HB 1661

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

As Reported by House Committee On:

Public Safety

Title: An act relating to misdemeanor marijuana offense convictions.

Brief Description: Addressing misdemeanor marijuana offense convictions.

Sponsors: Representatives Fitzgibbon, Condotta, Roberts, Jinkins, Green, Upthegrove, Walsh, Moscoso, Tharinger, Cody, Kagi, Hunt, Appleton, Ryu, Lytton, Farrell, Pollet, Van De Wege, Ormsby, Liias, Reykdal and Stanford.

Brief History:

Committee Activity:

Public Safety: 2/20/13, 2/21/13 [DP].

Brief Summary of Bill

  • Removes restrictions on vacating convictions of misdemeanor marijuana possession.


Majority Report: Do pass. Signed by 6 members: Representatives Goodman, Chair; Roberts, Vice Chair; Appleton, Moscoso, Pettigrew and Takko.

Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 5 members: Representatives Klippert, Ranking Minority Member; Hayes, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Holy, Hope and Ross.

Staff: Sarah Koster (786-7303).


Misdemeanor Marijuana Possession.

Section 69.50.4014 RCW provides that it is a misdemeanor for a person to possess 40 grams or less of marijuana.

Under Initiative 502, which was approved by Washington voters on November 6, 2012, the possession, by a person 21 years or older, of: (a) 1 ounce of useable marijuana; (b) 16 ounces of marijuana-infused product in solid form; or (c) 72 ounces of marijuana-infused product in liquid form, is not a violation of Washington law.

Vacation of Misdemeanors and Gross Misdemeanors.

Every person convicted of a misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor who has completed all terms of the sentence may apply for a vacation of the record of conviction for the offense. The applicant's record cannot be cleared if:

Additionally, certain misdemeanor offenses may not be vacated or may only be vacated under additional circumstances:


Summary of Bill:

Every person convicted of the misdemeanor, possession of 40 grams or less of marijuana, may apply to the sentencing court for a vacation of the applicant's record of conviction for the offense.

The court shall vacate the record of conviction by permitting the applicant to withdraw the applicant's plea of guilty and to enter a plea of not guilty or, if the applicant has been convicted after a plea of not guilty, the court setting aside the verdict of guilty and the court dismissing the information, indictment, complaint, or citation against the applicant and vacating the judgment and sentence.

Vacations of a record of conviction for misdemeanor marijuana possession are not subject to the restrictions applicable to vacating other misdemeanor convictions, including waiting three years after completing the terms of the sentence and disqualification if the applicant has pending or subsequent criminal convictions, or has ever vacated another record of conviction.


Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Preliminary fiscal note available.

Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of the session in which the bill is passed.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony:

(In support) The voters of this state legalized possession of small amounts of marijuana, which had been a misdemeanor. Some county prosecutors dismissed pending misdemeanor possession charges, but for thousands with these convictions on their record, dismissal is not an option. Some are concerned with giving them a second chance at life. There is no doubt they made a mistake, as possession was illegal at that time. Voters made it clear that possession of small amounts of marijuana should not ruin lives. Since 2008 there have been 19,367 marijuana misdemeanor convictions and for 1,828 of those individuals, it was the only conviction. This is a plant that used to be one of the most valuable plants to human cultures around the world. It was a moral injustice to ever put someone in jail for possession of cannabis; this is the first step towards righting the wrongs that have been done to the citizens of this country by the government with regard to cannabis prohibition. Often low-income people and minority groups are caught up in the system. They may have taken a plea bargain to go on with their lives, but with good defense, this may not have been the case. Let us allow these people to get on with their lives. Possession should not be more damaging to an individual than use of a drug itself. This bill looks to the past to remedy the lingering damage to an adult citizen convicted of marijuana possession. Youth and minorities have been struck hardest, but medical marijuana patients have been hurt as well. This will restore the public faith in the court system and the Legislature.

(With concerns) Recognizing that voters voted to get rid of this law and that there are many people who would like to get rid of those past convictions and move on, there are concerns that the current misdemeanor goes beyond what is allowed under Initiative 502. There is a question of whether that was really the intent of the bill. These are technical and policy questions to consider. If this was not the intent, the bill should be narrowed.

(Opposed) There is a process already in place to vacate convictions, including misdemeanor marijuana possession. It requires individuals to be three years crime free and this is the appropriate period. Some question if this is different from the mistake that a person made in trespassing or breaking a window. Initiative 502 did not change the fact that possession between 28 and 40 grams is illegal or that it is illegal for those under 21 years. No one here thinks that the laws in Washington are perfect. What is important is that we commit to live by those laws until we amend those laws. The question is why should the vacation for this one crime be accelerated; marijuana is not that special, so some ask why those convictions should be treated differently.

Persons Testifying: (In support) Representative Fitzgibbon, prime sponsor; Ezra Eickmeyer, Washington Cannabis Association; Michael Wilson and Keith Henson, National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws; and John Novak, Cannabis Defense Coalition.

(With concerns) Candice Bock, Association of Washington Cities.

(Opposed) Tom McBride, Washington Association of Prosecuting Attorneys.

Persons Signed In To Testify But Not Testifying: Rose Eilts, National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws; and Stefani Quane, Cannabis Business Law.