SENATE BILL REPORT

SB 5094

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

As of February 6, 2013

Title: An act relating to requiring notification of sex offenders attending schools.

Brief Description: Requiring notification of sex offenders attending schools.

Sponsors: Senators Pearson, Rivers, Roach, Padden, Benton, Bailey, Carrell, Becker, Holmquist Newbry, Litzow, Sheldon, Honeyford, Dammeier, Parlette, Smith, Braun and Hewitt.

Brief History:

Committee Activity: Early Learning & K-12 Education: 2/01/13, 2/06/13.

SENATE COMMITTEE ON EARLY LEARNING & K-12 EDUCATION

Staff: Katherine Taylor (786-7434)

Background: Any adult or juvenile residing, attending school, or working in the state of Washington, whether or not they have a fixed address, who has been found to have committed or been convicted of, or found not guilty by reason of insanity of any sex offense or kidnapping offense must register as a sex offender.

Sex offender risk classifications are broken down as follows:

Level I – Low Risk to the Community.

Level II – Moderate Risk to the Community.

Level III – High Risk to the Community.

Summary of Bill: Requires a sheriff, upon receiving notice from a registered sex offender that the offender will be attending or employed by a school or institution of higher education, to promptly notify the school district and principal or the institution's department of public safety, and provide the school or department with information about the registered sex offender, including the sex offender's sentence imposed for conviction.

Upon notice that a person, who must register as a risk level I or unclassified sex offender, plans to attend a school, the school district or the department of public safety, must make the following notifications:

Upon notice that a person, who must register as a risk level II or III sex offender, plans to attend a school, the school district or the department of public safety, must make the following notifications:

School districts must collect the residential addresses and email addresses of parents, legal guardians, students who are 18 years of age or older, and school district personnel. School districts must collect this information prior to the beginning of the school year and at any time a student enrolls in a school in the district or an employee is hired by the school district.

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Available.

Committee/Commission/Task Force Created: No.

Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony: PRO: We have to balance the interests of students in schools and juvenile sex offenders. If you advance the bill, please include private schools.

CON: We do not support this bill. This bill is in conflict with current policies. Juvenile offenders should be treated differently than adult offenders. Juveniles sometimes make bad choices and get punished long after. Juvenile sex offenders deal with bullies. This bill will not help, it will just embarrass juvenile offenders more. Kids can pull up information about juvenile sex offenders in class. Sometimes juvenile sex offenders’ families receive death threats. Making sex offender information public may cause juvenile offenders to drop out of school and become suicidal. Almost all juvenile sex offenders are unlikely to reoffend.

OTHER: We are concerned about notification. Not everyone provides email addresses. We already have model policies in place. Multiple notifications will be needed per sex offender. Students will transfer because parents will not want their kids around or associated with sex offenders. There will be a disruption of school. We need a safety plan for level II sex offenders. We do not advocate notifying all people. Since Washington developed the first sex offender management system, we now know that most juvenile sex offenders never reoffend. Juveniles are different and should be treated differently. Treatment of juvenile sex offenders is very effective. Schools should just follow the Superintendent of Public Instruction's model policy. Notification should be left to law enforcement.

Persons Testifying: PRO: Donna Christensen, Catholic Conference.

CON: Dan Knoepfler, WA Assn. for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers.

OTHER: Lonnie Johns-Brown, WA Coalition of Sexual Assault Programs; Marie Sullivan, WA State School Directors' Assn.; Jerry Bender, Assn. of WA School Principals; Bev Emery, Sex Offender Policy Board.