify costs for any additional detail design and production drawings costs related to incorporating the aluminum superstructure and any changes in the proposed furnishings and fittings.))

      (4) (($6,300,000)) $2,000,000 of the Puget Sound capital construction account--state appropriation is provided solely for emergency capital costs.

      (5) (($3,000,000)) $1,235,000 of the ((Puget Sound capital construction account--federal)) total appropriation is provided solely for completing the Anacortes terminal design up to the maximum allowable construction cost phase.  Beyond preparing environmental work, these funds may be spent only after the following conditions have been met:  (a) A value engineering process is conducted on the existing design and the concept of a terminal building smaller than preferred alternative; (b) the office of financial management participates in the value engineering process; (c) the office of financial management concurs with the recommendations of the value engineering process; and (d) the office of financial management gives its approval to proceed with the design work.

      (6) (($3,965,000 of the Puget Sound capital construction account--state appropriation is provided solely for the following vessel projects:  Waste heat recovery pilot project for the Issaquah; jumbo Mark 1 class steering gear ventilation pilot project; and improvements to the Yakima and Kaleetan propulsion controls to allow for two engine operation.  Before beginning these projects, the Washington state ferries must ensure the vessels' out-of-service time does not negatively impact service to the system.
      (7))) The department shall pursue purchasing a foreign-flagged vessel for service on the Anacortes, Washington to Sidney, British Columbia ferry route.

      (((8))) (7) The department shall provide to the office of financial management and the legislature quarterly reports providing the status on each project listed in this section and in the project lists submitted pursuant to this act and on any additional projects for which the department has expended funds during the 2009-11 fiscal biennium.  Elements must include, but not be limited to, project scope, schedule, and costs.  The department shall also provide the information required under this subsection via the transportation executive information systems (TEIS).  The quarterly report regarding the status of projects identified on the list referenced in subsection (1) of this section must be developed according to an earned value method of project monitoring.

      (((9))) (8) The department shall review and adjust its capital program staffing levels to ensure staffing is at the most efficient level necessary to implement the capital program in the omnibus transportation appropriations act.  The Washington state ferries shall report this review and adjustment to the office of financial management and the house and senate transportation committees of the legislature by July 2009.

      (((10))) (9) $1,200,000 of the total appropriation is provided solely for improving the toll booth configuration at the Port Townsend and Keystone ferry terminals.

      (((11))) (10) $2,636,000 of the total appropriation is provided solely for continued permitting work on the Mukilteo ferry terminal.  The department shall seek additional federal funding for this project.

      (((12))) (11) The department shall develop a proposed ferry vessel maintenance, preservation, and improvement program and present it to the transportation committees of the legislature by July 1, 2010.  The proposal must:

      (a) Improve the basis for budgeting vessel maintenance, preservation, and improvement costs and for projecting those costs into a sixteen-year financial plan;

      (b) Limit the amount of planned out-of-service time to the greatest extent possible, including options associated with department staff as well as commercial shipyards.  At a minimum, the department shall consider the following:

      (i) The costs compared to benefits of Eagle Harbor repair and maintenance facility operations options to include staffing costs and benefits in terms of reduced out-of-service time;

      (ii) The maintenance requirements for on-vessel staff, including the benefits of a systemwide standard;

      (iii) The costs compared to benefits of staff performing preservation or maintenance work, or both, while the vessel is underway, tied up between sailings, or not deployed;

      (iv) A review of the department's vessel maintenance, preservation, and improvement program contracting process and contractual requirements;

      (v) The costs compared to benefits of allowing for increased costs associated with expedited delivery;

      (vi) A method for comparing the anticipated out-of-service time of proposed projects and other projects planned during the same construction period;

      (vii) Coordination with required United States coast guard dry dockings;

      (viii) A method for comparing how proposed projects relate to the service requirements of the route on which the vessel normally operates; and

      (ix) A method for evaluating the ongoing maintenance and preservation costs associated with proposed improvement projects; and

      (c) Be based on the service plan in the capital plan, recognizing that vessel preservation and improvement needs may vary by route.

      (((13))) (12) $247,000 of the Puget Sound capital construction account-- state appropriation is provided solely for the Washington state ferries to review and update its vessel life-cycle cost model and report the results to the house of representatives and senate transportation committees of the legislature by December 1, 2010.  This review will evaluate the impact of the planned out-of-service periods scheduled for each vessel on the ability of the overall system to deliver uninterrupted service and will assess the risk of service disruption from unscheduled maintenance or longer than planned maintenance periods.

      (((14))) (13) The department shall work with the department of archaeology and historic preservation to ensure that the cultural resources investigation is properly conducted on all large ferry terminal projects.  These projects must be conducted with active archaeological management.  Additionally, the department shall establish a scientific peer review of independent archaeologists that are knowledgeable about the region and its cultural resources.

      (((15))) (14) The Puget Sound capital construction account--state appropriation includes up to (($114,000,000)) $91,000,000 in proceeds from the sale of bonds authorized in RCW 47.10.843.

      (((16))) (15) The Puget Sound capital construction account--state appropriation reflects the reduction of three terminal positions due to decreased terminal activity and funding.

      (((17))) (16) The department shall provide data to the transportation committees of the senate and house of representatives for a transparent analysis of travel pay policies.

Sec. 909.  2010 c 247 s 307 (uncodified) is amended to read as follows:

FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-RAIL-PROGRAM Y-CAPITAL

Essential Rail Assistance Account--State

      Appropriation......................................................................................................................................................................... (($333,000))

      $334,000

Transportation Infrastructure Account‑-State

      Appropriation.................................................................................................................................................................... (($13,184,000))

      $12,348,000

Multimodal Transportation Account--State

      Appropriation.................................................................................................................................................................. (($102,202,000))

      $82,091,000

Multimodal Transportation Account‑-Federal

      Appropriation.................................................................................................................................................................. (($619,527,000))

      $48,445,000

((Multimodal Transportation Account--Private/Local
      Appropriation.............................................................................................................................................................................. $81,000))

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION.................................................................................................................................... (($735,327,000))

      $143,218,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1)(a) Except as provided otherwise in this section, the entire appropriations in this section are provided solely for the projects and activities as listed by project and amount in LEAP Transportation Document 2011-2 ALL PROJECTS ((2010-2)) as developed ((March 8, 2010)) April 19, 2011, Program - Rail Capital Program (Y).

      (b)(i) Within the amounts provided in this section, $116,000 of the transportation infrastructure account--state appropriation is for a low-interest loan through the freight rail investment bank program to the Port of Ephrata (BIN 722710A) for rehabilitation of a rail spur.

      (ii) Within the amounts provided in this section, (($1,200,000)) $400,000 of the transportation infrastructure account--state appropriation is for a low-interest loan through the freight rail investment bank program to the Port of Everett (BIN 722810A) for a new rail track to connect a cement loading facility to the mainline.

      (iii) The department shall issue the loans referenced in this subsection (1)(b) with a repayment period of no more than ten years, and only so much interest as is necessary to recoup the department's costs to administer the loans.

      (c)(i) Within the amounts provided in this section, $1,713,000 of the multimodal transportation account--state appropriation and $333,000 of the essential rail assistance account--state appropriation are for statewide - emergent freight rail assistance projects as follows:  Port of Ephrata/Ephrata - additional spur rehabilitation (BIN 722710A) $363,000; Tacoma Rail/Tacoma - new refinery spur tracks (BIN 711010A) $420,000; CW Line/Lincoln County - grade crossing rehabilitation (BIN 700610A) $371,000; Chelatchie Prairie owned railroad/Vancouver - track rehabilitation (BIN 710110A) $367,000; Tacoma Rail/Tacoma - improved locomotive facility (BIN 711010B) $525,000.

      (ii) Within the amounts provided in this section, (($338,000)) $346,000 of the multimodal transportation account--state appropriation is for a statewide - emergent freight rail assistance project grant for the Lincoln County PDA/Creston - new rail spur (BIN ((710510A)) F01001E) project, provided that the grantee first documents to the satisfaction of the department sufficient commitments from the new shipper or shippers to locate in the publicly owned industrial park west of Creston to ensure that the net present value of the public benefits of the project is greater than the grant amount.

      (d) Within the amounts provided in this section, (($8,115,000)) $8,079,000 of the transportation infrastructure account--state appropriation is for grants to any intergovernmental entity or local rail district to which the department of transportation assigns the management and oversight responsibility for the business and economic development elements of existing operating leases on the Palouse River and Coulee City (PCC) rail lines.  $300,000 of the transportation infrastructure account--state appropriation is provided solely for the fence line replacement project on the CW line.  The PCC rail line system is made up of the CW, P&L, and PV Hooper rail lines.  Business and economic development elements include such items as levels of service and business operating plans, but must not include the state's oversight of railroad regulatory compliance, rail infrastructure condition, or real property management issues.  The PCC rail system must be managed in a self-sustaining manner and best efforts must be used to ensure that it does not require state capital or operating subsidy beyond the level of state funding expended on it to date.  The assignment of the stated responsibilities to an intergovernmental entity or rail district must be on terms and conditions as the department of transportation and the intergovernmental entity or rail district mutually agree.  The grant funds may be used only to refurbish the rail lines.  It is the intent of the legislature to make the funds appropriated in this section available as grants to an intergovernmental entity or local rail district for the purposes stated in this section at least until June 30, 2012, and to reappropriate as necessary any portion of the appropriation in this section that is not used by June 30, 2011.

      (2)(a) The department shall issue a call for projects for the freight rail investment bank program and the emergent freight rail assistance program, and shall evaluate the applications according to the cost benefit methodology developed during the 2008 interim using the legislative priorities specified in (c) of this subsection.  By November 1, 2010, the department shall submit a prioritized list of recommended projects to the office of financial management and the transportation committees of the legislature.

      (b) When the department identifies a prospective rail project that may have strategic significance for the state, or at the request of a proponent of a prospective rail project or a member of the legislature, the department shall evaluate the prospective project according to the cost benefit methodology developed during the 2008 interim using the legislative priorities specified in (c) of this subsection.  The department shall report its cost benefit evaluation of the prospective rail project, as well as the department's best estimate of an appropriate construction schedule and total project costs, to the office of financial management and the transportation committees of the legislature.

      (c) The legislative priorities to be used in the cost benefit methodology are, in order of relative importance:

      (i) Economic, safety, or environmental advantages of freight movement by rail compared to alternative modes;

      (ii) Self-sustaining economic development that creates family-wage jobs;

      (iii) Preservation of transportation corridors that would otherwise be lost;

      (iv) Increased access to efficient and cost-effective transport to market for Washington's agricultural and industrial products;

      (v) Better integration and cooperation within the regional, national, and international systems of freight distribution; and

      (vi) Mitigation of impacts of increased rail traffic on communities.

      (3) The department is directed to seek the use of unprogrammed federal rail crossing funds to be expended in lieu of or in addition to state funds for eligible costs of projects in program Y.

      (4) At the earliest possible date, the department shall apply, and assist ports and local jurisdictions in applying, for any federal funding that may be available for any projects that may qualify for such federal funding.  State projects must be (a) currently identified on the project list referenced in subsection (1)(a) of this section or (b) projects for which no state match is required to complete the project.  Local or port projects must not require additional state funding in order to complete the project, with the exception of (c) state funds currently appropriated for such project if currently identified on the project list referenced in subsection (1)(a) of this section or (d) potential grants awarded in the competitive grant process for the essential rail assistance program.  If the department receives any federal funding, the department is authorized to obligate and spend the federal funds in accordance with federal law.  To the extent permissible by federal law, federal funds may be used (e) in addition to state funds appropriated for projects currently identified on the project list referenced in subsection (1)(a) of this section in order to advance funding from future biennia for such project(s) or (f) in lieu of state funds; however, the state funds must be redirected within the rail capital program to advance funding for other projects currently identified on the project list referenced in subsection (1)(a) of this section.  State funds may be redirected only upon consultation with the transportation committees of the legislature and the office of financial management, and approval by the director of the office of financial management.  The department shall spend the federal funds before the state funds, and shall consult the office of financial management and the transportation committees of the legislature regarding project scope changes.

      (5) The department shall provide quarterly reports to the office of financial management and the transportation committees of the legislature regarding applications that the department submits for federal funds and the status of such applications.

