Washington State

House of Representatives

Office of Program Research

BILL

ANALYSIS

State Government & Tribal Affairs Committee

HB 1738

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

Brief Description: Providing public funding for supreme court campaigns.

Sponsors: Representatives Liias, Goodman, Appleton, Carlyle, Probst, Nelson, Hasegawa, Orwall, Rolfes, Dickerson, Hunt, Pettigrew, Cody, Darneille, White, Chase, Kenney, Dunshee, Ormsby, Miloscia, Moeller, Roberts, Simpson, Sells, Flannigan, Eddy, McCoy, Wood, Kagi, Wallace, Williams and Green.

Brief Summary of Bill

  • Establishes a program for public financing for the office of Supreme Court Justice.

Hearing Date: 3/5/09

Staff: Marsha Reilly (786-7135).

Background:

The Fair Campaign Practices Act was enacted following passage of Initiative 134 in 1992. The initiative imposed campaign contribution limits on elections for statewide and legislative office, further regulated independent expenditures, restricted the use of public funds for political purposes, and required public officials to report gifts received in excess of $50. In 2006 contribution limits were expanded to include elections for certain county and special purpose district offices, and for judicial office.

A series of court decisions have identified a number of constitutional limitations on the regulation of campaign financing. Decisions have upheld ceilings on a candidate's expenditures only as part of a public financing agreement under which a candidate agrees to abide by the limits in exchange for public financing. However, recent district court actions have ruled that provisions in public financing programs granting matching funds are unconstitutional.

A number of states, including Arizona, Maine, and Connecticut have enacted public financing programs for statewide and legislative offices. North Carolina has enacted a public financing program for Supreme Court and Court of Appeals offices.

Summary of Bill:

A program providing public campaign funding for candidates for Supreme Court Justice, cited as the Judicial Election Reform Act (Act), is established. The Public Disclosure Commission (PDC) enforces the program and is authorized to adopt rules regarding reporting requirements and auditing of qualifying contributions. Program Requirements.The program is voluntary. Candidates who wish to participate in the program must agree to the following:

Qualifying Contributions.

Participating candidates must collect 500 qualifying contributions in any amount between $10 and the contribution limit allowed for a single election, currently $1,600. Qualifying contributions must be made by an individual, and not by any political committee, organization, union, business, etc., and must be made during the qualifying period. The qualifying period begins February 1 of an election year and ends one week after the close of the regular filing period for the office. Up to 25 percent of the minimum dollar amount of qualifying contributions may be used to pay for expenses related to raising qualifying contributions.

Certification Procedure.

To become certified for the program, a candidate must file an application to participate, submit a report itemizing the qualifying contributions received, and submit a check or money order equal to the total qualifying contributions, less the money used to pay for expenses, to the PDC. Affidavits attesting that the qualifying contributions were made by registered voters of the state and signed by persons collecting qualifying contributions also must be submitted. The PDC must determine a candidate's eligibility to participate in the program within seven days of receiving an application. If an application is denied, written reasons for the denial must be provided to the candidate. Any candidate denied certification may reapply one time within 14 days of denial by submitting the required information or the number of qualifying contributions needed to complete the certification. Candidates certified for the program may be designated as a publicly financed candidate in the state voters' pamphlet.

Public Financing.Within five business days after a publicly financed candidate's name is approved to appear on the primary ballot, the PDC must authorize distribution of funds for the primary election. The amount of funding for the primary election must be set by rule by the PDC based on the number of participating candidates filing for office and may be no more than 100 times the filing fee for the office (1 percent of the salary for the office, or $164,200). Within five business days after a publicly financed candidate's name is approved to appear on the general election ballot, the PDC must authorize an amount equal to 125 times the filing fee ($205,250). Publicly financed candidates in uncontested elections shall receive four times the filing fee ($6,568). A publicly financed candidate must return funds distributed that are unspent and uncommitted as of the date that the candidate ceases to be a candidate, or as of the date of the election, whichever occurs first.

Revocation.

A publicly financed candidate may revoke a decision to participate in the program no later than June 30 in the year of the election. Within 30 days of revocation, all money received from the judicial election reform act fund must be returned. Rescue Funds. A participating candidate is eligible for rescue funds in the event that a nonparticipating candidate raises more than was allotted to the participating candidate. Independent expenditures and electioneering communications made in support of a nonparticipating candidate or opposing a participating candidate are considered in determining eligibility for rescue funds. A participating candidate may determine when to access rescue funds. The total amount of rescue funds a participating candidate may receive is 500 times the filing fee for the office ($821,000). Participating candidates determine when to access matching funds. If the candidate chooses not to use matching funds in a contested primary, he or she is not eligible to use those funds in an uncontested general. The PDC must disburse matching funds within five calendar days of receiving a request.

Reporting Requirements.

Nonparticipating candidates must provide to the PDC a report of planned expenditures for the 21 days before an election and the costs associated with those expenditures. If the nonparticipating candidate fails to submit the report, the PDC shall authorize twice the amount of an expenditure not reported in rescue funds.

Nonparticipating candidates must report to the PDC within 24 hours of raising contributions that total 80 percent of the amount authorized for participating candidates. Any person making independent expenditures or electioneering communications in excess of $3,000 in support of or opposition to a publicly financed candidate, or in support of a candidate opposing a publicly financed candidate, must submit a report detailing the expenditure to the PDC. The PDC may initiate a civil proceeding in superior court to enjoin political advertising not reported.

Disqualification and Penalties.

If the PDC finds that a publicly financed candidate or the candidate's committee is accepting or expending money outside the provisions of the Act, the candidate shall be disqualified from the program, be subject to a civil penalty, and return all money received from the fund.

A violation of the qualification contribution or expenditure limit may result in a fine of 10 times the amount of the expenditure or contribution that exceeds the limit, or 20 times that amount if the violation is within five days of an election. A violation of any reporting violation by a publicly financed candidate is subject to a fine of $100 per day, or up to twice the amount not reported. The civil penalty for late revocation will result in a fine of $1,000 per day for each day beyond the allowed revocation period.

Implementation and Enforcement.

The PDC must enforce the program, adopt rules to carry out the policy of the program, and prescribe forms for reports, statements, notices, and other documents required for the program. The PDC must develop an expedited administrative review process in which individuals may seek review of PDC decisions. The program may not be implemented until an appropriation of $3 million is made. Once the program is offered, the PDC is required to report to the Governor and to the appropriate committees of the Legislature in January of even-numbered years on the effectiveness of the Act.

Proposed Substitute Bill.

The Proposed Substitute bill makes the following changes to the underlying bill:

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Available.

Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of the session in which the bill is passed.