CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT

 

                   SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 3099

 

 

 

 

                        56th Legislature

                      2000 Regular Session

 

Passed by the House March 6, 2000

  Yeas 98   Nays 0

 

 

 

Speaker of the House of Representatives

     

 

 

Speaker of the House of Representatives

 

 

 

 

Passed by the Senate March 2, 2000

  Yeas 44   Nays 0

             CERTIFICATE

 

We, Timothy A. Martin and Cynthia Zehnder, Co-Chief Clerks of the House of Representatives of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 3099  as passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate on the dates hereon set forth.

 

 

 

                          Chief Clerk

 

 

 

                          Chief Clerk

President of the Senate

 

 

 

Approved Place Style On Codes above, and Style Off Codes below.           

                                FILED

                

 

Governor of the State of Washington

                   Secretary of State

                  State of Washington


          _______________________________________________

 

                    SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 3099

          _______________________________________________

 

             Passed Legislature - 2000 Regular Session

 

                     AS AMENDED BY THE SENATE

 

State of Washington      56th Legislature     2000 Regular Session

 

By House Committee on Capital Budget (originally sponsored by Representatives Dunshee, Barlean, Murray, Reardon, Koster and Lovick)

 

Read first time 02/08/2000.  Referred to Committee on .

Concerning the issuance of state and local government bonds.  


    AN ACT Relating to extending provisions on interest rates on government bonds; amending RCW 39.96.010, 39.96.030, 39.96.070, 36.61.020, and 36.61.260; adding a new section to chapter 36.61 RCW; and providing an effective date.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

 

    Sec. 1.  RCW 39.96.010 and 1995 c 192 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:

    The legislature finds and declares that the issuance by state and local governments of bonds and other obligations((, and the investment of moneys in connection with these obligations,)) involves exposure to changes in interest rates; that a number of financial instruments are available to lower the net cost of these borrowings, ((to increase the net return on these investments,)) or to reduce the exposure of state and local governments to changes in interest rates; that these reduced costs ((and increased returns)) for state and local governments will benefit taxpayers and ratepayers; and that the legislature desires to provide state and local governments with express statutory authority to take advantage of these instruments.  In recognition of the complexity of these financial instruments, the legislature desires that this authority be subject to certain limitations, and be granted for a period of ((seven)) twelve years.

 

    Sec. 2.  RCW 39.96.030 and 1993 c 273 s 3 are each amended to read as follows:

    (1) Subject to subsections (2) and (3) of this section, any governmental entity may enter into a payment agreement in connection with, or incidental to, the issuance, incurring, or carrying of specific obligations, for the purpose of managing or reducing the governmental entity's exposure to fluctuations or levels of interest rates.  No governmental entity may carry on a business of acting as a dealer in payment agreements.  Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to provide governmental entities with separate or additional authority to invest funds or moneys relating to or held in connection with any obligations.

    (2) No governmental entity may enter into a payment agreement under this chapter unless it first:

    (a) Finds and determines, by ordinance or resolution, that the payment agreement, if fully performed by all parties thereto, will (i) reduce the amount or duration of its exposure to changes in interest rates; or (ii) result in a lower net cost of borrowing with respect to the related obligations((, or a higher net rate of return on investments made in connection with, or incidental to, the issuance, incurring, or carrying of those obligations));

    (b) Obtains, on or prior to the date of execution of the payment agreement, a written certification from a financial advisor that (i) the terms and conditions of the payment agreement and any ancillary agreements, including without limitation, the interest rate or rates and any other amounts payable thereunder, are commercially reasonable in light of then existing market conditions; and (ii) the finding and determination contained in the ordinance or resolution required by (a) of this subsection is reasonable.

    (3) Prior to selecting the other party to a payment agreement, a governmental entity shall solicit and give due consideration to proposals from at least two entities that meet the criteria set forth in RCW 39.96.040(2).  Such solicitation and consideration shall be conducted in such manner as the governmental entity shall determine is reasonable.

 

    Sec. 3.  RCW 39.96.070 and 1998 c 245 s 35 are each amended to read as follows:

    (1) Except as provided in subsection (3) of this section, no governmental entity may enter a payment agreement under RCW 39.96.030 after June 30, ((2000)) 2005.

    (2) The termination of authority to enter payment agreements after June 30, ((2000)) 2005, shall not affect the validity of any payment agreements or other contracts entered into under RCW 39.96.030 on or before that date.

    (3) A governmental entity may enter into a payment agreement under and in accordance with this chapter after June 30, ((2000)) 2005, to replace a payment agreement that relates to specified obligations issued on or before that date and that has terminated before the final term of those obligations.

