_____________________________________________

 

               BILL REQUEST - CODE REVISER'S OFFICE

           _____________________________________________

 

 

 

BILL REQ. #:        AMH-5032.1/00

 

ATTY/TYPIST:        KB:rmh

 

BRIEF DESCRIPTION:


6277-S.E AMH AGEC AMH-5032.1

 

 

 

ESSB 6277 - H COMM AMD                   ADOPTED AS AMENDED 3/3/00

By Committee on Agriculture & Ecology

 

                                                                   

 

    Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert the following:

 

    "NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1.  INTENT.  It is the intent of the legislature to allow applicants for environmental permits for complex projects to compensate permitting agencies for providing environmental review through the voluntary negotiation of cost-reimbursement agreements with the permitting agency.  It is the further intent of the legislature that cost-reimbursement agreements for complex projects free permitting agency resources to focus on the review of small projects permits.

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 2.  A new section is added to chapter 43.21A RCW to read as follows:

    COST-REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BY THE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY.  (1)  The department may enter into a written cost-reimbursement agreement with a permit applicant for a complex project to recover from the applicant the reasonable costs incurred by the department in carrying out the requirements of this chapter, as well as the requirements of other relevant laws, as they relate to permit coordination, environmental review, application review, technical studies, and permit processing.  The cost-reimbursement agreement shall identify the specific tasks, costs, and schedule for work to be conducted under the agreement.  For purposes of this section, a complex project is a project for which an environmental impact statement is required under chapter 43.21C RCW.

    (2) The written cost-reimbursement agreement shall be negotiated with the permit applicant.  Under the provisions of a cost-reimbursement agreement, funds from the applicant shall be used by the department to contract with an independent consultant to carry out the work covered by the cost-reimbursement agreement.  The department may also use funds provided under a cost-reimbursement agreement to assign current staff to review the work of the consultant, to provide necessary technical assistance when an independent consultant with comparable technical skills is unavailable, and to recover reasonable and necessary direct and indirect costs that arise from processing the permit.  The department shall, in developing the agreement, ensure that final decisions that involve policy matters are made by the agency and not by the consultant.  The department shall make an estimate of the number of permanent staff hours to process the permits, and shall contract with consultants to replace the time and functions committed by these permanent staff to the project.  The billing process shall provide for accurate time and cost accounting and may include a billing cycle that provides for progress payments.  Use of cost-reimbursement agreements shall not reduce the current level of staff available to work on permits not covered by cost-reimbursement agreements.  The department may not use any funds under a cost-reimbursement agreement to replace or supplant existing funding.  The restrictions of chapter 42.52 RCW apply to any cost-reimbursement agreement, and to any person hired as a result of a cost-reimbursement agreement.

    (3) The department may not enter into any new cost-reimbursement agreements on or after July 1, 2005.  The department may continue to administer any cost-reimbursement agreement which was entered into before July 1, 2005, until the project is completed.

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 3.  A new section is added to chapter 43.30 RCW to read as follows:

    COST-REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BY THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES.  (1) The department may enter into a written cost-reimbursement agreement with a permit or lease applicant for a complex project to recover from the applicant the reasonable costs incurred by the department in carrying out the requirements of this chapter, as well as the requirements of other relevant laws, as they relate to permit coordination, environmental review, application review, technical studies, and permit or lease processing.  The cost-reimbursement agreement shall identify the specific tasks, costs, and schedule for work to be conducted under the agreement.  For purposes of this section, a complex project is a project for which an environmental impact statement is required under chapter 43.21C RCW.  An applicant for a lease issued under chapter 79.90 RCW may not enter into a cost-reimbursement agreement under this section for projects conducted under the lease.

    (2) The written cost-reimbursement agreement shall be negotiated with the permit or lease applicant.  Under the provisions of a cost-reimbursement agreement, funds from the applicant shall be used by the department to contract with an independent consultant to carry out the work covered by the cost-reimbursement agreement.  The department may also use funds provided under a cost-reimbursement agreement to assign current staff to review the work of the consultant, to provide necessary technical assistance when an independent consultant with comparable technical skills is unavailable, and to recover reasonable and necessary direct and indirect costs that arise from processing the permit or lease.  The department shall, in developing the agreement, ensure that final decisions that involve policy matters are made by the agency and not by the consultant.  The department shall make an estimate of the number of permanent staff hours to process the permits or leases, and shall contract with consultants to replace the time and functions committed by these permanent staff to the project.  The billing process shall provide for accurate time and cost accounting and may include a billing cycle that provides for progress payments.  Use of cost-reimbursement agreements shall not reduce the current level of staff available to work on permits or leases not covered by cost-reimbursement agreements.  The department may not use any funds under a cost-reimbursement agreement to replace or supplant existing funding.  The restrictions of chapter 42.52 RCW apply to any cost-reimbursement agreement, and to any person hired as a result of a cost-reimbursement agreement.

