FINAL BILL REPORT

SSB 6295

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

C 34 L 12

Synopsis as Enacted

Brief Description: Modifying certain exchange facilitator requirements and penalties.

Sponsors: Senate Committee on Financial Institutions, Housing & Insurance (originally sponsored by Senator Morton).

Senate Committee on Financial Institutions, Housing & Insurance

House Committee on Business & Financial Services

Background: The Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 1031) (Code) provides that no gain or loss is recognized on the exchange of property held for productive use in a trade or business or for investment. A tax‑deferred exchange is a method by which a property owner trades one or more relinquished properties for one or more like‑kind replacement properties. This enables a property owner to defer the payment of federal income taxes on the transaction. If the replacement property is sold (as opposed to making another qualified exchange), the property owner must pay tax on the original deferred gain plus any additional gain realized since the purchase of the replacement property. Section 1031 of the Code does not apply to exchanges of inventory, stocks, bonds, notes, other securities or evidence of indebtedness, or certain other assets.

The 1031 exchanges require the assistance of an exchange facilitator (facilitator) or qualified intermediary. The facilitator holds proceeds from the sale of the original property until those funds are applied to the purchase of the replacement property. While in the possession of the facilitator, funds may be deposited in a financial institution or placed in another investment.

In 2009 the Legislature passed E2SHB 1078 to regulate the activities of facilitators, which was in response to their recent investment activities that resulted in significant asset losses to clients. Amongst other obligations, the Legislature required a facilitator to maintain a $1 million fidelity bond or deposit an equivalent amount of cash and securities into an interest-bearing or money market account; demonstrate compliance with the fidelity bond and insurance requirements if requested by a current or prospective client; and act as a custodian for all exchange funds, property, and other items received from the client. The Legislature also held a facilitator criminally and civilly liable for engaging in certain prohibited practices such as making false or misleading material statements; commingling of funds, except as allowed; and failing to make disclosures required by any applicable state or federal law.

Facilitators were required to submit a report on their activities to the Department of Financial Institutions (DFI) at the end of 2009, which was later submitted in a report to the Legislature by DFI.

Summary: A person engaged in the facilitator business must either maintain a fidelity bond for at least $1 million which covers the dishonest acts of employees and owners or deposit all exchange funds in a qualified escrow account or qualified trust. The qualified escrow account or qualified trust must require the exchange facilitator and the client to independently authenticate a record of any withdrawal or transfer from the account. Exchange facilitators must provide a disclosure statement on the company website and the contractual agreement regarding the fidelity bond and qualified escrow account or trust. Additionally, exchange facilitators must disclose any financial benefits they may receive for recommending other products or services to clients.

A stakeholder taskforce, comprised of DFI, the Office of Insurance Commissioner, exchange facilitators, and title holders, must convene to identify effective regulatory procedures for the exchange facilitator industry and provide specific recommendations to the Legislature by December 1, 2012.

Failure to comply with these requirement is prima facie evidence that the facilitator intended to defraud a client who suffered a subsequent loss of assets entrusted to the facilitator. With limited exception, an exchange facilitator is guilty of a class B felony for noncompliance. A current client of a facilitator may receive treble damages and attorneys' fees as part of the damages awarded in a civil suit against the facilitator for violation of these requirements.

Votes on Final Passage:

Senate

49

0

House

97

0

Effective:

June 7, 2012