SENATE BILL REPORT

ESHB 1553

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

As of March 20, 2015

Title: An act relating to certificates of restoration of opportunity.

Brief Description: Encouraging certificates of restoration of opportunity.

Sponsors: House Committee on Public Safety (originally sponsored by Representatives Walkinshaw, MacEwen, Ryu, Appleton, Moscoso, Holy, Gregerson, Zeiger, Peterson, Farrell, Walsh, Reykdal, Orwall, Pettigrew, Tharinger, Fitzgibbon and Kagi).

Brief History: Passed House: 3/02/15, 97-0.

Committee Activity: Law & Justice: 3/19/15.

SENATE COMMITTEE ON LAW & JUSTICE

Staff: Lindsay Erickson (786-7465)

Background: Under current law, any state, county, city, or other municipal entity is prohibited from disqualifying a person from employment, or any occupation, trade, vocation, or business for which a state or local license, permit, certificate, or registration is required solely because of a prior conviction of a felony. However, the state, county, city, or other municipal entity may consider the fact of any prior conviction.

The following exceptions apply to the above law:

Summary of Bill: If a person holds a certificate of restoration of opportunity (CROP), no state, county, or municipal department, board, officer, or agency authorized to assess the qualifications of any applicant for a license, certificate of authority, qualification to engage in the practice of a profession or business, or for admission to an examination to qualify for such a license or certificate may disqualify a qualified applicant, solely based on the applicant's criminal history, if the applicant meets all other statutory and regulatory requirements.

A CROP may be granted to a person by a superior court if the person meets the following eligibility requirements:

All applicants in the above six categories must also meet the following additional requirements:

The following exemptions apply:

A qualified court has jurisdiction to issue a CROP to a qualified applicant. A court must determine, in its discretion, whether the certificate applies to all past criminal history or applies only to the convictions or adjudications in the jurisdiction of the court. The CROP does not apply to any future criminal justice involvement that occurs after the certificate is issued. A CROP has no effect on any other court records, including records in the judicial information system.

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Available.

Committee/Commission/Task Force Created: No.

Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony: PRO: There are a number of employers statewide that may deny a person employment based on that person's criminal history. This bill does not impact an employer's ability to make a choice about hiring, it does not mandate employers to act, and it does not create a cause of action. Rather, this bill removes a barrier and empowers employers by providing them with additional information that will be helpful when making a choice about hiring an individual who has met a set of criteria and is now motivated to seek employment. The employer can see the applicant's criminal record, but can also see that the person is in compliance, as determined by a court. There are between 6000 and 7000 people reentering our society from prison each year, and many of those individuals end up back in prison. Sixty percent of those people released one year ago still do not have jobs. There are over 90 professional licenses that bar people with felonies from applying. This bill could reduce the rate of recidivism and reduce the need to build a new prison. It provides an open and transparent alternative to sealing and increases public safety, reduces cost to the criminal justice system, and avoids harm to future victims. This bill does not give people a free pass – they need to work hard in order to be successful in society. The system will see many downstream savings including an increase in the number tax-paying citizens.

Persons Testifying: PRO: Representative Walkinshaw, prime sponsor; Dan Satterberg, WA Assn. of Prosecuting Attorneys; Merf Ehman, Columbia Legal Services; Brad Finegood, King Co. Dept. of Community Health Services; Bill Hinkle, Rental Housing Assn.; Liz Mills, YWCA Seattle, King, Snohomish; James McMahan, WA Assn. of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs; Julie Gorton, WA Restaurant Assn.; Bill Keizer, Tonia Morrison, citizens.

Persons Signed in to Testify But Not Testifying: PRO: Nick Federici, Pioneer Human Services.