      (6) The department shall, on a quarterly basis, provide to the office of financial management and the legislature reports providing the status on active projects identified in the LEAP transportation document described in subsection (1)(a) of this section.  Report formatting and elements must be consistent with the October 2009 quarterly project report.

      (7) The multimodal transportation account--state appropriation includes up to $48,000,000 in proceeds from the sale of bonds authorized in RCW 47.10.867.

      (8) When the balance of that portion of the miscellaneous program account apportioned to the department for the grain train program reaches $1,180,000, the department shall acquire twenty-nine additional grain train railcars.

      (9) (($590,000,000)) $22,354,000 of the multimodal transportation account--federal appropriation is provided solely for high-speed rail projects awarded to Washington state from the high-speed intercity passenger rail program under the American recovery and reinvestment act.  Funding will allow for two additional round trips between Seattle and Portland, and other rail improvements.

      (10) $2,200,000 of the multimodal transportation account--state appropriation is provided solely for expenditures related to the capital high-speed passenger rail grant that are not federally reimbursable.

      (11) The Burlington Northern Santa Fe Skagit river bridge is an integral part of the rail system.  Constructed in 1916, the bridge does not meet current design standards and is at risk during flood events that occur on the Skagit river.  The department shall work with Burlington Northern Santa Fe and local jurisdictions to secure federal funding for the Skagit river bridge and to develop an appropriate replacement plan and schedule.

      (12) $1,000,000 of the multimodal transportation account--state appropriation is provided solely for additional expenditures along the Chelatchie Prairie railroad (((LN2000025))) (710110A).

Sec. 910.  2010 c 247 s 308 (uncodified) is amended to read as follows:

FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-LOCAL PROGRAMS-PROGRAM Z-CAPITAL

((Highway Infrastructure Account-State Appropriation.................................................................................................................. $207,000
Highway Infrastructure Account-Federal
      Appropriation......................................................................................................................................................................... $1,602,000))

Freight Mobility Investment Account‑-State

      Appropriation.................................................................................................................................................................... (($13,848,000))

      $9,170,000

Transportation Partnership Account‑-State

      Appropriation...................................................................................................................................................................... (($8,863,000))

      $6,828,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation......................................................................................................................... (($14,068,000))

      $9,668,000

Motor Vehicle Account‑-Federal Appropriation..................................................................................................................... (($43,835,000))

      $25,727,000

Freight Mobility Multimodal Account‑-State

      Appropriation.................................................................................................................................................................... (($15,620,000))

      $7,472,000

Freight Mobility Multimodal Account‑-Local

      Appropriation...................................................................................................................................................................... (($3,258,000))

      $2,980,000

Multimodal Transportation Account--Federal

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................ $2,118,000

Multimodal Transportation Account‑-State

      Appropriation.................................................................................................................................................................... (($28,855,000))

      $20,923,000

Transportation 2003 Account (Nickel Account)‑-State

      Appropriation............................................................................................................................................................................ $2,709,000

Passenger Ferry Account--State Appropriation......................................................................................................................... (($2,879,000))

      $1,764,000

Puyallup Tribal Settlement Account--State

      Appropriation...................................................................................................................................................................... (($5,895,000))

      $5,905,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION.................................................................................................................................... (($143,757,000))

      $95,264,000

 

      The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

      (1) The department shall, on a quarterly basis, provide status reports to the legislature on the delivery of projects as outlined in the project lists incorporated in this section.  For projects funded by new revenue in the 2003 and 2005 transportation packages, reporting elements shall include, but not be limited to, project scope, schedule, and costs.  Other projects may be reported on a programmatic basis.  The department shall also provide the information required under this subsection on a quarterly basis via the transportation executive information system (TEIS).

      (2) (($2,729,000)) $1,614,000 of the passenger ferry account--state appropriation is provided solely for near and long-term costs of capital improvements ((in a)) and operating expenses that are consistent with the business plan approved by the governor for passenger ferry service.

      (3) $150,000 of the passenger ferry account--state appropriation is provided solely for the Port of Kingston for a one-time operating subsidy needed to retain a federal grant.

      (4) $3,000,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation is provided solely for the Coal Creek parkway project (L1000025).

      (5) The department shall seek the use of unprogrammed federal rail crossing funds to be expended in lieu of or in addition to state funds for eligible costs of projects in local programs, program Z capital.

      (6) The department shall apply for surface transportation program (STP) enhancement funds to be expended in lieu of or in addition to state funds for eligible costs of projects in local programs, program Z capital.

      (7) Federal funds may be transferred from program Z to programs I and P and state funds shall be transferred from programs I and P to program Z to replace those federal funds in a dollar-for-dollar match.  Fund transfers authorized under this subsection shall not affect project prioritization status.  Appropriations shall initially be allotted as appropriated in this act.  The department may not transfer funds as authorized under this subsection without approval of the office of financial management.  The department shall submit a report on those projects receiving fund transfers to the office of financial management and the transportation committees of the legislature by December 1, 2009, and December 1, 2010.

      (8) The city of Winthrop may utilize a design-build process for the Winthrop bike path project.  Of the amount appropriated in this section for this project, $500,000 of the multimodal transportation account--state appropriation is contingent upon the state receiving from the city of Winthrop $500,000 in federal funds awarded to the city of Winthrop by its local planning organization.

      (9) (($18,289,000)) $13,732,000 of the multimodal transportation account--state appropriation, (($8,810,000)) $7,104,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation, and (($4,000,000)) $2,805,000 of the transportation partnership account--state appropriation are provided solely for the pedestrian and bicycle safety program projects and safe routes to schools program projects identified in LEAP Transportation Document 2009-A, pedestrian and bicycle safety program projects and safe routes to schools program projects, as developed March 30, 2009, LEAP Transportation Document 2007-A, pedestrian and bicycle safety program projects and safe routes to schools program projects, as developed April 20, 2007, and LEAP Transportation Document 2006-B, pedestrian and bicycle safety program projects and safe routes to schools program projects, as developed March 8, 2006.  Projects must be allocated funding based on order of priority.  The department shall review all projects receiving grant awards under this program at least semiannually to determine whether the projects are making satisfactory progress.  Any project that has been awarded funds, but does not report activity on the project within one year of the grant award must be reviewed by the department to determine whether the grant should be terminated.  The department shall promptly close out grants when projects have been completed, and identify where unused grant funds remain because actual project costs were lower than estimated in the grant award.

      (10) Except as provided otherwise in this section, the entire appropriations in this section are provided solely for the projects and activities as listed by project and amount in LEAP Transportation Document 2011-2 ALL PROJECTS ((2010-2)) as developed ((March 8, 2010)) April 19, 2011, Program - Local Program (Z).

      (11) For the 2009-11 project appropriations, unless otherwise provided in this act, the director of financial management may authorize a transfer of appropriation authority between projects managed by the freight mobility strategic investment board in order for the board to manage project spending and efficiently deliver all projects in the respective program.

      (12) (($913,386 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation and $2,858,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation are provided solely for completion of the US 101 northeast peninsula safety rest area and associated roadway improvements east of Port Angeles at the Deer Park scenic view point.  The department must surplus any right-of-way previously purchased for this project near Sequim.  Approval to proceed with construction is contingent on surplus of previously purchased right-of-way.  $865,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is to be placed into unallotted status until such time as the right-of-way sale is completed.
      (13) $5,894,000)) $5,905,000 of the Puyallup tribal settlement account--state appropriation is provided solely for costs associated with the Murray Morgan/11th Street bridge project.  The city of Tacoma may use the Puyallup tribal settlement account appropriation and other appropriated funds for bridge rehabilitation, bridge replacement, bridge demolition, and bridge mitigation.  The department's participation, including prior expenditures, may not exceed (($40,270,000)) $40,281,000.  The city of Tacoma has taken ownership of the bridge in its entirety, and the payment of these funds extinguishes any real or implied agreements regarding future bridge expenditures.

      (((14))) (13) Up to (($3,702,000)) $52,000 of the motor vehicle account--federal appropriation and (($75,000)) $52,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation are provided solely to reimburse the cities of Kirkland and Redmond for pavement and bridge deck rehabilitation on state route number 908 (project 1LP611A).  These funds may not be expended unless the cities sign an agreement stating that the cities agree to take ownership of state route number 908 in its entirety and agree that the payment of these funds represents the entire state commitment to the cities for state route number 908 expenditures.  The amount provided in this subsection is contingent on the enactment by June 30, 2010, of Senate Bill No. 6555.

      (((15))) (14) The department shall consider the condition of the Broadway bridge in the city of Everett when prioritizing bridge projects.

      (((16))) (15) In order to make the Hood Canal bridge safe for cyclists, the department must work with stakeholders to review bicycle safety needs on the bridge, including consideration of accident data and improvements already made to this project.

      (((17) $250,000)) (16) $25,000 of the multimodal transportation account--state appropriation is provided solely for the Shell Valley emergency access road and bicycle/pedestrian path.

      (((18) $500,000)) (17) $50,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for improvements to the 150th and Murray Road intersection in the city of Lakewood.

      (((19) $250,000)) (18) $100,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for flood reduction solutions on state route number 522 caused by the lower McAleer and Lyon creek basins.

      (((20))) (19) $200,000 of the motor vehicle account--state appropriation is provided solely for improvements to the intersection of 39th Ave SE and state route number 96 in Snohomish county.

TRANSFERS AND DISTRIBUTIONS

Sec. 1001.  2010 c 247 s 401 (uncodified) is amended to read as follows:

FOR THE STATE TREASURER-BOND RETIREMENT AND INTEREST, AND ONGOING BOND REGISTRATION AND TRANSFER CHARGES:  FOR BOND SALES DISCOUNTS AND DEBT TO BE PAID BY MOTOR VEHICLE ACCOUNT AND TRANSPORTATION FUND REVENUE

Highway Bond Retirement Account Appropriation.............................................................................................................. (($733,667,000))

      $720,842,000

 Ferry Bond Retirement Account Appropriation.......................................................................................................................... $33,771,000

State Route Number 520 Corridor Account--State

      Appropriation......................................................................................................................................................................... (($600,000))

      $1,308,000

Transportation Improvement Board Bond Retirement

      Account--State Appropriation........................................................................................................................................... (($22,962,000))

      $21,084,000

Nondebt-Limit Reimbursable Account--State

      Appropriation.................................................................................................................................................................... (($18,451,000))

      $16,850,000

Transportation Partnership Account--State

      Appropriation...................................................................................................................................................................... (($4,722,000))

      $6,818,000

Motor Vehicle Account--State Appropriation.............................................................................................................................. (($901,000))

      $672,000

Transportation 2003 Account (Nickel Account)--State

      Appropriation...................................................................................................................................................................... (($4,116,000))

      $3,116,000

Special Category C Account--State Appropriation....................................................................................................................... (($148,000))

      $136,000

Urban Arterial Trust Account--State Appropriation........................................................................................................................... $85,000

Transportation Improvement Account--State Appropriation.............................................................................................................. $41,000

Multimodal Transportation Account--State

      Appropriation......................................................................................................................................................................... (($283,000))

      $164,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION.................................................................................................................................... (($831,004,000))

      $804,887,000

Sec. 1002.  2010 c 247 s 402 (uncodified) is amended to read as follows:

FOR THE STATE TREASURER-BOND RETIREMENT AND INTEREST, AND ONGOING BOND REGISTRATION AND TRANSFER CHARGES:  FOR BOND SALE EXPENSES AND FISCAL AGENT CHARGES

State Route Number 520 Corridor Account--State

      Appropriation........................................................................................................................................................................... (($40,000))

      $83,000

Transportation Partnership Account--State

      Appropriation......................................................................................................................................................................... (($787,000))

      $537,000

Motor Vehicle Account--State Appropriation.............................................................................................................................. (($122,000))

      $62,000

Transportation 2003 Account (Nickel Account)--State

      Appropriation......................................................................................................................................................................... (($364,000))

      $264,000

Special Category C Account--State Appropriation......................................................................................................................... (($15,000))

      $12,000

Urban Arterial Trust Account--State Appropriation............................................................................................................................. $5,000

Transportation Improvement Account--State Appropriation................................................................................................................ $3,000

Multimodal Transportation Account--State

      Appropriation........................................................................................................................................................................... (($34,000))

      $40,000

             TOTAL APPROPRIATION........................................................................................................................................ (($1,370,000))

      $1,006,000

Sec. 1003.  2010 c 247 s 403 (uncodified) is amended to read as follows:

FOR THE STATE TREASURER-BOND RETIREMENT AND INTEREST, AND ONGOING BOND REGISTRATION AND TRANSFER CHARGES:  FOR MVFT BONDS AND TRANSFERS

Motor Vehicle Account‑-State Appropriation:  For

      transfer to the Puget Sound Capital Construction

      Account............................................................................................................................................................................ (($114,000,000))

      $91,000,000

 

      The department of transportation is authorized to sell up to (($114,000,000)) $91,000,000 in bonds authorized by RCW 47.10.843 for vessel and terminal acquisition, major and minor improvements, and long lead-time materials acquisition for the Washington state ferries.

