WSR 14-01-062
RULES OF COURT
STATE SUPREME COURT
[December 12, 2013]
IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION OF THE AMENDMENTS TO CrR 2.2 -  WARRANT OF ARREST AND SUMMONS—CrR 2.3 - SEARCH AND SEIZURE - CrR 3.2.1 - PROCEDURE FOLLOWING WARRANTLESS ARREST - PRELIMINARY APPEARANCE
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
NO. 25700-A-1053
The Superior Court Judges' Association having recommended the adoption of the proposed amendments to CrR 2.2 - Warrant of Arrest and Summons - CrR 2.3 - Search and Seizure - CrR 3.2.1 - Procedure Following Warrantless Arrest - Preliminary Appearance, and the Court having approved the proposed amendments for publication;
Now, therefore, it is hereby
ORDERED:
(a) That pursuant to the provisions of GR 9(g), the proposed amendments as shown below are to be published for comment in the Washington Reports, Washington Register, Washington State Bar Association and Administrative Office of the Court's websites in January, 2014.
(b) The purpose statement as required by GR 9(e), is published solely for the information of the Bench, Bar and other interested parties.
(c) Comments are to be submitted to the Clerk of the Supreme Court by either U.S. Mail or Internet E-Mail by no later than April 30, 2014. Comments may be sent to the following addresses: P.O. Box 40929, Olympia, Washington 98504-0929, or Denise.Foster@courts.wa.gov. Comments submitted by e-mail message must be limited to 1500 words.
DATED at Olympia, Washington this 12th day of December, 2013.
 
For the Court
 
 
 
Madsen, C.J.
 