    (3) The department may not enter into any new cost-reimbursement agreements on or after July 1, 2005.  The department may continue to administer any cost-reimbursement agreement which was entered into before July 1, 2005, until the project is completed.

    (4)(a) Until July 1, 2003, the use of state-owned aquatic lands for local public utility lines owned by a nongovernmental entity shall be granted by lease if the use is consistent with the purpose of RCW 79.90.450 through 79.90.460 and does not obstruct navigation or other public uses.  The total charge for the term of the lease shall be the larger of (i) an amount equal to the diminution in the property value caused by locating the utility lines on the aquatic land, based on the appraised value of the land in its current use at the time of application for the lease, or (ii) five thousand dollars.  The charge shall be paid in advance upon grant of the lease.  The term of the lease shall be thirty years.  In addition to the charge for the lease, the department may charge a fee that recovers its actual administrative expenses directly incurred in receiving an application for the lease, approving the lease, and reviewing plans for and construction of the utility lines.  A final decision on existing applications for leases shall be made within one hundred twenty days.  The department shall process and come to a final decision on a maximum of five new applications submitted by each nongovernmental entity per year.  Upon request of the applicant, the department may reach a decision on an application within sixty days and charge an additional fee for such an expedited processing in the amount of ten percent of the total rent.

    (b) The utilities and aquatic lands task force is created.  The task force is composed of the following:  Two members of the house of representatives, one from each major caucus, appointed by the co-speakers of the house of representatives; two members of the senate, one from each major caucus, appointed by the president of the senate; two members from the department of natural resources; one member from nonprofit electric utilities; and one member from investor-owned electric utilities.  The utilities and aquatic lands task force shall study charges made for the lease or easement of aquatic lands for local public utility lines, and, by July 1, 2001, must recommend to the legislature any changes from current practice found appropriate.

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 4.  A new section is added to chapter 43.70 RCW to read as follows:

    COST-REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH.  (1) The department may enter into a written cost-reimbursement agreement with a permit applicant for a complex project to recover from the applicant the reasonable costs incurred by the department in carrying out the requirements of this chapter, as well as the requirements of other relevant laws, as they relate to permit coordination, environmental review, application review, technical studies, and permit processing.

The cost-reimbursement agreement shall identify the specific tasks, costs, and schedule for work to be conducted under the agreement.  For purposes of this section, a complex project is a project for which an environmental impact statement is required under chapter 43.21C RCW.

    (2) The written cost-reimbursement agreement shall be negotiated with the permit applicant.  Under the provisions of a cost-reimbursement agreement, funds from the applicant shall be used by the department to contract with an independent consultant to carry out the work covered by the cost-reimbursement agreement.  The department may also use funds provided under a cost-reimbursement agreement to assign current staff to review the work of the consultant, to provide necessary technical assistance when an independent consultant with comparable technical skills is unavailable, and to recover reasonable and necessary direct and indirect costs that arise from processing the permit.  The department shall, in developing the agreement, ensure that final decisions that involve policy matters are made by the agency and not by the consultant.  The department shall make an estimate of the number of permanent staff hours to process the permits, and shall contract with consultants to replace the time and functions committed by these permanent staff to the project.  The billing process shall provide for accurate time and cost accounting and may include a billing cycle that provides for progress payments.  Use of cost-reimbursement agreements shall not reduce the current level of staff available to work on permits not covered by cost-reimbursement agreements.  The department may not use any funds under a cost-reimbursement agreement to replace or supplant existing funding.  The restrictions of chapter 42.52 RCW apply to any cost-reimbursement agreement, and to any person hired as a result of a cost-reimbursement agreement.

    (3) The department may not enter into any new cost-reimbursement agreements on or after July 1, 2005.  The department may continue to administer any cost-reimbursement agreement which was entered into before July 1, 2005, until the project is completed.

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 5.  A new section is added to chapter 43.300 RCW to read as follows:

    COST-REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BY THE DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE.  (1) The department may enter into a written cost-reimbursement agreement with a permit applicant for a complex project to recover from the applicant the reasonable costs incurred by the department in carrying out the requirements of this chapter, as well as the requirements of other relevant laws, as they relate to permit coordination, environmental review, application review, technical studies, and permit processing.  The cost-reimbursement agreement shall identify the specific tasks, costs, and schedule for work to be conducted under the agreement.  For purposes of this section, a complex project is a project for which an environmental impact statement is required under chapter 43.21C RCW.

