SENATE BILL REPORT

SB 6416

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

As Reported by Senate Committee On:

Human Services & Corrections, February 2, 2010

Title: An act relating to relatives in dependency proceedings.

Brief Description: Concerning relatives in dependency proceedings.

Sponsors: Senators Roach, Hargrove and Stevens.

Brief History:

Committee Activity: Human Services & Corrections: 1/21/10, 2/02/10 [DPS].

SENATE COMMITTEE ON HUMAN SERVICES & CORRECTIONS

Majority Report: That Substitute Senate Bill No. 6416 be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass.

Signed by Senators Hargrove, Chair; Regala, Vice Chair; Stevens, Ranking Minority Member; Brandland, Carrell, Kauffman and McAuliffe.

Staff: Jennifer Strus (786-7316)

Background: When a child has resided in a foster home for at least 90 consecutive days, the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) or supervising agency must notify the foster parent at least five days before moving the child to another placement. DSHS is relieved of the five day notice requirement in the following circumstances:

If a child has resided in a foster home for less than 90 days and one of the above circumstances exists so that it is not possible to provide the foster parent with five days notice, DSHS or the supervising agency must notify the foster parent of the proposed placement changes as soon as reasonably possible.

No court hearing need be held prior to changing a child's foster care placement.

Foster parents may request a review of the placement decision by DSHS's complaint resolution process.

As a matter of practice, DSHS follows the same notification and complaint resolution process requirements with regard to the removal of a dependent child from the home of a relative.

Summary of Bill (Recommended Substitute): A relative of a dependent child may petition the juvenile court to be heard on DSHS or a supervising agency's decision to remove the child from the relative's care if:

The relative has ten business days from the date the relative learns of the removal decision, or the child is removed from the relative's care, whichever is later, to file the petition to be heard.

If the requirements to file a petition to be heard are met, the court must grant the petition to be heard on the sole issue of the placement decision and must schedule an expedited hearing on the matter. The relative has the right to be represented by counsel, at his or her own expense, at the hearing on the petition to be heard.  The relative may call and cross-examine witnesses at the hearing.

The granting of the petition to be heard under this section does not grant the relative party status in the underlying dependency.

At the shelter care and dispositional stages of the dependency proceedings, when a parent requests that his or her child be placed with a relative, there is a presumption that relative placement is in the child's best interest unless the placement will impede reasonable efforts to reunify the child with his or her parents. DSHS has the burden of overcoming this presumption by a preponderance of the evidence.

EFFECT OF CHANGES MADE BY HUMAN SERVICES & CORRECTIONS COMMITTEE (Recommended Substitute): Allows a relative to file a petition to be heard on the issue of the removal of a dependent child from their care. The relative has ten business days from the date of the removal, or when the relative learns of the removal, whichever is later, to file the petition. The relative may call and cross examine witnesses at the hearing on the petition. The relative's ability to file a petition to be heard does not grant them party status in the underlying dependency. When a parent requests that his or her child be placed with a relative, there is a presumption that such placement is in the child's best interests.

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Available.

Committee/Commission/Task Force Created: No.

Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony on Original Bill: PRO: The slightly higher burden of proof to overcome the presumption that placement with relatives is in the best interests of the child will make sure that relatives are actually given the preference that the Legislature has directed the courts and DSHS to give. This change will assist in making sure the best interests of the child are followed.

Persons Testifying: PRO: Senator Roach, prime sponsor; Elaine Wolcott-Ehrhardt, Christy Curry, Washington Families United; Jan Smith, Andrew Willard, Bari Willard, Doug and Anne-Marie Stuth, citizens; Bob Rudolph, Grandparents' Rights of Washington State.