Sec. 1004.  2010 1st sp.s. c 37 s 804 (uncodified) is amended to read as follows:

FOR THE STATE TREASURER-ADMINISTRATIVE TRANSFERS

      (1) ((Tacoma Narrows Toll Bridge Account--State
Appropriation:  For transfer to the Motor Vehicle
Account--State................................................................................................................................................................................. $5,288,000
      (2))) Motor Vehicle Account--State Appropriation:

For transfer to the Puget Sound Ferry Operations

Account--State.......................................................................................................................................................................... (($54,100,000))

      $78,000,000

      (((3))) (2) Recreational Vehicle Account--State

Appropriation:  For transfer to the Motor Vehicle

Account--State............................................................................................................................................................................ (($2,000,000))

      $1,800,000

      (((4))) (3) License Plate Technology Account--State

Appropriation:  For transfer to the Highway Safety

Account--State................................................................................................................................................................................. $2,750,000

      (((5))) (4) Multimodal Transportation Account--State

Appropriation:  For transfer to the Puget Sound

Ferry Operations Account--State............................................................................................................................................... (($9,000,000))

      $13,000,000

      (((6) Highway Safety Account--State Appropriation:
For transfer to the Multimodal Transportation
Account--State............................................................................................................................................................................... $18,750,000
      (7))) (5) Department of Licensing Services Account--State

Appropriation:  For transfer to the Motor Vehicle

Account--State................................................................................................................................................................................. $1,300,000

      (((8))) (6) Advanced Right-of-Way Account:  For transfer

to the Motor Vehicle Account--State............................................................................................................................................. $14,000,000

      (((9) State Route Number 520 Civil Penalties
Account--State Appropriation:  For transfer to the
State Route Number 520 Corridor Account--State............................................................................................................................. $190,000
      (10))) (7) Advanced Environmental Mitigation

Revolving Account--State Appropriation:  For transfer

to the Motor Vehicle Account--State............................................................................................................................................... $5,000,000

      (((11))) (8) Regional Mobility Grant Program Account--State

Appropriation:  For transfer to the Multimodal

Transportation Account--State........................................................................................................................................................ $4,000,000

      (((12))) (9) Motor Vehicle Account--State Appropriation:

For transfer to the State Patrol Highway Account--

State............................................................................................................................................................................................ (($5,600,000))

      $4,600,000

      (((13) The transfers identified in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:
      (a) The amount transferred in subsection (1) of this section represents repayment of operating loans and reserve payments provided to the Tacoma Narrows toll bridge account from the motor vehicle account in the 2005-07 fiscal biennium.  However, if Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6499 is enacted by June 30, 2010, the transfer in subsection (1) of this section shall not occur.
      (b) Any cash balance in the waste tire removal account in excess of one million dollars must be transferred to the motor vehicle account for the purpose of road wear-related maintenance on state and local public highways.
      (c) The transfer in subsection (9) of this section represents toll revenue collected from toll violations.))

(10) Highway Safety Account--State Appropriation:
For transfer to the Motor Vehicle Account--State......................................................................................................................... $19,000,000

MISCELLANEOUS

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1101.  If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1102.  Except for sections 703, 704, 705, 716, 719, and 722 of this act, this act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and takes effect immediately.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1103.  Sections 703, 704, 716, and 719 of this act are necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and take effect July 1, 2011.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1104.  Sections 705 and 722 of this act take effect upon certification by the secretary of transportation that the new statewide tolling operations center and photo toll system are fully operational.  A notice of certification must be filed with the code reviser for publication in the state register.  If a certificate is not issued by the secretary of transportation by December 1, 2012, sections 705 and 722 of this act are null and void.

                On page 1, line 1 of the title, after "appropriations;" strike the remainder of the title and insert "amending RCW 47.29.170, 46.63.170, 46.63.160, 43.19.642, 43.19.534, 47.01.380, 47.56.403, 43.105.330, 47.64.170, 47.64.270, 47.64.280, 46.68.170, 46.68.370, 47.12.244, 46.68.060, 46.68.220, 47.56.876, and 46.68.---; reenacting and amending RCW 46.18.060 and 47.28.030; amending 2010 c 247 ss 205, 207, 208, 209, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 307, 308, 401, 402, and 403 (uncodified); amending 2009 c 470 ss 301 and 305 (uncodified); amending 2010 c 283 s 19 (uncodified); amending 2010 1st sp.s. c 37 s 804 (uncodified); adding a new section to 2010 c 247 (uncodified); creating new sections; repealing 2010 c 161 s 1126; making appropriations and authorizing expenditures for capital improvements; providing an effective date; providing a contingent effective date; and declaring an emergency."

 

and the same is herewith transmitted.

Brad Hendrickson, Deputy, Secretary

 


 


 

SENATE AMENDMENT TO HOUSE BILL

 

There being no objection, the House concurred in the Senate amendment to ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1175 and advanced the bill as amended by the Senate to final passage.

 

FINAL PASSAGE OF HOUSE BILL

AS SENATE AMENDED

 

      Representatives Clibborn, Armstrong, Klippert and Seaquist spoke in favor of the passage of the bill.

 

      Representative Upthegrove spoke against the passage of the bill.

 

The Speaker (Representative Moeller presiding) stated the question before the House to be the final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1175, as amended by the Senate.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Clerk called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1175, as amended by the Senate, and the bill passed the House by the following vote:  Yeas, 87; Nays, 9; Absent, 0; Excused, 2.

      Voting yea: Representatives Ahern, Alexander, Anderson, Angel, Appleton, Armstrong, Asay, Bailey, Billig, Blake, Clibborn, Cody, Condotta, Dahlquist, Dammeier, Darneille, DeBolt, Dickerson, Dunshee, Eddy, Fagan, Finn, Fitzgibbon, Frockt, Goodman, Green, Haigh, Haler, Hargrove, Harris, Hinkle, Hope, Hudgins, Hunt, Hurst, Jinkins, Johnson, Kagi, Kelley, Kenney, Kirby, Klippert, Kretz, Kristiansen, Ladenburg, Liias, Lytton, Maxwell, McCoy, McCune, Miloscia, Moeller, Morris, Moscoso, Nealey, Orcutt, Ormsby, Parker, Pearson, Pedersen, Pettigrew, Probst, Reykdal, Rivers, Roberts, Rodne, Rolfes, Ross, Ryu, Santos, Schmick, Seaquist, Sells, Short, Smith, Springer, Stanford, Sullivan, Takko, Tharinger, Van De Wege, Walsh, Warnick, Wilcox, Wylie, Zeiger and Mr. Speaker.

      Voting nay: Representatives Buys, Carlyle, Chandler, Hasegawa, Orwall, Overstreet, Shea, Taylor and Upthegrove.

      Excused: Representatives Crouse and Hunter.

 

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1175, as amended by the Senate, having received the necessary constitutional majority, was declared passed.

 

MESSAGES FROM THE SENATE

 

April 22, 2011

MR. SPEAKER:

 

The President has signed:

ENGROSSED SENATE BILL 5005

SENATE BILL 5044

ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5073

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5187

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5204

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5271

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5385

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5487

SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5622

SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5636

SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5662

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5708

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5748

ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5769

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5791

and the same are herewith transmitted.

Thomas Hoemann, Secretary

 

April 22, 2011

MR. SPEAKER:

 

The President has signed:

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5023

SENATE BILL 5304

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5531

SENATE BILL 5625

SENATE BILL 5628

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5656

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5691

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5722

SENATE JOINT MEMORIAL 8008

and the same are herewith transmitted.

Thomas Hoemann, Secretary

 

THIRD READING

 

CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT

April 20, 2011

Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1478

Includes “New Item”: YES

Mr. Speaker:

 

We of your Conference Committee, to whom was referred ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1478, , delaying or modifying certain regulatory and statutory requirements affecting cities and counties, have had the same under consideration and we recommend that:

 

All previous amendments not be adopted and that the attached striking amendment be adopted

0) 

                Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert the following:

"NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1.  It is the legislature's intent to provide local governments with more time to meet certain statutory requirements.  Many cities and counties in Washington are facing revenue shortfalls, higher expenses, and more difficulty with borrowing money as a result of the economic downturn.  The effects of the economic downturn on the budgets of local governments will be felt most deeply from 2010 to 2012.  Local governments are facing the combined impact of decreased tax revenues, a falloff in state and federal aid, and increased demand for social services.  With the loss of tax revenue and state and federal aid, local governments are being forced to make significant cuts that will eliminate jobs, curtail essential services, and increase the number of people in need.  Additionally, local governments are struggling to comply with certain statutory requirements.  Local governments want to comply with these statutory requirements, but with budget constraints, they need more time to do so.  The legislature does not intend to remove any existing statutory requirement, but rather modify the time under which a local government must meet certain statutory requirements.

Sec. 2.  RCW 36.70A.130 and 2010 c 216 s 1 and 2010 c 211 s 2 are each reenacted and amended to read as follows:

      (1)(a) Each comprehensive land use plan and development regulations shall be subject to continuing review and evaluation by the county or city that adopted them.  Except as otherwise provided, a county or city shall take legislative action to review and, if needed, revise its comprehensive land use plan and development regulations to ensure the plan and regulations comply with the requirements of this chapter according to the deadlines in subsections (4) and (5) of this section.

      (b) Except as otherwise provided, a county or city not planning under RCW 36.70A.040 shall take action to review and, if needed, revise its policies and development regulations regarding critical areas and natural resource lands adopted according to this chapter to ensure these policies and regulations comply with the requirements of this chapter according to the deadlines in subsections (4) and (5) of this section.  Legislative action means the adoption of a resolution or ordinance following notice and a public hearing indicating at a minimum, a finding that a review and evaluation has occurred and identifying the revisions made, or that a revision was not needed and the reasons therefor.

      (c) ((The review and evaluation required by this subsection may be combined with the review required by subsection (3) of this section.))  The review and evaluation required by this subsection shall include, but is not limited to, consideration of critical area ordinances and, if planning under RCW 36.70A.040, an analysis of the population allocated to a city or county from the most recent ten-year population forecast by the office of financial management.

      (d) Any amendment of or revision to a comprehensive land use plan shall conform to this chapter.  Any amendment of or revision to development regulations shall be consistent with and implement the comprehensive plan.

      (2)(a) Each county and city shall establish and broadly disseminate to the public a public participation program consistent with RCW 36.70A.035 and 36.70A.140 that identifies procedures and schedules whereby updates, proposed amendments, or revisions of the comprehensive plan are considered by the governing body of the county or city no more frequently than once every year.  "Updates" means to review and revise, if needed, according to subsection (1) of this section, and the deadlines in subsections (4) and (5) of this section or in accordance with the provisions of subsection (6) of this section.  Amendments may be considered more frequently than once per year under the following circumstances:

      (i) The initial adoption of a subarea plan.  Subarea plans adopted under this subsection (2)(a)(i) must clarify, supplement, or implement jurisdiction-wide comprehensive plan policies, and may only be adopted if the cumulative impacts of the proposed plan are addressed by appropriate environmental review under chapter 43.21C RCW;

      (ii) The development of an initial subarea plan for economic development located outside of the one hundred year floodplain in a county that has completed a state-funded pilot project that is based on watershed characterization and local habitat assessment;

      (iii) The adoption or amendment of a shoreline master program under the procedures set forth in chapter 90.58 RCW;

      (iv) The amendment of the capital facilities element of a comprehensive plan that occurs concurrently with the adoption or amendment of a county or city budget; or

      (v) The adoption of comprehensive plan amendments necessary to enact a planned action under RCW 43.21C.031(2), provided that amendments are considered in accordance with the public participation program established by the county or city under this subsection (2)(a) and all persons who have requested notice of a comprehensive plan update are given notice of the amendments and an opportunity to comment.