    (2) The written cost-reimbursement agreement shall be negotiated with the permit applicant.  Under the provisions of a cost-reimbursement agreement, funds from the applicant shall be used by the department to contract with an independent consultant to carry out the work covered by the cost-reimbursement agreement.  The department may also use funds provided under a cost-reimbursement agreement to assign current staff to review the work of the consultant, to provide necessary technical assistance when an independent consultant with comparable technical skills is unavailable, and to recover reasonable and necessary direct and indirect costs that arise from processing the permit.  The department shall, in developing the agreement, ensure that final decisions that involve policy matters are made by the agency and not by the consultant.  The department shall make an estimate of the number of permanent staff hours to process the permits, and shall contract with consultants to replace the time and functions committed by these permanent staff to the project.  The billing process shall provide for accurate time and cost accounting and may include a billing cycle that provides for progress payments.  Use of cost-reimbursement agreements shall not reduce the current level of staff available to work on permits not covered by cost-reimbursement agreements.  The department may not use any funds under a cost-reimbursement agreement to replace or supplant existing funding.  The restrictions of chapter 42.52 RCW apply to any cost-reimbursement agreement, and to any person hired as a result of a cost-reimbursement agreement.

    (3) The department may not enter into any new cost-reimbursement agreements on or after July 1, 2005.  The department may continue to administer any cost-reimbursement agreement which was entered into before July 1, 2005, until the project is completed.

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 6.  A new section is added to chapter 70.94 RCW to read as follows:

    COST-REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BY AN AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY.  (1) An authority may enter into a written cost-reimbursement agreement with a permit applicant for a complex project to recover from the applicant the reasonable costs incurred by the authority in carrying out the requirements of this chapter, as well as the requirements of other relevant laws, as they relate to permit coordination, environmental review, application review, technical studies, and permit processing.  The cost-reimbursement agreement shall identify the specific tasks, costs, and schedule for work to be conducted under the agreement.  For purposes of this section, a complex project is a project for which an environmental impact statement is required under chapter 43.21C RCW.

    (2) The written cost-reimbursement agreement shall be negotiated with the permit applicant.  Under the provisions of a cost-reimbursement agreement, funds from the applicant shall be used by the air pollution control authority to contract with an independent consultant to carry out the work covered by the cost-reimbursement agreement.  The air pollution control authority may also use funds provided under a cost-reimbursement agreement to assign current staff to review the work of the consultant, to provide necessary technical assistance when an independent consultant with comparable technical skills is unavailable, and to recover reasonable and necessary direct and indirect costs that arise from processing the permit.  The air pollution control authority shall, in developing the agreement, ensure that final decisions that involve policy matters are made by the agency and not by the consultant.  The air pollution control authority shall make an estimate of the number of permanent staff hours to process the permits, and shall contract with consultants to replace the time and functions committed by these permanent staff to the project.  The billing process shall provide for accurate time and cost accounting and may include a billing cycle that provides for progress payments.  Use of cost-reimbursement agreements shall not reduce the current level of staff available to work on permits not covered by cost-reimbursement agreements.  The air pollution control authority may not use any funds under a cost-reimbursement agreement to replace or supplant existing funding.  The provisions of chapter 42.52 RCW apply to any cost-reimbursement agreement, and to any person hired as a result of a cost-reimbursement agreement.  Members of the air pollution control authority's board of directors shall be considered as state officers, and employees of the air pollution control authority shall be considered as state employees, for the sole purpose of applying the restrictions of chapter 42.52 RCW to this section.

    (3) An air pollution control authority may not enter into any new cost-reimbursement agreements on or after July 1, 2005.  The department may continue to administer any cost-reimbursement agreement which was entered into before July 1, 2005, until the project is completed.

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 7.  A new section is added to chapter 90.03 RCW to read as follows:

    Any applicant for a new withdrawal or a change, transfer, or amendment of a water right pending before the department, may initiate a cost-reimbursement agreement with the department to provide expedited review of the application.  A cost-reimbursement agreement may only be initiated under this section if the applicant agrees to pay for, or as part of a cooperative effort agrees to pay for, the cost of processing his or her application and all other applications from the same source of supply which must be acted upon before the applicant's request because they were filed prior to the date of when the applicant filed.  The department shall use the process established under section 2 of this act for entering into cost-reimbursement agreements, except that it is not necessary for an environmental impact statement to be filed as a prerequisite for entering into a cost-reimbursement agreement under this section.

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 8.  Captions used in this act are not any part of the law.

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 9.  This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and takes effect immediately."

 

    Correct the title.

 

 

 


    EFFECT:  Removes requirement for OFM to develop guidelines and replaces it with language that specifies what must be identified in an agreement.  Removes section pertaining to processing water rights permits in Island County.  Allows cost-reimbursement agreements for complex projects - which is defined as a project requiring an EIS.  Limits the time for which new agreements can be negotiated at July 1, 2005. Leases under chapter 79.90 RCW are ineligible for these agreements.  Requires the funds under an agreement to be used to hire independent consultants, but current staff may be used to review the work being done by the consultants and may be used to provide technical assistance if the available consultants don't have comparable technical skills.  Adds nonsupplanting language.  Prohibits the level of staff to work on other permits from being reduced.  Allows the hiring of consultants to replace permanent staff diverted to work on permits covered by the agreements.  Applies the restrictions of the Ethics in Public Service chapter of law to cost-reimbursement agreements.

 


                            --- END ---