RULES OF COURT
|IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION OF THE AMENDMENTS TO CRLJ 14A(b) AND RALJ 1.1||)
Now, therefore, it is hereby
(a) That the amendments as attached hereto are adopted.
(b) That the amendments will be published in the Washington Reports and will become effective on September 1, 2004.
DATED at Olympia, Washington this 8th day of July 2004.
| Alexander, C. J.
| Johnson, J.
|| Bridge, J.
| Madsen, J.
|| Chambers, J.
| Sanders, J.
|| Owens, J.
| Ireland, J.
|| Fairhurst, J.
(b) Claims in Excess of Jurisdiction - Generally. When
defendant, third party defendant, or cross claimant any party
in good faith asserts a claim in an amount in excess of the
jurisdiction of the district court or seeks a remedy beyond
the jurisdiction of the district court, the district court
shall order the entire case removed to superior court.
(c) - (e) [Unchanged.]
(b) These rules do not apply to the de novo review of a decision of a judge who is not admitted to the practice of law in Washington and do not apply to the de novo review on the record of a decision of a small claims court operating under RCW 12.40. The procedures for review of these decisions are set forth in CRLJ 73 and 75.
(b) (c) [Unchanged.] (c) (d) [Unchanged.] (d) (e) [Unchanged.] (e) (f) [Unchanged.] (f) (g) [Unchanged.]
Reviser's note: The brackets and enclosed material in the text of the above section occurred in the copy filed by the agency and appear in the Register pursuant to the requirements of RCW 34.08.040.
Reviser's note: The typographical errors in the above material occurred in the copy filed by the State Supreme Court and appear in the Register pursuant to the requirements of RCW 34.08.040.