      (b) Except as otherwise provided in (a) of this subsection, all proposals shall be considered by the governing body concurrently so the cumulative effect of the various proposals can be ascertained.  However, after appropriate public participation a county or city may adopt amendments or revisions to its comprehensive plan that conform with this chapter whenever an emergency exists or to resolve an appeal of a comprehensive plan filed with the growth management hearings board or with the court.

      (3)(a) Each county that designates urban growth areas under RCW 36.70A.110 shall review, ((at least every ten years)) according to the schedules established in subsection (5) of this section, its designated urban growth area or areas, and the densities permitted within both the incorporated and unincorporated portions of each urban growth area.  In conjunction with this review by the county, each city located within an urban growth area shall review the densities permitted within its boundaries, and the extent to which the urban growth occurring within the county has located within each city and the unincorporated portions of the urban growth areas.

      (b) The county comprehensive plan designating urban growth areas, and the densities permitted in the urban growth areas by the comprehensive plans of the county and each city located within the urban growth areas, shall be revised to accommodate the urban growth projected to occur in the county for the succeeding twenty-year period.  The review required by this subsection may be combined with the review and evaluation required by RCW 36.70A.215.

      (4) Except as provided in subsection (6) of this section, counties and cities shall take action to review and, if needed, revise their comprehensive plans and development regulations to ensure the plan and regulations comply with the requirements of this chapter as follows:

      (a) On or before December 1, 2004, for Clallam, Clark, Jefferson, King, Kitsap, Pierce, Snohomish, Thurston, and Whatcom counties and the cities within those counties;

      (b) On or before December 1, 2005, for Cowlitz, Island, Lewis, Mason, San Juan, Skagit, and Skamania counties and the cities within those counties;

      (c) On or before December 1, 2006, for Benton, Chelan, Douglas, Grant, Kittitas, Spokane, and Yakima counties and the cities within those counties; and

      (d) On or before December 1, 2007, for Adams, Asotin, Columbia, Ferry, Franklin, Garfield, Grays Harbor, Klickitat, Lincoln, Okanogan, Pacific, Pend Oreille, Stevens, Wahkiakum, Walla Walla, and Whitman counties and the cities within those counties.

      (5) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (6) of this section, following the review of comprehensive plans and development regulations required by subsection (4) of this section, counties and cities shall take action to review and, if needed, revise their comprehensive plans and development regulations to ensure the plan and regulations comply with the requirements of this chapter as follows:

      (a) On or before ((December 1, 2014)) June 30, 2015, and every ((seven)) eight years thereafter, for ((Clallam, Clark, Jefferson,)) King, ((Kitsap,)) Pierce, and Snohomish((, Thurston, and Whatcom)) counties and the cities within those counties;

      (b) On or before ((December 1, 2015)) June 30, 2016, and every ((seven)) eight years thereafter, for ((Cowlitz,)) Clallam, Clark, Island, ((Lewis)) Jefferson, Kitsap, Mason, San Juan, Skagit, Thurston, and ((Skamania)) Whatcom counties and the cities within those counties;

      (c) On or before ((December 1, 2016)) June 30, 2017, and every ((seven)) eight years thereafter, for Benton, Chelan, Cowlitz, Douglas, ((Grant,)) Kittitas, Lewis, Skamania, Spokane, and Yakima counties and the cities within those counties; and

      (d) On or before ((December 1, 2017)) June 30, 2018, and every ((seven)) eight years thereafter, for Adams, Asotin, Columbia, Ferry, Franklin, Garfield, Grant, Grays Harbor, Klickitat, Lincoln, Okanogan, Pacific, Pend Oreille, Stevens, Wahkiakum, Walla Walla, and Whitman counties and the cities within those counties.

      (6)(a) Nothing in this section precludes a county or city from conducting the review and evaluation required by this section before the deadlines established in subsections (4) and (5) of this section.  Counties and cities may begin this process early and may be eligible for grants from the department, subject to available funding, if they elect to do so.

      (b) A county that is subject to a deadline established in subsection (4)(b) through (d) of this section and meets the following criteria may comply with the requirements of this section at any time within the thirty-six months following the deadline established in subsection (4) of this section:  The county has a population of less than fifty thousand and has had its population increase by no more than seventeen percent in the ten years preceding the deadline established in subsection (4) of this section as of that date.

      (c) A city that is subject to a deadline established in subsection (4)(b) through (d) of this section and meets the following criteria may comply with the requirements of this section at any time within the thirty-six months following the deadline established in subsection (4) of this section:  The city has a population of no more than five thousand and has had its population increase by the greater of either no more than one hundred persons or no more than seventeen percent in the ten years preceding the deadline established in subsection (4) of this section as of that date.

      (d) A county or city that is subject to a deadline established in subsection (4)(d) of this section and that meets the criteria established in subsection (6)(b) or (c) of this section may comply with the requirements of subsection (4)(d) of this section at any time within the thirty-six months after the extension provided in subsection (6)(b) or (c) of this section.

      (e) A county that is subject to a deadline established in subsection (5)(b) through (d) of this section and meets the following criteria may comply with the requirements of this section at any time within the twenty-four months following the deadline established in subsection (5) of this section:  The county has a population of less than fifty thousand and has had its population increase by no more than seventeen percent in the ten years preceding the deadline established in subsection (5) of this section as of that date.
      (f) A city that is subject to a deadline established in subsection (5)(b) through (d) of this section and meets the following criteria may comply with the requirements of this section at any time within the twenty-four months following the deadline established in subsection (5) of this section:  The city has a population of no more than five thousand and has had its population increase by the greater of either no more than one hundred persons or no more than seventeen percent in the ten years preceding the deadline established in subsection (5) of this section as of that date.
      (g) State agencies are encouraged to provide technical assistance to the counties and cities in the review of critical area ordinances, comprehensive plans, and development regulations.

      (7)(a) The requirements imposed on counties and cities under this section shall be considered "requirements of this chapter" under the terms of RCW 36.70A.040(1).  Only those counties and cities that meet the following criteria may receive grants, loans, pledges, or financial guarantees under chapter 43.155 or 70.146 RCW:

      (i) Complying with the deadlines in this section;

      (ii) Demonstrating substantial progress towards compliance with the schedules in this section for development regulations that protect critical areas; or

      (iii) Complying with the extension provisions of subsection (6)(b), (c), or (d) of this section.

      (b) A county or city that is fewer than twelve months out of compliance with the schedules in this section for development regulations that protect critical areas is making substantial progress towards compliance.  Only those counties and cities in compliance with the schedules in this section may receive preference for grants or loans subject to the provisions of RCW 43.17.250.

Sec. 3.  RCW 36.70A.215 and 1997 c 429 s 25 are each amended to read as follows:

      (1) Subject to the limitations in subsection (7) of this section, a county shall adopt, in consultation with its cities, countywide planning policies to establish a review and evaluation program.  This program shall be in addition to the requirements of RCW 36.70A.110, 36.70A.130, and 36.70A.210.  In developing and implementing the review and evaluation program required by this section, the county and its cities shall consider information from other appropriate jurisdictions and sources.  The purpose of the review and evaluation program shall be to:

      (a) Determine whether a county and its cities are achieving urban densities within urban growth areas by comparing growth and development assumptions, targets, and objectives contained in the countywide planning policies and the county and city comprehensive plans with actual growth and development that has occurred in the county and its cities; and

      (b) Identify reasonable measures, other than adjusting urban growth areas, that will be taken to comply with the requirements of this chapter.

      (2) The review and evaluation program shall:

      (a) Encompass land uses and activities both within and outside of urban growth areas and provide for annual collection of data on urban and rural land uses, development, critical areas, and capital facilities to the extent necessary to determine the quantity and type of land suitable for development, both for residential and employment- based activities;

      (b) Provide for evaluation of the data collected under (a) of this subsection ((every five years)) as provided in subsection (3) of this section.  ((The first evaluation shall be completed not later than September 1, 2002.)) The evaluation shall be completed no later than one year prior to the deadline for review and, if necessary, update of comprehensive plans and development regulations as required by RCW 36.70A.130.  The county and its cities may establish in the countywide planning policies indicators, benchmarks, and other similar criteria to use in conducting the evaluation;

      (c) Provide for methods to resolve disputes among jurisdictions relating to the countywide planning policies required by this section and procedures to resolve inconsistencies in collection and analysis of data; and

      (d) Provide for the amendment of the countywide policies and county and city comprehensive plans as needed to remedy an inconsistency identified through the evaluation required by this section, or to bring these policies into compliance with the requirements of this chapter.

      (3) At a minimum, the evaluation component of the program required by subsection (1) of this section shall:

      (a) Determine whether there is sufficient suitable land to accommodate the countywide population projection established for the county pursuant to RCW 43.62.035 and the subsequent population allocations within the county and between the county and its cities and the requirements of RCW 36.70A.110;

      (b) Determine the actual density of housing that has been constructed and the actual amount of land developed for commercial and industrial uses within the urban growth area since the adoption of a comprehensive plan under this chapter or since the last periodic evaluation as required by subsection (1) of this section; and

      (c) Based on the actual density of development as determined under (b) of this subsection, review commercial, industrial, and housing needs by type and density range to determine the amount of land needed for commercial, industrial, and housing for the remaining portion of the twenty-year planning period used in the most recently adopted comprehensive plan.

      (4) If the evaluation required by subsection (3) of this section demonstrates an inconsistency between what has occurred since the adoption of the countywide planning policies and the county and city comprehensive plans and development regulations and what was envisioned in those policies and plans and the planning goals and the requirements of this chapter, as the inconsistency relates to the evaluation factors specified in subsection (3) of this section, the county and its cities shall adopt and implement measures that are reasonably likely to increase consistency during the subsequent five-year period.  If necessary, a county, in consultation with its cities as required by RCW 36.70A.210, shall adopt amendments to countywide planning policies to increase consistency.  The county and its cities shall annually monitor the measures adopted under this subsection to determine their effect and may revise or rescind them as appropriate.

      (5)(a) Not later than July 1, 1998, the department shall prepare a list of methods used by counties and cities in carrying out the types of activities required by this section.  The department shall provide this information and appropriate technical assistance to counties and cities required to or choosing to comply with the provisions of this section.

      (b) By December 31, 2007, the department shall submit to the appropriate committees of the legislature a report analyzing the effectiveness of the activities described in this section in achieving the goals envisioned by the countywide planning policies and the comprehensive plans and development regulations of the counties and cities.

      (6) From funds appropriated by the legislature for this purpose, the department shall provide grants to counties, cities, and regional planning organizations required under subsection (7) of this section to conduct the review and perform the evaluation required by this section.

      (7) The provisions of this section shall apply to counties, and the cities within those counties, that were greater than one hundred fifty thousand in population in 1995 as determined by office of financial management population estimates and that are located west of the crest of the Cascade mountain range.  Any other county planning under RCW 36.70A.040 may carry out the review, evaluation, and amendment programs and procedures as provided in this section.

Sec. 4.  RCW 43.19.648 and 2009 c 459 s 7 are each amended to read as follows:

      (1) Effective June 1, 2015, all state agencies ((and local government subdivisions of the state)), to the extent determined practicable by the rules adopted by the department of ((community, trade, and economic development)) commerce pursuant to RCW 43.325.080, are required to satisfy one hundred percent of their fuel usage for operating publicly owned vessels, vehicles, and construction equipment from electricity or biofuel.

      (2) Effective June 1, 2018, all local government subdivisions of the state, to the extent determined practicable by the rules adopted by the department of commerce pursuant to RCW 43.325.080, are required to satisfy one hundred percent of their fuel usage for operating publicly owned vessels, vehicles, and construction equipment from electricity or biofuel.
      (3) In order to phase in this transition for the state, all state agencies, to the extent determined practicable by the department of ((community, trade, and economic development)) commerce by rules adopted pursuant to RCW 43.325.080, are required to achieve forty percent fuel usage for operating publicly owned vessels, vehicles, and construction equipment from electricity or biofuel by June 1, 2013.  The department of general administration, in consultation with the department of ((community, trade, and economic development)) commerce, shall report to the governor and the legislature by December 1, 2013, on what percentage of the state's fuel usage is from electricity or biofuel.

