CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 6279

Chapter 93, Laws of 2014

63rd Legislature
2014 Regular Session



SEARCH WARRANTS--MAGISTRATE ACCESS



EFFECTIVE DATE: 06/12/14

Passed by the Senate March 10, 2014
  YEAS 47   NAYS 2

BRAD OWEN
________________________________________    
President of the Senate
Passed by the House March 5, 2014
  YEAS 98   NAYS 0

FRANK CHOPP
________________________________________    
Speaker of the House of Representatives


 
CERTIFICATE

I, Hunter G. Goodman, Secretary of the Senate of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 6279 as passed by the Senate and the House of Representatives on the dates hereon set forth.

HUNTER G. GOODMAN
________________________________________    
Secretary
Approved March 27, 2014, 10:52 a.m.








JAY INSLEE
________________________________________    
Governor of the State of Washington
 
FILED
March 27, 2014







Secretary of State
State of Washington


_____________________________________________ 

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 6279
_____________________________________________

AS AMENDED BY THE HOUSE

Passed Legislature - 2014 Regular Session
State of Washington63rd Legislature2014 Regular Session

By Senate Law & Justice (originally sponsored by Senators Kline, Padden, O'Ban, Pedersen, and Tom)

READ FIRST TIME 02/04/14.   



     AN ACT Relating to creating effective and timely access to magistrates for purposes of reviewing search warrant applications; amending RCW 9A.72.085; adding a new section to chapter 2.20 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 10.79 RCW; and creating a new section.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1   The legislature finds that recent decisions of the United States supreme court and the Washington state supreme court require law enforcement to obtain the review of a neutral and disinterested magistrate and the issuance of a search warrant more frequently before proceeding with a criminal investigation. The legislature intends to accommodate this requirement by creating effective and timely access to magistrates for purposes of reviewing search warrant applications across the state of Washington. This act does not change the legal standards for issuing a search warrant or the legal standards for review of an issued search warrant.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 2   A new section is added to chapter 2.20 RCW to read as follows:
     Any district or municipal court judge, in the county in which the offense is alleged to have occurred, may issue a search warrant for any person or evidence located anywhere within the state.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 3   A new section is added to chapter 10.79 RCW to read as follows:
     (1) Any magistrate as defined by RCW 2.20.010, when satisfied that there is probable cause, may upon application supported by oath or affirmation, issue a search warrant to search for and seize any: (a) Evidence of a crime; (b) contraband, the fruits of crime, or things otherwise criminally possessed; (c) weapons or other things by means of which a crime has been committed or reasonably appears about to be committed; or (d) person for whose arrest there is probable cause or who is unlawfully restrained.
     (2) The application may be provided or transmitted to the magistrate by telephone, e-mail, or any other reliable method.
     (3) If the magistrate finds that probable cause for the issuance of a warrant exists, the magistrate must issue a warrant or direct an individual whom the magistrate authorizes to affix the magistrate's signature to a warrant identifying the property or person and naming or describing the person, place, or thing to be searched. The magistrate may communicate permission to affix the magistrate's signature to the warrant by telephone, e-mail, or any other reliable method.
     (4) The evidence in support of the finding of probable cause and a record of the magistrate's permission to affix the magistrate's signature to the warrant shall be preserved and shall be filed with the issuing court as required by CrRLJ 2.3 or CrR 2.3.

Sec. 4   RCW 9A.72.085 and 1981 c 187 s 3 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) Whenever, under any law of this state or under any rule, order, or requirement made under the law of this state, any matter in an official proceeding is required or permitted to be supported, evidenced, established, or proved by a person's sworn written statement, declaration, verification, certificate, oath, or affidavit, the matter may with like force and effect be supported, evidenced, established, or proved in the official proceeding by an unsworn written statement, declaration, verification, or certificate, which:
     (((1))) (a) Recites that it is certified or declared by the person to be true under penalty of perjury;
     (((2))) (b) Is subscribed by the person;
     (((3))) (c) States the date and place of its execution; and
     (((4))) (d) States that it is so certified or declared under the laws of the state of Washington.
     (2) The certification or declaration may be in substantially the following form:

     "I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct":
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Date and Place)(Signature)



     (3) For purposes of this section, a person subscribes to an unsworn written statement, declaration, verification, or certificate by:
     (a) Affixing or placing his or her signature as defined in RCW 9A.04.110 on the document;
     (b) Attaching or logically associating his or her digital signature or electronic signature as defined in RCW 19.34.020 to the document;
     (c) Affixing or logically associating his or her signature in the manner described in general rule 30 to the document if he or she is a licensed attorney; or
     (d) Affixing or logically associating his or her full name, department or agency, and badge or personnel number to any document that is electronically submitted to a court, a prosecutor, or a magistrate from an electronic device that is owned, issued, or maintained by a criminal justice agency if he or she is a law enforcement officer.
     (4)
This section does not apply to writings requiring an acknowledgment, depositions, oaths of office, or oaths required to be taken before a special official other than a notary public.


         Passed by the Senate March 10, 2014.
         Passed by the House March 5, 2014.
         Approved by the Governor March 27, 2014.
         Filed in Office of Secretary of State March 27, 2014.