Washington State

House of Representatives

Office of Program Research

BILL

ANALYSIS

Environment Committee

HB 1589

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

Brief Description: Concerning natural resource management activities.

Sponsors: Representatives Taylor, Shea, Harris, Short, G. Hunt, Scott, Pike and Condotta.

Brief Summary of Bill

  • Provides the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) with specific authority to manage lands acquired by the WDFW using the best available land management techniques.

  • Includes a non-exclusive list of land management techniques available to the WDFW which are, except for grazing leases on lands that have not been grazed for ten years, similar to categorical exemptions to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA).

  • Exempts the enumerated list of land management techniques from the SEPA when undertaken by the WDFW.

Hearing Date: 2/16/15

Staff: Jason Callahan (786-7117).

Background:

Department of Fish and Wildlife.

Land acquisition is a tool used by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) to meet its legislative mandate of preserving, protecting, and perpetuating fish and wildlife, while providing sustainable recreational and commercial opportunities. The WDFW currently owns or manages about 900,000 acres in 32 wildlife areas, along with approximately 700 public water access sites.

State Environmental Policy Act.

The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) establishes a review process for state and local governments to identify environmental impacts that may result from governmental decisions, such as the issuance of permits or the adoption of land use plans. Except for development projects that are exempt from SEPA requirements, the SEPA generally requires a project applicant to submit an environmental checklist. The checklist includes questions about the potential impacts of the project on the built environment and the natural environment. Generally, an environmental impact statement must be prepared for a proposal which the lead agency determines will have a probable significant, adverse impact on the environment.

State statutes and the SEPA rules contain categorical exemptions for certain actions that are not major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment (WAC 197-11-800). Categorically exempt actions do not require the submission of a checklist or the development of an environmental impact statement. Under the existing SEPA rules, certain natural resources management activities are considered to be exempt from review under the SEPA. These include activities such as:

Summary of Bill:

The WDFW is provided with the specific authority to manage lands acquired by the WDFW using the best available land management techniques. A non-exclusive list of land management techniques available to the WDFW is provided. These include:

The specific land management techniques enumerated for the WDFW are exempted from the requirements of the SEPA. Consequently, an environmental impact statement is not necessary to perform the listed techniques. The enumerated list is similar to the existing categorical exemptions provided in rule; however, the categorical exemptions are expanded to include all grazing leases issued by the WDFW and not just those for land that has been grazed within the past 10 years.

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Not requested.

Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of the session in which the bill is passed.