      (((3))) (4) Except for cars owned or operated by the Washington state patrol, when tires on vehicles in the state's motor vehicle fleet are replaced, they must be replaced with tires that have the same or better rolling resistance as the original tires.

      (((4))) (5) By December 31, 2015, the state must, to the extent practicable, install electrical outlets capable of charging electric vehicles in each of the state's fleet parking and maintenance facilities.

      (((5))) (6) The department of transportation's obligations under subsection (((2))) (3) of this section are subject to the availability of amounts appropriated for the specific purpose identified in subsection (((2))) (3) of this section.

      (((6))) (7) The department of transportation's obligations under subsection (((4))) (5) of this section are subject to the availability of amounts appropriated for the specific purpose identified in subsection (((4))) (5) of this section unless the department receives federal or private funds for the specific purpose identified in subsection (((4))) (5) of this section.

      (((7))) (8) The definitions in this subsection apply throughout this section unless the context clearly requires otherwise.

      (a) "Battery charging station" means an electrical component assembly or cluster of component assemblies designed specifically to charge batteries within electric vehicles, which meet or exceed any standards, codes, and regulations set forth by chapter 19.28 RCW and consistent with rules adopted under RCW 19.27.540.

      (b) "Battery exchange station" means a fully automated facility that will enable an electric vehicle with a swappable battery to enter a drive lane and exchange the depleted battery with a fully charged battery through a fully automated process, which meets or exceeds any standards, codes, and regulations set forth by chapter 19.28 RCW and consistent with rules adopted under RCW 19.27.540.

Sec. 5.  RCW 43.325.080 and 2007 c 348 s 204 are each amended to read as follows:

(1) By June 1, 2010, the department shall adopt rules to define practicability and clarify how state agencies ((and local government subdivisions)) will be evaluated in determining whether they have met the goals set out in RCW 43.19.648(1).  At a minimum, the rules must address:

      (((1))) (a) Criteria for determining how the goal in RCW 43.19.648(1) will be met by June 1, 2015;

      (((2))) (b) Factors considered to determine compliance with the goal in RCW 43.19.648(1), including but not limited to:  The regional availability of fuels; vehicle costs; differences between types of vehicles, vessels, or equipment; the cost of program implementation; and cost differentials in different parts of the state; and

      (((3))) (c) A schedule for phased-in progress towards meeting the goal in RCW 43.19.648(1) that may include different schedules for different fuel applications or different quantities of biofuels.

(2) By June 1, 2015, the department shall adopt rules to define practicability and clarify how local government subdivisions of the state will be evaluated in determining whether they have met the goals set out in RCW 43.19.648(2).  At a minimum, the rules must address:
      (a) Criteria for determining how the goal in RCW 43.19.648(2) will be met by June 1, 2018;
      (b) Factors considered to determine compliance with the goal in RCW 43.19.648(2), including but not limited to:  The regional availability of fuels; vehicle costs; differences between types of vehicles, vessels, or equipment; the cost of program implementation; and cost differentials in different parts of the state; and
      (c) A schedule for phased-in progress towards meeting the goal in RCW 43.19.648(2) that may include different schedules for different fuel applications or different quantities of biofuels.

Sec. 6.  RCW 43.185C.210 and 2008 c 256 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:

      (1) The transitional housing operating and rent program is created in the department to assist individuals and families who are homeless or who are at risk of becoming homeless to secure and retain safe, decent, and affordable housing.  The department shall provide grants to eligible organizations, as described in RCW 43.185.060, to provide assistance to program participants.  The eligible organizations must use grant moneys for:

      (a) Rental assistance, which includes security or utility deposits, first and last month's rent assistance, and eligible moving expenses to be determined by the department;

      (b) Case management services designed to assist program participants to secure and retain immediate housing and to transition into permanent housing and greater levels of self-sufficiency;

      (c) Operating expenses of transitional housing facilities that serve homeless families with children; and

      (d) Administrative costs of the eligible organization, which must not exceed limits prescribed by the department.

      (2) Eligible to receive assistance through the transitional housing operating and rent program are:

      (a) Families with children who are homeless or who are at risk of becoming homeless and who have household incomes at or below fifty percent of the median household income for their county;

      (b) Families with children who are homeless or who are at risk of becoming homeless and who are receiving services under chapter 13.34 RCW;

      (c) Individuals or families without children who are homeless or at risk of becoming homeless and who have household incomes at or below thirty percent of the median household income for their county;

      (d) Individuals or families who are homeless or who are at risk of becoming homeless and who have a household with an adult member who has a mental health or chemical dependency disorder; and

      (e) Individuals or families who are homeless or who are at risk of becoming homeless and who have a household with an adult member who is an offender released from confinement within the past eighteen months.

      (3) All program participants must be willing to create and actively participate in a housing stability plan for achieving permanent housing and greater levels of self-sufficiency.

      (4) Data on all program participants must be entered into and tracked through the Washington homeless client management information system as described in RCW 43.185C.180.  For eligible organizations serving victims of domestic violence or sexual assault, compliance with this subsection must be accomplished in accordance with 42 U.S.C. Sec.  11383(a)(8).

      (5)(a) Except as provided in (b) of this subsection, beginning in 2011, each eligible organization receiving over five hundred thousand dollars during the previous calendar year from the transitional housing operating and rent program and from sources including:  (((a))) (i) State housing-related funding sources; (((b))) (ii) the affordable housing for all surcharge in RCW 36.22.178; (((c))) (iii) the home security fund surcharges in RCW 36.22.179 and 36.22.1791; and (((d))) (iv) any other surcharge imposed under chapter 36.22 or 43.185C RCW to fund homelessness programs or other housing programs, shall apply to the Washington state quality award program for an independent assessment of its quality management, accountability, and performance system, once every three years.

(b) Cities and counties are exempt from the provisions of (a) of this subsection until 2018.

      (6) The department may develop rules, requirements, procedures, and guidelines as necessary to implement and operate the transitional housing operating and rent program.

      (7) The department shall produce an annual transitional housing operating and rent program report that must be included in the department's homeless housing strategic plan as described in RCW 43.185C.040.  The report must include performance measures to be determined by the department that address, at a minimum, the following issue areas:

      (a) The success of the program in helping program participants transition into permanent affordable housing and achieve self- sufficiency or increase their levels of self‑sufficiency, which shall be defined by the department based upon the costs of living, including housing costs, needed to support:  (i) One adult individual; and (ii) two adult individuals and one preschool-aged child and one school-aged child;

      (b) The financial performance of the program related to efficient program administration by the department and program operation by selected eligible organizations, including an analysis of the costs per program participant served;

      (c) The quality, completeness, and timeliness of the information on program participants provided to the Washington homeless client management information system database; and

      (d) The satisfaction of program participants in the assistance provided through the program.

Sec. 7.  RCW 46.68.113 and 2006 c 334 s 21 are each amended to read as follows:

      During the ((2003-2005)) 2013-2015 biennium, cities and towns shall provide to the transportation commission, or its successor entity, preservation rating information on at least seventy percent of the total city and town arterial network.  Thereafter, the preservation rating information requirement shall increase in five percent increments in subsequent biennia, but in no case shall it exceed eighty percent.  The rating system used by cities and towns must be based upon the Washington state pavement rating method or an equivalent standard approved by the department of transportation.  Beginning January 1, 2007, the preservation rating information shall be submitted to the department.

Sec. 8.  RCW 82.02.070 and 2009 c 263 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:

      (1) Impact fee receipts shall be earmarked specifically and retained in special interest-bearing accounts.  Separate accounts shall be established for each type of public facility for which impact fees are collected.  All interest shall be retained in the account and expended for the purpose or purposes for which the impact fees were imposed.  Annually, each county, city, or town imposing impact fees shall provide a report on each impact fee account showing the source and amount of all moneys collected, earned, or received and system improvements that were financed in whole or in part by impact fees.

      (2) Impact fees for system improvements shall be expended only in conformance with the capital facilities plan element of the comprehensive plan.

      (3)(a) Except as provided otherwise by (b) of this subsection, impact fees shall be expended or encumbered for a permissible use within ((six)) ten years of receipt, unless there exists an extraordinary and compelling reason for fees to be held longer than ((six)) ten years.  Such extraordinary or compelling reasons shall be identified in written findings by the governing body of the county, city, or town.

      (b) School impact fees must be expended or encumbered for a permissible use within ten years of receipt, unless there exists an extraordinary and compelling reason for fees to be held longer than ten years.  Such extraordinary or compelling reasons shall be identified in written findings by the governing body of the county, city, or town.

      (4) Impact fees may be paid under protest in order to obtain a permit or other approval of development activity.

      (5) Each county, city, or town that imposes impact fees shall provide for an administrative appeals process for the appeal of an impact fee; the process may follow the appeal process for the underlying development approval or the county, city, or town may establish a separate appeals process.  The impact fee may be modified upon a determination that it is proper to do so based on principles of fairness.  The county, city, or town may provide for the resolution of disputes regarding impact fees by arbitration.

Sec. 9.  RCW 82.02.080 and 1990 1st ex.s. c 17 s 47 are each amended to read as follows:

      (1) The current owner of property on which an impact fee has been paid may receive a refund of such fees if the county, city, or town fails to expend or encumber the impact fees within ((six)) ten years of when the fees were paid or other such period of time established pursuant to RCW 82.02.070(3) on public facilities intended to benefit the development activity for which the impact fees were paid.  In determining whether impact fees have been encumbered, impact fees shall be considered encumbered on a first in, first out basis.  The county, city, or town shall notify potential claimants by first-class mail deposited with the United States postal service at the last known address of claimants.

      The request for a refund must be submitted to the county, city, or town governing body in writing within one year of the date the right to claim the refund arises or the date that notice is given, whichever is later.  Any impact fees that are not expended within these time limitations, and for which no application for a refund has been made within this one-year period, shall be retained and expended on the indicated capital facilities.  Refunds of impact fees under this subsection shall include interest earned on the impact fees.

      (2) When a county, city, or town seeks to terminate any or all impact fee requirements, all unexpended or unencumbered funds, including interest earned, shall be refunded pursuant to this section.  Upon the finding that any or all fee requirements are to be terminated, the county, city, or town shall place notice of such termination and the availability of refunds in a newspaper of general circulation at least two times and shall notify all potential claimants by first-class mail to the last known address of claimants.  All funds available for refund shall be retained for a period of one year.  At the end of one year, any remaining funds shall be retained by the local government, but must be expended for the indicated public facilities.  This notice requirement shall not apply if there are no unexpended or unencumbered balances within an account or accounts being terminated.

      (3) A developer may request and shall receive a refund, including interest earned on the impact fees, when the developer does not proceed with the development activity and no impact has resulted.

Sec. 10.  RCW 82.14.415 and 2009 c 550 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:

      (1) The legislative authority of any city that is located in a county with a population greater than six hundred thousand that annexes an area consistent with its comprehensive plan required by chapter 36.70A RCW((,)) may impose a sales and use tax in accordance with the terms of this chapter.  The tax is in addition to other taxes authorized by law and ((shall be)) is collected from those persons who are taxable by the state under chapters 82.08 and 82.12 RCW upon the occurrence of any taxable event within the city.  The tax may only be imposed by a city if:

      (a) The city has commenced annexation of an area having a population of at least ten thousand people, or four thousand in the case of a city described under subsection (3)(a)(i) of this section, prior to January 1, 2015; and

      (b) The city legislative authority determines by resolution or ordinance that the projected cost to provide municipal services to the annexation area exceeds the projected general revenue that the city would otherwise receive from the annexation area on an annual basis.

      (2) The tax authorized under this section is a credit against the state tax under chapter 82.08 or 82.12 RCW.  The department of revenue ((shall)) must perform the collection of such taxes on behalf of the city at no cost to the city and ((shall)) must remit the tax to the city as provided in RCW 82.14.060.