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 4.  A new section is added to chapter 36.61 RCW to read as follows:

    To improve the ability of counties to finance long-term lake management objectives, lake management districts may be created for any needed period of time.

 

    Sec. 5.  RCW 36.61.020 and 1987 c 432 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:

    Any county may create lake management districts to finance the improvement and maintenance of lakes located within or partially within the boundaries of the county.  All or a portion of a lake and the adjacent land areas may be included within one or more lake management districts.  More than one lake, or portions of lakes, and the adjacent land areas may be included in a single lake management district.  ((A lake management district may be created for a period of up to ten years.))

    Special assessments or rates and charges may be imposed on the property included within a lake management district to finance lake improvement and maintenance activities, including:  (1) The control or removal of aquatic plants and vegetation; (2) water quality; (3) the control of water levels; (4) storm water diversion and treatment; (5) agricultural waste control; (6) studying lake water quality problems and solutions; (7) cleaning and maintaining ditches and streams entering or leaving the lake; and (8) the related administrative, engineering, legal, and operational costs, including the costs of creating the lake management district.

    Special assessments or rates and charges may be imposed annually on all the land in a lake management district for the duration of the lake management district without a related issuance of lake management district bonds or revenue bonds.  Special assessments also may be imposed in the manner of special assessments in a local improvement district with each landowner being given the choice of paying the entire special assessment in one payment, or to paying installments, with lake management district bonds being issued to obtain moneys not derived by the initial full payment of the special assessments, and the installments covering all of the costs related to issuing, selling, and redeeming the lake management district bonds.

 

    Sec. 6.  RCW 36.61.260 and 1985 c 398 s 26 are each amended to read as follows:

    (1) Counties may issue lake management district bonds in accordance with this section.  Lake management district bonds may be issued to obtain money sufficient to cover that portion of the special assessments that are not paid within the thirty-day period provided in RCW 36.61.190.  ((The maximum term of lake management district bonds shall be ten years.))

    Whenever lake management district bonds are proposed to be issued, the county legislative authority shall create a special fund or funds for the lake management district from which all or a portion of the costs of the lake improvement and maintenance activities shall be paid.  Lake management district bonds shall not be issued in excess of the costs and expenses of the lake improvement and maintenance activities and shall not be issued prior to twenty days after the thirty days allowed for the payment of special assessments without interest or penalties.

    Lake management district bonds shall be exclusively payable from the special fund or funds and from a guaranty fund that the county may have created out of a portion of proceeds from the sale of the lake management district bonds.

    (2) Lake management district bonds shall not constitute a general indebtedness of the county issuing the bond nor an obligation, general or special, of the state.  The owner of any lake management district bond shall not have any claim for the payment thereof against the county that issues the bonds except for payment from the special assessments made for the lake improvement or maintenance activities for which the lake management district bond was issued and from a lake management district guaranty fund that may have been created.  The county shall not be liable to the owner of any lake management district bond for any loss to the lake management district guaranty fund occurring in the lawful operation of the fund.  The owner of a lake management district bond shall not have any claim against the state arising from the lake management district bond, special assessments, or guaranty fund.  Tax revenues shall not be used to secure or guarantee the payment of the principal of or interest on lake management district bonds.

    The substance of the limitations included in this subsection shall be plainly printed, written, engraved, or reproduced on:  (a) Each lake management district bond that is a physical instrument; (b) the official notice of sale; and (c) each official statement associated with the lake management district bonds.

    (3) If the county fails to make any principal or interest payments on any lake management district bond or to promptly collect any special assessment securing the bonds when due, the owner of the lake management district bond may obtain a writ of mandamus from any court of competent jurisdiction requiring the county to collect the special assessments, foreclose on the related lien, and make payments out of the special fund or guaranty fund if one exists.  Any number of owners of lake management districts may join as plaintiffs.

    (4) A county may create a lake management district bond guaranty fund for each issue of lake management district bonds.  The guaranty fund shall only exist for the life of the lake management district bonds with which it is associated.  A portion of the bond proceeds may be placed into a guaranty fund.  Unused moneys remaining in the guaranty fund during the last two years of the installments shall be used to proportionally reduce the required level of installments and shall be transferred into the special fund into which installment payments are placed.

    (5) Lake management district bonds shall be issued and sold in accordance with chapter 39.46 RCW.  The authority to create a special fund or funds shall include the authority to create accounts within a fund.

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 7.  This act takes effect July 1, 2000.

 


                            --- END ---