_____________________________________________ 

ENGROSSED HOUSE BILL 2734
_____________________________________________
State of Washington60th Legislature2008 Regular Session

By Representatives Newhouse and Hudgins

Read first time 01/16/08.   Referred to Committee on Local Government.



     AN ACT Relating to encouraging the removal of artificial vertical shoreline bank structures by redefining for certain projects the point from where the two hundred feet of shoreline is calculated; and adding a new section to chapter 90.58 RCW.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1   A new section is added to chapter 90.58 RCW to read as follows:
     (1)(a) A substantial development permit is not required for development within a restoration area if the proposed project is to be located on:
     (i) Shorelines designated as a high-intensity shoreline environment under the applicable master plan; or
     (ii) Shorelines consistent with a high-intensity shoreline environment designation under the applicable master plan.
     (b) For purposes of this section, a "restoration area" is an area that:
     (i) Was created by a landward shift in the ordinary high water mark that resulted from a voluntary habitat restoration project; and
     (ii) Was not subject to regulation under this chapter prior to the restoration project.
     (2)(a) Requests for development approvals within restoration areas may be granted in the form of restoration project variances. Restoration project variances may be issued to authorize relief from bulk, dimension, or other master program development standards, including use regulations, if:
     (i) The shift in shoreline jurisdiction resulting from the voluntary habitat restoration project causes hardship in the area within and adjacent to the restoration area. "Hardship" under this subsection means that a reasonable use of the property is precluded or significantly diminished in the area within and adjacent to the restoration area due to requirements of the applicable master program; and
     (ii) The variance includes measures to ensure that allowable uses of the property under this section result in no net loss of shoreline ecological functions within the restoration area.
     (b) Variances issued under this subsection (2):
     (i) Must be limited to only the minimum approvals necessary to afford relief;
     (ii) May not cause the public interest to suffer substantial detriment; and
     (iii) Must be processed according to the same procedures used for other shoreline variances.
     (3) Master programs may include provisions, including conditions of approval, areas of applicability, and other requirements, to ensure that restoration project variance processes achieve the objectives of this section.

--- END ---