      (3)(a) Except as provided in (b) of this subsection, the maximum rate of tax any city may impose under this section is:

      (i) 0.1 percent for each annexed area in which the population is greater than ten thousand and less than twenty thousand.  The ten thousand population threshold in this subsection (3)(a)(i) is four thousand for a city with a population between one hundred fifteen thousand and one hundred forty thousand and located within a county with a population over one million five hundred thousand; and

      (ii) 0.2 percent for an annexed area in which the population is greater than twenty thousand.

      (b) Beginning July 1, 2011, the maximum rate of tax imposed under this section is 0.85 percent for an annexed area in which the population is greater than ((eighteen)) sixteen thousand if the annexed area was, prior to November 1, 2008, officially designated as a potential annexation area by more than one city, one of which has a population greater than four hundred thousand.

      (4)(a) Except as provided in (b) of this subsection, the maximum cumulative rate of tax a city may impose under subsection (3)(a) of this section is 0.2 percent for the total number of annexed areas the city may annex.

      (b) The maximum cumulative rate of tax a city may impose under subsection (3)(a) of this section is 0.3 percent, beginning July 1, 2011, if the city commenced annexation of an area, prior to January 1, 2010, that would have otherwise allowed the city to increase the rate of tax imposed under this section absent the rate limit imposed in (a) of this subsection.

      (c) The maximum cumulative rate of tax a city may impose under subsection (3)(b) of this section is 0.85 percent for the single annexed area the city may annex and the amount of tax distributed to a city under subsection (3)(b) of this section ((shall)) may not exceed five million dollars per fiscal year.

      (5) The tax imposed by this section ((shall)) may only be imposed at the beginning of a fiscal year and ((shall)) may continue for no more than ten years from the date that each increment of the tax is first imposed.  Tax rate increases due to additional annexed areas ((shall be)) are effective on July 1st of the fiscal year following the fiscal year in which the annexation occurred, provided that notice is given to the department as set forth in subsection (9) of this section.

      (6) All revenue collected under this section ((shall)) may be used solely to provide, maintain, and operate municipal services for the annexation area.

      (7) The revenues from the tax authorized in this section may not exceed that which the city deems necessary to generate revenue equal to the difference between the city's cost to provide, maintain, and operate municipal services for the annexation area and the general revenues that the cities would otherwise expect to receive from the annexation during a year.  If the revenues from the tax authorized in this section and the revenues from the annexation area exceed the costs to the city to provide, maintain, and operate municipal services for the annexation area during a given year, the city ((shall)) must notify the department and the tax distributions authorized in this section ((shall)) must be suspended for the remainder of the year.

      (8) No tax may be imposed under this section before July 1, 2007.  Before imposing a tax under this section, the legislative authority of a city ((shall)) must adopt an ordinance that includes the following:

      (a) A certification that the amount needed to provide municipal services to the annexed area reflects the city's true and actual costs;

      (b) The rate of tax under this section that ((shall be)) is imposed within the city; and

      (c) The threshold amount for the first fiscal year following the annexation and passage of the ordinance.

      (9) The tax ((shall)) must cease to be distributed to the city for the remainder of the fiscal year once the threshold amount has been reached.  No later than March 1st of each year, the city ((shall)) must provide the department with a certification of the city's true and actual costs to provide municipal services to the annexed area, a new threshold amount for the next fiscal year, and notice of any applicable tax rate changes.  Distributions of tax under this section ((shall)) must begin again on July 1st of the next fiscal year and continue until the new threshold amount has been reached or June 30th, whichever is sooner.  Any revenue generated by the tax in excess of the threshold amount ((shall)) belongs to the state of Washington.  Any amount resulting from the threshold amount less the total fiscal year distributions, as of June 30th, ((shall)) may not be carried forward to the next fiscal year.

      (10) The tax ((shall)) must cease to be distributed to a city imposing the tax under subsection (3)(b) of this section for the remainder of the fiscal year, if the total distributions to the city imposing the tax exceed five million dollars for the fiscal year.

      (11) The resident population of the annexation area must be determined in accordance with chapter 35.13 or 35A.14 RCW.
      (12) The following definitions apply throughout this section unless the context clearly requires otherwise:

      (a) "Annexation area" means an area that has been annexed to a city under chapter 35.13 or 35A.14 RCW.  "Annexation area" includes all territory described in the city resolution.

      (b) "Commenced annexation" means the initiation of annexation proceedings has taken place under the direct petition method or the election method under chapter 35.13 or 35A.14 RCW.

      (c) "Department" means the department of revenue.

      (d) "Municipal services" means those services customarily provided to the public by city government.

      (e) "Fiscal year" means the year beginning July 1st and ending the following June 30th.

      (f) "Potential annexation area" means one or more geographic areas that a city has officially designated for potential future annexation, as part of its comprehensive plan adoption process under the state growth management act, chapter 36.70A RCW.

      (g) "Threshold amount" means the maximum amount of tax distributions as determined by the city in accordance with subsection (7) of this section that the department ((shall)) must distribute to the city generated from the tax imposed under this section in a fiscal year.

Sec. 11.  RCW 90.46.015 and 2009 c 456 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:

      (1) The department of ecology shall, in coordination with the department of health, adopt rules for reclaimed water use consistent with this chapter.  The rules must address all aspects of reclaimed water use, including commercial and industrial uses, land applications, direct groundwater recharge, wetland discharge, surface percolation, constructed wetlands, and streamflow or surface water augmentation.  The department of health shall, in coordination with the department of ecology, adopt rules for greywater reuse.  The rules must also designate whether the department of ecology or the department of health will be the lead agency responsible for a particular aspect of reclaimed water use.  In developing the rules, the departments of health and ecology shall amend or rescind any existing rules on reclaimed water in conflict with the new rules.

      (2) All rules required to be adopted pursuant to this section must be completed no later than December 31, 2010, ((although the department of ecology is encouraged to adopt the final rules as soon as possible)) except that the department of ecology shall adopt rules for reclaimed water use no earlier than June 30, 2013.

      (3) The department of ecology must consult with the advisory committee created under RCW 90.46.050 in all aspects of rule development required under this section.

Sec. 12.  RCW 90.48.260 and 2007 c 341 s 55 are each amended to read as follows:

(1) The department of ecology is hereby designated as the state water pollution control agency for all purposes of the federal clean water act as it exists on February 4, 1987, and is hereby authorized to participate fully in the programs of the act as well as to take all action necessary to secure to the state the benefits and to meet the requirements of that act.  With regard to the national estuary program established by section 320 of that act, the department shall exercise its responsibility jointly with the Puget Sound partnership, created in RCW 90.71.210.  The department of ecology may delegate its authority under this chapter, including its national pollutant discharge elimination permit system authority and duties regarding animal feeding operations and concentrated animal feeding operations, to the department of agriculture through a memorandum of understanding.  Until any such delegation receives federal approval, the department of agriculture's adoption or issuance of animal feeding operation and concentrated animal feeding operation rules, permits, programs, and directives pertaining to water quality shall be accomplished after reaching agreement with the director of the department of ecology.  Adoption or issuance and implementation shall be accomplished so that compliance with such animal feeding operation and concentrated animal feeding operation rules, permits, programs, and directives will achieve compliance with all federal and state water pollution control laws.  The powers granted herein include, among others, and notwithstanding any other provisions of chapter 90.48 RCW or otherwise, the following:

      (((1))) (a) Complete authority to establish and administer a comprehensive state point source waste discharge or pollution discharge elimination permit program which will enable the department to qualify for full participation in any national waste discharge or pollution discharge elimination permit system and will allow the department to be the sole agency issuing permits required by such national system operating in the state of Washington subject to the provisions of RCW 90.48.262(2).  Program elements authorized herein may include, but are not limited to:  (((a))) (i) Effluent treatment and limitation requirements together with timing requirements related thereto; (((b))) (ii) applicable receiving water quality standards requirements; (((c))) (iii) requirements of standards of performance for new sources; (((d))) (iv) pretreatment requirements; (((e))) (v) termination and modification of permits for cause; (((f))) (vi) requirements for public notices and opportunities for public hearings; (((g))) (vii) appropriate relationships with the secretary of the army in the administration of his responsibilities which relate to anchorage and navigation, with the administrator of the environmental protection agency in the performance of his duties, and with other governmental officials under the federal clean water act; (((h))) (viii) requirements for inspection, monitoring, entry, and reporting; (((i))) (ix) enforcement of the program through penalties, emergency powers, and criminal sanctions; (((j))) (x) a continuing planning process; and (((k))) (xi) user charges.

      (((2))) (b) The power to establish and administer state programs in a manner which will insure the procurement of moneys, whether in the form of grants, loans, or otherwise; to assist in the construction, operation, and maintenance of various water pollution control facilities and works; and the administering of various state water pollution control management, regulatory, and enforcement programs.

      (((3))) (c) The power to develop and implement appropriate programs pertaining to continuing planning processes, area-wide waste treatment management plans, and basin planning.

      The governor shall have authority to perform those actions required of him or her by the federal clean water act.

(2) By July 31, 2012, the department shall:
      (a) Reissue without modification and for a term of one year any national pollutant discharge elimination system municipal storm water general permit first issued on January 17, 2007; and
      (b) Issue an updated national pollutant discharge elimination system municipal storm water general permit for any permit first issued on January 17, 2007.  An updated permit issued under this subsection shall become effective beginning August 1, 2013.

Sec. 13.  RCW 90.58.080 and 2007 c 170 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:

      (1) Local governments shall develop or amend a master program for regulation of uses of the shorelines of the state consistent with the required elements of the guidelines adopted by the department in accordance with the schedule established by this section.

      (2)(a) Subject to the provisions of subsections (5) and (6) of this section, each local government subject to this chapter shall develop or amend its master program for the regulation of uses of shorelines within its jurisdiction according to the following schedule:

      (i) On or before December 1, 2005, for the city of Port Townsend, the city of Bellingham, the city of Everett, Snohomish county, and Whatcom county;

      (ii) On or before December 1, 2009, for King county and the cities within King county greater in population than ten thousand;

      (iii) Except as provided by (a)(i) and (ii) of this subsection, on or before December 1, 2011, for Clallam, Clark, Jefferson, King, Kitsap, Pierce, Snohomish, Thurston, and Whatcom counties and the cities within those counties;

      (iv) On or before December 1, 2012, for Cowlitz, Island, Lewis, Mason, San Juan, Skagit, and Skamania counties and the cities within those counties;

      (v) On or before December 1, 2013, for Benton, Chelan, Douglas, Grant, Kittitas, Spokane, and Yakima counties and the cities within those counties; and

      (vi) On or before December 1, 2014, for Adams, Asotin, Columbia, Ferry, Franklin, Garfield, Grays Harbor, Klickitat, Lincoln, Okanogan, Pacific, Pend Oreille, Stevens, Wahkiakum, Walla Walla, and Whitman counties and the cities within those counties.

      (b) Nothing in this subsection (2) shall preclude a local government from developing or amending its master program prior to the dates established by this subsection (2).

      (3)(a) Following approval by the department of a new or amended master program, local governments required to develop or amend master programs on or before December 1, 2009, as provided by subsection (2)(a)(i) and (ii) of this section, shall be deemed to have complied with the schedule established by subsection (2)(a)(iii) of this section and shall not be required to complete master program amendments until ((seven years after)) the applicable dates established by subsection (((2)(a)(iii))) (4)(b) of this section.  Any jurisdiction listed in subsection (2)(a)(i) of this section that has a new or amended master program approved by the department on or after March 1, 2002, but before July 27, 2003, shall not be required to complete master program amendments until ((seven years after)) the applicable date provided by subsection (((2)(a)(iii))) (4)(b) of this section.

      (b) Following approval by the department of a new or amended master program, local governments choosing to develop or amend master programs on or before December 1, 2009, shall be deemed to have complied with the schedule established by subsection (2)(a)(iii) through (vi) of this section and shall not be required to complete master program amendments until ((seven years after)) the applicable dates established by subsection (((2)(a)(iii) through (vi))) (4)(b) of this section.

