SENATE BILL REPORT

SSB 5343

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

As of January 5, 2012

Title: An act relating to air emissions from anaerobic digesters.

Brief Description: Concerning air emissions from anaerobic digesters.

Sponsors: Senate Committee on Agriculture & Rural Economic Development (originally sponsored by Senators Haugen, Delvin, Hatfield, Honeyford, Becker, Shin and Schoesler).

Brief History:

Committee Activity: Agriculture & Rural Economic Development: 1/31/11, 2/17/11 [DPS].

Passed Senate: 3/04/11, 42-7.

Agriculture, Water & Rural Economic Development: 1/12/12.

SENATE COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE & RURAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Majority Report: That Substitute Senate Bill No. 5343 be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass.

Signed by Senators Hatfield, Chair; Shin, Vice Chair; Becker, Delvin, Haugen, Hobbs, Honeyford and Schoesler.

Staff: Sam Thompson (786-7413)

SENATE COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE, WATER & RURAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Staff: Diane Smith (786-7410)

Background: Washington has long promoted anaerobic digesters as renewable energy sources. State incentives include tax exemptions, cost recovery payments, and bioenergy loans. Currently, five commercial digesters in the state generate electricity from biogas derived from livestock manure, in some instances co-digested with certain organic waste. The first commenced generating operations in 2004. Similar digesters are planned. In 2009 the Legislature resolved a regulatory issue by exempting these digesters from a solid waste permitting requirement, provided that they complied with several environmental safeguards and operating guidelines.

Generator engines used in digesters are usually not major sources of pollutants that trigger strict federal standards, and states have some discretion in regulating them. In Washington, regional air quality authorities have, pursuant to authority under the state Clean Air Act, required digester operators to obtain air emission permits for digester engines and satisfy monitoring requirements. Requirements in other states vary widely, ranging from permitting exemptions to restrictive conditions in areas with poor air quality. Michigan exempts internal combustion engines from air permitting requirements, including generator engines used in digesters, if they have less than 10 million British thermal units (Btu) per hour maximum heat input.

Summary of Bill: Generators operating at an electric generating project are exempt from state Clean Air Act regulatory requirements if:

Modified generators can retain the exemption if they continue to meet the foregoing requirements.

The exemption is applied retroactively to January 1, 2004, with respect to generators subject to state Clean Air Act requirements imposed prior to the effective date of the act.

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Available.

Committee/Commission/Task Force Created: No.

Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony on Original Bill (Agriculture & Rural Economic Development):

Testimony From 2011 Regular Session.

PRO: This beneficial technology, which has environmental benefits and extracts valuable phosphorus from manure, should be promoted. Digester operators face high startup costs, including high costs associated with air permitting requirements for engines that are not major emitters of pollutants under federal law. This bill should be expanded to apply to generators in digesters that process organic waste but not livestock manure.

CON: While anaerobic digesters beneficially reduce greenhouse gas emissions from livestock manure, generator engines used in digesters emit sulfur dioxide, raising public health concerns and potentially violating federal air quality standards.

Persons Testifying (Agriculture & Rural Economic Development):

Persons Testifying From 2011 Regular Session.

PRO: Jay Gordon, Washington State Dairy Federation; Kevin Maas, Farm Power Northwest; Kim Hoff, Puget Sound Energy.

CON: Marshall Taylor, Department of Ecology.