CHIEF JUSTICE
GR 9 COVER SHEET
Suggested Amendment
SUPERIOR COURT CRIMINAL RULES (CrR)
Rule 2.2: Warrant of Arrest and Summons
Submitted by the Superior Court Judges' Association
Purpose: An amendment to the rule is proposed to allow sworn testimony establishing the grounds for issuing an arrest warrant to be recorded through reliable means, in addition to electronically or stenographically.
There is a request to amend the comparable rule for courts of limited jurisdiction.
RULE 2.2 WARRANT OF ARREST AND SUMMONS
(a) Warrant of Arrest.
(1) Generally. If indictment is found or an information is filed, the court may direct the clerk to issue a warrant for the arrest of the defendant.
(2) Probable Cause. Before ruling on a request for a warrant the court may require the complainant to appear personally and may examine under oath the complainant and any witnesses the complainant may produce. A warrant of arrest may not issue unless the court determines that there is probable cause to believe that the defendant committed the offense charged. The court shall determine probable cause based on an affidavit, a document as provided in RCW 9A.72.085 or any law amendatory thereto, or sworn testimony establishing the grounds for issuing the warrant. Sworn testimony shall be recorded electronically or, stenographically, or through any other reliable means. The evidence shall be preserved and shall be subject to constitutional limitations for probable cause determinations and may be hearsay in whole or in part.
[Remainder of rule is unchanged]
Reviser's note: The typographical errors in the above material occurred in the copy filed by the state supreme court and appear in the Register pursuant to the requirements of RCW 34.08.040.
Reviser's note: The brackets and enclosed material in the text of the above section occurred in the copy filed by the agency and appear in the Register pursuant to the requirements of RCW 34.08.040.
GR 9 COVER SHEET
Suggested Amendment
SUPERIOR COURT CRIMINAL RULES (CrR)
Rule 2.3: Search and Seizure
Submitted by the Superior Court Judges' Association
Purpose: CrR 2.3 was adopted in 1973. The technology used by courts, law enforcement, and attorneys for transmitting and preserving documents and recorded testimony has significantly evolved. Telephone, facsimile, electronic mail, and digital recording methods are widely used. Statute and court rule allow for the use of digital signatures. With the proposed changes, the rule would continue to require that the court receive the sworn evidence from the prosecuting authority or police officer and issue the warrant through reliable methods that preserve the evidence and the warrant. Because technology continues to evolve, additional methods of transmitting the sworn evidence and issuing the warrant are not specified in the rule. General Rule 31 (Access to Court Records) sets forth the provisions for public review of court records.
CrR 2.3 SEARCH AND SEIZURE
[(a) and (b) are unchanged]
(c) Issuance and Contents. A search warrant may be issued only if the court determines there is probable cause for the issuance of a warrant. There The evidence in support of the warrant must be an in the form of affidavits, a document as provided in RCW 9A.72.085 or any law amendatory thereto, or sworn testimony establishing the grounds for issuing the warrant and may be provided to the court by any reliable means. The Any sworn testimony may must be an electronically recorded telephonic statement and made part of the court record. The recording or a duplication of the recording shall be a part of the court record and shall be transcribed if requested by a party if there is a challenge to the validity of the warrant or if ordered by the court. The evidence in support of the finding of probable cause shall be preserved and shall be subject to constitutional limitations for such determinations and may be hearsay in whole or in part. If the court finds that probable cause for the issuance of a warrant exists, it shall issue a warrant identifying the property or person and naming or describing the person, place or thing to be searched. The court's authorization may be communicated by any reliable means. The court shall record a summary A record shall be made of any additional evidence on which it the court relies. The warrant shall be directed to any peace officer. It and shall command the officer to search, within a specified period of time not to exceed 10 days, the person, place, or thing named for the property or person specified. It The warrant shall designate to whom the court to which the warrant it shall be returned. The warrant may be served at any time.
(d) Execution and Return With Inventory. The peace officer taking property under the warrant shall give to the person from whom or from whose premises the property is taken a copy of the warrant and a receipt for the property taken. If no such person is present, the officer may post a copy of the search warrant and receipt. The return shall be made promptly and shall be accompanied by a written inventory of any property taken. The inventory shall be made in the presence of the person from whose possession or premises the property is taken, or in the presence of at least one person other than the officer. The court shall upon request deliver provide a copy of the inventory to the person from whom or from whose premises the property was taken and to the applicant for the warrant.
[(e) and (f) are unchanged]
Reviser's note: The brackets and enclosed material in the text of the above section occurred in the copy filed by the agency and appear in the Register pursuant to the requirements of RCW 34.08.040.
GR 9 COVER SHEET
Suggested Amendment
SUPERIOR COURT CRIMINAL RULES (CrR)
Rule 3.2.1: Procedure Following Warrantless Arrest—Preliminary Appearance
Submitted by the Superior Court Judges' Association
Purpose: While amending CrR 3.2.1 to acknowledge that the technology for transmitting and preserving documents and recorded testimony has evolved, the proposed rule would preserve requirements that evidence be provided by reliable means and that sworn testimony and probable cause determinations be recorded by reliable means.
RULE 3.2.1 PROCEDURE FOLLOWING WARRANTLESS ARREST—
PRELIMINARY APPEARANCE
[(a) is unchanged]
(b) How Determined. The court shall determine probable cause on evidence presented by a peace officer or prosecuting authority in the same manner as provided for a warrant of arrest in rule CrR 2.2(a). The evidence shall be preserved and may consist of an electronically recorded telephonic statement. If the court finds that release without bail should be denied or that conditions should attach to the release on personal recognizance, other than the promise to appear for trial subsequent court hearings, the court shall proceed to determine whether probable cause exists to believe that the accused committed the offense charged crime alleged, unless this determination has previously been made by a court. Before making the determination, the court may consider an affidavits, a documents as provided in RCW 9A.72.085 or any law amendatory thereto, or sworn testimony, and further may examine under oath the affiant and any witnesses the affiant may produce. Evidence may be provided by any reliable means. Sworn testimony shall be recorded electronically, or stenographically recorded or through any other reliable means. The evidence shall be preserved and shall be subject to constitutional limitations for probable cause determinations, and may be hearsay in whole or in part. The court's probable cause determination may be recorded by any reliable means.
[(c) - (f) are unchanged]
Reviser's note: The brackets and enclosed material in the text of the above section occurred in the copy filed by the agency and appear in the Register pursuant to the requirements of RCW 34.08.040.