      (4)(a) Following the updates required by subsection (2) of this section, local governments shall conduct a review of their master programs at least once every ((seven)) eight years ((after the applicable dates established by subsection (2)(a)(iii) through (vi) of this section)) as required by (b) of this subsection.  Following the review required by this subsection (4), local governments shall, if necessary, revise their master programs.  The purpose of the review is:

      (((a))) (i) To assure that the master program complies with applicable law and guidelines in effect at the time of the review; and

      (((b))) (ii) To assure consistency of the master program with the local government's comprehensive plan and development regulations adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW, if applicable, and other local requirements.

(b) Counties and cities shall take action to review and, if necessary, revise their master programs as required by (a) of this subsection as follows:
      (i) On or before June 30, 2019, and every eight years thereafter, for King, Pierce, and Snohomish counties and the cities within those counties;
      (ii) On or before June 30, 2020, and every eight years thereafter, for Clallam, Clark, Island, Jefferson, Kitsap, Mason, San Juan, Skagit, Thurston, and Whatcom counties and the cities within those counties;
      (iii) On or before June 30, 2021, and every eight years thereafter, for Benton, Chelan, Cowlitz, Douglas, Grant, Kittitas, Lewis, Skamania, Spokane, and Yakima counties and the cities within those counties; and
      (iv) On or before June 30, 2022, and every eight years thereafter, for Adams, Asotin, Columbia, Ferry, Franklin, Garfield, Grant, Grays Harbor, Klickitat, Lincoln, Okanogan, Pacific, Pend Oreille, Stevens, Wahkiakum, Walla Walla, and Whitman counties and the cities within those counties.

      (5) In meeting the update requirements of subsection (2) of this section, local governments are encouraged to begin the process of developing or amending their master programs early and are eligible for grants from the department as provided by RCW 90.58.250, subject to available funding.  Except for those local governments listed in subsection (2)(a)(i) and (ii) of this section, the deadline for completion of the new or amended master programs shall be two years after the date the grant is approved by the department.  Subsequent master program review dates shall not be altered by the provisions of this subsection.

      (6) In meeting the update requirements of subsection (2) of this section, the following shall apply:

      (a) Grants to local governments for developing and amending master programs pursuant to the schedule established by this section shall be provided at least two years before the adoption dates specified in subsection (2) of this section.  To the extent possible, the department shall allocate grants within the amount appropriated for such purposes to provide reasonable and adequate funding to local governments that have indicated their intent to develop or amend master programs during the biennium according to the schedule established by subsection (2) of this section.  Any local government that applies for but does not receive funding to comply with the provisions of subsection (2) of this section may delay the development or amendment of its master program until the following biennium.

      (b) Local governments with delayed compliance dates as provided in (a) of this subsection shall be the first priority for funding in subsequent biennia, and the development or amendment compliance deadline for those local governments shall be two years after the date of grant approval.

      (c) Failure of the local government to apply in a timely manner for a master program development or amendment grant in accordance with the requirements of the department shall not be considered a delay resulting from the provisions of (a) of this subsection.

      (7) ((Notwithstanding the provisions)) In meeting the update requirements of subsection (2) of this section, all local governments subject to the requirements of this chapter that have not developed or amended master programs on or after March 1, 2002, shall, no later than December 1, 2014, develop or amend their master programs to comply with guidelines adopted by the department after January 1, 2003.

      (8) In meeting the update requirements of subsection (2) of this section, local governments may be provided an additional year beyond the deadlines in this section to complete their master program or amendment.  The department shall grant the request if it determines that the local government is likely to adopt or amend its master program within the additional year.

Sec. 14.  RCW 90.58.090 and 2003 c 321 s 3 are each amended to read as follows:

      (1) A master program, segment of a master program, or an amendment to a master program shall become effective when approved by the department.  Within the time period provided in RCW 90.58.080, each local government shall have submitted a master program, either totally or by segments, for all shorelines of the state within its jurisdiction to the department for review and approval.

The department shall strive to achieve final action on a submitted master program within one hundred eighty days of receipt and shall post an annual assessment related to this performance benchmark on the agency web site.

      (2) Upon receipt of a proposed master program or amendment, the department shall:

      (a) Provide notice to and opportunity for written comment by all interested parties of record as a part of the local government review process for the proposal and to all persons, groups, and agencies that have requested in writing notice of proposed master programs or amendments generally or for a specific area, subject matter, or issue.  The comment period shall be at least thirty days, unless the department determines that the level of complexity or controversy involved supports a shorter period;

      (b) In the department's discretion, conduct a public hearing during the thirty-day comment period in the jurisdiction proposing the master program or amendment;

      (c) Within fifteen days after the close of public comment, request the local government to review the issues identified by the public, interested parties, groups, and agencies and provide a written response as to how the proposal addresses the identified issues;

      (d) Within thirty days after receipt of the local government response pursuant to (c) of this subsection, make written findings and conclusions regarding the consistency of the proposal with the policy of RCW 90.58.020 and the applicable guidelines, provide a response to the issues identified in (c) of this subsection, and either approve the proposal as submitted, recommend specific changes necessary to make the proposal approvable, or deny approval of the proposal in those instances where no alteration of the proposal appears likely to be consistent with the policy of RCW 90.58.020 and the applicable guidelines.  The written findings and conclusions shall be provided to the local government, all interested persons, parties, groups, and agencies of record on the proposal;

      (e) If the department recommends changes to the proposed master program or amendment, within thirty days after the department mails the written findings and conclusions to the local government, the local government may:

      (i) Agree to the proposed changes.  The receipt by the department of the written notice of agreement constitutes final action by the department approving the amendment; or

      (ii) Submit an alternative proposal.  If, in the opinion of the department, the alternative is consistent with the purpose and intent of the changes originally submitted by the department and with this chapter it shall approve the changes and provide written notice to all recipients of the written findings and conclusions.  If the department determines the proposal is not consistent with the purpose and intent of the changes proposed by the department, the department may resubmit the proposal for public and agency review pursuant to this section or reject the proposal.

      (3) The department shall approve the segment of a master program relating to shorelines unless it determines that the submitted segments are not consistent with the policy of RCW 90.58.020 and the applicable guidelines.

      (4) The department shall approve the segment of a master program relating to critical areas as defined by RCW 36.70A.030(5) provided the master program segment is consistent with RCW 90.58.020 and applicable shoreline guidelines, and if the segment provides a level of protection of critical areas at least equal to that provided by the local government's critical areas ordinances adopted and thereafter amended pursuant to RCW 36.70A.060(2).

      (5) The department shall approve those segments of the master program relating to shorelines of statewide significance only after determining the program provides the optimum implementation of the policy of this chapter to satisfy the statewide interest.  If the department does not approve a segment of a local government master program relating to a shoreline of statewide significance, the department may develop and by rule adopt an alternative to the local government's proposal.

      (6) In the event a local government has not complied with the requirements of RCW 90.58.070 it may thereafter upon written notice to the department elect to adopt a master program for the shorelines within its jurisdiction, in which event it shall comply with the provisions established by this chapter for the adoption of a master program for such shorelines.

      Upon approval of such master program by the department it shall supersede such master program as may have been adopted by the department for such shorelines.

      (7) A master program or amendment to a master program takes effect when and in such form as approved or adopted by the department.  Shoreline master programs that were adopted by the department prior to July 22, 1995, in accordance with the provisions of this section then in effect, shall be deemed approved by the department in accordance with the provisions of this section that became effective on that date.  The department shall maintain a record of each master program, the action taken on any proposal for adoption or amendment of the master program, and any appeal of the department's action.  The department's approved document of record constitutes the official master program."

On page 1, line 3 of the title, after "requirements;" strike the remainder of the title and insert "amending RCW 36.70A.215, 43.19.648, 43.325.080, 43.185C.210, 46.68.113, 82.02.070, 82.02.080, 82.14.415, 90.46.015, 90.48.260, 90.58.080, and 90.58.090; reenacting and amending RCW 36.70A.130; and creating a new section."

 

and that the bill do pass as recommended by the Conference Committee:

 

Senators Pridemore, Nelson and Swecker

Representatives Fitzgibbon, Springer and Angel

 

There being no objection, the House adopted the conference committee report on ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1478 and advanced the bill as recommended by the conference committee to final passage.

 

FINAL PASSAGE OF HOUSE BILL AS

RECOMMENDED BY CONFERENCE COMMITTEE

 

Representatives Springer, Angel, Fitzgibbon and Orcutt spoke in favor of the passage of the bill as recommended by the conference committee.

 

Representatives Miloscia and Asay spoke against the passage of the bill as recommended by the conference committee.

 

The Speaker (Representative Moeller presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1478 as recommended by the conference committee.

 

ROLL CALL

 

The Clerk called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1478, as recommended by the conference committee, and the bill passed the House by the following votes:  Yeas, 90; Nays, 6; Absent, 0; Excused, 2.

Voting yea: Representatives Ahern, Alexander, Anderson, Angel, Appleton, Armstrong, Asay, Bailey, Billig, Blake, Buys, Carlyle, Chandler, Clibborn, Cody, Condotta, Dahlquist, Dammeier, Darneille, DeBolt, Dickerson, Dunshee, Eddy, Fagan, Finn, Fitzgibbon, Goodman, Green, Haigh, Haler, Hargrove, Harris, Hinkle, Hope, Hudgins, Hunt, Hurst, Jinkins, Johnson, Kagi, Kenney, Kirby, Klippert, Kretz, Kristiansen, Ladenburg, Liias, Lytton, Maxwell, McCoy, McCune, Moeller, Morris, Moscoso, Nealey, Orcutt, Ormsby, Orwall, Overstreet, Parker, Pearson, Pedersen, Pettigrew, Probst, Rivers, Roberts, Rodne, Rolfes, Ross, Santos, Schmick, Seaquist, Sells, Shea, Short, Smith, Springer, Stanford, Sullivan, Takko, Taylor, Tharinger, Upthegrove, Van De Wege, Walsh, Warnick, Wilcox, Wylie, Zeiger and Mr. Speaker.

Voting nay: Representatives Frockt, Hasegawa, Kelley, Miloscia, Reykdal and Ryu.

Excused: Representatives Crouse and Hunter.

 

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1478, as recommended by the conference committee, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

 

The Speaker assumed the chair.

 

SIGNED BY THE SPEAKER

 

The Speaker signed the following:

 

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1037

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1312

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1332

HOUSE BILL NO. 1544

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1560

HOUSE BILL NO. 1953

ENGROSSED HOUSE BILL NO. 1969

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 2017

HOUSE BILL NO. 2019

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1046

SECOND SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1128

ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1546

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1899

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1026

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1053

HOUSE BILL NO. 1229

ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1267

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1547

ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1599

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1725

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1874

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5023

SENATE BILL NO. 5304

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5531

SENATE BILL NO. 5625

SENATE BILL NO. 5628

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5656

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5691

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5722

SENATE JOINT MEMORIAL NO. 8008

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5025

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5072

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5097

SENATE BILL NO. 5141

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5156

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5186

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5192

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5203

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5232

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5239

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5253

SENATE BILL NO. 5083

SENATE BILL NO. 5119

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5485

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5502

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5504

ENGROSSED SENATE BILL NO. 5505

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5525

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5540

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5579

SENATE BILL NO. 5584

SENATE BILL NO. 5806

ENGROSSED SENATE BILL NO. 5907

SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5595

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5614

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5658

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5688

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5700

SENATE BILL NO. 5731

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5741

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5067

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5326

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5350

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5371

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5392

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5394

SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5427

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5436

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5445

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5451

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5452

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5504

HOUSE BILL NO. 1000

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1008

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1127

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1295

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1311

ENGROSSED HOUSE BILL NO. 1382

HOUSE BILL NO. 1418

HOUSE BILL NO. 1419

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1570

HOUSE BILL NO. 1594

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1635

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1691

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1774

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1790

SECOND SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1903

HOUSE BILL NO. 1916

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 2021

ENGROSSED SENATE BILL NO. 5005

SENATE BILL NO. 5044

ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5073

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5187

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5204

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5271

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5385

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5487

SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5622

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5708

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5748

ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5769

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5791

 

The Speaker called upon Representative Moeller to preside.

 

MOTION

 

Representative Condotta moved to advance to the eighth order of business.

 

The Speaker (Representative Moeller presiding) stated the question before the House to be the adoption of the motion to advance to the eighth order of business and the motion failed by the following vote:  Yeas, 41; Nays, 55; Not Voting, 0; Excused, 2.

      Voting yea: Representatives Ahern, Alexander, Angel, Armstrong, Asay, Bailey, Buys, Chandler, Condotta, Dahlquist, Dammeier, DeBolt, Fagan, Haler, Hargrove, Harris, Hinkle, Johnson, Klippert, Kretz, Kristiansen, McCune, Morris, Nealey, Orcutt, Overstreet, Parker, Pearson, Rivers, Rodne, Ross, Schmick, Shea, Short, Smith, Taylor, Walsh, Warnick, Wilcox and Zeiger.

      Voting Nay: Representatives Appleton, Billig, Blake, Carlyle, Clibborn, Cody, Darneille, Dickerson, Dunshee, Eddy, Finn, Fitzgobbon, Frockt, Goodman, Green, Haigh, Hasegawa, Hudgins, Hunt, Hurst, Jinkins, Kagi, Kelley, Kenney, Kirby, Ladenburg, Liias, Lytton, Maxwell, McCoy, Miloscia, Moeller, Morris, Moscoso, Ormsby, Orwall, Pedersen, Pettigrew, Probst, Reykdal, Roberts, Rolfes, Ryu, Santos, Seaquist, Sells, Springer, Stanford, Sullivan, Takko, Tharinger, Upthegorve, Van De Wege, Wylie and Mr. Speaker.

      Excused: Representatives Crouse and Hunter.

 

RESOLUTION

0) 

HOUSE RESOLUTION NO. 2011-4649, by Representatives Sullivan and Kretz

 

      WHEREAS, It is necessary to provide for the continuation of the work of the House of Representatives after its adjournment and during the interim periods between legislative sessions;

      NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Executive Rules Committee is hereby created by this resolution and shall consist of three members of the majority caucus and two members of the minority caucus, to be named by the Speaker of the House of Representatives and Minority Leader respectively; and

      BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Executive Rules Committee may assign subject matters, bills, memorials, and resolutions to authorized committees of the House of Representatives for study during the interim, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives may create special and select committees as may be necessary to carry out the functions, including interim studies, of the House of Representatives in an orderly manner and shall appoint members to such committees with the approval of the Executive Rules Committee; and

      BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That, during the interim, the schedules of and locations for all meetings of any committee or subcommittee shall be approved by the Executive Rules Committee, and those committees or subcommittees may conduct hearings and scheduling without a quorum being present; and

      BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That, during the interim, authorized committees have the power of subpoena, the power to administer oaths, and the power to issue commissions for the examination of witnesses in accordance with chapter 44.16 RCW if and when specifically authorized by the Executive Rules Committee for specific purposes and specific subjects; and

      BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives shall complete the work of the 2011 Regular Session of the Sixty-Second Legislature during interim periods, and all details that arise therefrom, including the editing, indexing, and publishing of the journal of the House of Representatives; and

      BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives shall make the necessary inventory of furnishings, fixtures, and supplies; and

      BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives may approve vouchers of the members of the House of Representatives, covering expenses incurred during the interim for official business of the Legislature in accordance with policies set by the Executive Rules Committee, at the per diem rate provided by law and established by the Executive Rules Committee, for each day or major portion of a day, plus mileage at the rate provided by law and established by the Executive Rules Committee; and

      BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives shall, during the interim, and as authorized by the Speaker of the House of Representatives, retain or hire any necessary employees and order necessary supplies, equipment, and printing to enable the House of Representatives to carry out its work promptly and efficiently, and accept committee reports, committee bills, prefiled bills, memorials, and resolutions as directed by the Rules of the House of Representatives and by Joint Rules of the Legislature; and

      BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives shall have authority to carry out the directions of the Executive Rules Committee regarding the authorization and execution of any personal services contracts or subcontracts that necessitate the expenditure of House of Representatives appropriations; and

      BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives shall execute the necessary vouchers upon which warrants are drawn for all legislative expenses and expenditures of the House of Representatives; and

      BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That members and employees of the Legislature be reimbursed for expenses incurred in attending authorized conferences and meetings at the rate provided by law and established by the Executive Rules Committee, plus mileage to and from the conferences and meetings at the rate provided by law and established by the Executive Rules Committee, which reimbursement shall be paid on vouchers from any appropriation made to the House of Representatives for legislative expenses; and

      BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That, during the interim, the use of the House of Representatives Chamber, any of its committee rooms, or any of the furniture or furnishings in them is permitted upon such terms and conditions as the Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives shall deem appropriate; and

      BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives may express the sympathy of the House of Representatives by sending flowers and correspondence when the necessity arises; and

      BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That this Resolution applies throughout the interim between sessions of the Sixty-Second Legislature, as well as any committee assembly.

 

The Speaker (Representative Moeller presiding) stated the question before the House to be adoption of House Resolution No. 4649.

 

HOUSE RESOLUTION NO. 4649 was adopted.

 

MESSAGES FROM THE SENATE

 

April 22, 2011

MR. SPEAKER:

 

The President has signed:

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5457

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5836

and the same are herewith transmitted.

Thomas Hoemann, Secretary

 

April 22, 2011

MR. SPEAKER:

 

The Senate has passed:

SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 8401

SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 8402

and the same are herewith transmitted.

Thomas Hoemann, Secretary

 

April 22, 2011

 

MR. SPEAKER:

 

The President has signed:

HOUSE BILL 1000

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1008

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1026

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1037

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1046

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1053

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1127

SECOND SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1128

HOUSE BILL 1229

ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1267

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1295

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1311

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1312

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1332

ENGROSSED HOUSE BILL 1382

HOUSE BILL 1418

HOUSE BILL 1419

HOUSE BILL 1544

ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1546

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1547

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1560

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1570

HOUSE BILL 1594

ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1599

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1635

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1691

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1725

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1774

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1790

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1874

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1899

SECOND SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1903

HOUSE BILL 1916

HOUSE BILL 1953

ENGROSSED HOUSE BILL 1969

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2017

HOUSE BILL 2019

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2021

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 4404

and the same are herewith transmitted.

Thomas Hoemann, Secretary

 

April 22, 2011

MR. SPEAKER:

 

Under the provisions of SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 8402, the following House Bills were returned to the House of Representatives:  

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1042

ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1144

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1277

HOUSE BILL 1286

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1449

ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1593

HOUSE BILL 1631

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1632

SECOND ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1738

ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1965

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1997

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1998

ENGROSSED HOUSE BILL 2003

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2026

and the same are herewith transmitted.

Thomas Hoemann, Secretary

 

RESOLUTION

0) 

SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 8401 by Senators Brown and Hewitt

 

BE IT RESOLVED, By the Senate of the State of Washington, the House of Representatives concurring, That the 2011 Regular Session of the Sixty-second Legislature adjourn SINE DIE.

 

The Speaker (Representative Moeller presiding) stated the question before the House to be adoption of Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 8401.

 

SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 8401 was adopted.

 

MOTIONS

 

On motion of Representative Sullivan, the reading of the Journal of the 103rd Day of the 2011 regular session of the 62nd Legislature was dispensed with and ordered to stand approved.

 

On motion of Representative Sullivan, the 2011 Regular Session of the 62nd Legislature was adjourned SINE DIE.

 

FRANK CHOPP, Speaker

BARBARA BAKER, Chief Clerk

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




1000

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 1, 60

1008-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 1, 60

1026-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 1, 60

1037-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 1, 60

1042-S

Messages...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 61

1046-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2, 60

1053-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2, 60

1127-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2, 60

1128-S2

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2, 60

1144-S2

Messages...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 61

1175-S

Final Passage................................................................................................................................................................................................ 51

Other Action................................................................................................................................................................................................ 51

Messages........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 8

1229

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2, 60

1267-S2

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2, 60

1277-S

Messages...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 61

1286

Messages...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 61

1295-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2, 60

1311-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2, 61

1312-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2, 61

1332-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2, 61

1371

Committee Report......................................................................................................................................................................................... 3

1382

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2, 61

1418

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2, 61

1419

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2, 61

1449-S

Messages...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 61

1478-S

Committee Report Conference.................................................................................................................................................................... 51

Final Passage................................................................................................................................................................................................ 58

Other Action................................................................................................................................................................................................ 58

1544

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2, 61

1546-S2

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2, 61

1547-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2, 61

1560-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2, 61

1570-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2, 61

1593-S2

Messages...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 61

1594

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2, 61

1599-S2

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2, 61

1631

Messages...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 61

1632-S

Messages...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 61

1635-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2, 61

1691-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2, 61

1725-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2, 61

1738-S2

Messages...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 61

1774-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2, 61

1790-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2, 61

1793-S

Committee Report Conference...................................................................................................................................................................... 5

Final Passage.................................................................................................................................................................................................. 8

Other Action.................................................................................................................................................................................................. 7

Messages........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 5

1874-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2, 61

1899-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

Messages........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2, 61

1903-S2

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2, 61

1916

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2, 61

1953

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2, 61

1965-S2

Messages...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 61

1969

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2, 61

1997-S

Messages...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 61

1998-S

Messages...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 61

2003

Messages...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 61

2017-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2, 61

2019

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2, 61

2021-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

Messages........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2, 61

2026-S

Messages...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 61

2105

Introduction & 1st Reading............................................................................................................................................................................ 2

2106

Introduction & 1st Reading............................................................................................................................................................................ 3

2107

Introduction & 1st Reading............................................................................................................................................................................ 3

4404-S

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2, 61

4649

Introduced.................................................................................................................................................................................................... 59

Adopted....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 60

5005

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

Messages........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1

President Signed........................................................................................................................................................................................... 51

5023-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

Messages........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1

President Signed........................................................................................................................................................................................... 51

5025-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

5044

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

Messages........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1

President Signed........................................................................................................................................................................................... 51

5067-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

5072-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

5073-S2

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

Messages........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1

President Signed........................................................................................................................................................................................... 51

5083

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

5097-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

5119

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

5141

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

5156-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

5186-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

5187-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

Messages........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1

President Signed........................................................................................................................................................................................... 51

5192-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

5203-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

5204-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

Messages........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1

President Signed........................................................................................................................................................................................... 51

5232-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

5239-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

5253-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

5271-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

Messages........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1

President Signed........................................................................................................................................................................................... 51

5304

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

Messages........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1

President Signed........................................................................................................................................................................................... 51

5326-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

5350-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

5371-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

5385-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

President Signed........................................................................................................................................................................................... 51

5392-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

5394-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

5427-S2

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

5436-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

5445-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

5451-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

5452-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

5457-S

Messages........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 2

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2, 60

5485-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

5487-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

Messages........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1

President Signed........................................................................................................................................................................................... 51

5502-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

5504-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

5505

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

5525-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

5531-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

Messages........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1

President Signed........................................................................................................................................................................................... 51

5540-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

5579-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

5584

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

5595-S2

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

5614-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

5622-S2

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

President Signed........................................................................................................................................................................................... 51

5625

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

Messages........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1

President Signed........................................................................................................................................................................................... 51

5628

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

Messages........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1

President Signed........................................................................................................................................................................................... 51

5636-S2

Messages........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1

President Signed........................................................................................................................................................................................... 51

5638

Committee Report......................................................................................................................................................................................... 3

5656-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

Messages........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1

President Signed........................................................................................................................................................................................... 51

5658-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

5662-S2

Messages........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1

President Signed........................................................................................................................................................................................... 51

5688-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

5691-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

Messages........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1

President Signed........................................................................................................................................................................................... 51

5700-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

5708-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

Messages........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1

President Signed........................................................................................................................................................................................... 51

5722-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

Messages........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1

President Signed........................................................................................................................................................................................... 51

5731

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

5741-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

5742-S

Second Reading.............................................................................................................................................................................................. 5

Third Reading Final Passage.......................................................................................................................................................................... 5

5748-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

Messages........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1

President Signed........................................................................................................................................................................................... 51

5769-S2

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

Messages........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1

President Signed........................................................................................................................................................................................... 51

5791-S

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

Messages........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1

President Signed........................................................................................................................................................................................... 51

5806

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

5836-S................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 2

Messages........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 2

President Signed....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2, 60

5907

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

8008

Speaker Signed............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

Messages........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1

President Signed........................................................................................................................................................................................... 51

8401

Introduced.................................................................................................................................................................................................... 61

Adopted....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 61

Messages...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 60

8402

Messages...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 60